Multiple Site Surveillance Cultures as a Predictor of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections

2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (8) ◽  
pp. 818-824 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benedict Lim Heng Sim ◽  
Emma McBryde ◽  
Alan C. Street ◽  
Caroline Marshall
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Icu Patients ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Icu Discharge ◽  
Colonization Density ◽  
Mrsa Infection ◽  
Mrsa Colonization

Objective.To determine the relationship between methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization density, colonization site, and probability of infection in a frequently screened cohort of intensive care unit (ICU) patients.Methods.Patients had swab samples tested for MRSA at admission to the ICU, discharge from the ICU, and twice weekly during their ICU stay, and they were followed up for development of MRSA infection. Swab test results were analyzed to determine the proportion of patients colonized and the proportion colonized at each screening site. Hazard of MRSA infection (rate of infection per day at risk) was calculated using a Cox proportional hazards analysis, and risk factors for MRSA infection, including presence of MRSA, degree of colonization, and pattern of colonization were determined.Results.Among the 4,194 patient episodes, 238 (5.7%) had screening results that were positive for MRSA, and there were 34 cases of MRSA infection. The hazard ratio (HR) for developing an infection increased as more sites were colonized (HR, 3.4 for being colonized at more than 1 site compared with colonization at 1 site [95% confidence interval, 1.2-9.9]). Colonization site was predictive of developing infection (HR for nose or throat colonization compared with no colonization, 168 [95% confidence interval, 69-407]).Conclusion.This study demonstrated that the hazard of developing an infection was higher when more sites were colonized and that certain sites were more predictive of infection than others. These results may be useful for predicting infection in ICU patients and may influence treatment.

Colonization With Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in ICU Patients Morbidity, Mortality, and Glycopeptide Use

2001 ◽  
Vol 22 (11) ◽  
pp. 687-692 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maité Garrouste-Orgeas ◽  
Jean-Francois Timsit ◽  
Hatem Kallel ◽  
Adel Ben Ali ◽  
Marie Francoise Dumay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Icu Mortality ◽  
Icu Patients ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Saps Ii ◽  
Icu Stay ◽  
Mrsa Infection ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Mrsa Colonization

Abstract Objective: To determine the impact of methicillin-resis-tant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization on the occurrence of S aureus infections (methicillin-resistant and methicillin-suscep-tible), the use of glycopeptides, and outcome among intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Design: Prospective observational cohort survey. Setting: A medical-surgical ICU with 10 single-bed rooms in a 460-bed, tertiary-care, university-affiliated hospital. Patients: A total of 1,044 ICU patients were followed for the detection of MRSA colonization from July 1, 1995, to July, 1 1998. Methods: MRSA colonization was detected using nasal samples in all patients plus wound samples in surgical patients within 48 hours of admission or within the first 48 hours of ICU stay and weekly thereafter. MRSA infections were defined using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention standard definitions, except for ventilator-associated pneumonia and catheter-related infections, which were defined by quantitative distal culture samples. Results: One thousand forty-four patients (70% medical patients) were included in the analysis. Mean age was 61±18 years; mean Simplified Acute Physiologic Score (SAPS) II was 36.4±20; and median ICU stay was 4 (range, 1-193) days. Two hundred thirty-one patients (22%) died in the ICU. Fifty-four patients (5.1%) were colonized with MRSA on admission, and 52 (4.9%) of 1,044 acquired MRSA colonization in the ICU. Thirty-five patients developed a total of 42 S aureus infections (32 MRSA, 10 methi-cillin-susceptible). After factors associated with the development of an S aureus infection were adjusted for in a multivariate Cox model (SAPS II >36: hazard ratio [HR], 1.64; P=.09; male gender: HR, 2.2; P=.05), MRSA colonization increased the risk of S aureus infection (HR, 3.84; P=.0003). MRSA colonization did not influence ICU mortality (HR, 1.01; P=.94). Glycopeptides were used in 11.4% of the patients (119/1,044) for a median duration of 5 days. For patients with no colonization, MRSA colonization on admission, and ICU-acquired MRSA colonization, respectively, glycopeptide use per 1,000 hospital days was 37.7, 235.2, and 118.3 days. MRSA colonization per se increased by 3.3-fold the use of glycopeptides in MRSA-colonized patients, even when an MRSA infection was not demonstrated, compared to non-colonized patients. Conclusions: In our unit, MRSA colonization greatly increased the risk of S aureus infection and of glycopeptide use in colonized and non-colonized patients, without influencing ICU mortality. MRSA colonization influenced glycopeptide use even if an MRSA infection was not demonstrated; thus, an MRSA control program is warranted to decrease vancomycin use and to limit glycopeptide resistance in gram-positive cocci.

Colonization With Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in ICU Patients Morbidity, Mortality, and Glycopeptide Use

2001 ◽  
Vol 22 (11) ◽  
pp. 687-692 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maité Garrouste-Orgeas ◽  
Jean-Francois Timsit ◽  
Hatem Kallel ◽  
Adel Ben Ali ◽  
Marie Francoise Dumay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Icu Mortality ◽  
Icu Patients ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Saps Ii ◽  
Icu Stay ◽  
Mrsa Infection ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Mrsa Colonization

AbstractObjective:To determine the impact of methicillin-resis-tant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization on the occurrence of S aureus infections (methicillin-resistant and methicillin-suscep-tible), the use of glycopeptides, and outcome among intensive care unit (ICU) patients.Design:Prospective observational cohort survey.Setting:A medical-surgical ICU with 10 single-bed rooms in a 460-bed, tertiary-care, university-affiliated hospital.Patients:A total of 1,044 ICU patients were followed for the detection of MRSA colonization from July 1, 1995, to July, 1 1998.Methods:MRSA colonization was detected using nasal samples in all patients plus wound samples in surgical patients within 48 hours of admission or within the first 48 hours of ICU stay and weekly thereafter. MRSA infections were defined using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention standard definitions, except for ventilator-associated pneumonia and catheter-related infections, which were defined by quantitative distal culture samples.Results:One thousand forty-four patients (70% medical patients) were included in the analysis. Mean age was 61±18 years; mean Simplified Acute Physiologic Score (SAPS) II was 36.4±20; and median ICU stay was 4 (range, 1-193) days. Two hundred thirty-one patients (22%) died in the ICU. Fifty-four patients (5.1%) were colonized with MRSA on admission, and 52 (4.9%) of 1,044 acquired MRSA colonization in the ICU. Thirty-five patients developed a total of 42 S aureus infections (32 MRSA, 10 methi-cillin-susceptible). After factors associated with the development of an S aureus infection were adjusted for in a multivariate Cox model (SAPS II >36: hazard ratio [HR], 1.64; P=.09; male gender: HR, 2.2; P=.05), MRSA colonization increased the risk of S aureus infection (HR, 3.84; P=.0003). MRSA colonization did not influence ICU mortality (HR, 1.01; P=.94). Glycopeptides were used in 11.4% of the patients (119/1,044) for a median duration of 5 days. For patients with no colonization, MRSA colonization on admission, and ICU-acquired MRSA colonization, respectively, glycopeptide use per 1,000 hospital days was 37.7, 235.2, and 118.3 days. MRSA colonization per se increased by 3.3-fold the use of glycopeptides in MRSA-colonized patients, even when an MRSA infection was not demonstrated, compared to non-colonized patients.Conclusions:In our unit, MRSA colonization greatly increased the risk of S aureus infection and of glycopeptide use in colonized and non-colonized patients, without influencing ICU mortality. MRSA colonization influenced glycopeptide use even if an MRSA infection was not demonstrated; thus, an MRSA control program is warranted to decrease vancomycin use and to limit glycopeptide resistance in gram-positive cocci.

scholarly journals Utility of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Nares Screening in Hospitalized Children with Acute Infectious Disease Syndromes

Antibiotics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 1434
Author(s):  
Ashley Sands ◽  
Nicole Mulvey ◽  
Denise Iacono ◽  
Jane Cerise ◽  
Stefan H. F. Hagmann
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Hospitalized Children ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Osteoarticular Infections ◽  
Clinical Culture ◽  
Acute Infectious Disease ◽  
Mrsa Infection ◽  
Age Range ◽  
Mrsa Colonization

Studies in adults support the use of a negative methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nares screening (MNS) to help limit empiric anti-MRSA antibiotic therapy. We aimed to evaluate the use of MNS for anti-MRSA antibiotic de-escalation in hospitalized children (<18 years). Records of patients admitted between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2020 with a presumed infectious diagnosis who were started on anti-MRSA antibiotics, had a PCR-based MNS, and a clinical culture performed were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 95 children were included with a median age (range) of 2 (0–17) years. The top three diagnosis groups were skin and soft tissue infections (n = 38, 40%), toxin-mediated syndromes (n = 17, 17.9%), and osteoarticular infections (n = 14, 14.7%). Nasal MRSA colonization and growth of MRSA in clinical cultures was found in seven patients (7.4%) each. The specificity and the negative predictive value (NPV) of the MNS to predict a clinical MRSA infection were both 95.5%. About half (n = 55, 57.9%) had anti-MRSA antibiotics discontinued in-house. A quarter (n = 14, 25.5%) were de-escalated based on the negative MNS test alone, and another third (n = 21, 38.2%) after negative MNS test and negative culture results became available. A high NPV suggests that MNS may be useful for limiting unnecessary anti-MRSA therapy and thereby a useful antimicrobial stewardship tool for hospitalized children. Prospective studies are needed to further characterize the utility of MNS for specific infectious diagnoses.

Comparison of Mortality Risk Associated With Bacteremia Due to Methicillin-Resistant and Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus

2007 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 273-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simone Shurland ◽  
Min Zhan ◽  
Douglas D. Bradham ◽  
Mary-Claire Roghmann
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Severe Sepsis ◽  
Relative Risk ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Mortality Risk ◽  
Methicillin Resistance ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Mrsa Infection ◽  
Underlying Diseases ◽  
Related Mortality

Objective.To quantify the clinical impact of methicillin-resistance in Staphylococcus aureus causing infection complicated by bacteremia in adult patients, while controlling for the severity of patients' underlying illnesses.Design.Retrospective cohort study from October 1, 1995, through December 31, 2003.Patients and Setting.A total of 438 patients with S. aureus infection complicated by bacteremia from a single Veterans Affairs healthcare system.Results.We found that 193 (44%) of the 438 patients had methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) infection and 114 (26%) died of causes attributable to S. aureus infection within 90 days after the infection was identified. Patients with MRSA infection had a higher mortality risk, compared with patients with methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) infections (relative risk, 1.7 [95% confidence interval, 1.3-2.4]; P < .01), except for patients with pneumonia (relative risk, 0.7 [95% confidence interval, 0.4-1.3]). Patients with MRSA infections were significantly older (P < .01), had more underlying diseases (P = .02), and were more likely to have severe sepsis in response to their infection (P < .01) compared with patients with MSSA bacteremia. Patients who died within 90 days after S. aureus infection was identified were significantly older (P < .01) and more likely to have severe sepsis (P < .01) and pneumonia (P = .01), compared with patients who survived. After adjusting for age as a confounder, comorbidities, and pneumonia as an effect modifier, S. aureus infection-related mortality remained significantly higher in patients with MRSA infection than in those with MSSA infection, among those without pneumonia (hazard ratio, 1.8 [95% confidence interval, 1.2-3.0]); P < .01.Conclusions.The results of this study suggest that patients with MRSA infections other than pneumonia have a higher mortality risk than patients with MSSA infections other than pneumonia, independent of the severity of patients' underlying illnesses.

scholarly journals In-hospital mortality associated with community-acquired pneumonia due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a matched-pair cohort study

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yukiyo Sakamoto ◽  
Yasuhiro Yamauchi ◽  
Taisuke Jo ◽  
Nobuaki Michihata ◽  
Wakae Hasegawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Healthcare Costs ◽  
Community Acquired Pneumonia ◽  
Matched Pair ◽  
Multivariable Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Mrsa Infection

Abstract Background It remains unclear whether methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) pneumonia is associated with higher mortality compared with non-MRSA pneumonia. This study’s objective was to compare outcomes including in-hospital mortality and healthcare costs during hospitalisation between patients with MRSA pneumonia and those with non-MRSA pneumonia. Methods Using a national inpatient database in Japan, we conducted a 1:4 matched-pair cohort study of inpatients with community-acquired pneumonia from 1 April 2012 to 31 March 2014. In-hospital outcomes (mortality, length of stay and healthcare costs during hospitalisation) were compared between patients with and without MRSA infection. We performed multiple imputation using chained equations followed by multivariable regression analyses fitted with generalised estimating equations to account for clustering within matched pairs. All-cause in-hospital mortality and healthcare costs during hospitalisation were compared for pneumonia patients with and without MRSA infection. Results Of 450,317 inpatients with community-acquired pneumonia, 3102 patients with MRSA pneumonia were matched with 12,320 patients with non-MRSA pneumonia. The MRSA pneumonia patients had higher mortality, longer hospital stays and higher costs. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that MRSA pneumonia was significantly associated with higher in-hospital mortality compared with non-MRSA pneumonia (adjusted odds ratio = 1.94; 95% confidence interval: 1.72–2.18; p < 0.001). Healthcare costs during hospitalisation were significantly higher for patients with MRSA pneumonia than for those with non-MRSA pneumonia (difference = USD 8502; 95% confidence interval: USD 7959–9045; p < 0.001). Conclusions MRSA infection was associated with higher in-hospital mortality and higher healthcare costs during hospitalisation, suggesting that preventing MRSA pneumonia is essential.

Development and Validation of a Simple and Easy-to-Employ Electronic Algorithm for Identifying Clinical Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infection

2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 692-698 ◽  
Author(s):  
Westyn Branch-Elliman ◽  
Judith Strymish ◽  
Kalpana Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Simple Algorithm ◽  
Electronic System ◽  
Surveillance Systems ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Sterile Site ◽  
Mrsa Infection

Background.With growing demands to track and publicly report and compare infection rates, efforts to utilize automated surveillance systems are increasing. We developed and validated a simple algorithm for identifying patients with clinical methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection using microbiologic and antimicrobial variables. We also estimated resource savings.Methods.Patients who had a culture positive for MRSA at any of 5 acute care Veterans Affairs hospitals were eligible. Clinical infection was defined on the basis of manual chart review. The electronic algorithm defined clinical MRSA infection as a positive non-sterile-site culture with receipt of MRSA-active antibiotics during the 5 days prior to or after the culture.Results.In total, 246 unique non-sterile-site cultures were included, of which 168 represented infection. The sensitivity (43.4%–95.8%) and specificity (34.6%–84.6%) of the electronic algorithm varied depending on the combination of antimicrobials included. On multivariable analysis, predictors of algorithm failure were outpatient status (odds ratio, 0.23 [95% confidence interval, 0.10–0.56]) and respiratory culture (odds ratio, 0.29 [95% confidence interval, 0.13–0.65]). The median cost was $2.43 per chart given 4.6 minutes of review time per chart.Conclusions.Our simple electronic algorithm for detecting clinical MRSA infections has excellent sensitivity and good specificity. Implementation of this electronic system may streamline and standardize surveillance and reporting efforts.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2014;35(6):692–698

scholarly journals Comparison of the Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Acquisition among Rehabilitation and Nursing Home Residents

2011 ◽  
Vol 32 (03) ◽  
pp. 244-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jon P. Furuno ◽  
Simone M. Shurland ◽  
Min Zhan ◽  
J. Kristie Johnson ◽  
Richard A. Venezia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Residential Care ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Nursing Home Residents ◽  
Study Data ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Rehabilitation Care ◽  
Extended Care

Objective.To assess risk factors for methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA) acquisition among extended care residents focusing on level of care (residential vs rehabilitation) and room placement with an MRSA-positive resident.Design.Prospective cohort study.Setting.Extended care units at 2 healthcare systems in Maryland.Participants.Four hundred forty-three residents with no history of MRSA and negative MRSA surveillance cultures of the anterior nares and areas of skin breakdown at enrollment.Methods.Follow-up cultures were collected every 4 weeks and/or at discharge for a period of 12 weeks. Study data were collected by a research nurse from the medical staff and the electronic medical records. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to calculate adjusted hazards ratios (aHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).Results.Residents in rehabilitation care had 4-fold higher risk of MRSA acquisition compared with residents in residential care (hazard ratio [HR], 4. [95% CI, 2.2-8.8]). Being bedbound was significantly associated with MRSA acquisition in both populations (residential care, aHR, 4.3 [95% CI, 1.5-12.2]; rehabilitation care, aHR, 4.8 [95% CI, 1.2-18.7]). Having an MRSA-positive roommate was not significantly associated with acquisition in either population (residential care, aHR, 1.4 [95% CI, 0.5-3.9]; rehabilitation care, aHR, 0.5 [95% CI, 0.1-2.2]); based on concordantspatyping, only 2 of 8 residents who acquired MRSA and had room placement with an MRSA-positive resident acquired their MRSA isolate from their roommate.Conclusion.Residents in rehabilitation care appear at higher risk and have different risk factors for MRSA acquisition compared to those in residential care.

scholarly journals Household Transmission of Community-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feiteng Zhu ◽  
Hemu Zhuang ◽  
Shujuan Ji ◽  
Er Xu ◽  
Lingfang Di ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Household Transmission ◽  
Environmental Surfaces ◽  
Mass Spectrometry Identification ◽  
Colonization Dynamics ◽  
Mrsa Infection ◽  
Household Members ◽  
Mrsa Colonization

Currently, the mechanism of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) transmission mechanism is unclear; however, it must be considered in conjunction with asymptomatic S. aureus strains colonization dynamics. This epidemiological study aimed to determine the role of the household in CA-MRSA transmission in China. Five patients with culture-confirmed CA-MRSA infection and five control patients were recruited from the Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital in Zhejiang, China, between December 2019 and January 2020. The household members of the patients, their pets, and environmental surfaces were sampled and screened for MRSA colonization. Mass spectrometry identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing were performed on the MRSA isolates. Whole-genome sequencing and core genome multilocus sequence typing (cgMLST) were performed to determine the origin and transmission of the MRSA isolates in the households. Overall, 14 S. aureus-positive specimens (14.1%, 14/99) were obtained from the five households of patients with CA-MRSA infections, of which 12 (85.7%) were MRSA. The overall positivity of MRSA was 12.1% (12/99) among the samples from the CA-MRSA households, while no MRSA isolates were detected in the five control households. Most MRSA isolates belonged to epidemic CA-MRSA clones, such as ST59 (15/35, 42.9%) and ST508 (15/35, 42.9%). The cgMLST results confirmed that MRSA was transmitted among patients, contacts, and pets in the households and was present on environmental surfaces in the CA-MRSA patients' households. In conclusion, the study revealed that the home environment was an important MRSA reservoir. Therefore, focusing on MRSA decolonization in patients alone is not sufficient for infection control of CA-MRSA.

scholarly journals Comparison of the Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Acquisition among Rehabilitation and Nursing Home Residents

2011 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 244-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jon P. Furuno ◽  
Simone M. Shurland ◽  
Min Zhan ◽  
J. Kristie Johnson ◽  
Richard A. Venezia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Residential Care ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Nursing Home Residents ◽  
Study Data ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Rehabilitation Care ◽  
Extended Care

Objective.To assess risk factors for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) acquisition among extended care residents focusing on level of care (residential vs rehabilitation) and room placement with an MRSA-positive resident.Design.Prospective cohort study.Setting.Extended care units at 2 healthcare systems in Maryland.Participants.Four hundred forty-three residents with no history of MRSA and negative MRSA surveillance cultures of the anterior nares and areas of skin breakdown at enrollment.Methods.Follow-up cultures were collected every 4 weeks and/or at discharge for a period of 12 weeks. Study data were collected by a research nurse from the medical staff and the electronic medical records. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to calculate adjusted hazards ratios (aHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).Results.Residents in rehabilitation care had 4-fold higher risk of MRSA acquisition compared with residents in residential care (hazard ratio [HR], 4. [95% CI, 2.2-8.8]). Being bedbound was significantly associated with MRSA acquisition in both populations (residential care, aHR, 4.3 [95% CI, 1.5-12.2]; rehabilitation care, aHR, 4.8 [95% CI, 1.2-18.7]). Having an MRSA-positive roommate was not significantly associated with acquisition in either population (residential care, aHR, 1.4 [95% CI, 0.5-3.9]; rehabilitation care, aHR, 0.5 [95% CI, 0.1-2.2]); based on concordant spa typing, only 2 of 8 residents who acquired MRSA and had room placement with an MRSA-positive resident acquired their MRSA isolate from their roommate.Conclusion.Residents in rehabilitation care appear at higher risk and have different risk factors for MRSA acquisition compared to those in residential care.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document