scholarly journals Examining the link between chromosomal instability and aneuploidy in human cells

2008 ◽  
Vol 180 (4) ◽  
pp. 665-672 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah L. Thompson ◽  
Duane A. Compton
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Chromosomal Instability ◽  
Live Cell Imaging ◽  
Cell Imaging ◽  
Human Cells ◽  
Phenotypic Changes ◽  
Chromosome Missegregation ◽  
Chromosome Attachment ◽  
Diploid Cells ◽  
The Relationship

Solid tumors can be highly aneuploid and many display high rates of chromosome missegregation in a phenomenon called chromosomal instability (CIN). In principle, aneuploidy is the consequence of CIN, but the relationship between CIN and aneuploidy has not been clearly defined. In this study, we use live cell imaging and clonal cell analyses to evaluate the fidelity of chromosome segregation in chromosomally stable and unstable human cells. We show that improper microtubule–chromosome attachment (merotely) is a cause of chromosome missegregation in unstable cells and that increasing chromosome missegregation rates by elevating merotely during consecutive mitoses generates CIN in otherwise stable, near-diploid cells. However, chromosome missegregation compromises the proliferation of diploid cells, indicating that phenotypic changes that permit the propagation of nondiploid cells must combine with elevated chromosome missegregation rates to generate aneuploid cells with CIN.

scholarly journals The wages of CIN

2008 ◽  
Vol 180 (4) ◽  
pp. 661-663 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen W. Yuen ◽  
Arshad Desai
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Cells ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Chromosomal Instability ◽  
Chromosome Instability ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Human Cells ◽  
Normal Cells ◽  
Chromosome Missegregation ◽  
Cell Biol ◽  
The Relationship

Aneuploidy and chromosome instability (CIN) are hallmarks of the majority of solid tumors, but the relationship between them is not well understood. In this issue, Thompson and Compton (Thompson, S.L., and D.A. Compton. 2008. Examining the link between chromosomal instability and aneuploidy in human cells. J. Cell. Biol. 180:665–672) investigate the mechanism of CIN in cancer cells and find that CIN arises primarily from defective kinetochore–spindle attachments that evade detection by the spindle checkpoint and persist into anaphase. They also explore the consequences of artificially elevating chromosome missegregation in otherwise karyotypically normal cells. Their finding that induced aneuploidy is rapidly selected against suggests that the persistence of aneuploid cells in tumors requires not only chromosome missegregation but also additional, as yet poorly defined events.

scholarly journals Yeast Kinetochores Do Not Stabilize Stu2p-dependent Spindle Microtubule Dynamics

2003 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. 4181-4195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chad G. Pearson ◽  
Paul S. Maddox ◽  
Ted R. Zarzar ◽  
E.D. Salmon ◽  
Kerry Bloom
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Live Cell Imaging ◽  
Cell Imaging ◽  
Regulatory Mechanism ◽  
Metaphase Plate ◽  
Microtubule Dynamics ◽  
Spindle Microtubule ◽  
Microtubule Binding ◽  
Microtubule Stabilization ◽  
Kinetochore Function

The interaction of kinetochores with dynamic microtubules during mitosis is essential for proper centromere motility, congression to the metaphase plate, and subsequent anaphase chromosome segregation. Budding yeast has been critical in the discovery of proteins necessary for this interaction. However, the molecular mechanism for microtubule–kinetochore interactions remains poorly understood. Using live cell imaging and mutations affecting microtubule binding proteins and kinetochore function, we identify a regulatory mechanism for spindle microtubule dynamics involving Stu2p and the core kinetochore component, Ndc10p. Depleting cells of the microtubule binding protein Stu2p reduces kinetochore microtubule dynamics. Centromeres remain under tension but lack motility. Thus, normal microtubule dynamics are not required to maintain tension at the centromere. Loss of the kinetochore (ndc10-1, ndc10-2, and ctf13-30) does not drastically affect spindle microtubule turnover, indicating that Stu2p, not the kinetochore, is the foremost governor of microtubule dynamics. Disruption of kinetochore function with ndc10-1 does not affect the decrease in microtubule turnover in stu2 mutants, suggesting that the kinetochore is not required for microtubule stabilization. Remarkably, a partial kinetochore defect (ndc10-2) suppresses the decreased spindle microtubule turnover in the absence of Stu2p. These results indicate that Stu2p and Ndc10p differentially function in controlling kinetochore microtubule dynamics necessary for centromere movements.

New Cell Cycle Inhibitors Target Aneuploidy in Cancer Therapy

2019 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 361-377 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masanori Kawakami ◽  
Xi Liu ◽  
Ethan Dmitrovsky
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Cells ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Antineoplastic Agents ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Critical Level ◽  
New Agents ◽  
Chromosome Missegregation ◽  
Diploid Cells ◽  
Cell Cycle Inhibitors ◽  
Proliferative Advantage

Aneuploidy is a hallmark of cancer. Defects in chromosome segregation result in aneuploidy. Multiple pathways are engaged in this process, including errors in kinetochore-microtubule attachments, supernumerary centrosomes, spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) defects, and chromosome cohesion defects. Although aneuploidy provides an adaptation and proliferative advantage in affected cells, excessive aneuploidy beyond a critical level can be lethal to cancer cells. Given this, enhanced chromosome missegregation is hypothesized to limit survival of aneuploid cancer cells, especially when compared to diploid cells. Based on this concept, proteins and pathways engaged in chromosome segregation are being exploited as candidate therapeutic targets for aneuploid cancers. Agents that induce chromosome missegregation and aneuploidy now exist, including SAC inhibitors, those that alter centrosome fidelity and others that are under active study in preclinical and clinical contexts. This review explores the therapeutic potentials of such new agents, including the benefits of combining them with other antineoplastic agents.

scholarly journals Human securin proteolysis is controlled by the spindle checkpoint and reveals when the APC/C switches from activation by Cdc20 to Cdh1

2002 ◽  
Vol 157 (7) ◽  
pp. 1125-1137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anja Hagting ◽  
Nicole den Elzen ◽  
Hartmut C. Vodermaier ◽  
Irene C. Waizenegger ◽  
Jan-Michael Peters ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Live Cell Imaging ◽  
Cell Imaging ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Cyclin B1 ◽  
Mutant Form ◽  
Exact Time ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Sister Chromatid Separation

Progress through mitosis is controlled by the sequential destruction of key regulators including the mitotic cyclins and securin, an inhibitor of anaphase whose destruction is required for sister chromatid separation. Here we have used live cell imaging to determine the exact time when human securin is degraded in mitosis. We show that the timing of securin destruction is set by the spindle checkpoint; securin destruction begins at metaphase once the checkpoint is satisfied. Furthermore, reimposing the checkpoint rapidly inactivates securin destruction. Thus, securin and cyclin B1 destruction have very similar properties. Moreover, we find that both cyclin B1 and securin have to be degraded before sister chromatids can separate. A mutant form of securin that lacks its destruction box (D-box) is still degraded in mitosis, but now this is in anaphase. This destruction requires a KEN box in the NH2 terminus of securin and may indicate the time in mitosis when ubiquitination switches from APCCdc20 to APCCdh1. Lastly, a D-box mutant of securin that cannot be degraded in metaphase inhibits sister chromatid separation, generating a cut phenotype where one cell can inherit both copies of the genome. Thus, defects in securin destruction alter chromosome segregation and may be relevant to the development of aneuploidy in cancer.

scholarly journals Spatial telomere organization and clustering in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae nucleus is generated by a random dynamics of aggregation–dissociation

2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (11) ◽  
pp. 1791-1800 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathanaël Hozé ◽  
Myriam Ruault ◽  
Carlo Amoruso ◽  
Angela Taddei ◽  
David Holcman
Keyword(s):  
Live Cell Imaging ◽  
Cell Imaging ◽  
Control Mechanism ◽  
Random Motion ◽  
Regulatory Proteins ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Diploid Cells ◽  
Different Levels ◽  
Telomere Dynamics

Spatial and temporal behavior of chromosomes and their regulatory proteins is a key control mechanism in genomic function. This is exemplified by the clustering of the 32 budding yeast telomeres that form foci in which silencing factors concentrate. To uncover the determinants of telomere distribution, we compare live-cell imaging with a stochastic model of telomere dynamics that we developed. We show that random encounters alone are inadequate to produce the clustering observed in vivo. In contrast, telomere dynamics observed in vivo in both haploid and diploid cells follows a process of dissociation–aggregation. We determine the time that two telomeres spend in the same cluster for the telomere distribution observed in cells expressing different levels of the silencing factor Sir3 protein, limiting for telomere clustering. We conclude that telomere clusters, their dynamics, and their nuclear distribution result from random motion, aggregation, and dissociation of telomeric regions, specifically determined by the amount of Sir3.

scholarly journals Live Cell Imaging of Chromosome Segregation During Mitosis

10.3791/57389 ◽  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prajakta Varadkar ◽  
Kazuyo Takeda ◽  
Brenton McCright
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Live Cell Imaging ◽  
Cell Imaging ◽  
Live Cell

scholarly journals Mad2 and BubR1 Function in a Single Checkpoint Pathway that Responds to a Loss of Tension

2002 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 3706-3719 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katie B. Shannon ◽  
Julie C. Canman ◽  
E. D. Salmon
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Live Cell Imaging ◽  
Cell Imaging ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Normal Numbers ◽  
Microtubule Attachment ◽  
Checkpoint Pathway ◽  
Chromosome Congression ◽  
Full Complement ◽  
Checkpoint Genes

The spindle checkpoint monitors microtubule attachment and tension at kinetochores to ensure proper chromosome segregation. Previously, PtK1 cells in hypothermic conditions (23°C) were shown to have a pronounced mitotic delay, despite having normal numbers of kinetochore microtubules. At 23°C, we found that PtK1 cells remained in metaphase for an average of 101 min, compared with 21 min for cells at 37°C. The metaphase delay at 23°C was abrogated by injection of Mad2 inhibitors, showing that Mad2 and the spindle checkpoint were responsible for the prolonged metaphase. Live cell imaging showed that kinetochore Mad2 became undetectable soon after chromosome congression. Measurements of the stretch between sister kinetochores at metaphase found a 24% decrease in tension at 23°C, and metaphase kinetochores at 23°C exhibited higher levels of 3F3/2, Bub1, and BubR1 compared with 37°C. Microinjection of anti-BubR1 antibody abolished the metaphase delay at 23°C, indicating that the higher kinetochore levels of BubR1 may contribute to the delay. Disrupting both Mad2 and BubR1 function induced anaphase with the same timing as single inhibitions, suggesting that these checkpoint genes function in the same pathway. We conclude that reduced tension at kinetochores with a full complement of kinetochore microtubules induces a checkpoint dependent metaphase delay associated with elevated amounts of kinetochore 3F3/2, Bub1, and BubR1 labeling.

scholarly journals Proliferation of aneuploid human cells is limited by a p53-dependent mechanism

2010 ◽  
Vol 188 (3) ◽  
pp. 369-381 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah L. Thompson ◽  
Duane A. Compton
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
P53 Gene ◽  
Human Cells ◽  
Nuclear Accumulation ◽  
P53 Pathway ◽  
Chromosome Missegregation ◽  
Mouse Tissues ◽  
A Cell ◽  
Elevated Rate ◽  
Diploid Cells

Most solid tumors are aneuploid, and it has been proposed that aneuploidy is the consequence of an elevated rate of chromosome missegregation in a process called chromosomal instability (CIN). However, the relationship of aneuploidy and CIN is unclear because the proliferation of cultured diploid cells is compromised by chromosome missegregation. The mechanism for this intolerance of nondiploid genomes is unknown. In this study, we show that in otherwise diploid human cells, chromosome missegregation causes a cell cycle delay with nuclear accumulation of the tumor suppressor p53 and the cyclin kinase inhibitor p21. Deletion of the p53 gene permits the accumulation of nondiploid cells such that CIN generates cells with aneuploid genomes that resemble many human tumors. Thus, the p53 pathway plays an important role in limiting the propagation of aneuploid human cells in culture to preserve the diploid karyotype of the population. These data fit with the concordance of aneuploidy and disruption of the p53 pathway in many tumors, but the presence of aneuploid cells in some normal human and mouse tissues indicates that there are known exceptions to the involvement of p53 in aneuploid cells and that tissue context may be important in how cells respond to aneuploidy.

scholarly journals Chromosome biorientation and APC activity remain uncoupled in oocytes with reduced volume

2017 ◽  
Vol 216 (12) ◽  
pp. 3949-3957 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon I.R. Lane ◽  
Keith T. Jones
Keyword(s):  
Cell Volume ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Chromosome Missegregation ◽  
Anaphase Onset ◽  
Reduced Volume ◽  
Chromosome Attachment ◽  
Meiosis I

The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) prevents chromosome missegregation by coupling anaphase onset with correct chromosome attachment and tension to microtubules. It does this by generating a diffusible signal from free kinetochores into the cytoplasm, inhibiting the anaphase-promoting complex (APC). The volume in which this signal remains effective is unknown. This raises the possibility that cell volume may be the reason the SAC is weak, and chromosome segregation error-prone, in mammalian oocytes. Here, by a process of serial bisection, we analyzed the influence of oocyte volume on the ability of the SAC to inhibit bivalent segregation in meiosis I. We were able to generate oocytes with cytoplasmic volumes reduced by 86% and observed changes in APC activity consistent with increased SAC control. However, bivalent biorientation remained uncoupled from APC activity, leading to error-prone chromosome segregation. We conclude that volume is one factor contributing to SAC weakness in oocytes. However, additional factors likely uncouple chromosome biorientation with APC activity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document