Operational Impact of Split Intersections

Author(s):  
Abishai Polus ◽  
Ronen Cohen

High volumes at urban and suburban intersections may cause considerable delay to vehicles during the peak periods, particularly when the left-turning volume is combined with high through volumes in both directions. The operational impact resulting from converting a major conventional cross intersection into two smaller signalized intersections is analyzed and evaluated. The two intersections are constructed along the minor road, allowing the left-turn movement from the major road to operate simultaneously with the through movement and to be stored in more lanes on the minor road. The general advantages and disadvantages of a split intersection are discussed. It is shown that the split increases capacity because of better efficiency resulting from ( a) the smaller geometry of each intersection, which reduces “lost time,” compared to the geometry of a single larger intersection, ( b) a reduction in the number of signal phases from four to three and an increase in the effective green time for all movements, and ( c) an increase in the number of lanes available for storage of the left-turn movement. It is also shown that delay is reduced, particularly when the flow is close to saturation. The impact of the cycle length and the left-turn volume is evaluated. Further analysis ascertains the minimum distance between the two smaller intersections under two scenarios: ( a) a minimum distance for storage of the left-turn movement and ( b) a longer distance to reduce delays and to allow for the simultaneous start of the green time for the through movements in the two intersections. It is concluded that the longer distance is feasible mainly for new intersections in suburban areas where the right of way is available.

2000 ◽  
Vol 1710 (1) ◽  
pp. 199-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuewen Le ◽  
Jian Lu ◽  
Edward A. Mierzejewski ◽  
Yanhu Zhou

The capacity analysis procedure for signalized intersections included in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) needs to consider the area type of a given intersection. The area-type adjustment factor used in the procedure is based on conclusions from a limited number of studies. In addition, the procedure for using an area-type adjustment factor is not well defined in the HCM. A study undertaken in central Florida to study the effects of four different area types on the capacity of signalized intersections is summarized. These four area types include recreational, business, residential, and shopping. Study results indicated that differences in saturation headways among different area types were significant. The saturation headways observed in recreational areas were significantly higher than those in other areas for both left-turn and through movements. The through-movement saturation headways obtained in residential, shopping, and business areas were not significantly different. This study resulted in a new area-type adjustment factor of 0.92 for recreational areas, whereas the factor is 1.00 for other areas. Results in this study also indicated that the differences in start-up lost time among different area types were not significantly different. In addition, according to the results of the analysis, 75 percent of the yellow interval in undersaturated conditions and 35 percent of the yellow interval in oversaturated conditions were found to be unused and considered clearance lost time.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhengtao Qin ◽  
Jing Zhao ◽  
Shidong Liang ◽  
Jiao Yao

Many intersections around the world are irregular crossings where the approach and exit lanes are offset or the two roads cross at oblique angles. These irregular intersections often confuse drivers and greatly affect operational efficiency. Although guideline markings are recommended in many design manuals and codes on traffic signs and markings to address these problems, the effectiveness and application conditions are ambiguous. The research goal was to analyze the impact of guideline markings on the saturation flow rate at signalized intersections. An adjustment estimation model was established based on field data collected at 33 intersections in Shanghai, China. The proposed model was validated using a before–after case study. The underlying reasons for the impact of intersection guideline markings on the saturation flow rate are discussed. The results reveal that the improvement in the saturation flow rate obtained from painting guide line markings is positively correlated with the number of traffic lanes, offset of through movement, and turning angle of left-turns. On average, improvements of 7.0% and 10.3% can be obtained for through and left-turn movements, respectively.


Author(s):  
Shannon Warchol ◽  
Nagui Rouphail ◽  
Chris Vaughan ◽  
Brendan Kearns

This research collected and analyzed gap acceptance in North Carolina to develop a data-driven method for determining the need for considering additional signalization analysis at intersections with fewer than four legs. This method can be used for movements that merge with or cross two lanes of oncoming traffic. It is intended to provide guidance and support to traffic engineers in their decision-making process. Charts are provided to determine the expected 95th percentile queue lengths for left-turn, right-turn, and U-turn movements crossing or merging with two lanes of conflicting traffic. This situation is typically present along four-lane roadways where a one-way primary movement opposes either a minor road right-turn movement or a left-turn movement, or in the case of a median U-turn opening. Adjustment factors to the conflicting flowrate were developed to account for the presence of upstream signalized intersections. This method less frequently recommends further signal consideration when compared with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices peak hour warrant, but is similar to the delay-based level of service D/E threshold for two-way stop-controlled intersections in HCM6 Chapter 19.


2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (7) ◽  
pp. 631-642 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanyong Guo ◽  
Tarek Sayed ◽  
Mohamed H. Zaki ◽  
Pan Liu

The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety impacts of unconventional outside left-turn lane at signalized intersections. New designed unconventional outside left-turn lanes are increasingly used at signalized intersections in urban areas in China. The unconventional outside left-turn lane design allows an exclusive left-turn lane to be located to the right of through lanes to improve the efficiency and increase the capacity of left-turn movements. However, the design also raises some concerns regarding potential negative safety impacts. The evaluation is conducted using an automated video-based traffic conflict technique. The traffic conflicts approach provides better understanding of collision contributing factors and the failure mechanism that leads to road collisions. Traffic conflicts are automatically detected and time to collision is calculated based on the analysis of the vehicles’ positions in space and time. Video data are collected from a signalized intersection in Nanjing, China, where both traditional inside and unconventional outside left-turn lanes are installed on two intersection approaches. The other two approaches have only inside left-turn lanes. The study compared frequency and severity of conflict for left-turning vehicles as well as the percentage of vehicles involved in conflicts from the inside and outside left-turn lanes. The results show that the intersection approaches with outside left-turn lanes had considerably more conflicts compared to approaches without outside left-turn lanes. As well, the approaches with outside left-turn lanes had significantly higher conflict severity than the approaches without outside left-turn lanes. As such, it is recommended that the trade-off between the improved mobility and negative safety impact of outside left-turn lanes be carefully considered before recommending their installation.


Author(s):  
Ray Saeidi Razavi ◽  
Peter G. Furth

At signalized intersections, permitted left turns (i.e., on a green ball, after yielding) across multiple through lanes and across a separated bike lane or bike path present a threat to bicyclist safety. A conflict study of two such intersections with a bidirectional bike path found that when cyclists cross while a vehicle is ready to turn left and there is no opposing through traffic to block it, the chance of the left-turning motorist yielding safely was only 9%, and the chance of their yielding at all—including yielding only after beginning the turn, then stopping in the opposing through lanes—was still only 37%. Motorist non-yielding rates were worse toward bikes arriving during green, toward bikes approaching from the opposite direction (i.e., riding on the right side of the road), and toward bikes facing a queue with multiple left turning vehicles. Of 112 cyclists who arrived on green when there was at least one left-turning car, but no opposing through traffic blocking it, 73 had to slow or stop to avoid a collision. Although these conflicts could be essentially eliminated using protected-only left turn phasing (turn on green arrow), common existing criteria prefer permitted left turns to reduce vehicular delay. A case study shows how, by considering multiple signalization alternatives, it can be possible to convert left turns to protected-only phasing without imposing a substantial delay burden on vehicles or other road users.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 431-441
Author(s):  
Syamsul Huda ◽  
Munifah ◽  
Muhamad Syazali ◽  
Syarifah Sri Rahayu ◽  
Rofiqul Umam

Purpose of the study: This study was conducted to determine the effect of the TSTS (Two Stay Two Stray) learning model, SAVI (Somatic, Auditory, Visualization, and Intellectually), and AIR (Auditory, Intellectually, Repetition) on the numerical abilities of students. The purpose of the study is to determine the effect of three models: TSTS, AIR, and SAVI. Methodology: Type research used in this study is quantitative research. The type of experiment used in this study is quasi-experimental method; the hypothesis test used is the one-way ANOVA test. Main Findings: The result of the research revealed that the data if TSTS combine with SAVI models there is no difference to increase the numerical abilities, but if one of TSTS or SAVI combines with the AIR model will give the best improvement to develop numerical abilities. Applications of this study: It can be implemented in the scope of education, educators or teachers can choose the right learning model adapted to the curriculum to improve the numerical abilities of students. This research can provide input in choosing the right model for the learning process with the applied curriculum. Provide an overview of the impact of each learning model used in influencing student abilities. Because in each learning model has advantages and disadvantages of each. Novelty/Originality of this study: The novelty of this study is to determine an effective learning model for students' numerical abilities. The learning model is the Two Stay Two Stray Learning, Somatic Auditory Visualization Intellectually Learning, and Auditory Intellectually Repetition learning models. Based on this research the reader can determine an effective learning model used to determine students' numerical abilities. The curriculum used is the 2013 curriculum. The application of learning models in the curriculum helps the learning process take place and improves students' numerical abilities.


Author(s):  
Yi Zhao ◽  
Rachel M. James ◽  
Lin Xiao ◽  
Joe Bared

Alternative intersection designs are increasingly proposed and adopted by different agencies to meet the needs of growing traffic demand and constrained transportation resources. The left turn (LT) is one of the most critical movements at signalized intersections from both a safety and operations perspective. Heavy LT volumes are especially impactful to the operational efficiency of a signalized intersection and often result in queue spillback. A contraflow left-turn pocket lane (CLPL) is proposed to mitigate congestion caused by heavy LT demand and has been shown in simulation to greatly mitigate the impact of queue spillback. The CLPL dynamically uses the opposing through lane (OTL) as an additional LT lane within the signal cycle on a temporary basis when the OTL is not occupied by through traffic. While geometric design schematics and analytical procedures for estimating delay have been proposed and discussed in existing literature, methodologies for estimating capacity benefits and traffic operations are not yet well defined. This paper has three primary contributions to the literature: development of a probabilistic capacity estimation model, exploration of the impact of key characteristics (e.g., cycle length, LT demand, lane selection preference) on estimated intersection capacity, and recommendations for the real-world implementation of a CLPL. The simulation results indicate that the CLPL treatment can increase a signalized intersection’s throughput up to 25% and decrease the intersection’s average delay by 35%.


Author(s):  
Husham N. Abdulsattar ◽  
Mohammed S. Tarawneh ◽  
Patrick T. McCoy ◽  
Stephen D. Kachman

Left- and right-turn movements at signalized intersections have been found to be three to six times more hazardous to pedestrians than through movements mainly because drivers fail to observe or yield the right of way to pedestrians. The objective was to evaluate the Turning Traffic Must Yield to Pedestrians sign, which was aimed at reminding turning motorists of their legal obligation to yield the right of way to pedestrians and, consequently, reducing vehicle-pedestrian conflicts. The sign was installed at 12 marked crosswalks in two cities, and vehicle-pedestrian conflict data were collected before and after its installation. The sign was effective in reducing left-turn conflicts 20 to 65 percent and right-turn conflicts 15 to 30 percent; both reductions were statistically significant at the 0.05 level. The sign was significantly more effective in reducing left-turn conflicts than it was for right-turn conflicts. Percentage conflicts between pedestrians and turning traffic decreased as the pedestrian group size increased. In other words, larger pedestrian group sizes encountered fewer conflicts with turning traffic. This result is true for both left- and right-turn movements, regardless of the presence of the sign. Based on the results of this study, it was recommended that the “Turning Traffic Must Yield to Pedestrians” sign be considered for inclusion in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices.


2006 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Sapia ◽  
Gábor Lövei ◽  
Zoltán Elek

Diversity relations among three stages of an urbanisation gradient were studied, using the Rényi scalable diversity index family and the Right Tail Sum (RTS) diversity. The rural areas were less diverse than either the urban or the suburban ones. The urban areas were more diverse considering the dominant species, while the suburban areas were more diverse considering the rare species. Next, we examined the impact of different sampling regimes on these diversity relations. A pulsating sampling method (sampling for 2 weeks every month) gave the same diversity ordering as continuous sampling. Further reduction in sampling period altered the diversity relations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document