Active Strategy to Improve the Right-Turn Capacity at Signalized Intersections

2021 ◽  
Vol 147 (1) ◽  
pp. 04020144
Author(s):  
Yujing Zheng ◽  
Yuxiong Ji ◽  
Wei Wang ◽  
Xuefen Cai ◽  
Yuchuan Du
Author(s):  
Abishai Polus ◽  
Ronen Cohen

High volumes at urban and suburban intersections may cause considerable delay to vehicles during the peak periods, particularly when the left-turning volume is combined with high through volumes in both directions. The operational impact resulting from converting a major conventional cross intersection into two smaller signalized intersections is analyzed and evaluated. The two intersections are constructed along the minor road, allowing the left-turn movement from the major road to operate simultaneously with the through movement and to be stored in more lanes on the minor road. The general advantages and disadvantages of a split intersection are discussed. It is shown that the split increases capacity because of better efficiency resulting from ( a) the smaller geometry of each intersection, which reduces “lost time,” compared to the geometry of a single larger intersection, ( b) a reduction in the number of signal phases from four to three and an increase in the effective green time for all movements, and ( c) an increase in the number of lanes available for storage of the left-turn movement. It is also shown that delay is reduced, particularly when the flow is close to saturation. The impact of the cycle length and the left-turn volume is evaluated. Further analysis ascertains the minimum distance between the two smaller intersections under two scenarios: ( a) a minimum distance for storage of the left-turn movement and ( b) a longer distance to reduce delays and to allow for the simultaneous start of the green time for the through movements in the two intersections. It is concluded that the longer distance is feasible mainly for new intersections in suburban areas where the right of way is available.


2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (7) ◽  
pp. 631-642 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanyong Guo ◽  
Tarek Sayed ◽  
Mohamed H. Zaki ◽  
Pan Liu

The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety impacts of unconventional outside left-turn lane at signalized intersections. New designed unconventional outside left-turn lanes are increasingly used at signalized intersections in urban areas in China. The unconventional outside left-turn lane design allows an exclusive left-turn lane to be located to the right of through lanes to improve the efficiency and increase the capacity of left-turn movements. However, the design also raises some concerns regarding potential negative safety impacts. The evaluation is conducted using an automated video-based traffic conflict technique. The traffic conflicts approach provides better understanding of collision contributing factors and the failure mechanism that leads to road collisions. Traffic conflicts are automatically detected and time to collision is calculated based on the analysis of the vehicles’ positions in space and time. Video data are collected from a signalized intersection in Nanjing, China, where both traditional inside and unconventional outside left-turn lanes are installed on two intersection approaches. The other two approaches have only inside left-turn lanes. The study compared frequency and severity of conflict for left-turning vehicles as well as the percentage of vehicles involved in conflicts from the inside and outside left-turn lanes. The results show that the intersection approaches with outside left-turn lanes had considerably more conflicts compared to approaches without outside left-turn lanes. As well, the approaches with outside left-turn lanes had significantly higher conflict severity than the approaches without outside left-turn lanes. As such, it is recommended that the trade-off between the improved mobility and negative safety impact of outside left-turn lanes be carefully considered before recommending their installation.


Author(s):  
Ray Saeidi Razavi ◽  
Peter G. Furth

At signalized intersections, permitted left turns (i.e., on a green ball, after yielding) across multiple through lanes and across a separated bike lane or bike path present a threat to bicyclist safety. A conflict study of two such intersections with a bidirectional bike path found that when cyclists cross while a vehicle is ready to turn left and there is no opposing through traffic to block it, the chance of the left-turning motorist yielding safely was only 9%, and the chance of their yielding at all—including yielding only after beginning the turn, then stopping in the opposing through lanes—was still only 37%. Motorist non-yielding rates were worse toward bikes arriving during green, toward bikes approaching from the opposite direction (i.e., riding on the right side of the road), and toward bikes facing a queue with multiple left turning vehicles. Of 112 cyclists who arrived on green when there was at least one left-turning car, but no opposing through traffic blocking it, 73 had to slow or stop to avoid a collision. Although these conflicts could be essentially eliminated using protected-only left turn phasing (turn on green arrow), common existing criteria prefer permitted left turns to reduce vehicular delay. A case study shows how, by considering multiple signalization alternatives, it can be possible to convert left turns to protected-only phasing without imposing a substantial delay burden on vehicles or other road users.


Author(s):  
Husham N. Abdulsattar ◽  
Mohammed S. Tarawneh ◽  
Patrick T. McCoy ◽  
Stephen D. Kachman

Left- and right-turn movements at signalized intersections have been found to be three to six times more hazardous to pedestrians than through movements mainly because drivers fail to observe or yield the right of way to pedestrians. The objective was to evaluate the Turning Traffic Must Yield to Pedestrians sign, which was aimed at reminding turning motorists of their legal obligation to yield the right of way to pedestrians and, consequently, reducing vehicle-pedestrian conflicts. The sign was installed at 12 marked crosswalks in two cities, and vehicle-pedestrian conflict data were collected before and after its installation. The sign was effective in reducing left-turn conflicts 20 to 65 percent and right-turn conflicts 15 to 30 percent; both reductions were statistically significant at the 0.05 level. The sign was significantly more effective in reducing left-turn conflicts than it was for right-turn conflicts. Percentage conflicts between pedestrians and turning traffic decreased as the pedestrian group size increased. In other words, larger pedestrian group sizes encountered fewer conflicts with turning traffic. This result is true for both left- and right-turn movements, regardless of the presence of the sign. Based on the results of this study, it was recommended that the “Turning Traffic Must Yield to Pedestrians” sign be considered for inclusion in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices.


2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 462-471 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahmoud Taha ◽  
Akmal Abdelfatah

The majority of traffic delays in urban areas occur at signalized intersections. Due to the limited availability of space and right-of-way, many transportation agencies are considering unconventional traffic control systems for intersections to improve signal efficiency and reduce overall delays. Common unconventional left-turn treatments include the right-turn followed by a U-turn (RTUT) and a U-turn followed by a right-turn (UTRT). The main goal of this study is to determine the traffic operational performance of the three left-turn treatments under different traffic conditions. The results showed that unconventional left-turn control types have less delay and travel time compared to the direct left-turn (DLT), when the U-turn locations are 200 m away from the main intersection. Also, RTUT showed superior performance over the other left-turn control types, when the U-turn locations are 100 m away from the main intersection.


Author(s):  
Mark R. Virkler

Pedestrian delay at signalized intersections must often be considered when describing the quality of pedestrian flow in downtown and other busy locations. Pedestrian delay at signals is usually modeled with the assumption that ( a) pedestrian arrivals are random and ( b) pedestrians proceed only when a Walk signal provides the right-of-way. To reduce their own delay, some pedestrians will at times proceed without a Walk indication. The range of delay reductions that pedestrians achieve by violating the pedestrian signal was examined through a field study of 18 crosswalks. Delays experienced by pedestrians were found to be 22 percent lower than those that would be predicted with complete signal compliance. Although relatively small reductions in delay were due to crossings while the signal was effectively red, the majority of delay reduction was due to people who began their crossing during the flashing Don’t Walk phase. The number of pedestrians who entered crosswalks during the flashing Don’t Walk phases was 69 percent of the number who would be expected to arrive at the curb during these periods if arrivals were random. It is inferred that some pedestrians increase their speeds to enter during the flashing Don’t Walk phase, rather than wait for the next Walk interval. A modification to a delay equation was developed to provide an improved estimate of pedestrian delay at signalized intersections.


Author(s):  
J. Anthony VanDuzer

SummaryRecently, there has been a proliferation of international agreements imposing minimum standards on states in respect of their treatment of foreign investors and allowing investors to initiate dispute settlement proceedings where a state violates these standards. Of greatest significance to Canada is Chapter 11 of the North American Free Trade Agreement, which provides both standards for state behaviour and the right to initiate binding arbitration. Since 1996, four cases have been brought under Chapter 11. This note describes the Chapter 11 process and suggests some of the issues that may arise as it is increasingly resorted to by investors.


2019 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guido Gainotti

Abstract The target article carefully describes the memory system, centered on the temporal lobe that builds specific memory traces. It does not, however, mention the laterality effects that exist within this system. This commentary briefly surveys evidence showing that clear asymmetries exist within the temporal lobe structures subserving the core system and that the right temporal structures mainly underpin face familiarity feelings.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document