Risk of Acute Kidney Injury after Intravenous Contrast Media Administration in Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: A Propensity-Matched Study

Author(s):  
Adi Elias ◽  
Doron Aronson

Abstract Background Although computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is the preferred diagnostic procedure in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE), some patients undergo ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) lung scan due to concern of contrast-associated acute kidney injury (AKI). Methods The study used a cohort of 4,565 patients with suspected PE. Patients who received contrast during CTPA were compared with propensity score-matched unexposed control patients who underwent V/Q lung scanning. AKI was defined as ≥50% increase in serum creatinine during the first 72 hours after either CTPA or V/Q lung scan. Results Classification and regression tree analysis demonstrated that baseline creatinine was the strongest determinant of the decision to use CTPA. Propensity-score matching yielded 969 patient pairs. There were 44 AKI events (4.5%) in patients exposed to contrast media (CM) and 33 events (3.4%) in patients not exposed to CM (risk difference: 1.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.6 to 2.9%; odds ratio [OR]: 1.39, 95% CI: 0.86–2.26; p = 0.18). Using different definitions for AKI and extending the time window for AKI diagnosis gave similar results. In a sensitivity analysis with the inverse probability weighting method, the OR for AKI in the CTPA versus V/Q scan was 1.14 (95% CI: 0.72–1.78; p = 0.58). Conclusion Intravenous contrast material administration was not associated with an increased risk of AKI in patients with suspected PE. Given the diagnostic superiority of CTPA, these results are reassuring with regard to the use of CTPE in patients with suspected PE perceived to be at risk for AKI.

2020 ◽  
pp. 102490792091339
Author(s):  
Seda Dağar ◽  
Emine Emektar ◽  
Hüseyin Uzunosmanoğlu ◽  
Şeref Kerem Çorbacıoğlu ◽  
Özge Öztekin ◽  
...  

Background: Despite its risks associated with renal injury, intravenous contrast media increases diagnostic efficacy and hence the chance of early diagnosis and treatment, which leaves clinicians in a dilemma regarding its use in emergency settings. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the risk and predictors of contrast-induced acute kidney injury following intravenous contrast media administration for computed tomography in the emergency department. Methods: All patients aged 18 years and older who had a basal creatinine measurement within the last 8 h before contrast-enhanced computed tomography and a second creatinine measurement within 48–72 h after computed tomography scan between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2017 were included in the study. Characteristics of patients with and without contrast-induced acute kidney injury development were compared. Multivariate regression analysis was used to assess the predictors for contrast-induced acute kidney injury. Results: A total of 631 patients were included in the final statistical analysis. After contrast media administration, contrast-induced acute kidney injury developed in 4.9% ( n = 31) of the patients. When the characteristics of patients are compared according to the development of contrast-induced acute kidney injury, significant differences were detected for age, initial creatinine, initial estimated glomerular filtration rate, and all acute illness severity indicators (hypotension, anemia, hypoalbuminemia, and need for intensive care unit admission). A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed. The need for intensive care unit admission (odds ratio: 6.413 (95% confidence interval: 1.709–24.074)) and hypotension (odds ratio: 5.575 (95% confidence interval: 1.624–19.133)) were the main factors for contrast-induced acute kidney injury development. Conclusion: Our study results revealed that hypotension, need for intensive care, and advanced age were associated with acute kidney injury in patients receiving contrast media. Therefore, we believe that to perform contrast-enhanced computed tomography in emergency department should not be decided only by checking for renal function tests and that these predictors should be taken into consideration.


2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrey Vasin ◽  
Olga Mironova ◽  
Viktor Fomin

Abstract Background and Aims Computed tomography with intravenous contrast media is widely used in hospitals. The incidence of CI-AKI due to intravenous contrast media administration in high-risk patients remains not studied as well as CI-AKI after intraarterial contrast media administration is. According to other researchers, the use of statins in the prevention of AKI after intra-arterial administration of a contrast agent is currently considered an efficient preventive measure. The aim of our study is to assess the incidence of contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients with cardiovascular diseases during CT scan with intravenous contrast media and analyze the efficacy and safety of various statin dosing regimens for prevention of CI-AKI. Method A randomized controlled open prospective study is planned. Statin naive patients with cardiovascular diseases will be divided into 3 groups. Patients in the first group will receive atorvastatin 80mg 24 hours and 40mg 2 hours before CT scans and 40 mg after. The second group – 40 mg 2 hours before CT scans and 40 mg after. A third group is a control group. Exclusion criteria were current or previous statin treatment, contraindications to statins, severe renal failure, acute coronary syndrome, administration of nephrotoxic drugs. The primary endpoint will the development of CI-AKI, defined as an increase in serum Cr concentration 0.5 mg/dl (44.2 mmol/l) or 25% above baseline at 72 h after exposure to the contrast media. Results We assume a higher incidence of contrast-induced acute kidney injury in the group of patients not receiving statin therapy (about 5-10%). At the same time, it is unlikely to get a significant difference between statin dosing regimens. Risk factors such as age over 75 years, the presence of chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, and chronic heart failure increase the risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury. Conclusion Despite the significantly lower incidence of CI-AKI with intravenous contrast compared to intra-arterial, patients with CVD have a greater risk of this complication even with intravenous contrast. Therefore, the development of prevention methods and scales for assessing the likelihood of CI-AKI is an important problem. As a result of the study, we expect to conclude the benefits of statins in CI-AKI prevention and the optimal dosage regimen. This information will help us to reduce the burden of CI-AKI after CT scanning in statin naive patients with cardiovascular diseases in everyday clinical practice. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04666389


2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lantam Sonhaye ◽  
Bérésa Kolou ◽  
Mazamaesso Tchaou ◽  
Abdoulatif Amadou ◽  
Kouméabalo Assih ◽  
...  

The goal of this study was to assess risk for CIN after CT Scan during an emergency and to identify risk factors for the patient. Prospective review of all patients admitted to the emergency room (ER) of the Teaching Hospital of Lomé (Togo) during a 2-year period. CIN was defined as an increase in serum creatinine by 0.5 mg/dL from admission after undergoing CT Scan with intravenous contrast. A total of 620 patients underwent a CT Scan in the emergency room using intravenous contrast and 672 patients took the CT Scan without intravenous contrast. Out of the patients who received intravenous contrast for CT Scan, three percent of them developed CIN during their admission. Moreover, upon discharge no patient had continued renal impairment. No patient required dialysis during their admission. The multivariate analysis of all patients who had serial creatinine levels (including those who did not receive any contrast load) shows no increased risk for acute kidney injury associated intravenous contrast (odds ratio = 0.619,pvalue = 0.886); only diabetes remains independent risk factor of acute kidney injury (odds ratio = 6.26,pvalue = 0.031).


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Shetty ◽  
H Malik ◽  
A Abbas ◽  
Y Ying ◽  
W Aronow ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Acute kidney injury (AKI) is frequently present in patients admitted for acute heart failure (AHF). Several studies have evaluated the mortality risk and have concluded poor prognosis in any patient with AKI admitted for AHF. For the most part, the additional morbidity and mortality burden in AHF patients with AKI has been attributed to the concomitant comorbidities, and/or interventions. Purpose We sought to determine the impact of acute kidney injury (AKI) on in-hospital outcomes in patients presenting with acute heart failure (AHF). We identified isolated AKI patients after excluding other concomitant diagnoses and procedures, which may contribute to an increased risk of mortality and morbidity. Methods Data from the National Inpatient Sample (2012- 14) were used to identify patients with the principal diagnosis of AHF and the concomitant secondary diagnosis of AKI. Propensity score matching was performed on 30 baseline variables to identify a matched cohort. The outcome of interest was in-hospital mortality. We further evaluated in-hospital procedures and complications. Results Of 1,470,450 patients admitted with AHF, 24.3% had AKI. After propensity matching a matched cohort of 356,940 patients was identified. In this matched group, the AKI group had significantly higher in-hospital mortality (3.8% vs 1.7%, p<0.001). Complications such as sepsis and cardiac arrest were higher in the AKI group. Similarly, in-hospital procedures including CABG, mechanical ventilation and IABP were performed more in the AKI group. AHF patients with AKI had longer in-hospital stay of ∼1.7 days. Conclusions In a propensity score-matched cohort of AHF with and without AKI, the risk of in-hospital mortality was >2-fold in the AKI group. Healthcare utilization and burden of complications were higher in the AKI group. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


2015 ◽  
Vol 90 (8) ◽  
pp. 1046-1053 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer S. McDonald ◽  
Robert J. McDonald ◽  
John C. Lieske ◽  
Rickey E. Carter ◽  
Richard W. Katzberg ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document