scholarly journals Modeling legal regulation in the field of legal innovations sustainable development in the agribusiness national projects implementation

2021 ◽  
Vol 937 (3) ◽  
pp. 032062
Author(s):  
Nikolay Saraev ◽  
Gennady Pratsko ◽  
Yuriy Demidchenko ◽  
Irina Khilchevscaya

Abstract Purpose: The purpose of this work is to study the patterns of legal regulation of public relations in the implementation of strategies and concepts related to improving the institutions of state and law in the field of ensuring the security and rights of citizens. Design/methodology/approach: The methodological basis of the research was made up of general scientific and private scientific methods (comparative-legal, statistical and the method of expert assessments). Findings: Failure to comply with the requirements of modeling the target system, forces and controls and predictable indicators has a negative impact on the level of legal technology of modern legislation, the uniformity of legal practice, the implementation of general legal principles, the effectiveness of institutional mechanisms that guarantee compliance with the requirements of the law, the inevitability, proportionality and fairness of measures of responsibility for their violation. Originality/value: Particular attention should be paid to improving Russian legislation, unswerving observance of the principles of social justice, equality before the law and the court, increasing the efficiency of the activities and authority of state bodies and officials, in connection with which we consider it timely and expedient to adopt the Concept of ensuring the rule of law in the Russian Federation.

Author(s):  
Nikolai S. Kovalev

The object of the study is the implementation of equality principle before the law by fixing equal rights and obligations of prisoners in the normative legal acts of the Soviet state. The subject of research: provisions of normative legal acts of the Provisional Government, departmental normative acts of the People’s Commissariat of Justice of the RSFSR and People’s Commissariat for Internal Affairs of the RSFSR. As a methodological basis for cognition, general scientific methods of analysis, synthesis, induction, de-duction are used, which allow us to investigate aspects of legal reality directly related to the implementation of the principles of penal enforcement (correctional labor) legislation, to formulate reasonable conclusions. Private scientific methods: formal-legal and comparative-legal – allow us to identify differences in the legal regulation of the legal status of prisoners in the pre-war period. As a result of the conducted research, we make a reasonable conclusion that the principle of equality before the law, although it was not enshrined in specific norms regulating the procedure for the execution and serving of imprisonment, however, was manifested in the provisions regulating the legal status of persons deprived of liberty. The notions of equality before the law of both citizens in general and prisoners in particular were not the fundamental basis of the legislation of the Soviet State. Prisoners were differentiated on the basis of social affiliation, due to: 1) the principle of class approach proclaimed by the Constitution of the RSFSR; 2) the functioning of two systems of places of deprivation of liberty for prisoners with different social status; 3) regulating the execution (serving) of sentences in the form of deprivation of liberty by various regulatory legal acts.


2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 547-571
Author(s):  
Andrey V. Skorobogatov ◽  
Alexandr V. Krasnov

The article explores the legal nature of law principles from the perspective of philosophical and legal analysis. The purpose of the article is to form scientifically based knowledge on the philosophical and legal nature of the category law principle using postclassical methodological tools. Research Methods: The methodology of the article is based on the postclassical scientific rationality. The authors use an integrative approach to the study of legal reality in combination with a phenomenological and synergetic methodology, thereby using a number of general scientific and special scientific methods in a particular logical system, which makes it possible to study law principles both ontologically, in terms of their role in law in general, and epistemologically as well as axiologically. Moreover, the content, functioning and development of law principles are considered phenomenologically, as well as in the context of law communication. Results: The law principle in the ontological aspect is a fundamental form of law, reflecting the most significant ideas concerning regulation of public relations; the law principle is used as a direct regulator along with the rule of law. The epistemological law principle can be interpreted as a generalizing category, reflecting interpretation and assessment of legal reality from the standpoint of postclassical methodology. From an axiological point of view, the law principle embodies the law and social values and traditions that are dominant within the framework of a given socio-cultural chronotope, and is also used as one of the fundamental tools for constructing legal reality and its development. Conclusions: the law nature of law principles is determined with the account of postclassical methodology onto-logically, epistemologically and axiologically, in terms of their dual role in formation, development and construction of legal reality at all of its levels, in the context of both objective and subjective factors. The findings can be applied in drawing up concepts of legal and judicial reforms in terms of targeted construction of legal reality, as well as in the process of predicting the development of the Russian legal system.


Author(s):  
Anton Nikolaevich Rundkvist

The objects of this research are the principle of justice as a universal fundamental, cornerstone and key cohesive general legal superprinciple and the legal axioms as transmitters of most objectified legal justice reflected in simple and clear formulations. The subject of this research is correlation between the aforementioned concepts, which allows looking at the problem of indeterminacy of the content of the principle of justice from a new perspective, namely through indicating the violation of legal axioms as one of criterions of ultimate injustice. Methodological framework is comprised of the general scientific methods of deduction, induction, analysis and synthesis, as well as sociological method of content analysis used examination of the materials of law enforcement practice of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation. The work yielded the following results: 1) substantiation is made on the key role of the principle of justice in law as a whole; 2) an original definition is given to the legal axioms ; 3) demarcation is drawn between legal axioms and legal principles in accordance with the criteria of external manifestation, evidence of conformity or nonconformity, nature of action, and depending on the presence or absence of systemic links, which is important from theoretical and practical perspectives, 4) a direct correlation is established between noncompliance with legal axioms and the loss of baseline claim to justice by legal regulation. The theoretical novelty of this work consists in the fact that legal axioms that establish the generally accepted imperative rules are viewed as a primary reference point for resolving the issue on possible violation of the principle of justice


Legal Concept ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 18-23
Author(s):  
Ekaterina Zaitseva ◽  

Introduction: the knowledge of the legal regulation sphere and its limits is impossible without the analysis of the factors under the influence of which it is formed. Despite the obvious significance, the factors of establishing the limits of legal regulation did not become an independent subject of research but were only indirectly affected in the context of the analysis of the legal education factors. Meanwhile, these factors are of independent importance and need additional reflection. Their identification and clarification contribute to the introduction of the concept of “smart regulation” in the law-making policy of the modern state. Purpose: to identify the factors of setting the limits of legal regulation. Methods: the methodological framework for the study was made up of the general scientific and specific scientific methods of cognition. Results: the analysis of the factors of the establishment of the legal regulation sphere and its limits with the aim of its most adequate reflection as a subject of legal regulation is a necessary condition for improving the effectiveness of the law-making policy of the modern state. Conclusions: the factors that determine the limits of legal regulation can be objective and subjective. The objective factors determine the limits of the sphere of legal regulation; as such, it is necessary to consider the properties of public relations that have a legal nature, which in turn are under the influence of the objective factors of a natural and social nature, traditionally referred to as lawforming. The main natural factors should include biological, geographical, climatic, and physiological factors. The main objective social factors are scientific and technological, axiological, economic, and psychological. The identification of the sphere of legal regulation and its consolidation as a subject of legal regulation are caused not only by the influence of the objective factors but also by the subjective ones, which should include political-legal, scientific-cognitive, and technical-legal. All these factors interact with each other and “work” in the system. Depending on the specifics of the public attitude that is in the sphere of legal regulation and is fixed as its subject, the influence of various factors will be unequal.


Retos ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
pp. 662-672
Author(s):  
Inna Bolokan ◽  
Georgiy Samoylenko ◽  
Maxym Tkalych ◽  
Bogdan Panchenko ◽  
Volodymyr Dmytriv

  Sports law is a relatively new phenomenon for jurisprudence in Ukraine. At present, there is no developed theoretical basis for responsibility in the field of sports in the domestic legal science. This publication is a study of world and national experience in solving this problem and is intended to be a source of further research in the field of sports law. The purpose of the study is to analyze the state of legal regulation of liability in the field of sports. The object of the study is the social relations that have developed in the field of sports law. The subject of the study is the public relations that have developed in the field of sports law in relation to legal and sports-competitive liability. Philosophical, general scientific and special scientific methods such as dialectical, system-structural, comparative-legal, and formal-legal methods acted as research methods. As a result of the work, the general features of legal regulation of sports sanctions in foreign countries were established, the terminology and conceptual schemes fundamental for legal doctrine were analyzed, the description of the state of research of the problem in the scientific environment is given, the national situation on responsibility in the field of sports is analyzed, typical examples of court cases in the researched aspect are specified, and also recommendations on improvement of the legal base are given.  Resumen: El derecho deportivo es un fenómeno relativamente nuevo para la jurisprudencia en Ucrania. En la actualidad, no existe una base teórica desarrollada para la responsabilidad en el campo del deporte en la ciencia jurídica nacional. Esta publicación es un estudio de la experiencia nacional y mundial en la solución de este problema y pretende ser una fuente de investigación adicional en el campo del derecho deportivo. El objetivo del estudio es analizar el estado de la regulación legal de la responsabilidad en el ámbito del deporte. El objeto del estudio son las relaciones sociales que se han desarrollado en el ámbito del derecho deportivo. El tema del estudio son las relaciones públicas que se han desarrollado en el ámbito del derecho deportivo en relación a la responsabilidad jurídica y competitiva deportiva. Actuaron como métodos de investigación métodos filosóficos, científicos generales y científicos especiales tales como métodos dialécticos, sistémicos-estructurales, comparativos-legales, formales-legales. Como resultado del trabajo se establecieron las características generales de la regulación legal de las sanciones deportivas en países extranjeros, se analizó la terminología y esquemas conceptuales fundamentales para la doctrina jurídica, se da la descripción del estado de la investigación del problema en el ámbito científico. , se analiza la situación nacional de la responsabilidad en el ámbito del deporte, se especifican ejemplos típicos de casos judiciales en el aspecto investigado, y también se dan recomendaciones sobre la mejora de la base jurídica.


Author(s):  
Николай Сергеевич Ковалев

Объектом представленного в статье исследования являются общественные правоотношения в области уголовно-исполнительного законодательства, которые заключаются в реализации равных прав и обязанностей, а также в их защите государством. Предметом выступают нормы уголовно-исполнительного права, регламентирующие взаимоотношения субъектов правоотношений по поводу исполнения и отбывания всех видов уголовных наказаний, одним из которых выступает осужденный в качестве лица со специальным правовым статусом. В качестве методологической основы познания в работе были использованы общенаучные методы - анализ, сравнение, дедукция, индукция, и частнонаучные - формально-юридический и метод анализа. Принцип равенства осужденных перед законом предусматривает равные права и обязанности осужденных в уголовно-исполнительным праве, а также единую возможность для реализации этих права и исполнения возложенных законом обязанностей. При этом гарантии их соблюдения, а равно и защита, устанавливаются государством. The object of this study is public relations in the field of criminal-executive legislation, which consist in the implementation of equal rights and duties, as well as in their protection by the state, which is one of the most pressing issues. The subject of the research is the norms of criminal-executive law governing the relationship between the subjects of legal relations regarding the execution and serving of all types of criminal penalties, which the convicted person, on the one hand, acts as a person with special legal status. As a methodological basis of knowledge, general scientific methods were used in the work: analysis, comparison, deduction, induction and private science: formal-legal and method of analysis. The principle of equality of convicted persons before the law provides for equal rights and obligations of convicted persons in criminal-executive law, as well as a single opportunity for the exercise of these rights and the fulfillment of obligations imposed by law. At the same time, guarantees of their observance, as well as protection, are established by the state.


Legal Concept ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 103-107
Author(s):  
Anastasia Kuleshova

Introduction: the paper deals with certain issues of the legal regulation of the relations in oil and gas production. The reasons for the fragmentary and non-systematic legal regulation of the economic relations for the planning and working of mines by the special legislation are highlighted. The paper considers the system of norms regulating the control in the Russian Federation, which requires further development regarding the establishment of sanctions for the violations of environmental safety and negative impact on the environment. The purpose of research: to analyze the features of the legal regulation of public relations in the oil and gas sector, identify the theoretical positions and problems of the law enforcement, and form recommendations for improving the legislation in this area. The research used the following methods: the general method (dialectical materialism); the general scientific methods (logical (induction, deduction, analysis and synthesis), system and functional); private law methods (formal legal, comparative legal). Results: the issues of the legal regulation of the regime of oil and petroleum products are considered, and the theoretical concepts are presented. The problems of the law enforcement based on the dual interpretation of the norms of law in the oil sector and, as a result, their incorrect application are identified. The problem of the local regulation of the fuel and economic complex is raised and the recommendation is made to generalize or fill in the gaps in the regulations in the sphere of regulating public relations in the oil and gas industry. Conclusion: the author substantiates the need to fill in the gaps in the legislation starting from the bylaw regulation and to rely on the practical experience of the companies in the field of oil and gas production. It is argued that it is possible to fill in the gaps in the law at the first stage by means of issuing orders from the ministries and departments.


2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 281-293
Author(s):  
Galina S. Belyaeva

The purpose of the study is to conduct a general theoretical analysis of scientific approaches to the definition of the concept and essence of the legal regime in order to overcome its narrow industrial understanding and identify the role and significance in the process of legal regulation. General scientific and private scientific methods of knowledge including formal legal and comparative legal methods have been chosen as research methods of this paper. Logical techniques allowing to reveal the essence of legal regimes and formulate the author's definition of them have also been applied. The analysis of scientific works expressing various opinions indicates that at present an instrumental approach to the definition of the concept and essence of the legal regime prevails directly (or indirectly through the procedure of legal regulation) as a set of legal means (instruments). The following are mentioned as signs of the legal regime: mandatory normative legal consolidation (formal legal nature), specific target, special regulatory order based on a combination of legal means and methods of legal regulation, in relation to subjects of law, i.e., in a subjective sense, creating of favorable (or unfavorable) conditions to achieve certain interests, systemic and integrated character of a regime and its special structure. As a result, the author's definition of the legal regime is presented as a special procedure for the legal regulation of public relations, based on a certain combination of legal means and methods of legal regulation (permits, prohibitions, and positive obligations) aimed at achieving the relevant legal goals and planned optimal socially significant result.


Author(s):  
Наталья Рубцова ◽  
Natal'ya Rubcova

The paper features the correlation between the concepts of mechanism and method of legal regulation in the context of entrepreneurial activity. The research objective was to determine the features and prospects of the development of the mechanism of legal regulation in business sphere. The research was based on the General scientific dialectical method and such private scientific methods as comparative, historical, logical, and modeling. The paper describes separate elements of the mechanism of legal regulation that structure certain public relations. The authors analyzed opinions of legal scholars on the mechanism and method of legal regulation. The mechanism and the method of legal regulation proved to be non-identical concepts. In contrast to the method of legal regulation, which means a set of techniques and methods by which certain social relations are regulated, the mechanism of legal regulation reflects a certain technology of legal regulation. In addition, it ensures the functioning of both the system of law as a whole and its individual branches and institutions. This study can serve as a basis for a further analysis of the mechanism of legal regulation to determine its effectiveness in relation to business regulation.


Author(s):  
Nikolai S. Kovalev

One of the areas of effective legal regulation of penal legal relations is the compliance of lawmaking and law-enforcement activities with the requirements of the fundamental provisions of penal legislation. The object of the research is the implementation of the equality principle of convicts un-der the law through the consolidation of equal rights, duties and legitimate in-terests of convicts in the penal legislation. The subject of the research is the penal legislation norms governing the institution of the convicts’ departure outside the penitentiary. We indicate the connection of the phenomenon un-der study with the lawmaking and law-enforcement aspect of penal law. We outline some of the law-making and law-enforcement penal issues that are directly related to the consolidation and application of the penal legislation norms when granting convicts the right to leave the penitentiary to visit chil-dren. As a methodological basis for cognition, the following are used: general scientific methods of analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, which make it possible to investigate aspects of penal legal reality directly related to the im-plementation of the principles of penal legislation, to formulate well-grounded conclusions; private scientific methods – formal legal and comparative legal – make it possible to identify problems of legal regulation, develop proposals for changing legislation. As a result of the study, we identify the penal legislation norms that contradict the equality principle of convicts under the law, and propose ways to eliminate the identified contradictions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document