The March 2021 Italian constitutional court ruling on surrogacy: a prelude to common European legislation for the sake of reproductive health?

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Simona Zaami ◽  
Alessandro Del Rio ◽  
Francesca Negro ◽  
Maria Cristina Varone ◽  
Susanna Marinelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Reproductive Health ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Court Ruling ◽  
European Legislation

scholarly journals PUTUSAN MK NO.22 /PUU-XV /2017 TENTANG PERMOHONAN JUDICIAL REVIEW PASAl 7 AYAT (1) UU NO. 1 TAHUN 1974 TENTANG USIA PERKAWINAN DALAM PERSPEKTIF MASLAHAH

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 72
Author(s):  
Samsul Hadi
Keyword(s):  
Reproductive Health ◽  
Judicial Review ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Life Safety ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Court Ruling ◽  
Right To Education ◽  
Age Limit ◽  
The Right ◽  
Age Of Marriage

The Decision of Constitutional Court Number. 22 / puu-XV / 2017 granted the request for a judicial review againt article 7 paragraph 1 (one) of cositution Number. 1 of 1974 concerning the age limit of marriage. This article actually distinguishes the age of marriage for women and men. For women at least 16 years and for men 19 years. This distinction is discrimination against women's rights as citizens and not in accordance with the principle of equality before the law as stated in article 12 paragraph 1 of the constitution 1945. This discrimination has caused some women to be forced to marry at the age of under 16 years, which is detrimental to the right to education, reproductive health and life safety. This court ruling gives hope for women to be better in the future. This decision is in accordance with the Purpose of Islamic law, to realize the benefit and keep away from damage.Artikel ini membahas tentang Putusan Mahkamah Konstutusi Nomor. 22/PUU-XV/2017  tentang Usia Perkawinan sebagai revisi terhadap Pasal 7 ayat 1( satu) undang-undang No. 1 tahun 1974 tentang batasan usia perkawinan. Pasal ini secara nyata membedakan  umur perkawinan bagi wanita dan laki-laki. Bagi wanita minimal 16 tahun dan bagi laki-laki 19 tahun.  Pembedaan ini merupakan diskriminasi terhadap hak-hak wanita sebagai warga negara dan tidak sesuai dengan prinsip kesamaan di depan hukum sebagimana yang disebutkan dalam pasal 27 ayat 1 UUD tahun 1945. diskriminasi ini berdampak sebagian wanita dikawinkan secara paksa pada umur di bawah 16 tahun, yang merugikan hak mendapatkan pendidikan, kesehatan reproduksi, dan keselamatan jiwa. putusan mahkamah ini memberikan harapan bagi wanita untuk lebih baik pada masa yang kan datang. hal ini sesaui dengan tujuan  dalam hukum Islam, merealisasikan kemaslahatan dan menjauhkan dari kerusakan.

scholarly journals AKIBAT HUKUM PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 69/PUU-XIII/2015 TERHADAP HAK TANAH PELAKU KAWIN CAMPUR

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jihan Khairunnisa
Keyword(s):  
Land Ownership ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Constitutional Rights ◽  
Court Ruling ◽  
Mixed Marriages ◽  
Ownership Of Land ◽  
To Receive

Land ownership for Indonesian citizens the result of mixed marriages without marriage agreement Indonesian citizen can only use the use rights and lease rights to buildings in the ownership of land. This study uses a normative juridical approach. It can be concluded that according to Law No. 5/1960 for Indonesian citizens, mixed marriages may own land with a status other than use rights and lease rights to buildings if there is a marriage agreement before or at the time of marriage. However, after the Constitutional Court ruling number 69 / PUU-XIII / 2015 gave a breath of fresh air for mixed marriages to still be able to receive their constitutional rights by making marriage agreements during the marriage.

scholarly journals Conscientious Objection to Abortion and Accommodating Women's Reproductive Health Rights: Reflections on a Decision of the Constitutional Court of Colombia from an African Regional Human Rights Perspective

2014 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. 183-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles G Ngwena
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Reproductive Health ◽  
Conscientious Objection ◽  
Fundamental Rights ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Conscientious Objector ◽  
Women’S Reproductive Health ◽  
The Right ◽  
Women's Reproductive Health ◽  
Health Rights

AbstractIf applied in isolation from the fundamental rights of women seeking abortion services, the right to conscientious objection can render any given rights to abortion illusory, including the rights to health, life, equality and dignity that are attendant to abortion. A transformative understanding of human rights requires that the right to conscientious objection to abortion be construed in a manner that is subject to the correlative duties which are imposed on the conscientious objector, as well as the state, in order to accommodate women's reproductive health rights. In recent years, the Colombian Constitutional Court has been giving a judicial lead on the development of a right to conscientious objection that accommodates women's fundamental rights. This article reflects on one of the court's decisions and draws lessons for the African region.

Romanian leaders will go further against rule of law

2018 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Political Elite ◽  
Economic Damage ◽  
Communist Country ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Court Ruling ◽  
Content Type ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Political Interference

Significance Iohannis had resisted Justice Minister Toader Tudorel’s request to remove Kovesi, the head of the National Anti-Corruption Directorate (DNA), but was undercut by a Constitutional Court ruling that he could only refuse on procedural grounds. A 15-year effort to remove the justice system from political interference is drawing to a close, making it far harder to subject the political elite to the rule of law. Impacts Romania may find it hard to avoid economic damage from the assault on the rule of law. The steep reverse in Europeanising this post-communist country will not easily be undone. Romania’s slide into being an illiberal and kleptocratic EU member will increase doubts about admitting similar applicant states.

Colombia court ruling will help extractives sector

2018 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Veto Power ◽  
Environmental Concerns ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Court Ruling ◽  
Armed Groups ◽  
Social Unrest ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Gold Mines ◽  
Local Municipalities ◽  
Alternative Means

Subject Mining referenda. Significance The Constitutional Court on October 11 ruled that popular consultations held by local municipalities or regions do not have veto power. This ruling is important as a series of popular consultations since 2016 have voted to suspend or cancel extractives projects, concerning both current and potential investors. The new ruling should provide greater stability for such projects but is likely to spark renewed frustration in the most affected regions. Impacts The ruling may encourage more companies to invest in the extractives sector, with positive implications for economic activity. Social unrest around extractives projects may increase with the removal of an electoral outlet for popular opposition. Environmental activism may increase with mining opponents using environmental concerns as an alternative means of halting projects. Non-state armed groups will present a continuing threat of violence and extortion for mining firms, particularly those with gold mines.

scholarly journals KEDUDUKAN KOMISI YUDISIAL DALAM SISTEM PENYELENGGARAAN PENGAWASAN KODE ETIK HAKIM PASCA PUTUSAN MK NO 43/PUU-XIII/2015

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 15
Author(s):  
Heru Nuswanto ◽  
Amri P. Sihotang,
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Code Of Conduct ◽  
Regulatory System ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Court Ruling ◽  
Basic Principles ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Constitutional System ◽  
Sense Of Justice

<p>Kedudukan komisi yudisial sebagai pengawas system peradilan di Indonesia di rasa sangat penting untuk menjadikan system peradilan di Indonesia professional dan berintegritas. Persoalan kemudian hadir pasca putusan <a href="http://kepaniteraan.mahkamahagung.go.id/kegiatan/1181-putusan-mk-no-43-puu-xiii-2015-proses-seleksi-hakim-tingkat-pertama-tidak-perlu-melibatkan-ky">MK No 43/PUU-XIII/2015</a> dimana dalam putusan menjadikan Komisi Yudisial tidak lagi sebagai pihak yang ikut serta mengawasi perekrutan hakim tingkat pertama. Padahal dalam system ketatanegaraan jika lembaga komisi yudisial peran dan fungsinya dibatasi akan menjadikan mahkamah agung sebagai lembaga absolute dalam kekuasaan yudikatif.</p><p>.</p><p>Pasca putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi <a href="http://kepaniteraan.mahkamahagung.go.id/kegiatan/1181-putusan-mk-no-43-puu-xiii-2015-proses-seleksi-hakim-tingkat-pertama-tidak-perlu-melibatkan-ky"> No 43/PUU-XIII/2015</a> tidaklah menjadi penghambat Komisi Yudisial dalam melakukan penegakan kode etik. Bahkan pada sisi lain Komisi Yudisial harus mampu melakukan penerobosan penafsiran bahwa putusan tersebut semata-mata memberikan ruang dan kedudukan Komisi Yudisial untuk merespon upaya kemerdekaan kekuasaan kehakiman yang secara mandiri dan merdeka akan tetapi harus sesuai real nilai-nilai pancasila dan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia dengan menempatkan Komisi Yudisial yang nantinya akan menguji idependensi hakim-hakim yang merupakan hasil seleksi dari Mahkamah Agung secara ketat dalam menjalankan tugas dan fungsinya sesuai dengan prinsip-prinsip dasar kode etik yang telah telah dicanangkan sesuai dengan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku.</p><p>Status of the Judicial Commission as the regulatory system in the sense of justice in Indonesia Sangat system makes for a review of integrity and professional judiciary in Indonesia. Present Problems then after the Constitutional Court ruling No. 43/PUU-XIII/2015 Where hearts Judicial Commission Decision making is NOT Again as parties Yang Participate oversee the recruitment of judges of first instance. Whereas hearts constitutional system if Institution Role and functions of the Judicial Commission shall be limited to make the Supreme Court as the Institute for Judicial power absolute hearts.</p><p>Post a Constitutional Court decision No. 43/PUU-XIII/2015 does not become an obstacle to the Judicial Commission in enforcing the code of conduct. Even on the other side of the Judicial Commission should be able to make a breakthrough interpretation that the decision merely provides the space and the position of the Judicial Commission to respond to the efforts of the independence of judiciary is independent and free but must be corresponding real values of Pancasila and the Constitution of the Republic Indonesia by placing the Judicial Commission which will examine idependensi judges were selected from the Supreme Court strictly in performing their duties and functions in accordance with the basic principles of the code of conduct that has been implemented in accordance with the legislation in force.</p>

scholarly journals KEWENANGAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM MENGADILI PERKARA PERSELISIHAN HASIL PEMILIHAN KEPALA DAERAH (SUATU KAJIAN TERHADAP PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 97/PUU-XI/2013 JO. PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 072-073/PUU-II/2004)

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 570
Author(s):  
Hardy Salim ◽  
Cut Memi
Keyword(s):  
Vice President ◽  
General Election ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Court Ruling ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
The Republic

Acccording to the Arrticle 24C paragaaph (1) the Constttution of thr Republic of Indonesia of 1945, the Constitutional Court of thr Republic of Indonesia have thr power to decide upon disputes over the results of general election. The general election referred to here is elections to elect members of the legislature, regional representative councils, regional legislatures, president amd vice president. Both of thr provisions have been limitative, so there will no be any other elections that included. However, in its development, the Constittutional Court of the Republc of Indonesia is given the power to decide upon disputes ovrr the results of regional hed elections with a legal basis of the Constittutional Court Ruling Number 072-073/PUU-II/2004. However, a litle later the Constttution Court of the Republic of Indonesia issued a Consttttuional Court Ruling Number 97/PUU-XI/2013 which said tht the Constitusional Court of the Republic of Indonesia can’t have the power to decide upon disputes over the resuls of regional hed elections. This reaises problems regarding whether regional head elections are included in thr general election regime? And whether the Constitutional Court of the Republic Indonesia has thr authorty to decide upon disputes over the results of regional hed elections? Thr Author examined the issue by normative method. The results of thr resrarch show tht thr regional hesd elections is not a part of the general electiins regime and the Constututional Corrt of the Republic Indonesia can’t have thr power to decide upon disputes ovrr thr resulls of the regional hesd elections.

scholarly journals Implementation Agreement By Mixed Marriage Based On Act No. 1 of 1974 Concerning Marriage After Constitutional Court Ruling No. 69 / PUU-XIII / 2015 (Study of Notary Role)

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 829
Author(s):  
Riyanto Riyanto ◽  
Arief Cholil
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Mixed Marriage ◽  
Court Ruling ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Mixed Marriages ◽  
Legal Implications ◽  
Ownership Rights

Abstract. The bride and groom's candidate before the marriage takes place, can make a "Marriage Agreement" to provide legal certainty related to property and for legal protection against third parties. Primarily for mixed marriages, the bride and groom are subject to two different legal systems according to their nationality. , the agreement made by the Marriage Agreement has been amended by the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number: 69 / PUU-XIII / 2015 dated October 27, 2016. The positive implication for the intermarriage is that it can have land rights in the form of Ownership Rights (HM) and Right to Build (HGB) without having to divorce first. Then, this research intends to discuss the practice of the Implementation of Mixed Marriage Agreements based on Act No. 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage after the decision of the Constitutional Court Number: 69 / PUU-XIII / 2015. The purpose of this study was to describe the role of the notary in the deed Mating Agreement and its implementation after the decision of the Court in question, and to know the legal implications of the couples in mixed marriages. The method in this research is juridical empirical research methods.Keywords: Mating Agreement; Marriage Commingling; Deed; Decision of the Constitutional Court; Marriage Act.

scholarly journals HOW MUCH MIGHT IS RIGHT? Application of Section 49 of the Criminal Procedure Act

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Traggy Maepa
Keyword(s):  
South African ◽  
Use Of Force ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
The State ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Court Ruling ◽  
The South ◽  
Standards Of Practice ◽  
The Law

In 1998 the South African parliament voted on the issue of the use of force when effecting an arrest, in order to bring standards of practice in line with the rest of the democratic world. Four years later the law still has not been signed by the state president, largely due to protests by the ministers of Justice and Constitutional Affairs and Safety and Security. The issue has been before the Constitutional Court and in May 2002, this court did what the executive was afraid to do, striking down parts of the Section and clarifying “reasonable force”. But the court ruling still did not go as far as the legislation in protecting citizens.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document