scholarly journals Pediatric Gram-Negative Bacteremia: Hidden Agenda

2018 ◽  
Vol 08 (01) ◽  
pp. e1-e6
Author(s):  
Elham Bukhari ◽  
Abdulkarim Alrabiaah
Keyword(s):  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Hidden Agenda ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteremia ◽  
Common Clinical Presentation ◽  
Healthcare Associated ◽  
Epidemiological Characteristics ◽  
Community Onset

Background Recently, new types of community-onset bacteremia have been introduced as healthcare associated (HCA) in which the infection onset started outside the hospital and there were interactions with the healthcare system. Little data exist differentiating community-acquired (CA) and HCA bacteremia from hospital-acquired bacteremia (HA). Objectives This article determines differences in the epidemiological characteristics and bacteriology of community-onset (i.e., CA and HCA) and HA gram-negative bacteremia in Saudi pediatric patients. Methods We conducted a prospective cohort of all pediatric patients diagnosed with gram-negative bacteremia at the King Khalid University Hospital over a year (2015). We received daily electronic notifications of all blood culture positive cases for gram-negative bacilli. Results A total of 92 children were hospitalized with gram-negative bacteremia; among these 64 (71.1%) were with HA bacteremia, 20 (21.1%) with CA bacteremia, and 8 (7.8%) with HCA bacteremia. Urinary tract infection was common clinical presentation (50%) in the patients diagnosed with CA and HCA bacteremia. Up to 92% of HA bacteremia and 2% of CA bacteremia were presented with septic shock. The most common gram-negative bacteria causing bacteremia is Klebsiella pneumoniae, constituting almost 29.3% of all organisms, and was only isolated from HA bacteremia. The antimicrobial susceptibility among the 92 isolates showed that the organisms were nonextended spectrum β-lactamase (non-ESBL) in 90%, and 10% of the isolates were ESBL. There was a significant difference in the total frequency of isolates between CA and HA incidences, regardless of ESBL or non-ESBL (p < 0.001). Conclusion The most common type of gram-negative bacteremia is HA bacteremia followed by the CA and HCA bacteremia.

scholarly journals Between Community and Hospital: Healthcare-Associated Gram-Negative Bacteremia among Hospitalized Patients

2009 ◽  
Vol 30 (11) ◽  
pp. 1050-1056 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonas Marschall ◽  
Victoria J. Fraser ◽  
Joshua Doherty ◽  
David K. Warren
Keyword(s):  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Intravascular Catheter ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteremia ◽  
Healthcare Associated ◽  
Hospital Acquired ◽  
Epidemiological Characteristics

Objective.Healthcare-associated, community-acquired bacteremia is a subcategory of community-acquired bacteremia distinguished by recent exposure of the patient to the healthcare system before hospital admission. Our objective was to apply this category to a prospective cohort of hospitalized patients with gram-negative bacteremia to determine differences in the epidemiological characteristics, treatment, and outcome of community-acquired bacteremia; healthcare-associated, community-acquired bacteremia; and hospital-acquired bacteremia.Design.A 6-month prospective cohort study.Setting.A 1,250-bed tertiary care hospital.Patients.Adults hospitalized with gram-negative bacteremia.Results.Among 250 patients, 160 (64.0%) had bacteremia within 48 hours after admission; 132 (82.5%) of these were considered to have healthcare-associated, community-acquired bacteremia, according to previously published criteria. For patients with healthcare-associated, community-acquired bacteremia, compared with patients with community-acquired bacteremia, malignancies (59 [44.7%] of 132 patients vs 3 [10.7%] of 28 patients; P = .001), open wounds at admission (42 [31.8%] vs 3 [10.7%]; P = .02), and intravascular catheter-related infections (26 [19.7%] vs 0; P = .009) were more frequent and Escherichia coli as a causative agent was less frequent (16 [57.1%] vs 33 [25.0%]; P = .001). There was no difference between these 2 groups in inadequate empirical antibiotic treatment (36 [27.3%] vs 6 [21.4%]; P = .5) and hospital mortality (18 [13.6%] vs 2 [[7.1%]; P = .5). Compared with 90 patients with hospital-acquired bacteremia, patients with healthcare-associated, community-acquired bacteremia had a higher Charlson score (odds ratio [OR], 1.31 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.14–1.49]) but were less likely to have lymphoma (OR, 0.07 [95% CI, 0.01–0.51]), neutropenia (OR, 0.21 [95% CI, 0.07–0.61]), a removable foreign body (OR, 0.08 [95% CI, 0.03–0.20]), or Klebsiella pneumoniae infection (OR, 0.26 [95% CI, 0.11–0.62]).Conclusions.Many cases of gram-negative bacteremia that occurred in hospitalized patients were healthcare associated. The patients differed in some aspects from patients with community-acquired bacteremia and from those with hospital-acquired bacteremia, but not in mortality.

scholarly journals 519. Multidrug-resistant Gram-Negative Bacteremia in Pediatric Patients: Is It Time to Change to Empiric Meropenem?

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S250-S250
Author(s):  
Kanokporn Mongkolrattanothai ◽  
Leslie Stach ◽  
Regina Orbach
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Agents ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Suspected Sepsis ◽  
In Vitro Susceptibility ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteremia ◽  
Delayed Initiation ◽  
Poor Outcomes

Abstract Background The rise of antimicrobial resistance among gram-negative (GN) pathogens has been dramatic nationally. Delayed initiation of active antimicrobial agents has been associated with poor outcomes. We aimed at evaluating the prevalence and treatment of multi-drug-resistant gram-negative (MDR-GN) bacteremia in our pediatric patients. Methods All episodes of GN bacteremia from 2017–2018 at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. GN defined as MDR in our study were carbapenem-resistant organisms (CRO), extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producers, and GN that were resistant to cefepime and ≥2 classes of non-cephalosporin antimicrobial agents. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia was excluded. Ineffective empirical treatment (IET) is defined as an initial antibiotic regimen that is not active against the identified pathogen[s] based on in vitro susceptibility testing results. Results A total of 292 episodes of GN bacteremia were identified and 6 S. maltophilia were excluded. Of these, 29 bacteremic episodes in 26 patients were caused by MDR-GN organisms including 18 ESBL, 7 CRO, 1 ESBL and CRO, 3 non-ESBL/non-CRO cefepime-resistant MDR-GN. None of the CRO had carbapenemase genes detected. However, there was a patient with multiple sites of infection simultaneously with non-NDM CR Acinetobacter bacteremia and NDM-mediated CR-Klebsiella ventriculitis. The annual rate of MDR-GN bacteremia increased from 8% in 2017 to 12% in 2018. Almost half (48%) of episodes were community onset. Among these, all but one had underlying medical conditions with hospital exposure and most patients had central venous devices at the time of infection. 52% (15/29) episodes of MDR-GN bacteremia had IET. Despite IET, 47% (7/15) had negative blood cultures prior to initiation of effective therapy (6 ESBL and 1 P. aeruginosa). Various antibiotic regimens were used for CRO therapy as shown in Table 1. Conclusion In our institution, MDR-GN infection is increasing. As such, empiric meropenem is currently recommended in BMT or neutropenic patients with suspected sepsis. However, empiric meropenem must be used judiciously as its widely use will lead to more selection of MDR pathogens. It is essential to continue monitoring of these MDR-GN to guide appropriate empiric regimens. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals 149. Short vs. Long Course of Antibiotics for Uncomplicated Gram-Negative Bacteremia

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S101-S102
Author(s):  
James Go ◽  
Sarah Cotner ◽  
Donna R Burgess ◽  
David Burgess ◽  
Katie Wallace ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Data Bank ◽  
The United States ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Short Course ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteremia ◽  
Long Course

Abstract Background Bloodstream infections (BSI) continue to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States; thus, the correct choice of antibiotics for an appropriate duration is imperative. However, there are limited recommendations on adequate duration of treatment of bacteremia caused by Gram-negative organisms. Therefore, treating an infection for an adequate duration to prevent complications while preventing adverse effects from unnecessary antibiotic exposure remains a balancing act. This study aims to compare clinical outcomes between patients treated with a short (7–10 days) vs. long (11–20 days) course of antibiotics for uncomplicated gram-negative bacteremia. Methods This single-center retrospective cohort study evaluated adult patients admitted between January 2007 to October 2018 with a blood culture positive for gram-negative bacteria. Data came from the University of Kentucky Microbiological Laboratory and Center for Clinical and Translational Science (CCTS) Data Bank. Patients included must have received appropriate antibiotics for at least 7 days. Appropriate antibiotics were defined as those to which the organism is susceptible with day one of therapy as the first day of appropriate antibiotic therapy. Patients were excluded if they were treated with aminoglycoside monotherapy, had polymicrobial bacteremia, or if treated for longer than 20 days of therapy. Results A total of 466 patients were identified (208 in the short-course group and 258 in the long course group). Gender and ethnicity were similar across both groups. The patients in the long course group had more ICU admissions compared with the short-course group (52.7% vs. 43.3%, P = 0.0426), tended to be older (57 ± 16.7 vs. 53 ± 15.9 years, P = 0.0119), had a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (5.7 ± 3.6 vs. 4.6 ± 3.6, P = 0.0009) and remained admitted to the hospital longer (23.2 ± 25.6 vs. 15.8 ± 17.5 days, P = 0.0002). However, patients treated with a long course had no difference in 30-day mortality compared with the short-course group (3.9% vs. 3.4%, P = 0.7701). Conclusion Patients with an uncomplicated gram-negative BSI treated with a short course (7–10 days) of antibiotics do not appear to have a significant difference in 30-day mortality compared with those patients treated with a long course (11–20 days). Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals 46. Antimicrobial Stewardship’s Selective Antibiotic Suppression Does Not Lead to Adverse Outcomes in Neutropenic Patients with Gram-Negative Bacteremia

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S46-S46
Author(s):  
Anna Witt ◽  
Mason G Harper ◽  
Juan Carlos Rico Crescencio ◽  
Ryan K Dare ◽  
Mary Burgess
Keyword(s):  
Intervention Group ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Narrow Spectrum ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteremia ◽  
Post Intervention Group

Abstract Background An antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) strategy to minimize the use of overly broad antimicrobials is to suppress specific antimicrobial susceptibility results when isolates are sensitive to narrow antibiotics. There is limited data on possible adverse outcomes of this method. Patients with febrile neutropenia (FN) and gram-negative bacteremia (GNB) whose culture is sensitive to non-pseudomonal antibiotics still require broader pseudomonal coverage to treat the syndrome of FN. We evaluated if ASP suppression of anti-pseudomonal antibiotics adversely affects patients with FN and GNB. Methods In February 2018, our institution’s ASP began suppressing cefepime and meropenem susceptibility results from E. coli, Klebsiella spp, and Proteus spp when sensitive to cefepime (MIC ≤ 2), ceftriaxone and ceftazidime. We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with FN and GNB from 2016 – 2020 to evaluate the appropriateness of antibiotic regimens before and after the ASP intervention. Antibiotic regimens were deemed inappropriate if the patient was de-escalated to a narrow-spectrum, non-pseudomonal agent while neutropenic. Of 338 inpatient encounters identified with any bacteremia and FN, 49 were due to non-Pseudomonas, non-ESBL GNB, 20 before and 29 after the intervention. Sixteen of the 29 post-intervention patients were excluded, as their isolates did not meet suppression criteria. This resulted in a total of 13 patients in the post-intervention group. Results After culture susceptibility reports were released, 3 out of 20 patients in the pre-intervention group (15%) and 4 out of 13 patients in the post-intervention group (30.8%) were inappropriately tailored to narrow-spectrum antibiotics (p=0.39). There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality, 10.0% pre- and 0% post-intervention (p=0.50), or amount of meropenem prescribed, 45% pre- and 38.5% post-intervention (p=0.74). Conclusion These data show no significant difference in inappropriate antibiotic regimens prescribed for patients with FN and GNB after ASP antibiotic suppression was implemented. 30-day mortality was also not affected. The ASP intervention did not decrease meropenem prescriptions in this patient group, which may be appropriate. Larger studies are needed to verify these findings. Disclosures Ryan K. Dare, MD, MS, Accelerate Diagnostics, Inc (Research Grant or Support) Mary Burgess, MD, Pfizer Inc (Grant/Research Support)

scholarly journals Tracheal Diameter Estimates Using Age-Related Formula Versus Radiographic Findings: Which Approximates the Actual Tracheostomy Tube in Pediatric Patients?

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 32-36
Author(s):  
Isaac Cesar S. De Guzman
Keyword(s):  
Endotracheal Tube ◽  
Tracheostomy Tube ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Estimation Methods ◽  
Radiographic Findings ◽  
Average Value ◽  
Age Related ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Difference

Objective: To compare actual tracheostomy tube sizes with estimated endotracheal tube sizes using age-related formula and tracheal diameter from preoperative radiographs among pediatric Filipino patients aged 0-18 years old undergoing tracheostomy. Methods: Study Design: Review of records Setting:           Tertiary Private University Hospital in Dasmarinas, Cavite, Philippines Patients:         Pediatric patients regardless of gender, aged 0 to 18 years old, with a preoperative radiograph of the trachea, and who subsequently underwent tracheostomy anytime from January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2016 were considered for inclusion. Radiographs were measured, endotracheal tube sizes were computed using age-related formula, and recorded tracheotomy tube sizes were retrieved. Results: Twenty-two patients (12 males, 10 females) aged 10 months to 18-years-old (median age: 11 years) were included in the study. Mean tube sizes were 6.46mm (+/- 1.492 SD) for age-related formula, 5.67mm (+/- 1.1849 SD) for radiograph-based estimation, and 5.0 for actual tracheostomy tube inserted in each patient. The Bland-Altman plot showed the bias estimate at 0.7913 and the lower and upper limits of agreement at -1.3598 and 2.9423 (confidence level 95% or 2 standard deviations away from the mean). Conclusions: The average value derived from radiograph-based estimation is less than the corresponding average value from age-related formula. There is a significant difference between age-related formula-based estimation and actual tracheostomy tube inserted. Since the range of differences between the two estimation methods is high, these results imply that the bias or the difference between measures from the two methods is not consistent, with the two methods exhibiting very poor agreement. Keywords: Tracheostomy, Intubation, Intra Tracheal, Penlington Formula, Trachea Radiograph Measurement, age related formula for endotracheal tube estimation

scholarly journals Comparative study between intranasal dexmedetomidine and intranasal ketamine as a premedication for anxiolysis and sedation before pediatric general anesthesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Elsayed Ahmed Mohamed Elshafeey ◽  
Gehan Fouad Kamel Youssef ◽  
Ehab Hamed Abd Elsalam ◽  
Mohamed Saleh ◽  
Ramy Mahrose
Keyword(s):  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Sedation Score ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Sedation Level ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Sedation Scores ◽  
Double Blinded ◽  
Group D ◽  
Effective Sedation

Abstract Background This study compared dexmedetomidine versus ketamine as regard sedation and anxiolysis produced by giving them through intranasal route to pediatric patients undergoing adenotonsillectomy. This study was double-blinded randomized comparative prospective interventional clinical study done in Ain Shams University Hospital (El Demerdash Hospital) on 76 pediatric patients who underwent adenotonsillectomy, and they were randomly allocated equally into two main groups; group D received 2 μg/kg intranasal dexmedetomidine and group K received 5 μg/Kg intranasal ketamine 30 min before the operation, and the aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of intranasal dexmedetomidine versus intranasal ketamine for anxiolysis and sedation to alleviate stress, agitation, and anxiety in children before general anesthesia and for promoting good level of sedation for them. Results Results of this study as regards sedation level that was assessed by modified Ramsay sedation score showed that there was statistically significant difference between both groups at 10, 20, and 30 min from intranasal application of the drug (P value < 0.05), the median (IQR) of sedation score at 10, 20, and 30 min preoperative in group D was (2 (2 – 2)), (3 (3 – 4)), (4 (4 – 5)) compared to (2 (2 – 3)), (3 (2 – 3)), (4 (3 – 4)) in group K respectively which revealed that there was better and effective sedation in group D more than in group K, this difference was statistically significant but clinically insignificant as both drugs produced an acceptable level of sedation and decreased the level of anxiety in children. Conclusion Both drugs produce effective and favorable sedation level with superiority to dexmedetomidine in sedation scores and time of onset of sedation, and also there was little decrease in heart rate and mean arterial pressure which is favorable during such surgeries; also, there was accepted level of cannulation and parental separation scores, and the parents were highly satisfied with the procedure and were grateful for us due to alleviating stress and anxiety from them and from their children.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document