scholarly journals Down-regulation of Delta by proteolytic processing

2002 ◽  
Vol 159 (2) ◽  
pp. 313-324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ketu Mishra-Gorur ◽  
Matthew D. Rand ◽  
Beatriz Perez-Villamil ◽  
Spyros Artavanis-Tsakonas
Keyword(s):  
Notch Signaling ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Notch Receptor ◽  
Proteolytic Processing ◽  
Receptor Expression ◽  
Cell Fate Decisions ◽  
Functional Assays ◽  
Local Cell

Notch signaling regulates cell fate decisions during development through local cell interactions. Signaling is triggered by the interaction of the Notch receptor with its transmembrane ligands expressed on adjacent cells. Recent studies suggest that Delta is cleaved to release an extracellular fragment, DlEC, by a mechanism that involves the activity of the metalloprotease Kuzbanian; however, the functional significance of that cleavage remains controversial. Using independent functional assays in vitro and in vivo, we examined the biological activity of purified soluble Delta forms and conclude that Delta cleavage is an important down-regulating event in Notch signaling. The data support a model whereby Delta inactivation is essential for providing the critical ligand/receptor expression differential between neighboring cells in order to distinguish the signaling versus the receiving partner.

Runx1 Is Required for Notch-Induced Specification of Megakaryocyte Development from Early Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 1370-1370
Author(s):  
Melanie G Cornejo ◽  
Thomas Mercher ◽  
Joseph D. Growney ◽  
Jonathan Jesneck ◽  
Ivan Maillard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Notch Signaling ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Stromal Cells ◽  
Gfp Expression ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Cell Fate Decisions ◽  
Insight Into ◽  
Megakaryocyte Differentiation

Abstract The Notch signaling pathway is involved in a broad spectrum of cell fate decisions during development, and in the hematopoietic system, it is known to favor T cell- vs B cell lineage commitment. However, its role in myeloid lineage development is less well understood. We have shown, using heterotypic co-cultures of murine primary hematopoietic stem cells (Lin-Sca-1+ckit+ HSCs) and OP9 stromal cells expressing the Notch ligand Delta1 (OP9-DL1), that Notch signaling derived from cell non-autonomous cues acts as a positive regulator of megakaryocyte fate from LSK cells. Bone marrow transplantation experiments with a constitutively active Notch mutant resulted in enhanced megakaryopoiesis in vivo, with increased MEP numbers and megakaryocyte colony formation. In contrast, expression of dnMAML using a conditional ROSA26 knock-in mouse model significantly impaired megakaryopoiesis in vivo, with a marked decrease in megakaryocyte progenitors. In order to understand the cellular differentiation pathways controlled by Notch, we first examined the ability of various purified progenitor populations to differentiate toward megakaryocytes upon Notch stimulation in vitro. We observed that CMP and MEP, but not GMP, can engage megakaryopoiesis upon Notch stimulation. Our results were consistent with expression analysis of Notch signaling genes in these purified progenitors and were supported by the observation that transgenic Notch reporter mice display higher levels of reporter (i.e. GFP) expression in HSC and MEP, vs. CMP and GMP in vivo. Furthermore, purified progenitors with high GFP expression gave rise to increased numbers of megakarocyte-containing colonies when plated in vitro compared to GFP-negative progenitors. In addition, further purification of the HSC population into long-term (LT), short-term (ST), and lymphoid-primed myeloid progenitors (LMPP) before plating on OP9-DL1 stroma showed that LMPP have a reduced ability to give rise to megakaryocytes compared to the other two populations. These data support the hypothesis that there is an early commitment to erythro/megakaryocytic fate from HSC prior to lymphoid commitment. To gain insight into the molecular mechanism underlying Notch-induced megakaryopoiesis, we performed global gene expression analysis that demonstrated the engagement of a megakaryopoietic transcriptional program when HSC were co-cultured with OP9-DL1 vs. OP9 stroma or OP9-DL1 treated with gamma-secretase inhibitor. Of interest, Runx1 was among the most upregulated genes in HSC co-cultured on OP9-DL1 stroma. To assess whether Notch signaling engages megakaryocytic fate through induction of Runx1, we plated HSC from Runx1 −/− mice on OP9-DL1 stroma. Compared to WT cells, Runx1 −/− HSC had a severely reduced ability to develop into CD41+ cells. In contrast, overexpression of Runx1 in WT HSC was sufficient to induce megakaryocyte fate on OP9 stroma without Notch stimulation. Together, our results indicate that Notch pathway activation induced by stromal cells is an important regulator of cell fate decisions in early progenitors. We show that Notch signaling is upstream of Runx1 during Notch-induced megakaryocyte differentiation and that Runx1 is an essential target of Notch signaling. We believe that these results provide important insight into the pathways controlling megakaryocyte differentiation, and may have important therapeutic potential for megakaryocyte lineage-related disorders.

scholarly journals Neoplastic Transformation by Notch Requires Nuclear Localization

2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (11) ◽  
pp. 3928-3941 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shawn Jeffries ◽  
Anthony J. Capobianco
Keyword(s):  
Plasma Membrane ◽  
Notch Signaling ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Rat Kidney ◽  
Neoplastic Transformation ◽  
Notch Signaling Pathway ◽  
Proteolytic Processing ◽  
Cell Fate Decisions

ABSTRACT Notch proteins are plasma membrane-spanning receptors that mediate important cell fate decisions such as differentiation, proliferation, and apoptosis. The mechanism of Notch signaling remains poorly understood. However, it is clear that the Notch signaling pathway mediates its effects through intercellular contact between neighboring cells. The prevailing model for Notch signaling suggests that ligand, presented on a neighboring cell, triggers proteolytic processing of Notch. Following proteolysis, it is thought that the intracellular portion of Notch (Nic) translocates to the nucleus, where it is involved in regulating gene expression. There is considerable debate concerning where in the cell Notch functions and what proteins serve as effectors of the Notch signal. Several Notch genes have clearly been shown to be proto-oncogenes in mammalian cells. Activation of Notch proto-oncogenes has been associated with tumorigenesis in several human and other mammalian cancers. Transforming alleles of Notch direct the expression of truncated proteins that primarily consist of Nic and are not tethered to the plasma membrane. However, the mechanism by which Notch oncoproteins (generically termed here as Nic) induce neoplastic transformation is not known. Previously we demonstrated that N1ic and N2iccould transform E1A immortalized baby rat kidney cells (RKE) in vitro. We now report direct evidence that N1ic must accumulate in the nucleus to induce transformation of RKE cells. In addition, we define the minimal domain of N1ic required to induce transformation and present evidence that transformation of RKE cells by N1ic is likely to be through a CBF1-independent pathway.

Suppressor of Hairless-independent events in Notch signaling imply novel pathway elements

Development ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 4265-4273 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Matsuno ◽  
M.J. Go ◽  
X. Sun ◽  
D.S. Eastman ◽  
S. Artavanis-Tsakonas
Keyword(s):  
Notch Signaling ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Notch Pathway ◽  
Notch Receptor ◽  
Signaling Mechanism ◽  
Independent Events ◽  
Suppressor Of Hairless ◽  
Local Cell ◽  
Mutant Phenotypes

The Notch (N) pathway defines an evolutionarily conserved cell signaling mechanism that governs cell fate choices through local cell interactions. The ankyrin repeat region of the Notch receptor is essential for signaling and has been implicated in the interactions between Notch and two intracellular elements of the pathway: Deltex (Dx) and Suppressor of Hairless (Su(H)). Here we examine directly the function of the Notch cdc10/ankyrin repeats (ANK repeats) by transgenic and biochemical analysis. We present evidence implicating the ANK repeats in the regulation of Notch signaling through homotypic interactions. In vivo expression of the Notch ANK repeats reveals a cell non-autonomous effect and elicits mutant phenotypes that indicate the existence of novel downstream events in Notch signaling. These signaling activities are independent of the known effector Su(H) and suggest the existence of yet unidentified Notch pathway components.

scholarly journals POS0042 NOTCH 1 INHIBITION INCREASES OSTEOCLAST PROGENITOR ACTIVITY IN THE MOUSE MODEL OF RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 226.3-226
Author(s):  
M. Filipović ◽  
A. Šućur ◽  
D. Flegar ◽  
Z. Jajić ◽  
M. Ikić Matijašević ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Notch Signaling ◽  
Neutralizing Antibodies ◽  
Osteoclast Differentiation ◽  
Notch Receptor ◽  
Notch 1 ◽  
Collagen Induced Arthritis ◽  
Notch Receptors

Background:Osteoclasts mediate periarticular and systemic bone loss in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Osteoclast progenitor cells (OCPs) derived from the myeloid lineage are susceptible to regulation through Notch signaling. Murine bone marrow and splenic OCPs, identified as CD45+Ly6G-CD3-B220-NK1.1-CD11blo/+CD115+CCR2+ cells, are specifically increased in arthritis. We previously identified an increased frequency of OCPs expressing Notch receptors in arthritic mice.Objectives:Several studies suggested that Notch signaling modulation affects the course of experimental arthritis. We aimed to determine the effects of Notch receptor signaling inhibition on OCP activity and arthritis severity in murine collagen-induced arthritis (CIA).Methods:Male C57/Bl6 and DBA mice were immunized with chicken type II collagen and treated with i.p. injections of anti-Notch 1 neutralizing antibodies (1mg/kg). Notch receptor 1 through 4 expression on OCPs was analyzed by flow cytometry in periarticular bone marrow (PBM) and spleen (SPL). Gene expression of Notch receptors, ligands and transcription targets as well as osteoclast differentiation genes RANK, cFos and cFms was determined by qPCR from tissues and sorted OCPs. FACS sorted OCPs were stimulated by osteoclastogenic factors (M-CSF and RANKL), in control, IgG, Jagged (Jag)1 or Delta-like (DLL)1 coated wells, with or without anti-Notch 1 antibodies. Research was approved by the Ethics Committee.Results:We confirmed the expression of Notch receptors on OCPs by flow cytometry with Notch 1 and 2 being most abundantly expressed (around 25% and 40% positive OCPs in PBM and 35% and 20% in SPL respectively), with a significant increase of Notch 2 expression in arthritis. Seeding OCPs on DLL1 coated wells significantly increased while seeding on Jag1 coated wells significantly decreased osteoclastogenesis as reflected on the number of TRAP+ osteoclasts and expression of osteoclast differentiation genes. The addition of anti-Notch 1 antibodies to ligand-stimulated OCPs resulted in an increased number of TRAP+ osteoclasts, partially reversing Jag1 inhibition. In vivo treatment with anti-Notch 1 antibodies did not affect total OCP frequency, but increased expression of Notch 4 both in PBM and SPL as seen by flow cytometry and qPCR. Additionally, anti-Notch 1 treatment stimulated Notch transcription factors HES and HEY. Both PBM and SPL cultured OCPs from anti-Notch 1 treated mice produced a higher number of large TRAP+ osteoclasts, doubling the area covered with osteoclasts in the latter compared to untreated mice. Increased osteoclastogenesis in vitro was further confirmed by an increased expression of osteoclast differentiation genes in the treated group.Conclusion:Our results confirm that Notch signaling may represent an important therapeutic target for the regulation of osteoclast activity in arthritis. Both in vitro and in vivo anti-Notch 1 neutralizing antibodies enhanced osteoclastogenesis in CIA model, implying an inhibitory role of Notch 1 signaling in osteoclast differentiation. As Notch 2 expression is increased on OCPs of arthritic mice, we next plan to determine the effects of Notch 2 neutralization on osteoclast activity and arthritis severity.References:[1]Ikić Matijašević M, Flegar D, Kovačić N, Katavić V, Kelava T, Šućur A, et al. Increased chemotaxis and activity of circulatory myeloid progenitor cells may contribute to enhanced osteoclastogenesis and bone loss in the C57BL/6 mouse model of collagen-induced arthritis. Clin Exp Immunol. 2016;186(3):321–35.[2]Šućur A, Filipović M, Flegar D, Kelava T, Šisl D, Lukač N, et al. Notch receptors and ligands in inflammatory arthritis – a systematic review. Immunology Letters 2020 Vol. 223, p. 106–14.Acknowledgements:The work has been supported by Croatian Science Foundation projects IP-2018-01-2414, UIP-2017-05-1965 and DOK-2018-09-4276.Disclosure of Interests:None declared.

scholarly journals The LINC complex transmits integrin-dependent tension to the nuclear lamina and represses epidermal differentiation

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma Carley ◽  
Rachel K. Stewart ◽  
Abigail Zieman ◽  
Iman Jalilian ◽  
Diane. E. King ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Fate ◽  
Control Cell ◽  
Nuclear Lamina ◽  
Epidermal Differentiation ◽  
Keratinocyte Differentiation ◽  
Linc Complex ◽  
Force Transmission ◽  
Cell Fate Decisions

AbstractWhile the mechanisms by which chemical signals control cell fate have been well studied, how mechanical inputs impact cell fate decisions are not well understood. Here, using the well-defined system of keratinocyte differentiation in the skin, we examine whether and how direct force transmission to the nucleus regulates epidermal cell fate. Using a molecular biosensor, we find that tension on the nucleus through Linker of Nucleoskeleton and Cytoskeleton (LINC) complexes requires integrin engagement in undifferentiated epidermal stem cells, and is released during differentiation concomitant with decreased tension on A-type lamins. LINC complex ablation in mice reveals that LINC complexes are required to repress epidermal differentiation in vivo and in vitro and influence accessibility of epidermal differentiation genes, suggesting that force transduction from engaged integrins to the nucleus plays a role in maintaining keratinocyte progenitors. This work reveals a direct mechanotransduction pathway capable of relaying adhesion-specific signals to regulate cell fate.

scholarly journals Estrogen Signaling Drives Ciliogenesis in Human Endometrial Organoids

Endocrinology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 160 (10) ◽  
pp. 2282-2297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra Haider ◽  
Magdalena Gamperl ◽  
Thomas R Burkard ◽  
Victoria Kunihs ◽  
Ulrich Kaindl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Notch Signaling ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Estrogen Signaling ◽  
Ciliated Cells ◽  
Cell Fate Decisions ◽  
Primary Driver ◽  
Endometrial Epithelium ◽  
Cyclic Changes

Abstract The human endometrium is the inner lining of the uterus consisting of stromal and epithelial (secretory and ciliated) cells. It undergoes a hormonally regulated monthly cycle of growth, differentiation, and desquamation. However, how these cyclic changes control the balance between secretory and ciliated cells remains unclear. Here, we established endometrial organoids to investigate the estrogen (E2)-driven control of cell fate decisions in human endometrial epithelium. We demonstrate that they preserve the structure, expression patterns, secretory properties, and E2 responsiveness of their tissue of origin. Next, we show that the induction of ciliated cells is orchestrated by the coordinated action of E2 and NOTCH signaling. Although E2 is the primary driver, inhibition of NOTCH signaling provides a permissive environment. However, inhibition of NOTCH alone is not sufficient to trigger ciliogenesis. Overall, we provide insights into endometrial biology and propose endometrial organoids as a robust and powerful model for studying ciliogenesis in vitro.

scholarly journals Ero1L, a thiol oxidase, is required for Notch signaling through cysteine bridge formation of the Lin12-Notch repeats in Drosophila melanogaster

2008 ◽  
Vol 182 (6) ◽  
pp. 1113-1125 ◽  
Author(s):  
An-Chi Tien ◽  
Akhila Rajan ◽  
Karen L. Schulze ◽  
Hyung Don Ryoo ◽  
Melih Acar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Notch Signaling ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Disulfide Bonds ◽  
Cell Communication ◽  
Notch Receptor ◽  
Cell Fate Decisions ◽  
Unfolded Protein ◽  
Thiol Oxidase ◽  
The Unfolded Protein Response

Notch-mediated cell–cell communication regulates numerous developmental processes and cell fate decisions. Through a mosaic genetic screen in Drosophila melanogaster, we identified a role in Notch signaling for a conserved thiol oxidase, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) oxidoreductin 1–like (Ero1L). Although Ero1L is reported to play a widespread role in protein folding in yeast, in flies Ero1L mutant clones show specific defects in lateral inhibition and inductive signaling, two characteristic processes regulated by Notch signaling. Ero1L mutant cells accumulate high levels of Notch protein in the ER and induce the unfolded protein response, suggesting that Notch is misfolded and fails to be exported from the ER. Biochemical assays demonstrate that Ero1L is required for formation of disulfide bonds of three Lin12-Notch repeats (LNRs) present in the extracellular domain of Notch. These LNRs are unique to the Notch family of proteins. Therefore, we have uncovered an unexpected requirement for Ero1L in the maturation of the Notch receptor.

Notch-Dependent Control of Blood Lineage Development is Modified by Fucosylation

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 2448-2448
Author(s):  
Lan Zhou ◽  
Quanjian Yan ◽  
David Yao ◽  
Lebing W Li ◽  
Stanton L. Gerson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ligand Binding ◽  
Notch Signaling ◽  
Es Cells ◽  
Notch Receptor ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Notch Ligand ◽  
Hematopoietic Reconstitution ◽  
Myeloid Development

Abstract Notch receptors are conserved cell surface molecules essential for hematopoietic cell fate determination. Activated Notch enhances self-renewal of hematopoietic stem cells and promotes T lymphopoiesis. O-linked fucose moieties attached to the EGF domains of Notch receptors and its modification by Fringe can strongly modulate Notch signaling. Our recently published results indicate that Notch-dependent signaling controls myelopoiesis both in vitro and in vivo, and identify a requirement for Notch fucosylation in the expression of Notch ligand binding activity and Notch signaling efficiency in hematopoietic progenitor cells. In the current study, we tested the hypothesis that fucosylation controlled Notch signaling regulates hematopoietic lineage homeostasis. Genetically-modified mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells deficient in Notch1 receptor (NOTCH1−/−) or pofut1 (POFUT1−/−) that controls O-fucose modification of Notch receptor EGF repeats are studied in an in vitro co-culture assay with Notch ligand-expressing OP9 cells. Activation of Notch in wild type ES cells promotes T lymphopoiesis, while exposure of NOTCH1−/− or POFUT1−/− ES cells to Notch ligand failed to generate T lymphocytes but sustained granulocytic production. When probed with recombinant Notch ligand Dll1 or Dll4, hematopoietic cells derived from wild type ES line displayed robust Notch ligand binding, but cells from NOTCH1−/− or POFUT1−/− ES lines showed completely absent or reduced Notch ligand interaction, respectively. In comparison, ES cells deficient in pofut2 (POFUT2−/−) that controls O-fucose modification on thrombospondin repeats (TSR) displayed a wild type lineage development phenotype and normal Notch ligand binding ability. When examined for their in vivo hematopoietic reconstitution, blood cells derived from NOTCH1−/− or POFUT1−/− ES lines, but not POFUT2−/− ES line, showed enhanced granulocytic but suppressed T and B lymphoid lineage development. These results are consistent with our bone marrow transplantation findings that hematopoietic reconstitution by fucosylation-deficient marrow progenitor cells exhibited increased granulocytopoiesis while wild type or fucosylation-intact marrow cells have normal lineage distribution. Our observations indicate that Notch signaling maintains blood lineage homeostasis by promoting lymphoid lineage development and suppressing overt myeloid development. O-fucose modification of EGF repeats on Notch receptor is essential for this Notch-dependent control of blood lineage homeostasis as deficiency of fucose on Notch receptor results in enhanced myeloid development.

scholarly journals Activated Notch4 Inhibits Angiogenesis: Role of β1-Integrin Activation

2002 ◽  
Vol 22 (8) ◽  
pp. 2830-2841 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin G. Leong ◽  
Xiaolong Hu ◽  
Linheng Li ◽  
Michela Noseda ◽  
Bruno Larrivée ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endothelial Cells ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Chorioallantoic Membrane ◽  
Surface Expression ◽  
Cell Phenotype ◽  
Β1 Integrin ◽  
Cell Fate Decisions ◽  
Β1 Integrins

ABSTRACT Notch4 is a member of the Notch family of transmembrane receptors that is expressed primarily on endothelial cells. Activation of Notch in various cell systems has been shown to regulate cell fate decisions. The sprouting of endothelial cells from microvessels, or angiogenesis, involves the modulation of the endothelial cell phenotype. Based on the function of other Notch family members and the expression pattern of Notch4, we postulated that Notch4 activation would modulate angiogenesis. Using an in vitro endothelial-sprouting assay, we show that expression of constitutively active Notch4 in human dermal microvascular endothelial cells (HMEC-1) inhibits endothelial sprouting. We also show that activated Notch4 inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-induced angiogenesis in the chick chorioallantoic membrane in vivo. Activated Notch4 does not inhibit HMEC-1 proliferation or migration through fibrinogen. However, migration through collagen is inhibited. Our data show that Notch4 cells exhibit increased β1-integrin-mediated adhesion to collagen. HMEC-1 expressing activated Notch4 do not have increased surface expression of β1-integrins. Rather, we demonstrate that Notch4-expressing cells display β1-integrin in an active, high-affinity conformation. Furthermore, using function-activating β1-integrin antibodies, we demonstrate that activation of β1-integrins is sufficient to inhibit VEGF-induced endothelial sprouting in vitro and angiogenesis in vivo. Our findings suggest that constitutive Notch4 activation in endothelial cells inhibits angiogenesis in part by promoting β1-integrin-mediated adhesion to the underlying matrix.

scholarly journals Notch pathway activation targets AML-initiating cell homeostasis and differentiation

2013 ◽  
Vol 210 (2) ◽  
pp. 301-319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camille Lobry ◽  
Panagiotis Ntziachristos ◽  
Delphine Ndiaye-Lobry ◽  
Philmo Oh ◽  
Luisa Cimmino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Suppressor ◽  
Notch Signaling ◽  
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms ◽  
Notch Pathway ◽  
Notch Signaling Pathway ◽  
Notch Receptor ◽  
Pathway Activation ◽  
Function Models

Notch signaling pathway activation is known to contribute to the pathogenesis of a spectrum of human malignancies, including T cell leukemia. However, recent studies have implicated the Notch pathway as a tumor suppressor in myeloproliferative neoplasms and several solid tumors. Here we report a novel tumor suppressor role for Notch signaling in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and demonstrate that Notch pathway activation could represent a therapeutic strategy in this disease. We show that Notch signaling is silenced in human AML samples, as well as in AML-initiating cells in an animal model of the disease. In vivo activation of Notch signaling using genetic Notch gain of function models or in vitro using synthetic Notch ligand induces rapid cell cycle arrest, differentiation, and apoptosis of AML-initiating cells. Moreover, we demonstrate that Notch inactivation cooperates in vivo with loss of the myeloid tumor suppressor Tet2 to induce AML-like disease. These data demonstrate a novel tumor suppressor role for Notch signaling in AML and elucidate the potential therapeutic use of Notch receptor agonists in the treatment of this devastating leukemia.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document