scholarly journals Comparison of surface roughness of nanofilled and nanohybrid composite resins after polishing with a multi-step technique

2017 ◽  
Vol 884 ◽  
pp. 012091
Author(s):  
B S H Itanto ◽  
M Usman ◽  
A Margono
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Composite Resins ◽  
Nanohybrid Composite

scholarly journals Kekasaran Permukaan Resin Komposit Nanofilled dan Nanohybrid Setelah Paparan Asap Rokok Kretek

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 30
Author(s):  
Johanna Chandra ◽  
Laksmiari Setyowati ◽  
Setyabudi Setyabudi
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Physical Properties ◽  
Cigarette Smoke ◽  
Public Health Problem ◽  
Composite Resins ◽  
Dental Composites ◽  
Distilled Water ◽  
Control Groups ◽  
The Past ◽  
Nanohybrid Composite

Background: Cigarette smoking is a public health problem that may influence physical properties of dental composites. Surface roughness is one of the physical properties of restorative materials that can influence their success. The use of nanofilled and nanohybrid composites in dentistry has substantially increased over the past few years. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the surface roughness of nanofilled and nanohybrid composite resins exposed to kretek cigarette smoke. Methods: Twelve cylindrical specimens were prepared of each material and divided into two groups (n=6). For the control groups, the specimens were immersed in distilled water for 24 hours at 37oC and the water was renewed daily. For the experimental groups, the specimens were exposed daily to kretek cigarette smoke, then washed and stored in distilled water at 37oC. After 21 days, specimens were measured using a Surface Roughness Tester and the data was statistically analyzed. Result: Independent-T Test revealed that there were statistically significant differences in the surface roughness between control and experimental groups both nanofilled and nanohybrid, and between experimental groups nanofilled and nanohybrid. Conclusion: The exposure to kretek cigarette smoke can significantly increase the surface roughness of nanohybrid composites more than nanofilled composites.

scholarly journals New experimental zirconia-reinforced rice husk nanohybrid composite and the outcome of its surface roughness and microhardness in comparison with commercialized nanofilled and microhybrid composite resins

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 21
Author(s):  
NikRozainah Nik Abdul Ghani ◽  
GalvinSim Siang Lin ◽  
NoorHuda Ismail ◽  
Kiran Singbal ◽  
TahirYusuf Noorani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Rice Husk ◽  
Composite Resins ◽  
Nanohybrid Composite

The Effect of Different Polishing Systems on the Surface Roughness of Nanocomposites: Contact Profilometry and SEM Analyses

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
B Oglakci ◽  
BO Kucukyildirim ◽  
ZC Özduman ◽  
E Eliguzeloglu Dalkilic
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Surface Morphology ◽  
Lower Surface ◽  
Composite Resins ◽  
Elemental Content ◽  
Thermo Fisher Scientific ◽  
One Step ◽  
Nanohybrid Composite ◽  
The One ◽  
Glass Fillers

SUMMARY The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of different nanocomposite resins using various analysis methods. Three types of nanocomposite resins were investigated in this study: supra-nanohybrid (Estelite Asteria), nanohybrid (GrandioSo), and nanoceramic composite resins (Ceram-X Spheretec One). Forty-eight disc-shaped specimens (4 mm in diameter, 2 mm in thickness) were fabricated using a Teflon mold and divided into four groups according to the different polishing systems (n=12). All specimens were processed with one of the following methods: Mylar strip (control), one-step polishers (Opti1step), two-step polishers (Clearfil TwistDia), or multistep polishers (Sof-Lex XT Pop-on). The surface roughness (Ra, μm) was measured by contact profilometry (Mahr, Marsurf PS1) (n=10) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Phenom XL) at 400× magnification (n=2). The data were statistically analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Bonferroni correction tests (p<0.05). In addition, the surface morphology and elemental content were examined by SEM and energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS) analyses. Under SEM evaluation, in terms of the polishing systems, there were no significant differences in the surface roughness for supra-nanohybrid composite resin (p>0.05). The multistep polishers created lower surface roughness than the one-step polishers for nanohybrid and nanoceramic composites. In terms of the composite resins, supra-nanohybrid composite exhibited lower surface roughness than nanohybrid composite for all polishing systems (p<0.05). The SEM observations confirmed the surface roughness measurements related to the surface morphology. One-step and two-step polishers created porosity on the surface of nanohybrid and nanoceramic composites. EDS analysis indicated the elemental composition of the particles in the porous zones was quite close to diamond abrasives and glass fillers.

scholarly journals Effect of Different Finishing and Polishing Techniques on Surface Roughness of Two Universal Nanohybrid Composite Resins

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (D) ◽  
pp. 182-188
Author(s):  
Ebaa Alagha ◽  
Waad Alotaibi ◽  
Maha Maghrbil ◽  
Laila Hakami ◽  
Maram Alrashedi
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Vision System ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
Composite Resins ◽  
Resin Composites ◽  
Light Sectioning ◽  
Light Curing ◽  
Nanohybrid Composite ◽  
Glass Slab

AIM: This study investigated the effect of different finishing and polishing systems on surface roughness of two types of universal nanohybrid composite resins. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total number of 40 samples will be prepared to form two main equal groups of specimens (n = 20), according to the composite resin materials. Two universal nanohybrid resin composites were used in this study. First group (A1) is a universal nanohybrid composite resin (Mosaic) and the second group (A2) is a universal nanohybrid composite resin (Harmonize). Each group was subdivided equally into four equal subgroups (n = 5), according to the used finishing and polishing systems. Mold was made to prepare the specimens with a central hole of 4 mm in diameter and 4 mm in thickness. Light curing tip was placed touching the glass slab for 20 s then the cured specimens were removed from the mold and the specimens immediately and immersed in distilled water at 37°C for 24 h. Surface roughness (Ra) was measured using light sectioning vision system. SEM was done to support the results. RESULTS: The results showed that the lowest (Ra) values were recorded by the specimens under Myler strip followed by Polishing Discs treated specimens followed by Diacomp Plus specimens and the highest (Ra) values were recorded by white polishing stone specimens and regardless to finishing or polishing, it was found that mosaic resin composites group recorded statistically significant (p < 0.05) lower roughness mean value than Harmonize resin composites group. p ≤ 0.05 is statistically significant in all tests. CONCLUSION: Achieving long-lasting esthetics in resin composites restorations needs special attention for obtaining optimal resin polymerization and a perfect surface finish using the appropriate finishing and polishing system.

scholarly journals Surface Roughness of Composite Resins Subjected to Hydrochloric Acid

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 268-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Carolina Cabral Roque ◽  
Lauren Oliveira Lima Bohner ◽  
Ana Paula Terossi de Godoi ◽  
Vivian Colucci ◽  
Silmara Aparecida Milori Corona ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Hydrochloric Acid ◽  
Factorial Design ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Artificial Saliva ◽  
Composite Resins ◽  
Tukey Test ◽  
Nanohybrid Composite ◽  
Roughness Measurements ◽  
Acid Challenge

The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of hydrochloric acid on surface roughness of composite resins subjected to brushing. Sixty samples measuring 2 mm thick x 6 mm diameter were prepared and used as experimental units. The study presented a 3x2 factorial design, in which the factors were composite resin (n=20), at 3 levels: microhybrid composite (Z100), nanofilled composite (FiltekTM Supreme), nanohybrid composite (Ice), and acid challenge (n=10) at 2 levels: absence and presence. Acid challenge was performed by immersion of specimens in hydrochloric acid (pH 1.2) for 1 min, 4 times per day for 7 days. The specimens not subjected to acid challenge were stored in 15 mL of artificial saliva at 37 oC. Afterwards, all specimens were submitted to abrasive challenge by a brushing cycle performed with a 200 g weight at a speed of 356 rpm, totaling 17.8 cycles. Surface roughness measurements (Ra) were performed and analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey test (p≤0.05). Surface roughness values were higher in the presence (1.07±0.24) as compared with the absence of hydrochloric acid (0.72±0.04). Surface roughness values were higher for microhybrid (1.01±0.27) compared with nanofilled (0.68 ±0.09) and nanohybrid (0.48±0.15) composites when the specimens were not subjects to acid challenge. In the presence of hydrochloric acid, microhybrid (1.26±0.28) and nanofilled (1.18±0,30) composites presents higher surface roughness values compared with nanohybrid (0.77±0.15). The hydrochloric acid affected the surface roughness of composite resin subjected to brushing.

scholarly journals Surface roughness of nanofilled and nanohybrid composite resins exposed to kretek cigarette smoke

2018 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 37
Author(s):  
Laksmiari Setyowati ◽  
S. Setyabudi ◽  
Johanna Chandra
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Physical Properties ◽  
Cigarette Smoke ◽  
Daily Basis ◽  
Composite Resins ◽  
Public Health Issue ◽  
Distilled Water ◽  
Control Groups ◽  
Nanohybrid Composite ◽  
Experimental Group

Background: Cigarette smoking is a public health issue that may influence the physical properties of dental composites. Surface roughness is one of the physical properties of restorative materials potentially influencing their success. The use of nanofilled and nanohybrid composites in dentistry has increased substantially over the past few years. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the surface roughness of nanofilled and nanohybrid composite resins exposed to kretek cigarette smoke. Methods: Twelve cylindrical specimens of each material were prepared and divided into two groups (n=6). In the control groups, the specimens were immersed in distilled water for 24 hours at 37°C, with the water being renewed daily. For the experimental groups, the specimens were exposed to kretek cigarette smoke on a daily basis, then washed and soaked in distilled water at 37°C. After 21 days, the specimens were measured using a Surface Roughness Tester and the data was then statistically analyzed. Results: An Independent-T Test revealed that there were statistically significant differences in the surface roughness between the control and experimental groups of both nanofilled and nanohybrid composites, as well as between the nanofilled experimental group and the nanohybrid experimental group. Conclusion: Exposure to kretek cigarette smoke can increase the surface roughness of nanohybrid composites to a significantly greater extent than nanofilled composites.

Effect of sealant agents on the color stability and surface roughness of nanohybrid composite resins

2016 ◽  
Vol 116 (1) ◽  
pp. 119-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Doğu Ömür Dede ◽  
Onur Şahin ◽  
Aysegül Koroglu ◽  
Burak Yilmaz
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Color Stability ◽  
Composite Resins ◽  
Nanohybrid Composite

Effect of layer thickness on residual monomer release in polymerization of bulk-fill composites

2021 ◽  
pp. 096739112199958
Author(s):  
Vahti Kılıç ◽  
Feridun Hurmuzlu ◽  
Yılmaz Ugur ◽  
Suzan Cangul
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Layer Thickness ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Ethanol Solution ◽  
Composite Resins ◽  
Residual Monomer ◽  
Steel Mold ◽  
Nanohybrid Composite ◽  
Composite Samples

The aim of the present study was to investigate and compare the quantity of residual monomers leached from the bulk-fill composites with different compositions polymerized at varying layer thickness. Three bulk-fill (X-tra-fil, Beautifil Bulk Restorative, Fill-Up) and a nanohybrid composite (Filtek Z550) were used for the study. The composite resin samples were prepared with a stainless steel mold. For each composite, two groups were constructed. The samples in the first group were prepared using the 2 + 2 mm layering technique. In the second group, the composite samples were applied as a 4 mm-thick one layer and polymerized. Then, each composite samples were kept in a 75% ethanol solution and residual monomers released from composite resins were analyzed with an HPLC device after 24hour and 1 month. The data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. Except the Fill-Up, all of residual monomer elution from the bulk-fill composites was significantly affected by the layer thickness (p < 0.05). The greatest monomer release was detected at 1 month after polymerization as a single 4 mm layer for Beautifil Bulk Restorative. Fill-Up composite showed similar residual monomer release in polymerization at different layer thicknesses compared to other composite resins. In the 2 + 2 mm layering technique, the least monomer elution was detected in the Filtek Z550 composite group. While Bis-GMA was the most released monomer in X-tra fil composite, UDMA was the most released monomer in all other composite resins. During polymerization of the bulk-fill composite, the layer thickness of the composite applied may affect the amount of residual monomers released from the composite resins. Conventional composites may release less monomer than bulk-fill composites when used with layering.

Surface properties of composite resins with and without fluorides for bracket bonding / Propriedades de superfície de resinas compostas com e sem fluoretos para colagem de suportes

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (7) ◽  
pp. 67267-67276
Author(s):  
Emillyn Jones Greijal Dias Holanda ◽  
José Guilherme Neves ◽  
Milton Santamaria-Jr ◽  
Silvia Amélia Scudeler Vedovello ◽  
Ana Rosa Costa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Surface Properties ◽  
Color Change ◽  
Composite Resins ◽  
Hardness Tester ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Roughness Analysis ◽  
Diamond Paste ◽  
Penetration Time

The aim of this study was to evaluate the surface properties of orthodontic resins with and without fluoride. Forty disks, measuring 2 mm thick by 6 mm in diameter, were made of 4 bracket-bonding composite resins (n=10): Transbond Plus Color Change-3M/Unitek (TPCC); Transbond XT- 3M/Unitek (TXT), Orthocem -FGM (OC); Orthocem UV Trace-FGM (OCUV). The discs were photoactivated for 40 seconds with irradiance of 450 mW/cm2 and manually polished in sequence by silicon carbide sandpapers with 1200 and 2000 grain size and finished with diamond paste and felt disc. The surface microhardness analysis was performed using a Shimadzu Micro Hardness Tester HMV-2,000 (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) with a load of 50 gF and a 5 second penetration time. Surface roughness readings were taken using a Surf Corder Roughness Meter (SE 1700- Kosaka, Lisboa-Portugal). For data analysis, ANOVA (one-way) was used, followed by Tukey's post-test (?=0.05). The microhardness results showed a difference (p?0.05) in the means of the orthodontic resins between TPCC and TXT with the other groups. After the surface roughness analysis, the averages showed that TPCC resin showed higher roughness compared to OC and OCUV (p?0.05), and there was no statistical difference with TXT. It was concluded that statistically the composite resins with fluoride showed significant difference regarding hardness and roughness.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document