The effects of translating the Multidimensional Sexuality Questionnaire from English to Mandarin: a test of reliability and validity

Sexual Health ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng Tao ◽  
Rosemary Coates ◽  
Yun Zhao ◽  
Bruce Maycock
Keyword(s):  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Northern China ◽  
Total Sample ◽  
Language Version ◽  
Sexual Esteem

Background In China, sexuality studies using validated psychosexual instruments are limited, with no valid Mandarin language version of a sexuality inventory with psychometric properties available for use. Thus, the Mandarin version of the Multidimensional Sexuality Questionnaire (M-MSQ), comprising four subscales, originating from the Multidimensional Sexuality Questionnaire, was tested for its psychometric properties. Methods: A convenience sampling technique was employed to recruit 200 oil workers (100 males and 100 females) in northern China. Originally, 158 participants (84 males and 74 females) completed the questionnaire; these accounted for 79% of the total study sample. From this group, a subsample of 50 participants (25 males and 25 females) was randomly selected to investigate the test–retest reliability. Of these, the responses of 33 participants (18 males and 15 females) were valid. The analysis on reliability was based on Cronbach’s α, Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) and the intraclass correlation coefficient, also including evaluation on criterion validity and discriminatory validity. Results: The M-MSQ was found to be homogeneous in factor structure, comparing well with the original questionnaire. Both the discriminatory validity and the criterion-related validity were satisfactory in the total sample and gender groups, in addition, the overall reliability of the M-MSQ was sound in internal consistency with Cronbach’s α = 0.900–0.931. The results of the test–retest showed that the stability of the M-MSQ achieved a positive statistically significant standard assessed by Pearson’s coefficient and the intraclass correlation coefficient. Conclusion: The M-MSQ is reliable in these four subscales, and may be used as a measure of sexual esteem, sexual conscious, sexual motivation and sexual satisfaction in Mandarin speakers.

Reliability and Validity of the Thai Version of the Carolinas Comfort Scale

2021 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 1784-1787
Keyword(s):  
Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Inguinal Hernia Repair ◽  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Internal Consistency Reliability ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Objective: To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Thai version of the Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS) to measure health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in post-hernia repaired patients. Materials and Methods: Three hundred twenty-eight patients that underwent the inguinal hernia repair procedure in Vajira Hospital were recruited in the present study. The Thai version of CCS (TCCS) was performed entirely by the patient, and the test-retest reliability was conducted at a 2-week interval. Results: The TCCS’s internal consistency reliability was excellent (Cronbach’s alpha 0.89). The inter-rater reliability was found to agree with the intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.90. The test-retest reliability over two weeks was high, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.92. Conclusion: The Thai version of CCS was found to have adequate reliability and validity and could be used to measure HRQoL in Thai patients that undergo inguinal hernia repair. Keywords: Reliability; Validity; Carolinas Comfort Scale; Thai version

scholarly journals Transcultural reliability and validity of an Italian language version of the Constant–Murley Score

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 186-191
Author(s):  
Matteo Carosi ◽  
Giovanni Galeoto ◽  
Stefano Di Gennaro ◽  
Anna Berardi ◽  
Donatella Valente ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Internal Consistency ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Italian Population ◽  
Good Reliability ◽  
Language Version ◽  
Shoulder Dysfunction ◽  
Constant Murley Score ◽  
Good Internal Consistency

Purpose: The present study was designed to carry out an Italian translation of the Constant–Murley Score (CMS-IT) and, subsequently, evaluate its reliability and validity. Methods: This study included adults diagnosed with any type of clinical shoulder dysfunction who could read and respond to the questionnaires. Those individuals who underwent surgeries of any kind on the affected shoulder during the previous 12 months and individuals with shoulder instabilities were excluded. All of the participants were evaluated by two operators, and the CMS-IT, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, and visual analog scale (VAS) were administered. The internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach’s α, whereas the intra-rater and inter-rater reliabilities were evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The validity of the construction was evaluated using Pearson’s correlation coefficient between the scores of the administered scales. Results: A population of 72 individuals participated in this study. The internal consistency of the CMS-IT showed a value of 0.81. The ICC values showed that inter- and intra-rater reliability were 0.994 and 0.963, respectively. CMS-IT is inversely correlated with the VAS (−0.55) and DASH (−0.47) scales. Conclusions: This study revealed that the CMS-IT contained good internal consistency and good reliability. The results suggested that the CMS-IT questionnaire is a reliable and valid tool for assessing the shoulder dysfunctions of the Italian population, and it deserves broad applications in both clinical practice and research contexts. The scale can also be used as an alternative to the current “gold standard” VAS and DASH.

scholarly journals The reliability and validity of goniometric elbow measurements in adults: A systematic review of the literature

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 274-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne F van Rijn ◽  
Elisa L Zwerus ◽  
Koen LM Koenraadt ◽  
Wilco CH Jacobs ◽  
Michel PJ van den Bekerom ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Interrater Reliability ◽  
Literature Search ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Diagnostic Reliability ◽  
Measuring Tool ◽  
Simple Measuring

Background The universal goniometer is a simple measuring tool. With this review we aimed to investigate the reliability and validity of the universal goniometer in measurements of the adults' elbow. Methods Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines were followed and our study protocol was published online at PROSPERO. A literature search was conducted on relevant studies. Methodological quality was assessed using the Quality Appraisal of Diagnostic Reliability (QAREL) scoring system. Results Out of 697 studies yielded from our literature search, 12 were included. Six studies were rated as high quality. The intrarater reliability intraclass correlation coefficient ranged from 0.45 to 0.99, the interrater reliability ranged from intraclass correlation coefficient 0.53–0.97. One study providing instructions on goniometric alignment did not find a difference in expert versus non-expert examiners. Another study in which examiners were not instructed found a higher interrater reliability in expert examiners. One study investigating the validity of the goniometer in elbow measurements found a maximum standard error of the mean of 11.5° for total range of motion. Discussion Overall, the studies showed high intra- and interrater reliability of the universal goniometer. The reliability of the universal goniometer in non-expert examiners can be increased by clear instructions on goniometric alignment.

Development and Validation of a Questionnaire to Measure Attitude change in Health Professionals after Completion of an Aboriginal Health and Cultural Safety Training Programme

2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (01) ◽  
pp. 24-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Courtney Ryder ◽  
Tamara Mackean ◽  
Shahid Ullah ◽  
Heather Burton ◽  
Heather Halls ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Professional ◽  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Attitude Change ◽  
Focal Point ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Weighted Kappa ◽  
Aboriginal Health ◽  
Cultural Safety

Socially accountable health curricula, designed to decrease Aboriginal health inequities through the transformation of health professional students into culturally safe practitioners, has become a focal point for health professional programmes. Despite this inclusion in health curricula there remains the question of how to best assess students in this area in relation to the concept, of cultural safety and transformative unlearning, to facilitate attitudinal change. To address this question, this study developed a research questionnaire to measure thematic areas of transformative unlearning, cultural safety and critical thinking in Aboriginal Health for application on undergraduate and postgraduate students and faculty staff. The Likert-scale questionnaire was developed and validated through face and content validity. Test–retest methodology was utilised to determine stability and reliability of the questionnaire with 40 participants. The extent of agreement and reliability were determined through weighted kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient. Exploratory factor analysis was calculated to determine construct validity for questionnaire items. For the overall population subset the tool met good standards of reliability and validity, with 11 of the 15 items reaching moderate agreement (κ > 0.6) and an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.72, suggesting substantial agreement. Cronbach's alpha was calculated above 0.7 for the thematic areas. The majority of items provided high factor loadings, low loading items will be reviewed to strengthen the tool, where validations of the revised tool with a larger cohort will allow future use to compare and determine effective teaching methodologies in Aboriginal health and cultural safety curricula.

The Neurologic and Adaptive Capacity Score Is Not a Reliable Method of Newborn Evaluation

2001 ◽  
Vol 94 (6) ◽  
pp. 958-962 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen H. Halpern ◽  
Judith A. Littleford ◽  
Nicole J. Brockhurst ◽  
Paul J. Youngs ◽  
Nariman Malik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adaptive Capacity ◽  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Obstetric Anesthesia ◽  
Measurement Scales ◽  
Health Measurement ◽  
Vertex Presentation ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Background The Neurologic and Adaptive Capacity Score (NACS) is a multi-item scale that was published in 1982 to measure the effects of intrapartum drugs on the neonate. Although this scoring system has been widely used in obstetric anesthesia research, studies confirming its reliability have not been published. The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of the NACS. Methods Two teams of observers were trained to perform the NACS on healthy, term neonates born in the vertex presentation. Two examinations were performed on each neonate within the first 2.5 h of life. Simultaneous (or "split-half") reliability was assessed using the alpha coefficient. Test-retest reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient. The test was considered to be reliable if a was greater than 0.7 and the intraclass correlation coefficient was greater than 0.6. Results Two hundred babies were studied. The a was 0.47 and the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.38 (95% confidence interval, 0.24-0.52). Conclusions The NACS had poor reliability both on simultaneous testing and in the test-retest situation when used to evaluate term, healthy neonates. The authors suggest that other measures need to be developed to evaluate the effect of intrapartum drug administration in the neonate. Health measurement scales should undergo rigorous assessment for reliability and validity before they are used in clinical practice or for research purposes.

scholarly journals Cultural adaptation to Brazil and psychometric performance of the “Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire”

2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 405-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karina Rospendowiski ◽  
Neusa Maria Costa Alexandre ◽  
Marilia Estevam Cornélio
Keyword(s):  
Construct Validity ◽  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Cultural Adaptation ◽  
Evidence Based Practice ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Measurement Instruments ◽  
Brazilian Version

Objectives To culturally adapt the instrument “Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire” (EBPQ) to the Portuguese language and assess its psychometric qualities. Methods The steps of cultural adaptation of measurement instruments were followed. Reliability was verified through internal consistency, stability by test-retest, and construct validity by the contrasted groups approach. Results High Cronbach’s alpha (0.91 to 0.68) and satisfactory Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (0.90) were obtained in all domains. In assessing construct validity, significant differences were found between groups of nurses with different backgrounds. Conclusion The steps of cultural adaptation of measurement instruments have been successfully completed. The Brazilian version obtained presents reliable psychometric properties for its use in this population.

Reliability and Validity of the Sit-to-Stand as a Muscular Power Measure in Older Adults

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 455-466 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer J. Sherwood ◽  
Cathy Inouye ◽  
Shannon L. Webb ◽  
Jenny O
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Handgrip Strength ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Negative Relationship ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Sit To Stand ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
The Relationship

The study aims were to analyze the reliability and validity of the GymAware™ linear position transducer’s velocity and power measures during the sit-to-stand, compared with the Dartfish 2D videography analysis, and to assess the relationship of age and handgrip strength with velocity and power in 48 older men and women (77.6 ± 11.1 years). The results showed excellent agreement between GymAware- and Dartfish-derived sit-to-stand velocity (intraclass correlation coefficient2-1 = .94 and power intraclass correlation coefficient2-1 = .98) measures. A moderate and negative relationship was found between age and velocity (r = −.62; p < .001) and age and power (r = −.63; p < .001). A moderate and positive relationship was found between handgrip strength and velocity (r = .43; p = .002) and handgrip strength and power (r = .54; p < .001). The results show the GymAware velocity and power measures during the sit-to-stand in older adults to be reliable and valid.

The Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Kaiser Physical Activity Survey for Pregnant Women

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
pp. 962-967
Author(s):  
Esra Uzelpasaci ◽  
Türkan Akbayrak ◽  
Serap Özgül ◽  
Ceren Orhan ◽  
Emine Baran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Test Retest Reliability ◽  
Activity Survey ◽  
Activity Questionnaire

Background: Evaluation of physical activity by condition-specific surveys provides more accurate results than generic physical activity questionnaires. The aim of this study was to investigate the reliability and validity of the Kaiser Physical Activity Survey (KPAS) in Turkish pregnant women. Methods: In the translation and cultural adaptation of the KPAS, the 6-phase guidelines recommended in the literature were followed. The study included a total of 151 pregnant women who were assessed using the Turkish version of KPAS, the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire, and the SenseWear Pro3 Armband. To determine the test–retest reliability, the KPAS was reapplied after 7 days. The psychometric properties of KPAS were analyzed with respect to internal consistency, test–retest reliability, and concurrent validity. Results: Cronbach α coefficient indicating the internal consistency of the Turkish KPAS was found to be .60 to .80, showing moderate reliability. The intraclass correlation coefficient for test–retest reliability was very strong (intraclass correlation coefficient: .96–.98). The total KPAS scores were found to be moderately correlated with the total Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire score and the total energy expenditure value on the SenseWear Pro3 Armband. Conclusions: This study showed that KPAS is a valid and reliable instrument for evaluating physical activity in Turkish pregnant women in different aspects.

scholarly journals Reliability and Validity of the Belt-Stabilized Handheld Dynamometer in Hip- and Knee-Strength Tests

2017 ◽  
Vol 52 (9) ◽  
pp. 809-819 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaqueline Martins ◽  
Janaina Rodrigues da Silva ◽  
Marcelo Rodrigues Barbosa da Silva; ◽  
Débora Bevilaqua-Grossi
Keyword(s):  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Minimal Detectable Change ◽  
Detectable Change ◽  
Isokinetic Dynamometer ◽  
Hip Muscle ◽  
Bland Altman Method ◽  
Muscle Groups

Context:  The belt-stabilized handheld dynamometer (HHD) has been used to assess the strength of knee- and hip-muscle groups. However, few researchers have examined its reliability and validity for assessing the strength of these muscles. Objective:  To evaluate the intra-examiner reliability of the belt-stabilized HHD and its validity and agreement with the isokinetic dynamometer for assessing the strength of knee- and hip-muscle groups. Design:  Cross-sectional study. Setting:  University laboratory. Patients or Other Participants:  We evaluated 26 healthy participants (13 men, 13 women; age = 23.5 ± 2.8 years, height = 1.7 ± 0.1 m, mass = 68.6 ± 12.4 kg) in 2 sessions using the belt-stabilized HHD and an isokinetic dynamometer for maximum strength of the hip adductors, abductors, flexors, extensors, internal rotators, and external rotators and the knee flexors and extensors. Main Outcome Measure(s):  We used reliability values provided by the intraclass correlation coefficient (2,3), standard error of measurement (SEM and percentage SEM), and minimal detectable change; correlation values comparing the belt-stabilized HHD and the isokinetic instrument using the Pearson correlation coefficient (r); and the mean difference in values comparing the 2 instruments using the Bland-Altman method. Results:  The intrarater HHD reliability was excellent for most measurements (range = 0.80–0.96; SEM = 1.3–5.3 kilograms of force or 4.8−18.9 Nm, percentage SEM = 7.0%–22.0%, minimal detectable change = 3.6–18.8 kilograms of force or 13.2−52.4 Nm) and was moderate only for bilateral knee flexion and left hip internal rotation (intraclass correlation coefficient [2,3] = 0.62–0.66 and 0.70, respectively). Correlation with the isokinetic dynamometer was moderate to high (r = 0.60–0.90), but the absolute values did not demonstrate concordance between results using the Bland-Altman method. Conclusions:  The belt-stabilized HHD measurements were reliable, and although they did not agree with those from the isokinetic dynamometer, the values were correlated for the hip- and knee-muscle groups.

scholarly journals Development and psychometric properties of the Thai Graves’ ophthalmopathy quality of life (GO-QOL) questionnaire

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mingkwan Lumyongsatien ◽  
Benjama Keeratidamkerngsakul ◽  
Kanokrat Pornpanich ◽  
Sumalee Vangveeravong ◽  
Preamjit Saonanon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Life Questionnaire ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Graves Ophthalmopathy

Abstract Purpose To develop and assess the psychometric properties of the Thai version of the Graves’ Ophthalmopathy Quality of Life (GO-QOL) questionnaire. Background Graves’ ophthalmopathy (GO) is a chronic condition that causes negative self-image and impaired visual function. These conditions impact quality of life (QOL) but are rarely documented. Graves’ Ophthalmopathy Quality of Life Questionnaire (GO-QOL) has good validity, reliability and responsiveness. In this study we developed a Thai GO-QOL questionnaire by translating the questionnaire from English to the Thai language and evaluated its reliability and validity. Patients and methods Forward and backward translations were performed independently by four translators with extensive experience in both English and Thai. Seventy patients at the thyroid clinic responded to the Thai translated version upon their first visit and again 2–3 weeks afterwards. Validity was assessed by the content validity index (CVI) and correlation with relevant clinical parameters. Reliability was evaluated by Cronbach’s alpha, the intraclass correlation coefficient, and the Bland-Altman plot. Results The Thai GO-QOL version showed high CVI (0.97) and a moderate negative correlation of the functional QOL score with disease severity (r = − 0.49), the clinical activity score (r = − 0.31), and exposure parameter (r = − 0.32). It showed good reliability with a high intraclass correlation coefficient (0.92) and high Cronbach’ s coefficient (0.86). Conclusion The Thai GO-QOL has good validity and reliability. It can be used to evaluate the quality of life of Graves’ ophthalmopathy patients as a consequence of their disease in thyroid treatment programs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document