scholarly journals Quantitation of influenza virus antigens on infected target cells and their recognition by cross-reactive cytotoxic T cells.

1980 ◽  
Vol 151 (5) ◽  
pp. 1014-1025 ◽  
Author(s):  
C J Hackett ◽  
B A Askonas ◽  
R G Webster ◽  
K van Wyke
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
T Cells ◽  
Influenza Virus ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Cytotoxic T Cells ◽  
Type A ◽  
Protein Molecule ◽  
M Protein ◽  
Target Cells ◽  
Infected Cells

Monoclonal antibody to type-A influenza virus matrix (M)-protein was used to quantitate the appearance of M-protein on abortively infected P815 cells. After 16 h of infection with different type-A viruses, only a low amount of M-protein appears on the surface of infected cells (approximately 10(3) site/cell) in contrast to approximately 10(5) hemagglutinin molecules on each cell surface. However, virus replication is required for M-protein appearance. Analysis of solubilized membranes purified from 16-h-infected cells shows approximately 10(4) M-protein molecule/cell in the plasma membrane, a content that is consistent with the observed low surface expression, and that indicates that most of the M-protein is localized internally. We found no evidence that cross-reactive cytotoxic T cells could recognize M-protein; neither monoclonal antibody or hyperimmune anti-M-protein antiserum could inhibit T cell killing, either alone or in combination with monoclonal anti-H-2 antibody. Taken together, the low level of M-protein appearance and lack of T cell blocking by anti-M-protein antibody leaves doubt that M-protein is the antigen recognized by cross-reactive cytotoxic T cells.

scholarly journals Specificity of cytotoxicity T cells directed to influenza virus hemagglutinin.

1979 ◽  
Vol 149 (4) ◽  
pp. 856-869 ◽  
Author(s):  
T J Braciale
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Cytotoxic T Cells ◽  
Type A ◽  
Cross Reactivity ◽  
Cytotoxic T Cell ◽  
Target Cells ◽  
Effector Cells ◽  
Cell Induction

Purified type A influenza viral hemagglutinin stimulates an in vitro cell-mediated cytotoxic cell response that exhibits a high degree of specificity for the immunizing hemagglutinin. The response magnitude is proportional to the hemagglutinin dose used for stimulation. The lytic activity of the effector cells is H-2 restricted. Analysis of the specificity of the response indicated that these cytotoxic T cells readily distinguish target cells expressing serologically unrelated hemagglutinin from target cells bearing hemagglutinins serologically related to the stimulating hemagglutinin. Further analysis of the fine specificity of cytotoxic T-cell recognition with serologically cross-reactive type A influenza hemagglutinins revealed a hierarchy of cross-reactivity among these hemagglutinins that was the converse of the serologic hierarchy. These results are discussed in terms of possible differences and similarities in the specificity repertoire of cytotoxic T cells and antibodies. Possible implications of these findings from the standpoint of cytotoxic T-cell induction are also discussed.

Cytotoxic T cells kill influenza virus infected cells but do not distinguish between serologically distinct type A viruses

Nature ◽  
1977 ◽  
Vol 267 (5609) ◽  
pp. 354-356 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. J. ZWEERINK ◽  
S. A. COURTNEIDGE ◽  
J. J. SKEHEL ◽  
M. J. CRUMPTON ◽  
BRIGITTE A. ASKONAS
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Influenza Virus ◽  
Cytotoxic T Cells ◽  
Distinct Type ◽  
Type A ◽  
Infected Cells

Cytotoxic T cells to type A influenza virus; viral hemagglutinin induces A-strain specificity while infected cells confer cross-reactive cytotoxicity

1977 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 630-635 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.J. Zweerink ◽  
Brigitte A. Askonas ◽  
Dianne Millican ◽  
Sara A. Courtneidge ◽  
J.J. Skehel
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Influenza Virus ◽  
Cytotoxic T Cells ◽  
Type A ◽  
Strain Specificity ◽  
Viral Hemagglutinin ◽  
Infected Cells

scholarly journals Immunologic recognition of influenza virus-infected cells. II. Expression of influenza A matrix protein on the infected cell surface and its role in recognition by cross-reactive cytotoxic T cells

1977 ◽  
Vol 146 (3) ◽  
pp. 673-689 ◽  
Author(s):  
TJ Braciale
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Influenza Virus ◽  
Cell Surface ◽  
Infected Cell ◽  
Virus Strain ◽  
Influenza A ◽  
Matrix Protein ◽  
Cytotoxic T Cells ◽  
Type A ◽  
Target Cells

Two distinct subpopulations of cytotoxic T cells are generated in the primary or secondary response of mice to type A influenza viruses. One subpopulation is specific for the immunizing virus strain. The other subpopulation shows a high degree of cross-reactivity for heterologous type A virus of a different subtype. This report examines the possibility that distinct influenza virus antigens, expressed on the surface of the infected cell, are recognized by the different subpopulations of influenza-specific cytotoxic T cells. Data are presented which demonstrate that influenza A matrix protein, an internal virion antigen, is detectable on the surface of target cells infected with influenza A viruses of different subtypes. Since this viral antigen is type specific, i.e., serologically cross-reactive among all type A influenza viruses, it could serve as the target for cross-reactive cytotoxic T cells. To further examine the specificity of the two cytotoxic T-cell subpopulations, experiments were carried out by using the inhibitor of glycoprotein synthesis - 2-Deoxy-D-Glucose 2-DG. These experiments examine first the effect of 2-DG on the expression of influenza matrix protein and viral glycoprotein on the infected cell surface and second, the susceptibility of 2-DG-treated target cells to lysis by cytotoxic T cells. 2-DG inhibits the expression of the viral hemagglutinin glycoprotein on the cell surface but does not inhibit the expression of the nonglycosylated matrix protein. Furthermore, inhibition of glycoprotein synthesis in infected target cells abrogates the reactivity of infected target cells to lysis by virus strain-specific but not cross- reactive cytotoxic T cells. These findings suggest that the influenza glycoproteins (hemagglutinin and/or neuraminidase) and the nonglycosylated matrix protein are the targets for the virus strain- specific and cross-reactive cytotoxic T cells, respectively. These results are discussed in the light of available information on influenza virus structure and the biology of influenza infection and in terms of current models for cytotoxic T-cell recognition of virus-infected cells.

scholarly journals Costimulation by B7 Modulates Specificity of Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes: A Missing Link That Explains Some Bystander T Cell Activation

1997 ◽  
Vol 186 (10) ◽  
pp. 1787-1791 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pan Zheng ◽  
Yang Liu
Keyword(s):  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
T Cells ◽  
Influenza Virus ◽  
T Cell ◽  
T Cell Activation ◽  
Cell Activation ◽  
T Cell Proliferation ◽  
Target Cells ◽  
Cell Proliferation And Differentiation ◽  
Proliferation And Differentiation

It has been proposed that some bystander T cell activation may in fact be due to T cell antigen receptor (TCR) cross-reactivity that is too low to be detected by the effector cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL). However, this hypothesis is not supported by direct evidence since no TCR ligand is known to induce T cell proliferation and differentiation without being recognized by the effector CTL. Here we report that transgenic T cells expressing a T cell receptor to influenza virus A/NT/68 nucleoprotein (NP) 366-374:Db complexes clonally expand and become effector CTLs in response to homologous peptides from either A/PR8/34 (H1N1), A/AA/60 (H2N2), or A/NT/68 (H3N2). However, the effector T cells induced by each of the three peptides kill target cells pulsed with NP peptides from the H3N2 and H2N2 viruses, but not from the H1N1 virus. Thus, NP366–374 from influenza virus H1N1 is the first TCR ligand that can induce T cell proliferation and differentiation without being recognized by CTLs. Since induction of T cell proliferation was mediated by antigen-presenting cells that express costimulatory molecules such as B7, we investigated if cytolysis of H1N1 NP peptide–pulsed targets can be restored by expressing B7-1 on the target cells. Our results revealed that this is the case. These data demonstrated that costimulatory molecule B7 modulates antigen specificity of CTLs, and provides a missing link that explains some of the bystander T cell activation.

Influenza type A virus M protein expression on infected cells is responsible for cross-reactive recognition by cytotoxic thymus-derived lymphocytes

1980 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 719-723 ◽  
Author(s):  
C S Reiss ◽  
J L Schulman
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Influenza A Virus ◽  
Influenza A ◽  
Rabbit Antiserum ◽  
Type A ◽  
M Protein ◽  
Cytotoxic T Cell ◽  
Influenza A Viruses ◽  
Infected Cells ◽  
Cytotoxic T Cell Responses

M protein of influenza A virus was detected with rabbit antiserum by both indirect immunofluorescence and by antibody plus complement-mediated cytolysis on the cell surfaces of both productively and nonproductively infected cells. In contrast, antiserum to nucleoprotein failed to react with unfixed infected cells, but did bind to fixed infected cells, especially in the perinuclear area. Incorporation of antiserum to M protein in a T-cell-mediated cytotoxicity assay produced almost complete abrogation of lysis of H-2-compatible cells infected with an influenza A virus of a subtype which differed from that used to elicit the cytotoxic T cells. However, the antibody did not significantly block 51Cr release from cells infected with the homotypic type A influenza virus. These observations are in accord with the hypothesis that the cross-reactive cytotoxic T-cell responses seen with cells infected by heterotypic influenza A viruses are due to recognition of a common M protein.

scholarly journals Infection of HLA-DR1 Transgenic Mice with a Human Isolate of Influenza A Virus (H1N1) Primes a Diverse CD4 T-Cell Repertoire That Includes CD4 T Cells with Heterosubtypic Cross-Reactivity to Avian (H5N1) Influenza Virus

2009 ◽  
Vol 83 (13) ◽  
pp. 6566-6577 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine A. Richards ◽  
Francisco A. Chaves ◽  
Andrea J. Sant
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Influenza Virus ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Avian Influenza ◽  
Avian Influenza Virus ◽  
Cd4 T Cells ◽  
Cross Reactivity ◽  
Cd4 T Cell ◽  
Ns1 Protein ◽  
Infected Cells

ABSTRACT The specificity of the CD4 T-cell immune response to influenza virus is influenced by the genetic complexity of the virus and periodic encounters with variant subtypes and strains. In order to understand what controls CD4 T-cell reactivity to influenza virus proteins and how the influenza virus-specific memory compartment is shaped over time, it is first necessary to understand the diversity of the primary CD4 T-cell response. In the study reported here, we have used an unbiased approach to evaluate the peptide specificity of CD4 T cells elicited after live influenza virus infection. We have focused on four viral proteins that have distinct intracellular distributions in infected cells, hemagglutinin (HA), neuraminidase (NA), nucleoprotein, and the NS1 protein, which is expressed in infected cells but excluded from virion particles. Our studies revealed an extensive diversity of influenza virus-specific CD4 T cells that includes T cells for each viral protein and for the unexpected immunogenicity of the NS1 protein. Due to the recent concern about pandemic avian influenza virus and because CD4 T cells specific for HA and NA may be particularly useful for promoting the production of neutralizing antibody to influenza virus, we have also evaluated the ability of HA- and NA-specific CD4 T cells elicited by a circulating H1N1 strain to cross-react with related sequences found in an avian H5N1 virus and find substantial cross-reactivity, suggesting that seasonal vaccines may help promote protection against avian influenza virus.

scholarly journals G19.4(alpha CD3) x B43(alpha CD19) monoclonal antibody heteroconjugate triggers CD19 antigen-specific lysis of t(4;11) acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells by activated CD3 antigen-positive cytotoxic T cells

Blood ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 80 (11) ◽  
pp. 2826-2834
Author(s):  
PM Anderson ◽  
W Crist ◽  
D Hasz ◽  
AJ Carroll ◽  
DE Myers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
T Cells ◽  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Cytotoxic T Cells ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Interleukin 2 ◽  
Cytolytic Activity ◽  
Multiparameter Flow Cytometry ◽  
Specific Lysis

A highly purified, 300-Kd bispecific monoclonal antibody (MoAb) heteroconjugate was prepared by covalently linking the anti-CD3 MoAb, G19.4, to the anti-CD19 MoAb, B43. Dual-color staining techniques and multiparameter flow cytometry confirmed that this alpha CD3 x alpha CD19 heteroconjugate was able to bind to both CD3+ T cells and CD19+ t(4;11) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cells. T-cell-mediated lysis of freshly isolated primary bone marrow blasts from nine newly diagnosed ALL patients with a t(4;11)(q21;q23) chromosomal translocation were studied with 51Cr-release assays. Picomolar concentrations of alpha CD3 x alpha CD19 MoAb heteroconjugate effectively triggered lysis of CD19+ t(4;11) ALL cells by interleukin-2- activated CD3+ peripheral blood T-cell (PBTC) effectors but did not augment the cytolytic activity of the same effectors against CD19- T- ALL cells. In contrast to the alpha CD3 x alpha CD19 heteroconjugate, neither the alpha CD3 x alpha CD3 homoconjugate control nor the alpha CD19 x alpha CD72 heteroconjugate control facilitated the cytolysis of t(4;11) ALL blasts. Occupation of the target CD19 binding sites on t(4;11) ALL blasts by preincubation with excess unconjugated alpha CD19 MoAb abrogated the potentiating effects of the alpha CD3 x alpha CD19 heteroconjugate on PBTC-mediated cytolysis. Thus, the cell type- specific cytolysis of t(4;11) ALL blasts by PBTC effectors is dependent on both the alpha CD19 and alpha CD3 moieties of the alpha CD3 x alpha CD19 heteroconjugate. To our knowledge, this is the first description of an effective bispecific antibody that facilitates the T-cell- mediated lysis of t(4;11) ALL blasts.

scholarly journals Antibody to influenza virus matrix protein detects a common antigen on the surface of cells infected with type A influenza viruses.

1977 ◽  
Vol 146 (3) ◽  
pp. 690-697 ◽  
Author(s):  
W E Biddison ◽  
P C Doherty ◽  
R G Webster
Keyword(s):  
Influenza Virus ◽  
Matrix Protein ◽  
Type A ◽  
Cross Reactivity ◽  
T Cell Response ◽  
Influenza Viruses ◽  
Cytotoxic T Cell ◽  
Target Cells ◽  
Common Antigen ◽  
Infected Cells

Antisera to the type-specific internal influenza virus matrix (M) protein of a type A influenza virus were produced in goats. In the presence of complement, anti-M serum was cytotoxic for target cells which were infected with a variety of serologically distinct type A influenza viruses, but did not react with type B influenza virus-infected cells. Absorption experiments indicated that anti-M serum detected a common antigen(s) on the surface of type A-infected cells. This serological cross-reactivity parallels the cross-reactivity observed for the cytotoxic T-cell response to type A viruses.

scholarly journals Role of viral infectivity in the induction of influenza virus-specific cytotoxic T cells.

1978 ◽  
Vol 147 (4) ◽  
pp. 1236-1252 ◽  
Author(s):  
T J Braciale ◽  
K L Yap
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Influenza Virus ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Response ◽  
Infectious Virus ◽  
Cytotoxic T Cells ◽  
T Cell Response ◽  
Cytotoxic T Cell

This report examines the requirement for infectious virus in the induction of influenza virus-specific cytotoxic T cells. Infectious influenza virus was found to be highly efficient at generating both primary and secondary cytotoxic T-cell response in vivo. Inactivated influenza virus however, failed to stimulate a detectable cytotoxic T-cell response in vivo even at immunizing doses 10(5)-10(6)-fold higher than the minimum stimulatory dose of infectious virus. Likewise inactivated virus failed to sensitize target cells for T cell-mediated lysis in vitro but could stimulate a specific cytotoxic response from primed cells in vitro. Possible requirements for the induction of virus-specific cytotoxic T-cell responses are discussed in light of these observations and those of other investigators.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document