scholarly journals Cumulative mechanism of several major imatinib-resistant mutations in Abl kinase

2020 ◽  
Vol 117 (32) ◽  
pp. 19221-19227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Hoemberger ◽  
Warintra Pitsawong ◽  
Dorothee Kern

Despite the outstanding success of the cancer drug imatinib, one obstacle in prolonged treatment is the emergence of resistance mutations within the kinase domain of its target, Abl. We noticed that many patient-resistance mutations occur in the dynamic hot spots recently identified to be responsible for imatinib’s high selectivity toward Abl. In this study, we provide an experimental analysis of the mechanism underlying drug resistance for three major resistance mutations (G250E, Y253F, and F317L). Our data settle controversies, revealing unexpected resistance mechanisms. The mutations alter the energy landscape of Abl in complex ways: increased kinase activity, altered affinity, and cooperativity for the substrates, and, surprisingly, only a modestly decreased imatinib affinity. Only under cellular adenosine triphosphate (ATP) concentrations, these changes cumulate in an order of magnitude increase in imatinib’s half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50). These results highlight the importance of characterizing energy landscapes of targets and its changes by drug binding and by resistance mutations developed by patients.

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 2792-2792
Author(s):  
Sivahari P. Gorantla ◽  
Nikolas von Bubnoff ◽  
Christian Peschel ◽  
Justus Duyster

Abstract FIP1L1-PDGFR alpha is a constitutively activated protein kinase which was reported in chronic eosinophilic leukemia (CEL) and in cases of hypereosinophilic syndrome and mastocytosis with eosinophilia. Imatinib is clinically active against FIP1L1-PDGFRA positive disease. However, clinical resistance to imatinib has been observed in FIP1L1-PDGFRA positive leukemia and was shown to occur due to a secondary mutation (T674I) in the PDGFR alpha kinase domain. Using a screening strategy to identify imatinib resistant mutations, we generated numerous imatinib resistant cell clones. Analysis of the PDGFRA kinase domain in these cell clones revealed a broad spectrum of resistance mutations including the clinically reported exchange T674I. Interestingly, one of the abundant mutations was a Phe to Ser exchange at position 604 (F604S), which occurred alone or in combination with other exchanges. Surprisingly, FIP1L1-PDGFRA/F604S in contrast to D842H and F604+D842H did not increase the biochemical or cellular IC50 value to imatinib when compared to wild-type (wt). However, F604S and F604S+D842H transformed Ba/F3, NIH3T3 and mouse bone marrow more efficiently compared to wt and D842H, respectively. Also, F604S and F604S+D842H showed strong activation of Stat5, ERK and Akt compared to wt and D842H. Immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting indicated increased amounts of FIP1L1-PDGFRA protein in F604S versus wt cells. Moreover, SRC coimmunoprecipitated with FIP1L1-PDGFRA in wt, but not F604S cells. We hypothesized that F604S might interfere with FIP1L1-PDGFRA protein stability, and that SRC might be involved in this process. GST pull down experiments using SRC-SH2 domain showed lesser binding of FIP1L1-PDGFRA/F604S compared to wt. Similarly, using a GST-PDGFRA fragment, more SRC was precipitated with wt compared to F604S. Importantly both, the SRC inhibitor PD166326 and SRC siRNA mimicked the F604S phenotype and resulted in stabilization of the wt protein. Also, co-expression of SRC in 293T cells augmented degradation of wt, but not F604S FIP1L1-PDGFRA, indicating that SRC is a negative regulator of FIP1L1-PDGFRA protein stability. Similar results were obtained with an exchange in near proximity to F604. Kinase-defective SRC had no effect on FIP1L1-PDGFRA stability, indicating that kinase activity of SRC is necessary for its effect on FIP1L1-PDGFRA stability. Moreover, kinase defective FIP1L1-PDGFRA (G610R) was not degraded indicating that kinase activity of FIP1l1-PDGFRA is necessary for its own degradation. Taken together, imatinib resistance screening in FIP1L1-PDGFRA identified a novel class of resistance mutations, that do not act by impeding drug binding to the target, but rather increase target protein levels by interfering with its SRC mediated degradation.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 1739-1739
Author(s):  
Sivahari Prasad Gorantla ◽  
Nikolas von Bubnoff ◽  
Christian Peschel ◽  
Justus Duyster

Abstract Abstract 1739 FIP1L1-PDGFR alpha is a constitutively activated protein kinase which was reported in chronic eosinophilic leukemia (CEL) and in cases of hypereosinophilic syndrome and mastocytosis with eosinophilia. Imatinib is clinically active against FIP1L1-PDGFRA positive disease. However, clinical resistance to imatinib has been observed in FIP1L1-PDGFRA positive leukemia and was shown to occur due to a secondary mutation (T674I) in the PDGFR alpha kinase domain. Using a screening strategy to identify imatinib resistant mutations, we generated numerous imatinib resistant cell clones. Analysis of the PDGFRA kinase domain in these cell clones revealed a broad spectrum of resistance mutations including the clinically reported exchange T674I. Interestingly, one of the abundant mutations was a Phe to Ser exchange at position 604 (F604S), which occurred alone or in combination with other exchanges. Surprisingly, FIP1L1-PDGFRA/F604S did not increase the biochemical or cellular IC50 value to imatinib when compared to wild-type (WT FP). However, F604S and F604S+D842H transformed Ba/F3 and mouse bone marrow more efficiently compared to WT and D842H, respectively. Immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting indicated increased amounts of FIP1L1-PDGFRA protein in F604S versus WT cells. Pulse chase analysis revealed that FIP1L1-PDGFRA/F604S is strongly stabilized compared to WT. SRC coimmunoprecipitated with FIP1L1-PDGFRA in WT, but not F604S cells. Co-expression of SRC in 293T cells augmented degradation of WT, but not F604S FIP1L1-PDGFRA, indicating that SRC is a negative regulator of FIP1L1-PDGFRA protein stability. Importantly both, the SRC inhibitor PD166326 and SRC siRNA mimicked the F604S phenotype and resulted in stabilization of the WT protein. Importantly, phosphatase inhibitor treatment of FIP1L1-PDGFRA/F604S led to destabilization and SRC recruitment indicating that phosphatases might be responsible for the enhanced stability of FIP1L1-PDGFRA/F604S. In fact, coimmunuprecipitaion experiments identified the phosphatase SHP2 as a specific binding partner of F604S and mapping experiments revealed that the phosphatase domain of SHP-2 directly interacted with FIP1L1-PDGFRA/F604S but not with wt- FIP1L1-PDGFRA. Together, these results suggest that stabilization of FIP1L1-PDGFRA/F604S is due to dephosphorylation by SHP-2 leading to lesser activation of the SRC and Cbl mediated ubiquitination machinery. Finally a novel exchange (L629P) identified in imatinib resistance CEL patient also leads to the stabilization of FIP1L1-PDGFRA protein similar to F604S. This indicates that stabilization of FIP1L1-PDGFRA is a common mode of drug resistance in FIP1L1-PDGFRA positive HES or CEL. In summary, imatinib resistance screening identified a novel class of resistance mutations in FIP1L1-PDGFRA, that do not act by impeding drug binding to the target, but increased target protein stability and abundance by interfering with SRC- mediated degradation. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Matono ◽  
Masatomo Morita ◽  
Koji Yahara ◽  
Ken-ichi Lee ◽  
Hidemasa Izumiya ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Little is known about the evolutionary process and emergence time of resistance mutations to fluoroquinolone in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi. Methods We analyzed S. Typhi isolates collected from returned travelers between 2001 and 2016. Based on ciprofloxacin susceptibility, isolates were categorized as highly resistant (minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC] ≥ 4 μg/mL [CIPHR]), resistant (MIC = 1–2 μg/mL [CIPR]), intermediate susceptible (MIC = 0.12–0.5 μg/mL [CIPI]), and susceptible (MIC ≤ 0.06 μg/mL [CIPS]). Results A total of 107 isolates (33 CIPHR, 14 CIPR, 30 CIPI, and 30 CIPS) were analyzed by whole-genome sequencing; 2461 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were identified. CIPS had no mutations in the gyrA or parC genes, while each CIPI had 1 of 3 single mutations in gyrA (encoding Ser83Phe [63.3%], Ser83Tyr [33.3%], or Asp87Asn [3.3%]). CIPHR had the same 3 mutations: 2 SNPs in gyrA (encoding Ser83Phe and Asp87Asn) and a third in parC (encoding Ser80Ile). CIPHR shared a common ancestor with CIPR and CIPI isolates harboring a single mutation in gyrA encoding Ser83Phe, suggesting that CIPHR emerged 16 to 23 years ago. Conclusions Three SNPs—2 in gyrA and 1 in parC—are present in S. Typhi strains highly resistant to fluoroquinolone, which were found to have evolved in 1993–2000, approximately 10 years after the beginning of the ciprofloxacin era. Highly resistant strains with survival advantages arose from strains harboring a single mutation in gyrA encoding Ser83Phe. Judicious use of fluoroquinolones is warranted to prevent acceleration of such resistance mechanisms in the future.


2021 ◽  
Vol 118 (46) ◽  
pp. e2111451118
Author(s):  
Agatha Lyczek ◽  
Benedict-Tilman Berger ◽  
Aziz M. Rangwala ◽  
YiTing Paung ◽  
Jessica Tom ◽  
...  

Protein kinase inhibitors are potent anticancer therapeutics. For example, the Bcr-Abl kinase inhibitor imatinib decreases mortality for chronic myeloid leukemia by 80%, but 22 to 41% of patients acquire resistance to imatinib. About 70% of relapsed patients harbor mutations in the Bcr-Abl kinase domain, where more than a hundred different mutations have been identified. Some mutations are located near the imatinib-binding site and cause resistance through altered interactions with the drug. However, many resistance mutations are located far from the drug-binding site, and it remains unclear how these mutations confer resistance. Additionally, earlier studies on small sets of patient-derived imatinib resistance mutations indicated that some of these mutant proteins were in fact sensitive to imatinib in cellular and biochemical studies. Here, we surveyed the resistance of 94 patient-derived Abl kinase domain mutations annotated as disease relevant or resistance causing using an engagement assay in live cells. We found that only two-thirds of mutations weaken imatinib affinity by more than twofold compared to Abl wild type. Surprisingly, one-third of mutations in the Abl kinase domain still remain sensitive to imatinib and bind with similar or higher affinity than wild type. Intriguingly, we identified three clinical Abl mutations that bind imatinib with wild type–like affinity but dissociate from imatinib considerably faster. Given the relevance of residence time for drug efficacy, mutations that alter binding kinetics could cause resistance in the nonequilibrium environment of the body where drug export and clearance play critical roles.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 171-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piers Blombery ◽  
Ella Thompson ◽  
Tamia Nguyen ◽  
Xiangting Chen ◽  
Michelle McBean ◽  
...  

The BCL2 Gly101Val mutation may be acquired in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) treated with venetoclax (VEN), leading to reduced drug binding affinity and secondary resistance. In the majority of patients, the Gly101Val mutation is subclonal within the CLL compartment consistent with the presence of alternative resistance mechanisms in CLL cells not harboring the Gly101Val mutation. To date, two Gly101Val mutated patients have been identified with co-existing candidate resistance mechanisms in Gly101Val non-mutated cells; one with BCL-XL over-expression (Blombery et al, Cancer Discov., 2019) and another with a second subclonal candidate BCL2 resistance mutation - Asp103Tyr (Tausch et al, Haematologica 2019). Given the possibility of additional resistance mechanisms, we investigated patients with progressive CLL on VEN harboring the Gly101Val mutation for the presence of additional acquired resistance mutations in BCL2. Ten patients with progressive CLL on VEN with Gly101Val mutations were identified by sensitive allele-specific droplet digital PCR. To further assess for alternative BCL2 mutations in this cohort we performed ultra-deep amplicon-based next generation sequencing (NGS) (median depth ~50,000X) targeting BCL2. An amplicon variant caller (Canary) specifically designed for low level variant calling was used (Doig et al, BMC Bioinformatics, 2017). To achieve enhanced specificity we performed digital NGS with PCR error-correction using unique molecular indexes (UMI) (QiaSEQ Targeted DNA Panel). Given the high GC content of BCL2 we also used hybridization-based NGS using a custom targeted panel (Blombery et al, BJH 2017) combined with a sensitive unpaired variant caller (GATK4/Mutect2). In 7/10 (70%) patients, BCL2 mutations in addition to the Gly101Val were detected. Recurrent mutations (detected in more than one patient) were Asp103Tyr, Asp103Glu, Arg107_Arg110dup, and Val156Asp. All additional recurrent mutations were confirmed to be absent prior to commencing VEN (sensitivity 1% variant allele frequency[VAF]). Phase-analysis of NGS reads was consistent with the presence of the additional recurrent mutations on different alleles (and therefore cells, assuming heterozygosity) to both each other and to Gly101Val. Multiple addition recurrent mutations were observed in patients in the cohort with one patient harboring three recurrent mutations in addition to the Gly101Val (Asp103Tyr, Asp103Glu, Val156Asp). In multiple patients in the cohort, the VAF of non-Gly101Val mutations exceeded that of the Gly101Val mutation. Importantly, in all patients a significant (albeit variable) proportion of CLL cells were found to be BCL2 wild-type consistent with the presence of as yet unidentified resistance mechanisms unrelated to BCL2 mutations. In one patient, two additional non-recurrent mutations were observed (Ala113Gly and Arg129Leu) in addition to Gly101Val and Val156Asp. Again, all four mutations in this patient were observed to be in mutually exclusive NGS reads. Strikingly, all of the recurrent acquired BCL2 mutated residues identified in our cohort are situated in the BCL2 binding groove that binds VEN (Figure 1). The Asp103 codon in the P4 pocket is critical for VEN binding through hydrogen bonding between its sidechain and the azaindole moiety of VEN. The Asp103Glu mutation is noteworthy given that the equivalent residue to Asp103 in BCL-XL is a Glu, which reduces VEN binding to BCL-XL. The Val156 mutation situated at the base of the P2 pocket is close to the chlorophenyl moiety of VEN and a change to Asp in this position may disrupt VEN binding. Ongoing binding experiments and modeling in cellular systems will further elucidate the mechanism and contributions of these new recurrent mutations to VEN resistance. In summary, we have extended the landscape of acquired candidate resistance mutations occurring in patients treated with VEN to include four novel recurrent BCL2 mutations. Moreover, our data are consistent with the emerging observation of multiple acquired resistance mechanisms operating in different CLL cells in a single patient contributing to an "oligoclonal" pattern of clinical relapse on VEN therapy. Figure 1 - BCL2 protein structure surface bound to venetoclax (VEN) in orange. The Asp103Tyr, Asp103Glu and Val156Asp mutation sites are shown in red and Arg107_Arg110dup region in blue Disclosures Blombery: Janssen: Honoraria; Invivoscribe: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy. Anderson:Walter and Eliza Hall Institute: Employment, Patents & Royalties: Institute receives royalties for venetoclax, and I receive a fraction of these.. Seymour:Acerta: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy. Huang:Genentech: Patents & Royalties: DCSH is an employee of the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute which receives milestone and royalty payments related to venetoclax. Roberts:AbbVie: Other: Unremunerated speaker for AbbVie, Research Funding; Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Research Funding; Walter and Eliza Hall Institute: Patents & Royalties: Institute receives royalties for venetoclax, and I receive a fraction of these.; BeiGene: Research Funding.


Author(s):  
Pora Kim ◽  
Hanyang Li ◽  
Junmei Wang ◽  
Zhongming Zhao

Abstract More than 48 kinase inhibitors (KIs) have been approved by Food and Drug Administration. However, drug-resistance (DR) eventually occurs, and secondary mutations have been found in the previously targeted primary-mutated cancer cells. Cancer and drug research communities recognize the importance of the kinase domain (KD) mutations for kinasopathies. So far, a systematic investigation of kinase mutations on DR hotspots has not been done yet. In this study, we systematically investigated four types of representative mutation hotspots (gatekeeper, G-loop, αC-helix and A-loop) associated with DR in 538 human protein kinases using large-scale cancer data sets (TCGA, ICGC, COSMIC and GDSC). Our results revealed 358 kinases harboring 3318 mutations that covered 702 drug resistance hotspot residues. Among them, 197 kinases had multiple genetic variants on each residue. We further computationally assessed and validated the epidermal growth factor receptor mutations on protein structure and drug-binding efficacy. This is the first study to provide a landscape view of DR-associated mutation hotspots in kinase’s secondary structures, and its knowledge will help the development of effective next-generation KIs for better precision medicine.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14741-e14741
Author(s):  
Jun Zhao ◽  
Caixia Liu ◽  
Jianhua Chen ◽  
Likun Chen ◽  
Xinghao Ai ◽  
...  

e14741 Background: Patients (pts) treated with ALK inhibitors (ALKi) inevitably develops resistance. Diverse mutations (muts) confer resistance to ALKis, which may be related to the diverse types of ALK fusion. The objective of this study is to see whether the resistance mechanisms developed during ALKi therapy are ALK fusion types dependent. Methods: The mutation profiles of 38 pts with known ALK fusion partners and positions, who ordered NGS test in our institution after progressed on ≥ 1 ALKis, were analyzed. Results: Resistant muts in ALK kinase domain ( ALK resistant muts) were detected in 53% (20/38) of the resistant pts. 100% (1/1) of the EML4-ALK V5’ variant (V5’), 81% (13/16) of the EML4-ALK V3 variant (V3), 60% (3/5) of the non- EML4-ALK, 23% (3/13) of EML4-ALK V1 variant (V1), and 0% (0/3) of the EML4-ALK V2 variant (V2) had ALK resistant muts. ALK G1202R was detected in 29% of the pts. 100% (1/1) of the V5’, 50% (8/16) of the V3, 20% (1/5, HIP1-ALK) of the non- EML4-ALK, and none of the V1 (0/13) and V2 (0/3) had G1202R. Amplification and gain of function muts in oncogenes and loss of function muts in tumor suppressor gene were detected in 16% (6/38) of the pts, namely 4 V1, 1 V2, and 1 V3. On average, pts treated with 3rd generation ALKis had significantly more muts in ALK (7.5 vs. 3.6, p = 0.0008) and in all targeted regions (9.1 vs. 4.3, p = 0.0005) than pts treated with only 1st and 2nd generation ALKis. Conclusions: The type of resistance mechanisms developed during ALKi therapy may depend on the ALK fusion type of the pt. ALK resistant muts, especially G1202R, developed most frequently in V3/V5’, followed by non- EML4-ALK, and V1/V2, while amplification and grain of function muts in oncogenes and loss of function muts in tumor suppressor genes developed more often in V1/V2 than in V3/V5’. The 3rd generation ALKi may increase the genomic alterations in treated pts.


Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 1996-1996 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Azam ◽  
Valentina Nardi ◽  
William C. Shakespear ◽  
Robert R. Latek ◽  
Darren Veach ◽  
...  

Abstract The aberrant signaling behavior caused by the expression of BCR-ABL is necessary and sufficient to cause chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), an observation which paved the way for the development of imatinib (GleevecTM), a small molecule inhibitor of the BCR-ABL kinase. Enthusiasm for the remarkable efficacy of imatinib has been tempered by the development of clinical resistance. The most common mechanisms for resistance are the development of kinase domain mutations and/or overexpression of the BCR-ABL gene, with mutations in the kinase accounting for ~90 % of all cases. The resistance-conferring lesions are found in regions of the kinase that are critical to its autoregulation, such as P-loop, C-helix, gatekeeper area, activation loop and the SH2-C-lobe interface. Mechanistically, these mutations effect either a steric blockade or a change in the dynamic equilibrium that favors the active kinase conformation that precludes imatinib binding. We have analyzed two dual Src-Abl kinase inhibitors, AP23464 and PD166326, against 58 BCR-ABL kinase variants conferring imatinib resistance. PD166326 binds to the Abl kinase domain in the open although enzymatically inactive conformation, while AP23464 targets the active conformation. Both of these compounds have effectively suppressed the cell growth of imatinib resistance variants, except for a recurrent mutation in the gatekeeper residue (T315I). The P-loop variants are more sensitive to AP23464 than PD166326. Interestingly, the imatinib resistant variants from the C-helix, hinge region, activation loop and SH2-C-lobe region, are hypersensitive to both compounds, as compared to native BCR-ABL. The BCR-ABL variants in the C-helix, gatekeeper area, and the activation loop are more sensitive to AP23464 than PD166326, while variants from the hinge region and the SH2-C-lobe interface are hypersensitive to PD166326. Altogether, these results define a differential requirement for a specific ABL conformation for drug binding of AP23464 and PD166326. In order to better understand their structure activity relationships and the patterns of resistance, we carried out an in-vitro mutagenesis-screen using different concentration of the drug either alone or in combination with imatinib. AP23464 mediates 2–3 time less resistance than PD166326. A higher concentration of all three compounds suppresses all resistance mutations, save for the notable exceptions, T315I and F317L/VandC. Resistance conferring mutations selected at 10–20 fold higher IC50 values are different. AP23464 efficiently suppresses the mutations from the P-loop (except E255K) and two mutations from the activation loop, while PD166326 remains refractory to the mutations in the C-helix and SH2-C-lobe interface. In combination with imatinib, AP23464 and PD166326 suppressed the emergence of most resistance mutations, with the notable exception of T315I. These in-vitro studies demonstrate that the combination of two or three different conformation specific inhibitors is needed to suppress the emergence of resistance. We are characterizing variants of AP23464 that we predict will show activity against the most challenging imatinib resistance mutant T315I.


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 552-552 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael R. Burgess ◽  
Neil P. Shah ◽  
Brian J. Skaggs ◽  
Francis Y. Lee ◽  
Charles L. Sawyers

Abstract A novel dual SRC/ABL kinase inhibitor, BMS-354825, is showing promise for the treatment of imatinib-resistant chronic myeloid leukemia not only in vitro (Shah NP, et al., Science 305:399), but also in a phase I clinical trial (ASH abstract: Sawyers CL, et al.) Resistance to imatinib is increasingly found in patients due to point mutations in the BCR-ABL kinase domain that do not impair kinase activity but prevent drug binding. BMS-354825 is more potent than imatinib and retains activity against 14 of 15 imatinib-resistant BCR-ABL mutants in vitro. The compound’s ability to inhibit imatinib-resistant forms of BCR-ABL is presumed to be due to its relaxed binding requirements, whereas imatinib requires the adoption of a closed conformation of the kinase to bind. We addressed the hypothesis that the relaxed binding requirements of BMS-354825 would limit the range of BCR-ABL mutations that confer drug resistance. To address this question, we employed a saturation mutagenesis experiment as described by others (Azam M, et al., Cell 112:831) and found that the spectrum of BMS-354825-resistant mutants was reduced compared to that of imatinib. In a series of such screens, mutations at only four amino acids have been isolated, two of which account for the vast majority of resistant clones. In contrast, Azam et al. isolated over 20 mutations in a screen for imatinib resistance, a finding which has been generally reproduced in our lab. All four BMS-354825-resistant mutations map to known BMS-354825 contact residues as shown by co-crystallographic studies (ASH abstract: Tokarski JS et al., Bristol-Myers Squibb). Mutations at L248, T315, and F317 show BMS-354825 resistance and have been previously reported to confer imatinib resistance. Mutation at V299 represents a novel mode of resistance. Interestingly, some point mutations conferring BMS-354825 resistance were at positions known to be mutated in cases of imatinib resistance, but the mutated residues differed. Furthermore, the identity of the mutated residue was crucial in conferring sensitivity or resistance to an individual drug as shown by comparison of cellular IC50’s (see table). For example, F317L was shown previously to confer imatinib resistance. F317V, on the other hand, demonstrates relative BMS-354825-resistance but is still exquisitely sensitive to imatinib. In a screen for mutants simultaneously resistant to both drugs, we consistently recover 30–50 fold fewer mutant clones compared to single drug treatment. All such clones isolated to date encode for T315I. Kinase domain point mutation is becoming an increasingly encountered clinical problem in diseases treated with small molecule inhibitors. Our findings suggest that combination therapy with imatinib and BMS-354825 may be of clinical utility in CML, particularly by delaying the development of resistance. IC50 for growth (nM) Baf3 Clone imatinib BMS-354825 p210 wt < 1,000 < 5 T315I > 10,000 > 500 T315A 1,000 100 F317L 2,000 10 F317V < 1,000 60 V299L 1,000 20 L248R > 10,000 20


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agatha Lyczek ◽  
Benedict-Tilman Berger ◽  
Aziz M Rangwala ◽  
YiTing Paung ◽  
Jessica Tom ◽  
...  

Protein kinase inhibitors are potent anti-cancer therapeutics. For example, the Bcr-Abl kinase inhibitor imatinib decreases mortality for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) by 80%, but 22-41% of patients acquire resistance to imatinib. About 70% of relapsed patients harbor mutations in the Bcr-Abl kinase domain, in which more than a hundred different mutations have been identified. Some mutations are located near the imatinib binding site and cause resistance through altered interactions with the drug. However, many resistance mutations are located far from the drug binding site and it remains unclear how these mutations confer resistance. Additionally, earlier studies on small sets of patient-derived imatinib resistance mutations indicated that some of these mutant proteins were in fact sensitive to imatinib in cellular and biochemical studies (10). Here, we surveyed the resistance of 94 patient-derived Abl kinase domain mutations annotated as disease-relevant or resistance-causing using an engagement assay in live cells. We found that only two-thirds of mutations weaken imatinib affinity by more than two-fold compared to Abl wild type. Surprisingly, one-third of mutations in Abl kinase domain still remain sensitive to imatinib and bind with similar or higher affinity than wild type. Intriguingly, we identified a clinical Abl mutation that binds imatinib with wild type-like affinity but dissociates from imatinib three times faster. Given the relevance of residence time for drug efficacy, mutations that alter binding kinetics could cause resistance in the non-equilibrium environment of the body where drug export and clearance play critical roles.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document