Improvement of postinpatient psychiatric follow-up for veterans using telehealth

2020 ◽  
Vol 77 (4) ◽  
pp. 288-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy W Brearly ◽  
Courtney S Goodman ◽  
Calandra Haynes ◽  
Katherine McDermott ◽  
Jared A Rowland

Abstract Purpose To describe the implementation and initial outcomes of a pilot interdisciplinary telehealth clinic, Allied Transitional Telehealth Encounters post-iNpatient Discharge (ATTEND), providing clinical pharmacy specialist follow-up for veterans transitioning from inpatient to outpatient mental healthcare in a Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) hospital. Summary The ATTEND clinic’s primary intervention was providing medication management appointments through clinical video telehealth (CVT) to patient discharge locations through a DVA-provided tablet. An interdisciplinary team supported care through on-unit inpatient training, secure messaging, and self-help applications. Clinical outcomes were measured through readmission rates, wait times, self-report measures, and follow-up interview at the completion of ATTEND services. Twenty patients completed on-unit training, and 16 unique patients were seen for at least 1 outpatient appointment. Inpatient readmission rates were lower for ATTEND patients than with standard care (5% versus 19%, respectively). Wait times until first postdischarge mental health appointment were reduced by a mean of 18.6 (S.D., 8.8) days. The pharmacist made medication interventions, including dosing changes, education on incorrect administration, and medication discontinuation. Self-reported psychological symptoms decreased during ATTEND participation. Post-ATTEND interviews indicated high levels of acceptance and interest in continued tablet-based care. Primary challenges included unique technological limitations and effective care coordination. Conclusion The ATTEND telehealth clinic provided postinpatient mental health follow-up that was more prompt and convenient than conventional on-site appointments. Psychiatric self-report improved during ATTEND-facilitated transition to outpatient care, and the recidivism rate for ATTEND patients was lower than the general inpatient rate during the same time period.

1989 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 325-338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce R. Deforge ◽  
Jeffery Sobal

Depression is one of the most common mental health problems in the elderly, but there is little consensus about the best way to assess depression in the aged. The relationship between the CES-D and the ZUNG self-report depression scales was investigated in seventy-eight elderly people with osteoarthritis (mean age 71). The correlation between the scales was r = .69, with the CES-D classifying 15 percent of the participants as depressed, as compared to 6 percent by the ZUNG. Psychological symptoms had the strongest relationship with overall depression scores on both scales. No sex differences were found on psychological items on either scale, but females reported more somatic symptoms on the ZUNG. People over age seventy-four reported more psychological symptoms than their younger counterparts.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 358-358
Author(s):  
Hyojin Choi ◽  
Kristin Litzelman ◽  
Molly Maher ◽  
Autumn Harnish

Abstract Spouses of cancer survivors are 33% less likely to receive guideline-concordant depression treatment than other married adults. However, depression is only one of many manifestations of psychological distress for caregivers. This exploratory study sought to assess the paths by which caregivers access mental health-related treatment. Using nationally representative data from the Medical Expenditures Panel Survey, we assessed the proportion of caregivers who received a mental health-related prescription or psychotherapy visit across care settings (office based versus outpatient hospital, emergency room, or inpatient visit), provider type (psychiatric, primary care, other specialty, or other), and visit purpose (regular checkup, diagnosis and treatment, follow-up, psychotherapy, other). In addition, we assessed the health condition(s) associated with the treatment. The findings indicate that a plurality of caregivers accessed mental health-related treatment through an office-based visit (90%) with a primary care provider (47%). A minority accessed this care through a psychologist or psychiatrist (11%) or a physician with another specialty (12%) or other provider types. Nearly a third accessed treatment as part of a regular check-up (32%). These patterns did not differ from the general population after controlling for sociodemographic characteristics. Interestingly, mental health-related treatments were associated with a mental health diagnosis in only a minority of caregivers. The findings confirm the importance of regular primary care as a door way to mental healthcare, and highlight the range of potential paths to care. Future research will examine the correlates of accessing care across path types.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. e0241704
Author(s):  
Jennifer Wild ◽  
Shama El-Salahi ◽  
Michelle Degli Esposti ◽  
Graham R. Thew

Background Emergency responders are routinely exposed to traumatic critical incidents and other occupational stressors that place them at higher risk of mental ill health compared to the general population. There is some evidence to suggest that resilience training may improve emergency responders’ wellbeing and related health outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a tertiary service resilience intervention compared to psychoeducation for improving psychological outcomes among emergency workers. Methods We conducted a multicentre, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial. Minim software was used to randomly allocate police, ambulance, fire, and search and rescue services personnel, who were not suffering from depression or post-traumatic stress disorder, to Mind’s group intervention or to online psychoeducation on a 3:1 basis. The resilience intervention was group-based and included stress management and mindfulness tools for reducing stress. It was delivered by trained staff at nine centres across England in six sessions, one per week for six weeks. The comparison intervention was psychoeducation about stress and mental health delivered online, one module per week for six weeks. Primary outcomes were assessed by self-report and included wellbeing, resilience, self-efficacy, problem-solving, social capital, confidence in managing mental health, and number of days off work due to illness. Follow-up was conducted at three months. Blinding of participants, researchers and outcome assessment was not possible due to the type of interventions. Results A total of 430 participants (resilience intervention N = 317; psychoeducation N = 113) were randomised and included in intent-to-treat analyses. Linear Mixed-Effects Models did not show a significant difference between the interventions, at either the post-intervention or follow-up time points, on any outcome measure. Conclusions The limited success of this intervention is consistent with the wider literature. Future refinements to the intervention may benefit from targeting predictors of resilience and mental ill health. Trial registration ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN79407277.


2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 145-156
Author(s):  
Nicholas Guenzel ◽  
Leeza Struwe

BACKGROUND: Historical trauma (HT) among American Indians (AIs) has been linked with poor mental health but has been inadequately studied among urban populations. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to describe historical trauma, historical loss associated thoughts, ethnic experience, and psychological symptoms among a population of urban AIs. METHOD: This was a mixed methods study. In addition to focus groups, survey participants were administered the Historical Losses Scale, the Historical Losses Associated Symptoms Scale, the Scale of Ethnic Experience, and the Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment Adult Self-Report. Rates of psychological symptoms were compared with matched controls from a normative data set. RESULTS: Participants reported a strong sense of ethnic identity, a moderate desire to associate with other AIs, moderate comfort within mainstream society, and moderately high perceived discrimination. The most common HT themes were loss of culture, respect by children of traditional ways, and language. Compared with controls, participants had higher rates of aggressive behavior, substance use, thought problems, and obsessive symptoms, but some of these issues are likely explained by cultural factors. A greater number of participants met the clinical threshold for multiple problems compared with controls. CONCLUSIONS: This sample of AIs reported frequent experiences of discrimination. HT is a significant factor in the lives of many urban AIs who also have significantly higher rates of a number of mental health problems. Providers must be aware of these issues to provide the most effective care to AIs.


2020 ◽  
pp. bmjspcare-2019-001986 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly O'Malley ◽  
Laura Blakley ◽  
Katherine Ramos ◽  
Nicole Torrence ◽  
Zachary Sager

ContextPsychological symptoms are common among palliative care patients with advanced illness, and their effect on quality of life can be as significant as physical illness. The demand to address these issues in palliative care is evident, yet barriers exist to adequately meet patients’ psychological needs.ObjectivesThis article provides an overview of mental health issues encountered in palliative care, highlights the ways psychologists and psychiatrists care for these issues, describes current approaches to mental health services in palliative care, and reviews barriers and facilitators to psychology and psychiatry services in palliative care, along with recommendations to overcome barriers.ResultsPatients in palliative care can present with specific mental health concerns that may exceed palliative care teams’ available resources. Palliative care teams in the USA typically do not include psychologists or psychiatrists, but in palliative care teams where psychologists and psychiatrists are core members of the treatment team, patient well-being is improved.ConclusionPsychologists and psychiatrists can help meet the complex mental health needs of palliative care patients, reduce demands on treatment teams to meet these needs and are interested in doing so; however, barriers to providing this care exist. The focus on integrated care teams, changing attitudes about mental health, and increasing interest and training opportunities for psychologists and psychiatrists to be involved in palliative care, may help facilitate the integration of psychology and psychiatry into palliative care teams.


2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cecilia Kjellgren

Purpose: This study explores outcomes of treatment provided by specialized units within the social welfare sector in Sweden to clients seeking help with hypersexual behavior. Method: The participants were 27 males and 1 female ( M = 40.3 years) who sought help from one of the three specialized units within social welfare in Sweden. A pretest–posttest group design was used to assess changes after treatment. Quantitative data were collected through interviews and self-report forms. Results: At posttreatment stage (on average a 10-month follow-up), mental health was significantly improved and hypersexual behavior reportedly reduced. The treatment at the specialized units appeared to help the clients. Conclusions: The specialized units seemed to deliver favorable service without shaming and stigmatizing participants. As this study can be considered a pilot study, it needs to be replicated.


2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Birgitta Wickberg ◽  
Marie Bendix ◽  
Margareta Blomdahl Wetterholm ◽  
Alkistis Skalkidou

Sweden has a unique opportunity to identify and follow up women presenting with, or at risk for, perinatal mental health problems and disorders because universal screening programmes are provided by its primary healthcare system. Although they are implemented across almost the entire population, screening programmes are not necessarily leading to effective interventions because the multidisciplinary perinatal mental healthcare teams that provide for the assessment and treatment of moderate to severe disorders are very few in number and must be increased. In particular, efforts to reach immigrant parents must be intensified to achieve equal quality of care for all.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica L. Schleider ◽  
Mallory Dobias ◽  
Susmita Pati

INTRODUCTION SUMMARY. Major depression in youth is a serious psychiatric illness with extensive acute and chronic morbidity and mortality. In 2018, the American Academy of Pediatrics released updated practice guidelines promoting screening of youth depression in primary care (PC) clinics across the country, representing a critical step towards increasing early depression detection. However, the challenge of bridging screening with service access remains. Even when diagnosed by PC providers, <50% of youth with elevated depressive symptoms access treatment of any kind. Thus, there is a need for interventions that are more feasible for youths and parents to access and complete—and that may strengthen parents’ likelihood of pursuing future, longer-term services for their child.Single-session interventions (SSIs) may offer a promising path toward these goals. SSIs include core elements of comprehensive, evidence-based treatments, but their brevity makes them easier to disseminate beyond traditional clinical settings. Indeed, SSIs can successfully treat youth psychopathology: In a meta-analysis of 50 randomized controlled trials, SSIs reduced youth mental health difficulties of multiple types (mean g=0.32). To date, one SSI has been shown to reduce youth depressive symptoms in multiple RCTs: the online “growth mindset” (GM) SSI, which teaches the belief that personal traits are malleable rather than fixed. As one example, a 30-minute GM-SSI led to significant 9-month MD symptom reductions in high-symptom youths ages 12-15 versus a supportive therapy control (N=96; ds=0.60, 0.32 per parent and youth reports). Thus, GM SSIs represents a scalable, evidence-based strategy for reducing youth depressive symptoms.GM-SSIs can also strengthen parent beliefs about the effectiveness of mental health treatment, which robustly predict whether youths ultimately access services. A recent RCT including 430 parents of youth ages 7-17 indicated that an online, 15-minute SSI teaching growth mindset of emotion (viewing emotions as malleable) significantly increased parents’ beliefs that psychotherapy could be effective, both for themselves (d=0.51) and their offspring (d=0.43), versus a psychoeducation control. By helping reverse parents’ low expectancies for treatment, this low-cost program may enhance parents’ odds of seeking services for children with mental health needs.Accordingly, this study will test whether empirically-supported GM-SSIs can help bridge the gap between PC-based depression screening and access to depression services for high-symptom youth. Youths reporting elevated internalizing symptoms at a PC visit will be randomly assigned to one of two conditions: Information, Psychoeducation, and Referral (IPR; i.e., usual care) or IPR enhanced with youth- and parent-directed online SSIs (IPR+SSI), designed to reduce youth internalizing symptoms and improve parents’ mental health treatment expectancies, respectively. We predict that (1) IPR+SSI will increase parents’ treatment-seeking behaviors, versus IPR alone, across 3-month follow-up; (2) IPR+SSI will reduce youth internalizing symptoms across 3-month follow-up versus IPR alone; (3) IPR+SSI will reduce parental stress and psychological distress across 3-month follow-up, versus IPR alone; (4) parents and youths will rate this service delivery model as acceptable.METHOD SUMMARY. Per youth-reported internalizing symptom elevations during a PC visit (score >=5 on the Pediatric Symptom Checklist internalizing subscale), eligible families (N=246; youth ages 11-16) will be invited to participate in the study. In online surveys, parents will self-report recent treatment-seeking behaviors, expectancies for psychotherapy, stress and psychological symptoms, and youth mental health problems, along with family and demographic information; youths will self-report symptom levels. Within the same survey, youths and parents will then be randomized (1:1 allocation ratio) to one of two experimental conditions (IPR+SSI or IPR alone); those assigned to IPR+SSI will complete an intervention feedback form immediately post-intervention. At 3-month follow-up, to assess SSI effects on parent treatment-seeking, parent stress and symptoms, and youth internalizing problems, participating youths and parents will complete the same questionnaires administered at baseline.SIGNIFICANCE. There is a need for novel, potent strategies to increase families’ access to youth mental health services following PC-based symptoms screening. Ideally, such strategies would be low-cost (e.g., those that do not require new staff); involve both parents and youths to address the myriad factors that may undermine service access; and impose minimal burdens on PC providers. Results will indicate whether one such strategy—providing online, low-cost SSIs to youths and parents—may help reduce youth internalizing symptoms and promote treatment-seeking in parents.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document