Variation of the basal metabolic rate and dietary energy intake of Colombian women during 1 y

1994 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
G B Spurr ◽  
D L Dufour ◽  
J C Reina ◽  
R G Hoffmann ◽  
C I Waslien ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
pp. 175-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. HUBÁČEK ◽  
H. PIKHART ◽  
A. PEASEY ◽  
R. KUBÍNOVÁ ◽  
M. BOBÁK

The FTO gene variants are the most important genetic determinants of body weight and obesity known so far, but the mechanism of their effect remains unclear. We have analyzed FTO rs17817449 variant (G>T in first intron) in 6024 adults aged 45-69 years to assess the potential mediating role of diet and physical activity. Diet was assessed by a 140-item food frequency questionnaire. Physical activity was measured by hours spent during a typical week by sport, walking and other activities outside of work requiring heavy and medium physical activity. Basal metabolic rate was calculated according Schofield formula. The FTO variant was significantly associated with body mass index (means in GG, GT and TT carriers were 28.7, 28.2 and 27.8 kg/m2, p<0.001) and basal metabolic rate (BMR) (means in GG, GT and TT were 1603, 1588 and 1576 kcal per day, respectively, p<0.008) but it was not associated with physical activity, total energy intake or with energy intakes from fat, carbohydrates, proteins or alcohol. Results were essentially similar in men and women and the adjustment for physical activity or dietary energy intake did not reduce the effect of the FTO polymorphism. Means of BMR per kg of body weight was lowest in GG carriers (20.09, 20.21 for GT and 20.30 for TT, p<0.006) and this effect was more pronounced in females. These results suggest that the effect of the FTO rs17817449 variant on BMI in Caucasian adults is not mediated by energy intake or physical activity, but some effect on BMR per kg of body weight is possible.


2020 ◽  
Vol 92 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-33
Author(s):  
Gianpaolo Perletti ◽  
Vittorio Magri ◽  
Pietro Manuel Ferraro ◽  
Emanuele Montanari ◽  
Alberto Trinchieri

Objective: Obesity has been associated with an increased risk of kidney stone formation. The presence of obesity is due to an imbalance between energy intake and energy consumption resulting from physical activity and resting metabolic rate. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to assess the differences in dietary energy intake levels between patients developing urinary stones versus healthy individuals. Materials and methods: Medline/PubMed and EMBASE databases search was performed using the terms “urolithiasis”, “kidney stones*”, “calcul*”, “energy”, “calor*”, “intake”, “food”, “kilojoule/kjoule”, “Kilocal*/kcal” from January 1st, 2000, and were assessed as up to date on September 30th, 2019. Results: After having screened 1.782 records, four studies were included in the meta-analysis. The total population was 467.063, including 453.078 healthy men and/or women and 13.985 men and/or women affected by nephrolithiasis. When energy intake data were pooled irrespective of the sex of participants, mean calory intake values were significantly higher in nephrolithiasis patients, compared to healthy individuals. The mean difference (MD) was 39.16 kcal (95% CI 18.53 to 59.78, p = 0.0002, random-effects model, inverse-variance weighing). The odds ratio for this comparison – calculated from the standardized mean difference – is significant (OR = 1.946; 95% CI: 1.869 to 5.561). Conclusions: Patients affected by urolithiasis show a significantly higher energy intake in various patient populations (USA, China and Korea) including subjects of both sexes. The relevance of this finding should be confirmed by studies in populations showing different and diverse dietary patterns, and by evaluating energy consumption linked to physical activity and metabolic rate in renal stone formers.


2010 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Luana C. dos Santos ◽  
Mariana N. Pascoal ◽  
Mauro Fisberg ◽  
Isa de P. Cintra ◽  
Lígia A. Martini

BMJ ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. m4561
Author(s):  
R A Lewis

AbstractObjectiveTo estimate the daily dietary energy intake for me to maintain a constant body weight. How hard can it be?DesignVery introspective study.SettingAt home. In lockdown. (Except every Tuesday afternoon and Saturday morning, when I went for a run.)ParticipantsMe. n=1.Main outcome measuresMy weight, measured each day.ResultsSleeping, I shed about a kilogram each night (1.07 (SD 0.25) kg). Running 5 km, I shed about half a kilogram (0.57 (SD 0.15) kg). My daily equilibrium energy intake is about 10 000 kJ (10 286 (SD 201) kJ). Every kJ above (or below) 10 000 kJ adds (or subtracts) about 40 mg (35.4 (SD 3.2) mg).ConclusionsBody weight data show persistent variability, even when the screws of control are tightened and tightened.


2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-117
Author(s):  
Christopher G. BEAN ◽  
Helen R. WINEFIELD ◽  
Amanda D. HUTCHINSON ◽  
Charli SARGENT ◽  
Zumin SHI

1969 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 197-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. Davey ◽  
D. P. Morgan ◽  
C. M. Kincaid

2000 ◽  
Vol 2000 ◽  
pp. 107-107
Author(s):  
R. H. Santos Ricalde ◽  
I. J. Lean

Energy requirements for maintenance in pregnant sows increase when they are kept outdoors under temperate climates in comparison to indoors. However, there is little information on the energy requirements of breeding sows kept outdoors in tropical environments. Knowledge about the correct feeding management for pregnant sows kept outdoors will optimise the utilisation of feeding resources available in the tropics. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of energy level supply during pregnancy on backfat change and liveweight change of primiparous sows kept outdoors under tropical conditions.


2004 ◽  
Vol 112 (15) ◽  
pp. 1472-1480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenny Odum ◽  
Helen Tinwell ◽  
Graham Tobin ◽  
John Ashby

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document