scholarly journals DNA binding triggers tetramerization of the glucocorticoid receptor in live cells

2016 ◽  
Vol 113 (29) ◽  
pp. 8236-8241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diego M. Presman ◽  
Sourav Ganguly ◽  
R. Louis Schiltz ◽  
Thomas A. Johnson ◽  
Tatiana S. Karpova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Glucocorticoid Receptor ◽  
Rational Design ◽  
Quaternary Structure ◽  
Imaging Techniques ◽  
Steroid Receptor ◽  
Receptor Activation ◽  
Live Cells

Transcription factors dynamically bind to chromatin and are essential for the regulation of genes. Although a large percentage of these proteins appear to self-associate to form dimers or higher order oligomers, the stoichiometry of DNA-bound transcription factors has been poorly characterized in vivo. The glucocorticoid receptor (GR) is a ligand-regulated transcription factor widely believed to act as a dimer or a monomer. Using a unique set of imaging techniques coupled with a cell line containing an array of DNA binding elements, we show that GR is predominantly a tetramer when bound to its target DNA. We find that DNA binding triggers an interdomain allosteric regulation within the GR, leading to tetramerization. We therefore propose that dynamic changes in GR stoichiometry represent a previously unidentified level of regulation in steroid receptor activation. Quaternary structure analysis of other members of the steroid receptor family (estrogen, androgen, and progesterone receptors) reveals variation in oligomerization states among this family of transcription factors. Because GR’s oligomerization state has been implicated in therapy outcome, our findings open new doors to the rational design of novel GR ligands and redefine the quaternary structure of steroid receptors.

scholarly journals Distal substitutions drive divergent DNA specificity among paralogous transcription factors through subdivision of conformational space

2015 ◽  
Vol 113 (2) ◽  
pp. 326-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
William H. Hudson ◽  
Bradley R. Kossmann ◽  
Ian Mitchelle S. de Vera ◽  
Shih-Wei Chuo ◽  
Emily R. Weikum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Amino Acid ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Glucocorticoid Receptor ◽  
Binding Specificity ◽  
Conformational Space ◽  
Amino Acid Substitutions ◽  
Ancestral Gene ◽  
Response Elements ◽  
Binding Interface

Many genomes contain families of paralogs—proteins with divergent function that evolved from a common ancestral gene after a duplication event. To understand how paralogous transcription factors evolve divergent DNA specificities, we examined how the glucocorticoid receptor and its paralogs evolved to bind activating response elements [(+)GREs] and negative glucocorticoid response elements (nGREs). We show that binding to nGREs is a property of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) DNA-binding domain (DBD) not shared by other members of the steroid receptor family. Using phylogenetic, structural, biochemical, and molecular dynamics techniques, we show that the ancestral DBD from which GR and its paralogs evolved was capable of binding both nGRE and (+)GRE sequences because of the ancestral DBD’s ability to assume multiple DNA-bound conformations. Subsequent amino acid substitutions in duplicated daughter genes selectively restricted protein conformational space, causing this dual DNA-binding specificity to be selectively enhanced in the GR lineage and lost in all others. Key substitutions that determined the receptors’ response element-binding specificity were far from the proteins’ DNA-binding interface and interacted epistatically to change the DBD’s function through DNA-induced allosteric mechanisms. These amino acid substitutions subdivided both the conformational and functional space of the ancestral DBD among the present-day receptors, allowing a paralogous family of transcription factors to control disparate transcriptional programs despite high sequence identity.

scholarly journals Characterization of constitutive HSF2 DNA-binding activity in mouse embryonal carcinoma cells

1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (8) ◽  
pp. 5309-5317
Author(s):  
S P Murphy ◽  
J J Gorzowski ◽  
K D Sarge ◽  
B Phillips
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Heat Shock ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Embryonal Carcinoma ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Binding Activity ◽  
Hsp70 Promoter ◽  
Ec Cells

Two distinct murine heat shock transcription factors, HSF1 and HSF2, have been identified. HSF1 mediates the transcriptional activation of heat shock genes in response to environmental stress, while the function of HSF2 is not understood. Both factors can bind to heat shock elements (HSEs) but are maintained in a non-DNA-binding state under normal growth conditions. Mouse embryonal carcinoma (EC) cells are the only mammalian cells known to exhibit HSE-binding activity, as determined by gel shift assays, even when maintained at normal physiological temperatures. We demonstrate here that the constitutive HSE-binding activity present in F9 and PCC4.aza.R1 EC cells, as well as a similar activity found to be present in mouse embryonic stem cells, is composed predominantly of HSF2. HSF2 in F9 EC cells is trimerized and is present at higher levels than in a variety of nonembryonal cell lines, suggesting a correlation of these properties with constitutive HSE-binding activity. Surprisingly, transcription run-on assays suggest that HSF2 in unstressed EC cells does not stimulate transcription of two putative target genes, hsp70 and hsp86. Genomic footprinting analysis indicates that HSF2 is not bound in vivo to the HSE of the hsp70 promoter in unstressed F9 EC cells, although HSF2 is present in the nucleus and the promoter is accessible to other transcription factors and to HSF1 following heat shock. Thus trimerization and nuclear localization of HSF2 do not appear to be sufficient for in vivo binding of HSF2 to the HSE of the hsp70 promoter in unstressed F9 EC cells.

scholarly journals Differential Contribution of N- and C-Terminal Regions of HIF1α and HIF2α to Their Target Gene Selectivity

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (24) ◽  
pp. 9401
Author(s):  
Antonio Bouthelier ◽  
Florinda Meléndez-Rodríguez ◽  
Andrés A. Urrutia ◽  
Julián Aragonés
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Cellular Response ◽  
Target Gene ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Transactivation Domain ◽  
Transactivation Domains ◽  
Relative Contribution

Cellular response to hypoxia is controlled by the hypoxia-inducible transcription factors HIF1α and HIF2α. Some genes are preferentially induced by HIF1α or HIF2α, as has been explored in some cell models and for particular sets of genes. Here we have extended this analysis to other HIF-dependent genes using in vitro WT8 renal carcinoma cells and in vivo conditional Vhl-deficient mice models. Moreover, we generated chimeric HIF1/2 transcription factors to study the contribution of the HIF1α and HIF2α DNA binding/heterodimerization and transactivation domains to HIF target specificity. We show that the induction of HIF1α-dependent genes in WT8 cells, such as CAIX (CAR9) and BNIP3, requires both halves of HIF, whereas the HIF2α transactivation domain is more relevant for the induction of HIF2 target genes like the amino acid carrier SLC7A5. The HIF selectivity for some genes in WT8 cells is conserved in Vhl-deficient lung and liver tissue, whereas other genes like Glut1 (Slc2a1) behave distinctly in these tissues. Therefore the relative contribution of the DNA binding/heterodimerization and transactivation domains for HIF target selectivity can be different when comparing HIF1α or HIF2α isoforms, and that HIF target gene specificity is conserved in human and mouse cells for some of the genes analyzed.

scholarly journals Binding of disparate transcriptional activators to nucleosomal DNA is inherently cooperative.

1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 1405-1421 ◽  
Author(s):  
C C Adams ◽  
J L Workman
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Specific Binding ◽  
General Mechanism ◽  
Nf Kappa B ◽  
Nucleosomal Dna ◽  
Nucleosome Binding

To investigate mechanisms by which multiple transcription factors access complex promoters and enhancers within cellular chromatin, we have analyzed the binding of disparate factors to nucleosome cores. We used a purified in vitro system to analyze binding of four activator proteins, two GAL4 derivatives, USF, and NF-kappa B (KBF1), to reconstituted nucleosome cores containing different combinations of binding sites. Here we show that binding of any two or all three of these factors to nucleosomal DNA is inherently cooperative. Thus, the binuclear Zn clusters of GAL4, the helix-loop-helix/basic domains of USF, and the rel domain of NF-kappa B all participated in cooperative nucleosome binding, illustrating that this effect is not restricted to a particular DNA-binding domain. Simultaneous binding by two factors increased the affinity of individual factors for nucleosomal DNA by up to 2 orders of magnitude. Importantly, cooperative binding resulted in efficient nucleosome binding by factors (USF and NF-kappa B) which independently possess little nucleosome-binding ability. The participation of GAL4 derivatives in cooperative nucleosome binding required only DNA-binding and dimerization domains, indicating that disruption of histone-DNA contacts by factor binding was responsible for the increased affinity of additional factors. Cooperative nucleosome binding required sequence-specific binding of all transcription factors, appeared to have spatial constraints, and was independent of the orientation of the binding sites on the nucleosome. These results indicate that cooperative nucleosome binding is a general mechanism that may play a significant role in loading complex enhancer and promoter elements with multiple diverse factors in chromatin and contribute to the generation of threshold responses and transcriptional synergy by multiple activator sites in vivo.

scholarly journals Mechanism of Histone H1-Stimulated Glucocorticoid Receptor DNA Binding In Vivo

2008 ◽  
Vol 28 (21) ◽  
pp. 6730-6730
Author(s):  
Sergey Belikov ◽  
Carolina Åstrand ◽  
Örjan Wrange
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Glucocorticoid Receptor ◽  
Histone H1

scholarly journals c-Jun Homodimers Can Function as a Context-Specific Coactivator

2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. 2919-2933 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benoit Grondin ◽  
Martin Lefrancois ◽  
Mathieu Tremblay ◽  
Marianne Saint-Denis ◽  
André Haman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Basic Domain ◽  
Interaction Mode

ABSTRACT Transcription factors can function as DNA-binding-specific activators or as coactivators. c-Jun drives gene expression via binding to AP-1 sequences or as a cofactor for PU.1 in macrophages. c-Jun heterodimers bind AP-1 sequences with higher affinity than homodimers, but how c-Jun works as a coactivator is unknown. Here, we provide in vitro and in vivo evidence that c-Jun homodimers are recruited to the interleukin-1β (IL-1β) promoter in the absence of direct DNA binding via protein-protein interactions with DNA-anchored PU.1 and CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein β (C/EBPβ). Unexpectedly, the interaction interface with PU.1 and C/EBPβ involves four of the residues within the basic domain of c-Jun that contact DNA, indicating that the capacities of c-Jun to function as a coactivator or as a DNA-bound transcription factor are mutually exclusive. Our observations indicate that the IL-1β locus is occupied by PU.1 and C/EBPβ and poised for expression and that c-Jun enhances transcription by facilitating a rate-limiting step, the assembly of the RNA polymerase II preinitiation complex, with minimal effect on the local chromatin status. We propose that the basic domain of other transcription factors may also be redirected from a DNA interaction mode to a protein-protein interaction mode and that this switch represents a novel mechanism regulating gene expression profiles.

scholarly journals Phosphorylation of BATF regulates DNA binding: a novel mechanism for AP-1 (activator protein-1) regulation

2003 ◽  
Vol 374 (2) ◽  
pp. 423-431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher D. DEPPMANN ◽  
Tina M. THORNTON ◽  
Fransiscus E. UTAMA ◽  
Elizabeth J. TAPAROWSKY
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Leucine Zipper ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Activator Protein 1 ◽  
Basic Leucine Zipper ◽  
Activator Protein

BATF is a member of the AP-1 (activator protein-1) family of bZIP (basic leucine zipper) transcription factors that form transcriptionally inhibitory, DNA binding heterodimers with Jun proteins. In the present study, we demonstrate that BATF is phosphorylated in vivo on multiple serine and threonine residues and at least one tyrosine residue. Reverse-polarity PAGE revealed that serine-43 and threonine-48 within the DNA binding domain of BATF are phosphorylated. To model phosphorylation of the BATF DNA binding domain, serine-43 was replaced by an aspartate residue. BATF(S43D) retains the ability to dimerize with Jun proteins in vitro and in vivo, and the BATF(S43D):Jun heterodimer localizes properly to the nucleus of cells. Interestingly, BATF(S43D) functions like wild-type BATF to reduce AP-1-mediated gene transcription, despite the observed inability of the BATF(S43D):Jun heterodimer to bind DNA. These data demonstrate that phosphorylation of serine-43 converts BATF from a DNA binding into a non-DNA binding inhibitor of AP-1 activity. Given that 40% of mammalian bZIP transcription factors contain a residue analogous to serine-43 of BATF in their DNA binding domains, the phosphorylation event described here represents a mechanism that is potentially applicable to the regulation of many bZIP proteins.

scholarly journals A domain-resolution map of in vivo DNA binding reveals the regulatory consequences of somatic mutations in zinc finger transcription factors

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Berat Dogan ◽  
Senthilkumar Kailasam ◽  
Aldo Hernández Corchado ◽  
Naghmeh Nikpoor ◽  
Hamed S. Najafabadi
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Zinc Finger ◽  
Somatic Mutations ◽  
Eqtl Analysis ◽  
Context Aware ◽  
Dna Binding Specificity ◽  
Binding Data ◽  
Pan Cancer

ABSTRACTMulti-zinc finger proteins constitute the largest class of human transcription factors. Their DNA-binding specificity is usually encoded by a subset of their tandem Cys2His2 zinc finger (ZF) domains – the subset that binds to DNA, however, is often unknown. Here, by combining a context-aware machine-learning-based model of DNA recognition with in vivo binding data, we characterize the sequence preferences and the ZF subset that is responsible for DNA binding in 209 human multi-ZF proteins. We show that in vivo DNA binding is primarily driven by ∼50% of the ZFs – these DNA-binding ZFs are under strong selective pressure within and across species, and their mutations affect the expression of hundreds of genes as revealed by pan-cancer trans-eQTL analysis across 18 tissues. Among the genes affected by mutations in multi-ZF proteins, we identify several oncogenic factors regulated by SP1, and show that SP1 up-regulation in cancer promotes the expression of these genes while mutations in SP1 ZFs lead to their repression. Together, these analyses suggest that mutations in DNA-binding ZFs have distinct and widespread regulatory consequences that contribute to transcriptome remodelling in cancer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document