scholarly journals The everyday reality of private security work in Sweden: negotiations at the front line of public order maintenance

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Cecilia Hansen Löfstrand
2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (12) ◽  
pp. 11
Author(s):  
Pooja Shankar ◽  
Dr. Poonam Rani

Life is very precious for everyone. Life needs proper care and nurture. Human life depends on society. Only in a good society we can find a good life.  Life is simple, very little is needed to make it happy. But social evils insist on making it complicated. Social evils in society have become a serious concern in the present day world. It is gradually affecting roots of our culture and its blocking its rapid growth on the global chart. The aim of writing this research paper is to highlight Social Evils in rural and urban societies. This research paper will explore the meaning, reason, effect of social evils in the light of the analysis of two novels of Kamala Markandaya, an Indian English writer. The research paper entitled ‘The portrayal of Social Evils in Kamala Markandaya’s Nectar in a Sieve and A Handful of Rice.’ In this paper, the effort is made to study Kamala Markandaya’s Social Evils in Nectar in a Sieve and A Handful of Rice. We will find poverty, hunger, starvation, beggary, prostitution, crime, unemployment and many more social evils in both novels. Kamala Markandaya’s A Handful of Rice and Nectar in a Sieve nothing but an account of the suffering of the rural and urban people, and how the cruelty of social evil resulting in suffering, death and misfortune is more explicit in both novels. Poverty is the everyday reality of the characters in the both novels.  Poverty is not an abstract concept that one can really think about, it’s like wolf at the door that must constantly be staved off. Both novels are a jolt to awaken the society against social evils.  


2019 ◽  
Vol 49 ◽  
pp. 50-56
Author(s):  
Hélène Lefebvre ◽  
Marie-Josée Levert ◽  
Maryse Larrivière ◽  
Michelle Proulx ◽  
Dan Lecocq

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1200-1218
Author(s):  
Barbara Bossak-Herbst ◽  
Małgorzata Głowacka-Grajper

In this article the memory narrations of regular visitors to the Służewiec Racetrack in Warsaw are analysed. This, the only one long-term operating horse racetrack in communist Poland, was an enclave within public space, called by racegoers, who are predominantly elderly men, an ‘oasis of freedom’ – distant from the everyday reality and the rules of the official socialist ideology. The intricacies of the memory of regular racegoers are considered in reference to a broader discussion on the phenomenon of ‘post-communist nostalgia’. The nostalgic narrations are not only connected with communism but also with the imaginations of inter-war period’s horseracing. The authors show that contemporary interpretations of the horseracing world in communist Poland in terms of a ‘paradise lost’ expresses not positive assessing of the past but rather the criticism of post-communist times, when Polish horseracing has impoverished. Although the betting pools are now low, the ritualized gambling, practiced within the space of the Warsaw racetrack, seems to restore among the regular racegoers a sense of being in contact with that past better world.


Childhood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 354-368
Author(s):  
Aatina Nasir Malik

In Kashmir, the entrenchment of political violence in the everyday has marked a shift from understanding Kashmiris as passive receivers of violence to agentic beings; however, much attention has not been paid to the experiences of children. Based on ethnographic fieldwork in one of the downtown neighbourhoods in Srinagar, this article would look at the everyday of children by focusing on their game playing. Analysing two games, that is, Military-Mujahid and PUBG (Player Unknown’s Battlegrounds), the article highlights how playing blurs the lines between spectacular and everyday, and actual and virtual/imaginary, establishing itself as a part of children’s everyday reality.


2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 227-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy J. Vogus ◽  
Claus Rerup

Achieving and sustaining superior relative performance is central to strategic organization research. Recently, strategic organization researchers have turned their attention to the broader set of people doing strategy work, how they do it, and what contributes to superior performance. We deepen this focus by arguing that operational activity on the front line is strategic. To illustrate how everyday operations become strategic, we draw on insights from high-reliability organizing to illustrate how leaders, through practices and behaviors, support a more strategic front line and a specific set of discursive practices known as mindful organizing. The everyday mindful work of front line operations is a crucial source of emerging opportunities and threats that underlie superior relative performance. We discuss the methodological implications of applying high-reliability organizing approaches to study strategic organization and how strategic organization research can broaden and enrich research on high reliability.


1984 ◽  
Vol 74 ◽  
pp. 20-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wilfried Nippel

One fundamental question is already implied in the use of the word ‘policing’. A glance at the scholarly literature shows that ‘policing’ is used in the context of Roman history with respect to the aediles and the tresviri capitales, or as an equivalent of magisterial coercitio; or it is applied to the vigiles, the cohortes urbanae or the cohortes praetoriae of the Principate as well as to the respective praefecti; and, of course, to the various controlling bodies and agents of the Later Roman Empire. This is at least partly due to the fact that the fundamental nineteenth-century works reflect a usage of ‘policing’ which oscillates between the description of a function, i.e. securing public order, on the one hand and the designation of a specialized agency to fulfil this function on the other hand. This is due to the fact that the establishment of a specialized law-enforcement apparatus only took place during the (eighteenth and) nineteenth century. The institutionalization of a professional police force represents a fundamental change in societal as well as individual attitudes towards and demand for public order. It may easily be overlooked that the indisputable gain in security and public order had to be paid for with a considerable loss of flexibility in the interaction between rulers and ruled (which was now mediated by a bureaucratic organization), and with an intensification of control and discipline in the everyday life of most members and strata of society.


INVENSI ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-22
Author(s):  
Iskandar Iskandar

Kartun merupakan salah satu bentuk dialektika tanda dalam kategori bahasa verbal dan nonverbal, yang membuat dirinya unik adalah karena karakternya yang menyimpang, lucu, bersifat satir atau menyindir, baik terhadap orang atau tindakannya. Sebagai salah satu bahasa politik, kartun telah menjadi instrumen pokok untuk menceritakan realitas, segala tindakan dalam kartun merupakan studi tentang tanda. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui metafora yang digunakan dalam kartun bertema korupsi. Metodologi penelitian yang digunakan adalah metodologi kualitatif, dengan pendekatan deskriptif, yaitu dimana data yang dikumpulkan adalah karya visual kartun G.M. Sudharta yang dibuat tahun 2012 untuk koran Kompas, dan yang dipublikasikan pada media sosial Facebook-nya. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa terdapatnya metafora yang sangat dominan dan beragam dalam kartun bertema korupsi yang menandakan terdapatnya proses yang kritis dalam memandang budaya komunikasi. Setiap kartunis menciptakan tokoh kartun fiktif sebagai identitas yang mewakili dirinya untuk menyampaikan opini, kritik, dan olok-olok terhadap sesuatu yang sedang berlaku dalam realitas sehari-hari. Selain itu, setiap kartunis memiliki keunikan dalam menyampaikan pesan, hal tersebut merupakan gaya yang dipengaruhi oleh latar belakangnya masing-masing. Cartoon is a form of dialectic sign in the category of verbal and nonverbal language, which makes it unique is that deviant character, humorous, satirical or sarcatic, either against the person or his actions. As one of the political languages, cartoons have become a staple instrument to communicate the reality, every action in cartoon are the study of signs. This study aims to determine the metaphor used in cartoons with the theme of corruption. The research methodology used is qualitative methodology, with descriptive approach, that is where the data collected is a visual work of cartoon G.M. Sudarta made in 2012 for Kompas newspaper, and published on social media Facebook. The results of this study indicate that there is a very dominant and varied metaphor in a corruption-themed cartoon that signifies the existence of a critical process in viewing the culture of communication. Each cartoonist creates a fictitious cartoon character as an identity representing him/herself to convey opinions, criticisms, and banter towards something that is prevailing in the everyday reality. In addition, each cartoonist is unique in conveying the message, it is a style influenced by their background.


Refuge ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Carastathis ◽  
Aila Spathopoulou ◽  
Myrto Tsilimpounidi

Different evocations of “crisis” create distinct categories that in turn evoke certain social reactions. After 2008 Greece became the epicentre of the “financial crisis”; since 2015 with the advent of the “refugee crisis,” it became the “hotspot of Europe.” What are the different vocabularies of crisis? Moreover, how have both representations of crisis facilitated humanitarian crises to become phenomena for European and transnational institutional management? What are the hegemonically constructed subjects of the different crises? The everyday reality in the crisis-ridden hotspot of Europe is invisible in these representations. It is precisely the daily, soft, lived, and unspoken realities of intersecting crises that hegemonic discourses of successive, overlapping, or “nesting crises” render invisible. By shifting the focus from who belongs to which state-devised category to an open-ended, polyvocal account of capitalist oppressions, we aim to question the state’s and supranational efforts to divide the “migrant mob” into discrete juridical categories of citi-zens (emigrants), refugees, and illegal immigrants, thereby undermining coalitional struggles between precaritised groups.


2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 34
Author(s):  
Jenna Nemec-Loise

This past November, I packed my bags and a big box of ALSC loot so I could take the Everyday Advocacy show on the road. Sure, I’d already presented oodles of times at ALA conferences and the 2014 ALSC Institute, but bringing workshops to front-line youth services librarians in their home states was a new thing for me.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document