scholarly journals RAN/TC4 mutants identify a common requirement for snRNP and protein import into the nucleus.

1996 ◽  
Vol 133 (3) ◽  
pp. 485-494 ◽  
Author(s):  
I Palacios ◽  
K Weis ◽  
C Klebe ◽  
I W Mattaj ◽  
C Dingwall
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Import ◽  
Protein Import ◽  
Energy Requirement ◽  
Dominant Negative ◽  
Negative Effects ◽  
Gtp Hydrolysis ◽  
Ran Gtpase ◽  
Common Component ◽  
Import Share

Kinetic competition experiments have demonstrated that at least some factors required for the nuclear import of proteins and U snRNPs are distinct. Both import processes require energy, and in the case of protein import, the energy requirement is known to be at least partly met by GTP hydrolysis by the Ran GTPase. We have compared the effects of nonhydrolyzable GTP analogues and two mutant Ran proteins on the nuclear import of proteins and U snRNPs in vitro. The mutant Ran proteins have different defects; Q69L (glutamine 69 changed to leucine) is defective in GTP hydrolysis while T24N (threonine 24 changed to asparagine) is defective in binding GTP. Both protein and snRNP import are sensitive either to the presence of the two mutant Ran proteins, which act as dominant negative inhibitors of nuclear import, or to incubation with nonhydrolyzable GTP analogues. This demonstrates that there is a requirement for a GTPase activity for the import of U snRNPs, as well as proteins, into the nucleus. The dominant negative effects of the two mutant Ran proteins indicate that the pathways of protein and snRNP import share at lease one common component.

scholarly journals Dominant Negative Mutants Implicate STAT5 in Myeloid Cell Proliferation and Neutrophil Differentiation

Blood ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 93 (12) ◽  
pp. 4154-4166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert L. Ilaria ◽  
Robert G. Hawley ◽  
Richard A. Van Etten
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Dominant Negative ◽  
Dominant Negative Effect ◽  
Cytokine Signaling ◽  
Transactivation Domain ◽  
Negative Effects ◽  
Murine Bone Marrow ◽  
Negative Effect

Abstract STAT5 is a member of the signal transducers and activation of transcription (STAT) family of latent transcription factors activated in a variety of cytokine signaling pathways. We introduced alanine substitution mutations in highly conserved regions of murine STAT5A and studied the mutants for dimerization, DNA binding, transactivation, and dominant negative effects on erythropoietin-induced STAT5-dependent transcriptional activation. The mutations included two near the amino-terminus (W255KR→AAA and R290QQ→AAA), two in the DNA-binding domain (E437E→AA and V466VV→AAA), and a carboxy-terminal truncation of STAT5A (STAT5A/▵53C) analogous to a naturally occurring isoform of rat STAT5B. All of the STAT mutant proteins were tyrosine phosphorylated by JAK2 and heterodimerized with STAT5B except for the WKR mutant, suggesting an important role for this region in STAT5 for stabilizing dimerization. The WKR, EE, and VVV mutants had no detectable DNA-binding activity, and the WKR and VVV mutants, but not EE, were defective in transcriptional induction. The VVV mutant had a moderate dominant negative effect on erythropoietin-induced STAT5 transcriptional activation, which was likely due to the formation of heterodimers that are defective in DNA binding. Interestingly, the WKR mutant had a potent dominant negative effect, comparable to the transactivation domain deletion mutant, ▵53C. Stable expression of either the WKR or ▵53C STAT5 mutants in the murine myeloid cytokine-dependent cell line 32D inhibited both interleukin-3–dependent proliferation and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)–dependent differentiation, without induction of apoptosis. Expression of these mutants in primary murine bone marrow inhibited G-CSF–dependent granulocyte colony formation in vitro. These results demonstrate that mutations in distinct regions of STAT5 exert dominant negative effects on cytokine signaling, likely through different mechanisms, and suggest a role for STAT5 in proliferation and differentiation of myeloid cells.

scholarly journals Two Isoforms of Npap60 (Nup50) Differentially Regulate Nuclear Protein Import

2010 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 630-638 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yutaka Ogawa ◽  
Yoichi Miyamoto ◽  
Munehiro Asally ◽  
Masahiro Oka ◽  
Yoshinari Yasuda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Import ◽  
Protein Import ◽  
Nuclear Protein ◽  
Time Lapse ◽  
Binding Assays ◽  
Vitro Binding ◽  
Importin Α ◽  
Nuclear Protein Import

Npap60 (Nup50) is a nucleoporin that binds directly to importin α. In humans, there are two Npap60 isoforms: the long (Npap60L) and short (Npap60S) forms. In this study, we provide both in vitro and in vivo evidence that Npap60L and Npap60S function differently in nuclear protein import. In vitro binding assays revealed that Npap60S stabilizes the binding of importin α to classical NLS-cargo, whereas Npap60L promotes the release of NLS-cargo from importin α. In vivo time-lapse experiments showed that when the Npap60 protein level is controlled, allowing CAS to efficiently promote the dissociation of the Npap60/importin α complex, Npap60S and Npap60L suppress and accelerate the nuclear import of NLS-cargo, respectively. These results demonstrate that Npap60L and Npap60S have opposing functions and suggest that Npap60L and Npap60S levels must be carefully controlled for efficient nuclear import of classical NLS-cargo in humans. This study provides novel evidence that nucleoporin expression levels regulate nuclear import efficiency.

scholarly journals Nuclear Import of IκBα Is Accomplished by a Ran-Independent Transport Pathway

2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 1571-1582 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shrikesh Sachdev ◽  
Sriparna Bagchi ◽  
Donna D. Zhang ◽  
Angela C. Mings ◽  
Mark Hannink
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Import ◽  
Nuclear Export ◽  
Dominant Negative ◽  
Dominant Negative Mutant ◽  
Nuclear Pore ◽  
Transport Pathway ◽  
Repeat Domain ◽  
Nuclear Export Receptor

ABSTRACT The inhibitor of kappa B alpha (IκBα) protein is able to shuttle between the cytoplasm and the nucleus. We have utilized a combination of in vivo and in vitro approaches to provide mechanistic insight into nucleocytoplasmic shuttling by IκBα. IκBα contains multiple functional domains that contribute to shuttling of IκBα between the cytoplasm and the nucleus. Nuclear import of IκBα is mediated by the central ankyrin repeat domain. Similar to previously described nuclear import pathways, nuclear import of IκBα is temperature and ATP dependent and is blocked by a dominant-negative mutant of importin β. However, in contrast to classical nuclear import pathways, nuclear import of IκBα is independent of soluble cytosolic factors and is not blocked by the dominant-negative RanQ69L protein. Nuclear export of IκBα is mediated by an N-terminal nuclear export sequence. Nuclear export of IκBα requires the CRM1 nuclear export receptor and is blocked by the dominant-negative RanQ69L protein. Our results are consistent with a model in which nuclear import of IκBα is mediated through direct interactions with components of the nuclear pore complex, while nuclear export of IκBα is mediated via a CRM1-dependent pathway.

scholarly journals Monoclonal Antibodies to NTF2 Inhibit Nuclear Protein Import by Preventing Nuclear Translocation of the GTPase Ran

2000 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 703-719 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susanne M. Steggerda ◽  
Ben E. Black ◽  
Bryce M. Paschal
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Pore Complex ◽  
Nuclear Import ◽  
Protein Import ◽  
Nuclear Translocation ◽  
Living Cells ◽  
Nuclear Accumulation ◽  
Nuclear Pore ◽  
Permeabilized Cells ◽  
Dependent Protein

Nuclear transport factor 2 (NTF2) is a soluble transport protein originally identified by its ability to stimulate nuclear localization signal (NLS)-dependent protein import in digitonin-permeabilized cells. NTF2 has been shown to bind nuclear pore complex proteins and the GDP form of Ran in vitro. Recently, it has been reported that NTF2 can stimulate the accumulation of Ran in digitonin-permeabilized cells. Evidence that NTF2 directly mediates Ran import or that NTF2 is required to maintain the nuclear concentration of Ran in living cells has not been obtained. Here we show that cytoplasmic injection of anti-NTF2 mAbs resulted in a dramatic relocalization of Ran to the cytoplasm. This provides the first evidence that NTF2 regulates the distribution of Ran in vivo. Moreover, anti-NTF2 mAbs inhibited nuclear import of both Ran and NLS-containing protein in vitro, suggesting that NTF2 stimulates NLS-dependent protein import by driving the nuclear accumulation of Ran. We also show that biotinylated NTF2-streptavidin microinjected into the cytoplasm accumulated at the nuclear envelope, indicating that NTF2 can target a binding partner to the nuclear pore complex. Taken together, our data show that NTF2 is an essential regulator of the Ran distribution in living cells and that NTF2-mediated Ran nuclear import is required for NLS-dependent protein import.

scholarly journals An Atp-Dependent, Ran-Independent Mechanism for Nuclear Import of the U1a and U2b′′ Spliceosome Proteins

2000 ◽  
Vol 148 (2) ◽  
pp. 293-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Hetzer ◽  
Iain W. Mattaj
Keyword(s):  
Adenosine Triphosphate ◽  
Nuclear Import ◽  
Nucleocytoplasmic Transport ◽  
Nuclear Fraction ◽  
Gtp Hydrolysis ◽  
Permeabilized Cells ◽  
Nuclear Localization Signals ◽  
Small Nuclear Ribonucleoprotein ◽  
Nuclear Ribonucleoprotein

Nuclear import of the two uracil-rich small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (U snRNP) components U1A and U2B′′ is mediated by unusually long and complex nuclear localization signals (NLSs). Here we investigate nuclear import of U1A and U2B′′ in vitro and demonstrate that it occurs by an active, saturable process. Several lines of evidence suggest that import of the two proteins occurs by an import mechanism different to those characterized previously. No cross competition is seen with a variety of previously studied NLSs. In contrast to import mediated by members of the importin-β family of nucleocytoplasmic transport receptors, U1A/U2B′′ import is not inhibited by either nonhydrolyzable guanosine triphosphate (GTP) analogues or by a mutant of the GTPase Ran that is incapable of GTP hydrolysis. Adenosine triphosphate is capable of supporting U1A and U2B′′ import, whereas neither nonhydrolyzable adenosine triphosphate analogues nor GTP can do so. U1A and U2B′′ import in vitro does not require the addition of soluble cytosolic proteins, but a factor or factors required for U1A and U2B′′ import remains tightly associated with the nuclear fraction of conventionally permeabilized cells. This activity can be solubilized in the presence of elevated MgCl2. These data suggest that U1A and U2B′′ import into the nucleus occurs by a hitherto uncharacterized mechanism.

scholarly journals Identification of Regulators for Ypt1 GTPase Nucleotide Cycling

1998 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 2819-2837 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Jones ◽  
Celeste J. Richardson ◽  
Robert J. Litt ◽  
Nava Segev
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Secretory Pathway ◽  
Small Gtpases ◽  
Dominant Negative ◽  
Rab Proteins ◽  
Nucleotide Exchange ◽  
Gtp Hydrolysis ◽  
Golgi Transport ◽  
Transport Assay

Small GTPases of the Ypt/Rab family are involved in the regulation of vesicular transport. Cycling between the GDP- and GTP-bound forms and the accessory proteins that regulate this cycling are thought to be crucial for Ypt/Rab function. Guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) stimulate both GDP loss and GTP uptake, and GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) stimulate GTP hydrolysis. Little is known about GEFs and GAPs for Ypt/Rab proteins. In this article we report the identification and initial characterization of two factors that regulate nucleotide cycling by Ypt1p, which is essential for the first two steps of the yeast secretory pathway. The Ypt1p-GEF stimulates GDP release and GTP uptake at least 10-fold and is specific for Ypt1p. Partially purified Ypt1p-GEF can rescue the inhibition caused by the dominant-negative Ypt1p-D124N mutant of in vitro endoplasmic reticulum-to-Golgi transport. This mutant probably blocks transport by inhibiting the GEF, suggesting that we have identified the physiological GEF for Ypt1p. The Ypt1p-GAP stimulates GTP hydrolysis by Ypt1p up to 54-fold, has a higher affinity for the GTP-bound form of Ypt1p than for the GDP-bound form, and is specific to a subgroup of exocytic Ypt proteins. The Ypt1p-GAP activity is not affected by deletion of two genes that encode known Ypt GAPs, GYP7and GYP1, nor is it influenced by mutations inSEC18, SEC17, or SEC22, genes whose products are involved in vesicle fusion. The GEF and GAP activities for Ypt1p localize to particulate cellular fractions. However, contrary to the predictions of current models, the GEF activity localizes to the fraction that functions as the acceptor in an endoplasmic reticulum-to-Golgi transport assay, whereas the GAP activity cofractionates with markers for the donor. On the basis of our current and previous results, we propose a new model for the role of Ypt/Rab nucleotide cycling and the factors that regulate this process.

scholarly journals Nuclear Localization Signal and Protein Context both Mediate Importin α Specificity of Nuclear Import Substrates

2006 ◽  
Vol 26 (23) ◽  
pp. 8697-8709 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beate Friedrich ◽  
Christina Quensel ◽  
Thomas Sommer ◽  
Enno Hartmann ◽  
Matthias Köhler
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Localization ◽  
Nuclear Import ◽  
Nuclear Localization Signal ◽  
Protein Import ◽  
Binding Studies ◽  
Vitro Binding ◽  
Importin Α ◽  
Localization Signal ◽  
Experimental Approaches

ABSTRACT The “classical” nuclear protein import pathway depends on importin α and importin β. Importin α binds nuclear localization signal (NLS)-bearing proteins and functions as an adapter to access the importin β-dependent import pathway. In humans, only one importin β is known to interact with importin α, while six α importins have been described. Various experimental approaches provided evidence that several substrates are transported specifically by particular α importins. Whether the NLS is sufficient to mediate importin α specificity is unclear. To address this question, we exchanged the NLSs of two well-characterized import substrates, the seven-bladed propeller protein RCC1, preferentially transported into the nucleus by importin α3, and the less specifically imported substrate nucleoplasmin. In vitro binding studies and nuclear import assays revealed that both NLS and protein context contribute to the specificity of importin α binding and transport.

scholarly journals The cytoplasmic filaments of the nuclear pore complex are dispensable for selective nuclear protein import

2002 ◽  
Vol 158 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tobias C. Walther ◽  
Helen S. Pickersgill ◽  
Volker C. Cordes ◽  
Martin W. Goldberg ◽  
Terry D. Allen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Pore Complex ◽  
Nuclear Import ◽  
Protein Import ◽  
Nuclear Localization Sequence ◽  
Nuclear Pore ◽  
Slight Reduction ◽  
Cytoplasmic Filaments ◽  
Localization Sequence ◽  
Importin Α

The nuclear pore complex (NPC) mediates bidirectional macromolecular traffic between the nucleus and cytoplasm in eukaryotic cells. Eight filaments project from the NPC into the cytoplasm and are proposed to function in nuclear import. We investigated the localization and function of two nucleoporins on the cytoplasmic face of the NPC, CAN/Nup214 and RanBP2/Nup358. Consistent with previous data, RanBP2 was localized at the cytoplasmic filaments. In contrast, CAN was localized near the cytoplasmic coaxial ring. Unexpectedly, extensive blocking of RanBP2 with gold-conjugated antibodies failed to inhibit nuclear import. Therefore, RanBP2-deficient NPCs were generated by in vitro nuclear assembly in RanBP2-depleted Xenopus egg extracts. NPCs were formed that lacked cytoplasmic filaments, but that retained CAN. These nuclei efficiently imported nuclear localization sequence (NLS) or M9 substrates. NPCs lacking CAN retained RanBP2 and cytoplasmic filaments, and showed a minor NLS import defect. NPCs deficient in both CAN and RanBP2 displayed no cytoplasmic filaments and had a strikingly immature cytoplasmic appearance. However, they showed only a slight reduction in NLS-mediated import, no change in M9-mediated import, and were normal in growth and DNA replication. We conclude that RanBP2 is the major nucleoporin component of the cytoplasmic filaments of the NPC, and that these filaments do not have an essential role in importin α/β– or transportin-dependent import.

scholarly journals The human SKA complex drives the metaphase-anaphase cell cycle transition by recruiting protein phosphatase 1 to kinetochores

eLife ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sushama Sivakumar ◽  
Paweł Ł Janczyk ◽  
Qianhui Qu ◽  
Chad A Brautigam ◽  
P Todd Stukenberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Phosphatase ◽  
Force Production ◽  
Dominant Negative ◽  
Protein Phosphatase 1 ◽  
Negative Effects ◽  
Checkpoint Signaling ◽  
Anaphase Onset ◽  
Spindle Microtubules ◽  
Cell Cycle Transition

The spindle- and kinetochore-associated (Ska) complex is essential for normal anaphase onset in mitosis. The C-terminal domain (CTD) of Ska1 binds microtubules and was proposed to facilitate kinetochore movement on depolymerizing spindle microtubules. Here, we show that Ska complex recruits protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) to kinetochores. This recruitment requires the Ska1 CTD, which binds PP1 in vitro and in human HeLa cells. Ska1 lacking its CTD fused to a PP1-binding peptide or fused directly to PP1 rescues mitotic defects caused by Ska1 depletion. Ska1 fusion to catalytically dead PP1 mutant does not rescue and shows dominant negative effects. Thus, the Ska complex, specifically the Ska1 CTD, recruits PP1 to kinetochores to oppose spindle checkpoint signaling kinases and promote anaphase onset. Microtubule binding by Ska, rather than acting in force production for chromosome movement, may instead serve to promote PP1 recruitment to kinetochores fully attached to spindle microtubules at metaphase.

scholarly journals 275.Calmodulin-dependent nuclear import pathway of the testis-determining factor SRY

2004 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. 275
Author(s):  
G. Kaur ◽  
A. Delluc-Clavieres ◽  
I. Poon ◽  
D. A. Jans
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Import ◽  
Protein Import ◽  
Fluorescent Protein ◽  
Fluorescent Proteins ◽  
Gonadal Development ◽  
Nuclear Accumulation ◽  
Related Factor ◽  
Testis Development ◽  
New Findings

Modulation of the nuclear entry of transcription factors (TFs) and chromatin components is a means by which eukaryotic cells can regulate gene expression in response to extracellular signals and the cell cycle during differentiation and development. TFs and chromatin components access the nucleus through nuclear localisation sequences (NLSs), which mediate interaction with components of the cellular nuclear import machinery, such as members of the importin superfamily. The Ca2+-binding protein calmodulin (CaM ) has previously been shown to bind at or near NLSs in several nuclear-localising proteins that have important roles in testis development including the Y chromosome-encoded HMG-domain-carrying chromatin remodelling factor SRY, and related factor SOX9, both of which are key regulators of gonadal development. SRY function in the nucleus of somatic cells of the fetal gonad, in particular, is essential for development of a testis in males. Here we present new findings implicating a role for CaM in modulating SRY nuclear accumulation, whereby treatment of transfected cells with CaM antagonists significantly reduces nuclear accumulation of green fluorescent protein (GFP)-fusion proteins encoding either full length SRY or the SRY HMG domain alone. An in vitro nuclear transport assay using bacterially expressed fluorescent proteins showed similar results, with native gel electrophoresis/fluorimaging and fluorescence polarisation assays, indicating direct binding of CaM to the SRY HMG domain in Ca2+-dependent fashion. Since clinical mutations resulting in sex reversal occur within SRY's CaM-binding NLS, these results may shed new insight into CaM-dependent pathways of nuclear protein import, and how this may relate to testis development.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document