scholarly journals Thirty-Day Laboratory-Based Surveillance for Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae in the Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Area

2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 423-425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edwin C. Pereira ◽  
Kristin M. Shaw ◽  
Paula M. Snippes Vagnone ◽  
Jane E. Harper ◽  
Alexander J. Kallen ◽  
...  

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) are a growing problem in the United States. We explored the feasibility of active laboratory-based surveillance of CRE in a metropolitan area not previously considered to be an area of CRE endemicity. We provide a framework to address CRE surveillance and to monitor changes in the incidence of CRE infection over time.

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s305-s305
Author(s):  
Karoline Sperling ◽  
Amy Priddy ◽  
Nila Suntharam ◽  
Adam Karlen

Background: With increasing medical tourism and international healthcare, emerging multidrug resistant organisms (MDROs) or “superbugs” are becoming more prevalent. These MDROs are unique because they are resistant to antibiotics and can carry special resistance mechanisms. In April 2019, our hospital was notified that a superbug, New Delhi Metallo-β-lactamase(NDM)–producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), was identified in a patient who had been transferred to another hospital after being at our hospital for 3 weeks. Our facility had a CRE admission screening protocol in place since 2013, but this patient did not meet the criteria to be screened on admission. Methods: The infection prevention (IP) team consulted with the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) and gathered stakeholders to discuss containment strategies using the updated 2019 CDC Interim Guidance for Public Health Response to Contain Novel or Targeted Multidrug-resistant Organisms (MDROs) to determine whether transmission to other patients had occurred. NDM CRE was classified under tier 2 organisms, meaning those primarily associated with healthcare settings and not commonly identified in the region, and we used this framework to conduct an investigation. A point-prevalence study was done in an intensive care unit that consisted of rectal screening of 7 patients for both CRE and Candida auris, another emerging MDRO. These swabs were sent to the Antibiotic Resistance Laboratory Network (ARLN) Central Regional Lab at MDH for testing. An on-site infection control risk assessment was done by the MDH Infection Control Assessment and Response (ICAR) team. Results: All 7 patients were negative for both CRE and C. auris, and no further screening was done. During the investigation, it was discovered that the patient had had elective ambulatory surgery outside the United States in March 2019. The ICAR team assessment provided overall positive feedback to the nursing unit about isolation procedures, cleaning products, and hand hygiene product accessibility. Opportunities included set-up of soiled utility room and updating our process to the 2019 MDH recommendation to screen patients for CRE and C. auris on admission who have been hospitalized, had outpatient surgery, or hemodialysis outside the United States in the previous year. Conclusions: Point-prevalence study results showed no transmission of CRE and highlighted the importance of standard precautions. This event supports the MDH recommendation to screen for CRE any patients who have been hospitalized, had outpatient surgery, or had hemodialysis outside the United States in the previous year.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None


2019 ◽  
Vol 63 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cornelius J. Clancy ◽  
M. Hong Nguyen

ABSTRACT New antibiotics with activity against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) improve outcomes of CRE-infected patients. However, companies developing these drugs have faced financial difficulties. Sales of ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, and plazomicin in the United States totaled $101 million from February 2018 to January 2019. We estimate that the current annual U.S. market for new anti-CRE antibiotics is $289 million (range, $169 to $439 million). Without new antibiotic development models and/or reimbursement reform, the majority of anti-CRE drugs will be commercially inviable.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S237-S237
Author(s):  
Allison C Brown ◽  
Sarah Malik ◽  
Jennifer Huang ◽  
Amelia Bhatnagar ◽  
Rocio Balbuena ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Infections with metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing organisms are emerging in the United States. Treatment options for these infections are limited. We describe MBL genes among carbapenemase positive carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CP-CRE) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CP-CRPA) isolates tested during the first two years of the Antibiotic Resistance Laboratory Network (AR Lab Network). Methods State and local public health laboratories tested CRE and CRPA isolates for organism identification, antimicrobial susceptibility, and PCR-based detection of blaKPC, blaNDM, blaOXA-48-like, blaVIM, and blaIMP carbapenemase genes. All testing results were sent to CDC at least monthly. Results Since January 2017, the AR Lab Network tested 21,733 CRE and 14,141 CRPA. CP-CRE were detected in 37% of CRE; 2% of CRPA were CP-CRPA. Among CP-CRE, 9% (686/8016) were MBL-producers (NDM, VIM, or IMP). Among MBL-producers, a blaNDM gene was detected most often (81%; 551/686). blaNDM were most common among Klebsiella spp. (47%; 261/551), blaIMP were most common among Providencia spp. (53%; 40/75), blaVIM was most common among Enterobacter spp. (19%; 25/62). Twelve percent (96) of MBL CP-CRE contained more than one carbapenemase gene. Among CP-CRPA, 73% (218/300) were MBL producers and blaVIM was the most common gene (62%; 186). Three (1%) MBL CP-CRPA contained more than one carbapenemase. Conclusion Increased testing of CRE and CRPA isolates through the AR Lab Network has facilitated early and rapid detection of hard-to-treat infections caused by MBL-producing organisms across the United States. The widespread distribution of MBL genes highlights the continued need for containment strategies that help prevent transmission between patients and among healthcare facilities. To support therapeutic decisions for severe infections caused by MBL-producing organisms, the AR Lab Network is now offering rapid susceptibility testing against aztreonam/avibactam, using digital dispenser technology. This testing program aims to close the gap between the availability of new drugs or drug combinations and the availability of commercial AST methods, thereby improving patient safety and antimicrobial stewardship. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Timileyin Adediran ◽  
Anthony D Harris ◽  
J Kristie Johnson ◽  
David P Calfee ◽  
Loren G Miller ◽  
...  

Abstract We describe the epidemiologic and microbiologic characteristics of patients co-colonized with different species of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) from 5 hospitals in 4 states. Twenty-eight of 313 patients (8.9%) were co-colonized with at least 2 different CRE species. Different species within the same patient showed identical mechanism resistance in 18/28 (64%) cases.


2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 48.e9-48.e16 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.M. Bartsch ◽  
J.A. McKinnell ◽  
L.E. Mueller ◽  
L.G. Miller ◽  
S.K. Gohil ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s149-s150
Author(s):  
Jennifer Huang ◽  
Amanda Pettinger ◽  
Katie Bantle ◽  
Amelia Bhatnagar ◽  
Sarah Gilbert ◽  
...  

Background: Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) cause significant morbidity and mortality each year in the United States. Treatment options for these infections are often limited, in part due to carbapenemases, which are mobile β-lactam-hydrolyzing enzymes that confer multidrug resistance in CRE. As part of the CDC’s Containment Strategy for Emerging Resistance, public health laboratories (PHLs) in the CDC Antibiotic Resistance Laboratory Network (AR Lab Network) have worked to characterize clinical isolates of CRE for rapid identification of carbapenemase genes. These data are then used by public health and healthcare partners to promote patient safety by decreasing the spread of resistance. We summarize carbapenemase gene profiles in CRE, by genus and geography, using data collected through the AR Lab Network from January 2018 through August 2019. Methods: CRE isolates were submitted to 55 PHLs, including those of all 50 states, 4 large cities, and Puerto Rico, in accordance with each jurisdiction’s reporting laws. PHLs performed phenotypic and molecular testing on isolates to detect targeted, emerging carbapenemase genes and reported results to submitters. Carbapenemase-positive (CP) isolates were defined as PCR positive for ≥1 carbapenemase gene tested: blaKPC, blaNDM, blaVIM, blaIMP, blaOXA-48–LIKE. PHLs submitted results to CDC monthly. Genera other than Enterobacter, Klebsiella, and Escherichia coli are categorized as other genera in this analysis. Data were compiled and analyzed using SAS v 9.4 software. Results: From January 2018 to August 2019, the AR Lab Network tested 25,705 CRE isolates; 8,864 of 25,705 CRE (34%) were CP. Klebsiella spp represented the largest proportion of CP-CRE at 68% (n = 6,063), followed by E. coli (12%, n = 1,052), Enterobacter spp (11%, n = 981), and other genera (9%, n = 768). Figure 1a shows the composition of CP-CRE carbapenemase genes by genus. The most common carbapenemase and genus profiles were blaKPC in Klebsiella (74%; 5,562 of 7,561 blaKPC-positive) blaNDM in E. coli (43%; 372 of 868 blaNDM-positive) blaVIM in Enterobacter spp (35%; 25 of 72 blaVIM-positive), and blaIMP among other genera (90%; 92 of 102 blaIMP-positive). Common CP-CRE genes and genera also varied by geography (Fig. 1b). Conclusions: The AR Lab Network has greatly enhanced our nation’s ability to detect and characterize CP-CRE. Our data provide a snapshot of the organisms and regions where mobile carbapenemase genes are most often detected in CRE. Geographic variation in CP gene profiles provides actionable data to inform local priorities for detection and infection control and provide clinicians with situational awareness of the genes and organisms that are circulating in their region.Funding: NoneDisclosures: In this presentation, the authors discuss the drug combination aztreonam-avibactam and acknowledge that this drug combination is not currently FDA-approved.


Author(s):  
Daniel J. Livorsi ◽  
Margaret L. Chorazy ◽  
Marin L. Schweizer ◽  
Erin C. Balkenende ◽  
Amy E. Blevins ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cornelius J Clancy ◽  
Brian A Potoski ◽  
Deanna Buehrle ◽  
M Hong Nguyen

Abstract Background Polymyxins (colistin, polymyxin B) have been first-line antibiotics against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections. New anti-CRE antibiotics (ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, plazomicin) improve outcomes in CRE-infected patients and reduce toxicity compared with polymyxins. It is unclear how widely polymyxins and newer agents are used to treat CRE infections. Methods We conducted an online survey of US hospital-based pharmacists to determine antibiotic positioning against CRE infections. Numbers of all infections and CRE infections treated with different antibiotics in the United States were determined using IQVIA prescription data and Driving Re-investment in Research and Development and Responsible Antibiotic Use (DRIVE-AB) estimates of CRE infections. Results Ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, or plazomicin were positioned as first-line agents against CRE pneumonia, bacteremia, intra-abdominal infections, and urinary tract infections at 87%, 90%, 83%, and 56% of surveyed US hospitals, respectively. From February 2018 to January 2019, an estimated 9437 and 7941 CRE infections were treated with an intravenous polymyxin or new agent, respectively; these figures represented ~28% (range, 19%–50%) and ~23% (range, 16%–42%) of CRE infections in the United States. Use of ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, or plazomicin exceeded that of intravenous polymyxins against CRE infections as of December 2018. Currently, the new drugs are estimated to treat 35% (23% to 62%) of CRE infections in which they were expected to be first-line agents. Conclusions New anti-CRE agents recently surpassed intravenous polymyxins as treatment for CRE infections, but use is less than expected from their positioning at US hospitals. Research on behavioral and economic factors that impact use of new antibiotics is needed, as are financial “pull” incentives that promote an economically viable marketplace.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document