scholarly journals Implementation Agreement By Mixed Marriage Based On Act No. 1 of 1974 Concerning Marriage After Constitutional Court Ruling No. 69 / PUU-XIII / 2015 (Study of Notary Role)

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 829
Author(s):  
Riyanto Riyanto ◽  
Arief Cholil
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Mixed Marriage ◽  
Court Ruling ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Mixed Marriages ◽  
Legal Implications ◽  
Ownership Rights

Abstract. The bride and groom's candidate before the marriage takes place, can make a "Marriage Agreement" to provide legal certainty related to property and for legal protection against third parties. Primarily for mixed marriages, the bride and groom are subject to two different legal systems according to their nationality. , the agreement made by the Marriage Agreement has been amended by the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number: 69 / PUU-XIII / 2015 dated October 27, 2016. The positive implication for the intermarriage is that it can have land rights in the form of Ownership Rights (HM) and Right to Build (HGB) without having to divorce first. Then, this research intends to discuss the practice of the Implementation of Mixed Marriage Agreements based on Act No. 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage after the decision of the Constitutional Court Number: 69 / PUU-XIII / 2015. The purpose of this study was to describe the role of the notary in the deed Mating Agreement and its implementation after the decision of the Court in question, and to know the legal implications of the couples in mixed marriages. The method in this research is juridical empirical research methods.Keywords: Mating Agreement; Marriage Commingling; Deed; Decision of the Constitutional Court; Marriage Act.

scholarly journals Mechanism for collective property sharing in mixed marriage

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-80
Author(s):  
Siti Alfisyahrin Lasori
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Land Ownership ◽  
Mixed Marriage ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
Mixed Marriages ◽  
The Status ◽  
Ownership Rights

This research discusses the mechanism of sharing joint assets for mixed marriage partners. The results of the study illustrate the applicable provisions with the facts that occur in the community regarding land ownership for Indonesian husbands or wives in mixed marriages. The research method used in this research is normative research method. The statutory approach and the conceptual approach The statutory approach is an approach using legislation and regulations. And the conceptual approach is to refer to legal principles. These principles can be found in scholarly views or legal doctrines . This study aims to analyze the mechanism for sharing joint assets in marriage, is based on the prevailing laws and regulations and provides legal certainty for the husband or wife of Indonesian citizens regarding the status of land ownership in joint assets for mixed marriages. Based on the results of the research, a conclusion is obtained that land ownership for Indonesian citizens due to mixed marriages without being equated with land rights for their foreign partners, which is only limited to use rights. Legal certainty for current Indonesian citizens to be entitled to land with ownership rights.

scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM HAK ATAS TANAH ULAYAT MASYARAKAT HUKUM ADAT DI KABUPATEN MALUKU TENGGARA.

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 133-146
Author(s):  
Cornelia Junita Welerubun
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Land Dispute ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government ◽  
Ownership Of Land ◽  
Ownership Rights ◽  
The Relationship

Unalienated land dispute resolution in a way that is custom done by indigenous chiefs to resolve the dispute relating to customs. To resolve the disputes of indigenous chiefs hold a customary or sitting often known as judicial customs. The judicial nature of the Customs mediation, there is King as a mediator in it. The important role of indigenous chiefs of in dispute resolution is needed, this is because Community law is very respectful of indigenous chiefs. Legal protection must be viewed stages namely legal protection was born from a provision of the law and the rule of law given by a society that basically is the community's agreement to regulate the relationship between the behavior members of the society and between the individuals with the Government deemed to represent the interests of the community. Legal protection is not a true picture of the work function of the law itself that its purpose is not to provide other guarantees of fairness, expediency and also legal certainty. Legal protection will be more evident in the ownership of land rights is supported by the presence of certificate of land rights, as a means of proof of land ownership rights.

scholarly journals PENGARUH SERTIFIKAT HAK ATAS TANAH SEBAGAI ALAT BUKTI DALAM MENCAPAI KEPASTIAN HUKUM

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-43
Author(s):  
Abdul Muthallib
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right ◽  
Role Of The Government

This article discusses legal certainty as one of the objectives of Law No. 5 of 1960 concerning Agrarian (Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Pokok-Pokok Agraria) Principles and the influence of land rights certificates as a strong means of proof of land registration. The provision of guarantees of legal certainty to holders of land rights is accommodated in Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning Agrarian Principles and further regulated in Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration (Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah). Using a normative legal view, this article refers to regulations on agrarian. The discussion of the article looks at the role of the government in providing opportunities for all citizens to register land with the aim of obtaining legal certainty and minimizing disputes. This article looks at the purpose of issuing certificates in land registration activities so that right-holders can easily prove that they are the right-holders. This is done so that rights holders can obtain legal certainty and legal protection. However, the land rights certificate issued is considered to be still lacking in minimizing disputes and it is assumed that it has not affected the land rights owners to protect their rights.

scholarly journals Kepastian Dan Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pemegang Sertifikat Hak Milik Atas Tanah Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No.5 Tahun 1960 Tentang Peraturan Pokok-Pokok Agraria

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-84
Author(s):  
Jawakil Butarbutar
Keyword(s):  
Property Rights ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Basic Law ◽  
The People ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Government ◽  
Ownership Rights ◽  
Definite Role

This research is related to the Basic Agrarian Law which regulates land rights including property rights by registering the rights to their land to obtain ownership rights intended for maintain legal certainty and legal protection for holders of property rights over land. For this reason, it is important to socialize the importance of registering uncertified land to become certified land for legal certainty and protection of holders of property rights on the land to avoid land problems in the community. For this reason legal certainty and protection are needed so that the status of land owned by the people is clear as well as all actions taken relating to the land such as transfer, inheritance, transfer of rights, revocation / exemption and abolition of the land rights. With the certificate, the government has a definite role to provide legal protection to the  holders of property rights because the certified land has been registered at the landoffice and it becomes an obligation for the government to protect it. Keywords: Legal Certainty and Protection, Holders of Certificates of Ownership,  Agrarian Basic Law.

scholarly journals Legal Protection for Creditors in Money Loans Agreement Lending with Constitutional Court's Decision No. 69 / PUU-XIII / 2015

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 178
Author(s):  
Daniel Hendrawan ◽  
Christian Andersen ◽  
Theodora Novia Tjasa
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Third Parties ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Court Ruling ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Bad Faith ◽  
The Public ◽  
Legal Development ◽  
The Government ◽  
Legal Consequences

In Indonesia, the Marriage Agreement has long been valid and regulated in the legislation in Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage. Marriage Agreement regulates marriage property. In Article 29 paragraph (1) Law Number 1 Year 1974 concerning Marriage stipulates that marriage agreements must be made before the marriage takes place, but in 2015 the Constitutional Court issued Decision Number 69 / PUU-XIII / 2015 concerning changes to Article 29 paragraph (1), paragraph (3), and paragraph (4) of Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage which states that the Marriage Agreement can be made before, at the time of, and after the marriage takes place. The Constitutional Court ruling raises questions from various parties about how the legal consequences of the Marriage Agreement made after the marriage took place and what legal protection can be given to third parties on the Marriage Agreement which was made after the marriage took place. This study uses a normative juridical research method that is descriptive analytical based on the merging of primary, secondary and tertiary data acquisition. The results of this study indicate that the legal consequences of the Marriage Agreement made after the marriage took place will have legal consequences for the parties themselves, assets, and also for third parties. Legal protection that can be given to creditors is to pay attention to the element of good faith in each loan agreement making so that creditors will be protected by themselves, if one of the parties making the loan agreement has bad faith, the loan agreement will automatically be canceled law because it does not meet the objective requirements. The author's hope for this research is that the government can provide further regulation regarding the Constitutional Court Decision Number 69 / PUU-XIII / 2015 so that the public gets legal certainty in the implementation of the Decision and for the community the writer recommends restraint in carrying out the Decision until the regulation further from the government. Finally, the authors hope that this research can benefit the world of legal development in Indonesia.

scholarly journals JURIDICAL REVIEW OF RIGHT OF ACCESS TO LAND FOR INDONESIAN WOMEN CITIZEN WHO ARE BOUND BY MIXED MARRIAGE LAW (CASE STUDY DECISION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT NUMBER: 69 / PUU XIII / 2015)

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 222
Author(s):  
Achmad Sulchan ◽  
Nurmalia IW
Keyword(s):  
Secondary Data ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Mixed Marriage ◽  
District Office ◽  
Mixed Marriages ◽  
Access Rights ◽  
The Republic

ABSTRACTMixed marriages are marriages involving a race between nations, therefore, marriage is also subject to the principles applicable in the Indonesian Law and International Law. Mixed marriage has penetrated the whole of Indonesia . Notary role in making the deeds relating to pernjanjian marriage, inheritance etc.Dealing with the issue of marriage between men and women WNA WNA especially about women's access rights to land for the citizen and problems. Therefore, the authors take the title on the Juridical Review of the Acquisition of Land Rights for Women Bound citizen Mixed Marriage (Case Study No. Constitutional Court.69 / PUU XIII / 2015). The contents of the Constitutional Court about: Testing Law No. 5 of 1960 on the Basic Regulation and the Basic Agrarian Law No. 1 of 1974 on Marriage of the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia th 1945.Dalam decision mentions the Applicant, Ny. Ike Farida an Indonesian citizen. Applicant is a woman who is married to a Japanese national men by a valid marriage and are registered in the District Office of Religious Affairs Makasar East Jakarta Municipality No. 3948 / VII / 1995, the Civil Registry Office Prop. DKI Jakarta as defined in the Marriage Reports Receipt No. 36 / KHS / AI / 1849/1995/1999 dated May 24, 1999. Related to marriage, the applicant does not have marital separation agreement treasures, never abandoned his Indonesian citizenship and disenfranchised here at home. Applicant want to buy Flats in Jakarta, after the keel, towers not being handed over, and even then the purchase agreement terminated unilaterally by the developer. Then formulated the problems are: 1) What is the procedure of acquiring land rights for women citizens who are bound intermarriage? 2). Constraints and solutions that arise in obtaining the Women's Land Rights for citizens who are bound Mixed Marriage (Case Study No. Constitutional Court.69 / PUU XII / 2015)? As this study is sociological or empirical, in which the authors conducted a study which examined at first was secondary data, then resumed research on primary data in the field, or to society, an interview with the National Land Agency, notary, and two female citizens who marry foreigners. And examine the rules relating to mixed marriages, prevailing in Indonesia. The results showed the conclusion that the Notary has an important role in helping clients about: procedures for securing land rights for the citizen who is married to foreigners, namely the reduction in the rights, for example, from Properties menjaiHakPakai, the reduction in the rights of land owners. Constraints faced is the problem of domicile for male foreigners who are married to the citizen, and a couple of mixed marriages between Indonesian citizens and foreigners do not make a marriage agreement during their marriage. The solution is that if the land area can be divided into 2: 1/2; 1/2 for the wife, the land was downgraded to a Right of Use by registering at BPN, and made a covenant marriage.

Pelaksanaan Pencatatan Blokir Sertipikat Hak Atas Tanah (Studi di Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Sleman dan Bantul)

Tunas Agraria ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-135
Author(s):  
Anisa Sekarsari ◽  
Haryo Budhiawan ◽  
Akur Nurasa
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Land Dispute ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Recording Process ◽  
Potential Loss ◽  
The Government

Abstract: In order to give the assurance of legal certainty, certainty of rights and legal protection to holders and owners of land rights, the land registration shall be carried out. However, there is still a land dispute which now become a homework for The Government. This is because the certificate which should be a strong evidentiary can not guaranteed the legal certainty for the owner, so the person who right the land can blocking the certificate of land rights at Land Office. The issuance of Regulation Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial / Head of National Land Office Number 13 Year of 2017 concerning the Procedures of Block and Sita which expected to create uniformity, standardization in recording process and abolition of registration blocked, it turns out not all the rules can be implemented at The Land Office of Sleman and Bantul Regency.The result of this research shows that blocking certificate process at Sleman Land Office and Bantul Land Office have a policy that the applicant is required to pay the blocking recording fee after the blocking received. Makes a potential loss to the (PNBP) which should be owned by Land Office for faced the problem of KKPweb application which have not been able to accomodate the time period of blocking. Keywords : blocking certificate, blocking, registration blocked Intisari: Dalam rangka memberikan jaminan kepastian hukum dan kepastian hak serta perlindungan hukum kepada pemegang dan pemilik hak atas tanah, maka dilaksanakan pendaftaran tanah. Namun demikian, masih saja terjadi sengketa pertanahan yang saat ini menjadi pekerjaan rumah bagi Pemerintah. Hal ini disebabkan karena, sertipikat sebagai alat pembuktian yang kuat ternyata belum menjamin kepastian hukum pemiliknya sehingga pihak yang merasa berhak atas tanah tersebut dapat melakukan blokir sertipikat hak atas tanah di Kantor Pertanahan. Dikeluarkannya Permen ATR/Kepala Nomor 13 Tahun 2017 tentang Tata Cara Blokir dan Sita yang diharapkan bertujuan untuk mewujudkan keseragaman, standarisasi dalam pelaksanaan pencatatan dan penghapusan catatan blokir ternyata tidak semua peraturan tersebut dapat dilaksanakan di Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Sleman dan Bantul. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa pelaksanaan pencatatan blokir di kantor pertanahan Kabupaten Sleman dan Kabupaten Bantul terdapat kebijakan yaitu pemohon diwajibkan membayar biaya pencatatan blokir setelah blokirnya diterima membuat potensial loss terhadap (PNBP) yang seharusnya didapat kantor pertanahan untuk kendala yang dihadapi yaitu Aplikasi KKPweb yang belum dapat mengakomodir jangka waktu blokir. Kata Kunci: blokir sertipikat, pemblokiran, pencatatan blokir

scholarly journals The Basics of Good Faith and Good Intention in Land Purchase System in Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zaldi Pratama Bagus Putra
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Good Faith ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Binding Force ◽  
Land Title ◽  
Good Intention ◽  
The Right ◽  
Legal Consequences ◽  
Legal Procedures

The legal consequences of the issuance of the land title certificate whose application is made by a party who is not the right holder / owner is legally flawed. Issuance of a legally invalid certificate and no binding force and cancellation by the court. The defendant obtains a parcel of land through an auction, the auction is proven by photocopies of the auction object certificate, according to Article 21 of the 2016 Bidding Guidelines that the registered land auction must include an original certificate, so The Defendant did not go through the correct legal procedures. For the issuance of a double certificate for the same land field, the buyer of the land field loses the ownership certificate that is purchased by another party as a buyer with good intentions, because it has been carried out in accordance with the correct legal procedure, which means that the purchaser's certificate is guaranteed legal certainty. Legal protection for the purchaser of good land rights, that the buyer as a buyer has good intentions, with the issuance of the HGB certificate Number 181 Village / Cicau Village covering an area of ​​26,700 m2 in the name of the Defendant, is impaired, so that legal protection provided to the Plaintiff is filing an objection to the issuance HGB certificate to the Land Office as a preventive legal protection. 

scholarly journals AKIBAT HUKUM PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 69/PUU-XIII/2015 TERHADAP HAK TANAH PELAKU KAWIN CAMPUR

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jihan Khairunnisa
Keyword(s):  
Land Ownership ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Constitutional Rights ◽  
Court Ruling ◽  
Mixed Marriages ◽  
Ownership Of Land ◽  
To Receive

Land ownership for Indonesian citizens the result of mixed marriages without marriage agreement Indonesian citizen can only use the use rights and lease rights to buildings in the ownership of land. This study uses a normative juridical approach. It can be concluded that according to Law No. 5/1960 for Indonesian citizens, mixed marriages may own land with a status other than use rights and lease rights to buildings if there is a marriage agreement before or at the time of marriage. However, after the Constitutional Court ruling number 69 / PUU-XIII / 2015 gave a breath of fresh air for mixed marriages to still be able to receive their constitutional rights by making marriage agreements during the marriage.

scholarly journals Imunitas Hukum Bagi Notaris Yang Membuka Rahasia Jabatan

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 25
Author(s):  
Rita Permanasari ◽  
Akhmad Khisni
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Supervisory Board ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
The Political ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
The Law ◽  
Notary Public ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Law Regulation

ABSTRAKKetentuan Pasal 4 dan Pasal 16 ayat (1) huruf f Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris mewajibkan notaris untuk menjaga kerahasiaan segala sesuatu mengenai akta yang dibuatnya dan segala keterangan yang diperoleh guna pembuatan akta sesuai dengan sumpah janji jabatan kecuali undang-undang menentukan lain. Kemungkinan terhadap pelanggaran kewajiban tersebut berdasarkan Pasal 16 ayat (11) Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris, seorang notaris dapat dikenai sanksi berupa teguran lisan sampai dengan pemberhentian dengan tidak hormat. Terlebih lagi dengan adanya putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia dengan Nomor: 49/PUU–X/2012 memutuskan telah meniadakan atau mengakhiri kewenangan Majelis Pengawas Daerah (MPD) yang tercantum dalam Pasal 66 ayat (1) UUJN membuat notaris seakan-akan tidak ada perlindungan hukum bagi notaris dalam menjalankan tugas jabatannya. Ikatan Notaris Indonesia (INI) harus berusaha menjalankan peranan pembinaan dan perlindungan meningkatkan pengetahuan, kemampuan dan keterampilan para notaris. Demikian juga menjalin hubungan dengan para penegak hukum lainnya, agar penegak hukum lainnya yang ada hubungan dengan notaris dapat memahami kedudukan notaris sesuai UUJN.Berangkat dari pemikiran inilah kewajiban ingkar notaris masih tetap dipertahankan oleh pembuat undang-undang dalam revisi Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris Tahun 2014 yang merupakan konfigurasi kekuatan perlindungan terhadap profesi dan jabatan notaris dari sisi politik.Kata Kunci : Jabatan Notaris, Hak Ingkar, Perlindungan Hukum.ABSTRACTThe provisions of Article 4 and Article 16 paragraph (1) sub-paragraph f of the Notary's Office Law require a notary to maintain the confidentiality of all matters concerning the deeds it has made and all the information obtained for the deed in accordance with the oath of pledge of office except the law otherwise. The possibility of breach of such obligation under Article 16 paragraph (11) of Notary Law Regulation, a notary public may be subject to sanctions in the form of oral reprimands until dismissal with disrespect. Moreover, with the decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia with the number : 49 /PUU-X/2012 deciding to have canceled or terminated the authority of the Regional Supervisory Board (MPD) listed in Article 66 paragraph (1) UUJN made a notary as if there was no legal protection for a notary in performing duties. The Indonesian Notary Bond (INI) should endeavor to undertake the role of guidance and protection to increase the knowledge, abilities and skills of the notaries. Likewise establish relationships with other law enforcers, so that other law enforcement who has relationship with the notary can understand the position of notary under the UUJN.Departing from this thought the obligation of notarization is still maintained by the lawmakers in the revision of the Law Regulation of Position Notary on Year 2014 which is the configuration of the strength of the protection of the profession and the notary's position from the political side.Keyword : Position of Notary, Right of Remedy, Legal Protection.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document