Is Long Noncoding SNHG7 a Reliable Diagnostic Tool for Metastasis Diagnosis of Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Author(s):  
Mingchao Hu ◽  
Yong Wu ◽  
Wenzhao Su ◽  
Qiang Wang ◽  
Chungen Xing
2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18608-e18608
Author(s):  
Marco Tagliamento ◽  
Elisa Agostinetto ◽  
Marco Bruzzone ◽  
Marcello Ceppi ◽  
Kamal S. Saini ◽  
...  

e18608 Background: Patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and a diagnosis of cancer are at high risk of severe symptomatic disease (COVID-19) and death. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies, to estimate the case-fatality rate (CFR) of patients with solid or hematological tumors and SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed library up to 31 January, 2021, was performed in order to identify publications reporting the CFR among adult patients with solid or hematological tumors and SARS-CoV-2 infection. CFR was defined as the rate of deaths among SARS-CoV-2-positive cancer patients. Moreover, we separately assessed the CFR among patients with lung and breast cancer. Studies with at least 10 patients were included. The CFR was assessed through a random effect model, and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. The Higgins I2 index was computed to assess the heterogeneity between studies. Results: The systematic search of the literaturereturned 1,727studies. 1,551 were excluded on the basis of the title, 29 based on the abstract, and 3 were duplicates. A total of 144 studies were selected, including 35,725 patients with solid or hematological tumors and SARS-CoV-2 infection. In total, 46 and 32 studies reported the CFR among COVID-19 patients with lung (total N = 1,555) and breast (total N = 1.398) cancer, respectively. Overall, the CFR was 25.5% (95% CI 23.1%-28.1%, Egger test p < 0.001). A sensitivity analysis, after excluding studies with less than 100 patients, showed a CFR of 22.1% (95% CI 19.4%-25.2%). The CFR among patients with lung cancer and SARS-CoV2 infection was 33.4% (95% CI 28.1%-39.6%) when including all studies and 26.3% (95% CI 17.6%-39.2%) at the sensitivity analysis after excluding studies with less than 100 patients. The CFR among patients with breast cancer and SARS-CoV2 infection was 13.7% (95% CI 9.1%-20.7%) when including all studies and 13.0% (95% CI 7.6%-22.1%) at the sensitivity analysis after excluding studies with less than 100 patients. Conclusions: One year after the outbreak of the pandemic, this large meta-analysis reports the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with cancer. This population experienced a high probability of mortality, with a comparatively higher CFR in patients with lung cancer, and a comparatively lower CFR in patients with breast cancer. Patients with an underlying diagnosis of cancer require special attention with aggressive preventive measures that also include early access to COVID-19 vaccination.


2019 ◽  
Vol 59 (6) ◽  
pp. 340-8
Author(s):  
Hanum Ferdian ◽  
Dian Ibnu Wahid ◽  
Samad Samad ◽  
Anggun Esti Wardani ◽  
Guntur Surya Alam ◽  
...  

Background Neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS) is commonly diagnosed by clinical sign and symptoms, blood gas analysis, and chest x-ray. In the past, lung ultrasound (LUS) was not standard for NRDS examination. Many studies show that ultrasound diagnostic tool for NRDS is accurate, reliable, low cost, easy to use, and safe because due to no ionizing radiation. Objective To determine the sensitivity and specificity of LUS in diagnosing NRDS. Methods This meta-analysis study was conducted LUS as a diagnostic tool for NRDS. Inclusion criteria were all studies from PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Library, without any limitation on published journals, as well as using keywords or search terms of ultrasound, neonatal, and respiratory distress syndrome. Statistical analysis was undertaken using MedCalc® version 18.2 software. Results Seven studies with a total of 580 patients met the inclusion criteria. Proportional meta-analysis obtained random effects models, with total sensitivity of LUS was 97.2% (95% CI for I2 74.24 to 92.88; P<0.0001) and specificity of LUS was 94.8% (95% CI for I2 88.60 to 98.03; P<0.00001). Conclusion Lung ultrasound should be considered as a diagnostic tool for NRDS because it is high in sensitivity and specificity, inexpensive, safe, as well as limited radiation exposure.


2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 447-453 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Hema Shree ◽  
Pratibha Ramani ◽  
Herald Sherlin ◽  
Gheena Sukumaran ◽  
Gifrrina Jeyaraj ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 18 (10) ◽  
pp. 1244-1252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emilio Rodrigo ◽  
Marcos López-Hoyos ◽  
Mario Corral ◽  
Emilio Fábrega ◽  
Gema Fernández-Fresnedo ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianning Dong ◽  
Honggang Wang ◽  
Jie Zhao ◽  
Weiming Zhu ◽  
Liang Zhang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document