The Association of International Normalized Ratio with Postoperative Complications in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

Author(s):  
Jessica L. Churchill ◽  
Linsen T. Samuel ◽  
J. M. Karnuta ◽  
Alexander J. Acuña ◽  
Atul F. Kamath

AbstractThe purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between elevated preoperative international normalized ratio (INR) and (1) mortality, (2) postoperative bleeding, and (3) other postoperative complications in a national cohort of patients who underwent revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was queried for rTKA procedures conducted between 2006 and 2017. Cohorts were based on INR ranges: <1, 1 < INR ≤ 1.25, 1.25 < INR ≤ 1.5, and >1.5. Univariate/multivariate statistics were calculated to analyze associations between INR value and designated covariates. These statistics were additionally applied to optimal cutoff values of INR calculated using a receiver operating characteristics curve. The final cohort consisted of 1,676 patients. Progressively higher INR values were associated with an increased risk of mortality within 30 days (p < 0.006), bleeding requiring transfusion (p < 0.001), sepsis (p < 0.001), return to the operating room (Odds Ratio [OR], p = 0.011), reintubation (p < 0.001), pneumonia (p < 0.001), failure to wean from mechanical ventilation ≤48 hours (p < 0.001), acute renal failure (p = 0.001), and hospital length of stay (LOS). Statistically significant associations were similarly seen when calculated optimal INR values were used. Optimal INR turn point was found to be associated with a significant increased risk of long LOS (optimal INR = 1.03, OR: 1.7, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.33–2.18; p < 0.001) and a significant decreased risk of bleeding requiring transfusion (INR = 1.005, OR: 0.732, 95% CI: 0.681–0.786; p < 0.001). High preoperative INR values were independently and significantly associated with an increased risk of multiple postoperative complications. Current guidelines for INR <1.5 should be reassessed for patients undergoing rTKA.

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin-Ning Ma ◽  
Xiao-Lin Li ◽  
Pan Liang ◽  
Sheng-Li Yu

Abstract Background The optimal timing to perform a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) after knee arthroscopy (KA) was controversial in the literature. We aimed to 1) explore the effect of prior KA on the subsequent TKA; 2) identify who were not suitable for TKA in patients with prior KA, and 3) determine the timing of TKA following prior KA. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 87 TKAs with prior KA and 174 controls using propensity score matching in our institution. The minimum follow-up was 2 years. Postoperative clinical outcomes were compared between groups. Kaplan-Meier curves were created with reoperation as an endpoint. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regressions were performed to identify risk factors of severe complications in the KA group. The two-piecewise linear regression analysis was performed to examine the optimal timing of TKA following prior KA. Results The all-cause reoperation, revision, and complication rates of the KA group were significantly higher than those of the control group (p < 0.05). The survivorship of the KA group and control group was 92.0 and 99.4% at the 2-year follow-up (p = 0.002), respectively. Male (Hazards ratio [HR] = 3.2) and prior KA for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury (HR = 4.4) were associated with postoperative complications in the KA group. There was a non-linear relationship between time from prior KA to TKA and postoperative complications with the turning point at 9.4 months. Conclusion Prior KA is associated with worse outcomes following subsequent TKA, especially male patients and those with prior KA for ACL injury. There is an increased risk of postoperative complications when TKA is performed within nine months of KA. Surgeons should keep these findings in mind when treating patients who are scheduled to undergo TKA with prior KA.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin-Ning Ma ◽  
Xiao-Lin Li ◽  
Pan Liang ◽  
Sheng-Li Yu

Abstract Background The optimal time to perform a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) after knee arthroscopy (KA) was controversial in the literature. We aimed to 1) explore the effect of prior KA on the subsequent TKA; 2) identify who were not suitable for TKA in patients with prior KA; and 3) determine the timing of TKA following prior KA.Methods We retrospectively reviewed 87 TKAs with prior KA and 174 controls using propensity score matching in our institution. The minimum followup was 2 years. Postoperative clinical outcomes were compared between groups. Kaplan-Meier curves were created with reoperation as an end point. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regressions were performed to identify risk factors of severe complications in the KA group. The two-piecewise linear regression analysis was performed to examine the optimal timing of TKA following prior KA.Results The all-cause reoperation, revision and complication rates of KA group were significantly higher than those of control group (p<0.05). The survivorship of KA group and control group was 92.0% and 99.4% at the 2-year followup (p=0.002), respectively. Male (Hazards ratio [HR]=3.2) and prior KA for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury (HR=4.4) were associated with postoperative complications in the KA group. There was a non-liner relationship between time from prior KA to TKA and postoperative complications with the turning point at 9.4 months.Conclusion Prior KA is associated with worse outcomes following subsequent TKA, especially male patients and those with prior KA for ACL injury. There is an increased risk of postoperative complications when TKA is performed within 9 months of KA. Surgeons should keep these findings in mind when treating patients who are scheduled to undergo TKA with prior KA.


2019 ◽  
Vol 101-B (7_Supple_C) ◽  
pp. 70-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. L. Nowak ◽  
E. H. Schemitsch

Aims To evaluate the influence of discharge timing on 30-day complications following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Patients and Methods We identified patients aged 18 years or older who underwent TKA between 2005 and 2016 from the American College of Surgeons’ National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. We propensity score-matched length-of-stay (LOS) groups using all relevant covariables. We used multivariable regression to determine if the rate of complications and re-admissions differed depending on LOS. Results Our matched cohort consisted of 76 246 TKA patients (mean age 67 years (sd 9)). Patients whose LOS was zero and four days had an increased risk of major complications by an odds ratio (OR) of 1.8 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0 to 3.2) and 1.5 (95% CI 1.2 to 1.7), respectively, compared with patients whose LOS was two days. Patients whose LOS was zero, three, and four days had an increased risk of minor complications (OR 1.8 (95% CI 1.3 to 2.7), 1.2 (95% CI 1.0 to 1.4), and 1.6 (95% CI 1.4 to 1.9), respectively), compared with patients whose LOS was two days. In addition, a LOS of three days increased the risk of re-admission by an OR of 1.2 (95% CI 1.0 to 1.3), and a LOS of four days increased the risk of re-admission by an OR of 1.5 (95% CI 1.3 to 1.6), compared with a LOS of two days. Conclusion Patients discharged on days one to two postoperatively following TKA appear to have reduced major and minor complications compared with discharge on the day of surgery, or on days three to four. Prospective clinical data are required to confirm these findings. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B(7 Supple C):70–76


2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (10) ◽  
pp. 946-951 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Roche ◽  
Tsun Law ◽  
Nipun Sodhi ◽  
Samuel Rosas ◽  
Leah Elson ◽  
...  

AbstractNutritional status has become increasingly important in optimizing surgical outcomes and preventing postoperative infection and wound complications. However, currently, there is a paucity in the orthopaedics literature investigating the relationship between nutritional status and wound complications following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of (1) postoperative infections, (2) wound complications, (3) concomitant infection with wound (CoIW) complication, and (4) infection followed by wound complication by using (1) albumin, (2) prealbumin, and (3) transferrin levels as indicators of nutritional status. These four different outcome measures were chosen as they are encountered commonly in daily clinical practice. A retrospective review of a national private payer database for patients who underwent TKA with postoperative infections and wound complications stratified by preoperative serum albumin (normal: 3.5–5 g/dL), prealbumin (normal: 16–35 mg/dL), and transferrin levels (normal: 200–360 mg/dL) between 2007 and 2015 was conducted. Patients were identified by Current Procedural Terminology (CPT), International Classification of Disease, ninth revision (ICD-9) codes, and Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC). Linear regression was performed to evaluate changes over times. Yearly rates of infection, as well as a correlation and odds ratio analysis of nutritional laboratory values to postoperative complications, were also performed. Our query returned a total of 161,625 TKAs, of which 11,047 (7%) had postoperative wound complications, 18,403 (11%) had infections, 6,296 (34%) had CoIW, and 4,877 (4%) patients with infection developed wound complications. Albumin was the most commonly ordered laboratory test when assessing complications (96%). Wound complications, infections, CoIW, and infection with wound complications after were higher in those below the normal range: albumin <3.5 g/dL (9, 14, 6, and 5%), prealbumin <15 mg/dL (20, 23, 13, and 12%), and transferrin <200 mg/dL (12, 17, 6, and 6%). Preoperative albumin, prealbumin, and transferrin values falling below the normal range represented an increased risk for postoperative complications. Those patients who were in the normal range, however, did not have an increased risk. Therefore, our results suggest that preoperative nutritional optimization can play an important role in reducing the risk for postoperative complications.


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 66-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luke J. Garbarino ◽  
Peter A. Gold ◽  
Nipun Sodhi ◽  
Hiba K. Anis ◽  
Joseph O. Ehiorobo ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Peter Gold ◽  
Luke J. Garbarino ◽  
Nipun Sodhi ◽  
Hiba K. Anis ◽  
Joseph O. Ehiorobo ◽  
...  

AbstractSeveral recent intraoperative and wound management techniques have been developed and implemented in the United States over the past decade; however, it is unclear what the effects of these newer modalities have on reducing surgical site infection (SSI) rates. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to track the annual rate and trends of (1) overall, (2) deep, and (3) superficial SSIs following revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for all revision TKA cases performed between 2011 and 2016, which yielded 9,887 cases. Cases with superficial and/or deep SSIs were analyzed separately and then combined to evaluate overall SSI rates. After an overall 6-year correlation and trends analysis, univariate analysis was performed to compare the most recent year, 2016, with the preceding 5 years. Correlation coefficients and chi-square tests were used to determine correlation and statistical significance. No significant correlations between combined, deep, and/or superficial SSI rates and year were noted (p > 0.05). The lowest overall SSI incidence was in 2012 (1.16%), while the greatest incidence was in 2014 (1.76%). The deep SSI incidence over the 6 years was 0.67% (66 out of 9,887 cases). Deep SSI rate decreased by 10% in 2016 compared with 2011 (0.50 vs. 0.56%, p  > 0.05). In this 6-year period, 94 cases out of 9,887 were complicated by a superficial SSI, an incidence of 0.95%. The lowest superficial SSI incidence occurred in 2015 (n = 17, 0.77%). Overall, the incidence of SSIs in revision TKA has remained fairly low with some annual variance, indicating room for improvement. These variations likely as revision surgeries can be more complex and have several associated confounding factors influencing outcomes, when compared with primary cases. Further research is needed to identify revision-specific strategies to reduce the risk of surgical site infections.


2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (07) ◽  
pp. 730-733 ◽  
Author(s):  
Todd Pierce ◽  
Kimona Issa ◽  
Anthony Festa ◽  
Anthony Scillia ◽  
Vincent McInerney ◽  
...  

Manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) can help patients regain an adequate range of motion (ROM) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Although there are studies reporting that MUA can assist in improving ROM, there is a paucity of studies regarding whether requiring an MUA is associated with an increased risk of revision. The purpose of this study was to assess the: (1) incidence of revision TKA and (2) outcomes of those undergoing MUA and compare it with a matched cohort who did not require MUA. A prospectively collected database of two high-volume institutions was assessed for patients who required a single MUA following TKA between 2005 and 2011. We found a total of 138 knees with a mean 8.5-year follow-up post-MUA. We compared this with a matched cohort (1:1) who underwent TKA during this same time period but did not require an MUA. Incidence of revision surgery and clinical outcomes were compared between the two cohorts. Within the MUA cohort, nine knees underwent revision, which was similar to the matched cohort that had seven revisions (93 vs. 95%; p = 0.6). The mean KSS-functional (88 vs. 90 points; p = 0.15) and clinical scores (87 vs. 89 points; p = 0.1) were similar between the two cohorts. Undergoing an MUA was not associated with an increased risk of revision TKA. If patients require MUA, they may still achieve satisfactory outcomes. This information can be used in educating patients so they may be able to formulate their expectations following their MUA.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document