scholarly journals Potato Insect Control, 1993

1994 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 130-130
Author(s):  
A. C. Slocombe ◽  
D. N. Ferro
Keyword(s):  
First Generation ◽  
Second Generation ◽  
Sandy Loam ◽  
Block Design ◽  
Insect Control ◽  
Population Densities ◽  
Egg Masses ◽  
Fine Sandy Loam ◽  
Randomized Complete Block Design ◽  
Potato Insect

Abstract Potatoes were planted on 5 May in South Deerfield, Massachusetts. Fertilizer (600 lbs 10N:10P:I0K/ acre) was banded into the furrow at planting. Soil was a fine sandy loam with a pH of 5.6. Manzate (fungicide) was applied at 1 lb. Al/acre on 24 May, and 18 and 27 Jun. CPB densities on 15 Jun were 1.6 adults, 3.8 egg masses and 7.9 early instars per plant. Treatments were replicated 4 times in a randomized complete block design. Each plot consisted of four 30 ft. rows with a 6 ft. fallow area separating each plot. All samples were taken from the center plants in the center two rows for each plot. Treatments were applied with CO2-pressurized sprayers at 40 psi, delivering about 70 gal/acre. CPB population densities were determined by counting larvae on 10 whole stalks in each plot. The number of adults, egg masses, early instars (first and second) or late instars (third and fourth) were recorded. All treatments were first applied on 16 Jun, and again on 23 and 30 Jun, and 7, 14 and 21 Jul. The every other week applications were applied on 16 and 30 Jun and 7 and 21 Jul (second generation). For the Novodor-Abamectin rotation, Novodor was applied on 16 and 23 Jun followed by Abamectin on 30 Jun for first generation, and for second generation Novodor was applied on 7 and 14 Jul followed by Abamectin on 21 Jul. For the Abamectin-Novodor rotation, Abamectin was applied on 16 and 23 Jun followed by Novodor on 30 Jun for first generation, and for second generation Abamectin was applied on 7 and 14 Jul followed by Novodor on 21 Jul.

scholarly journals Potato Insect Control, 1992

1994 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 127-127
Author(s):  
A. C. Slocombe ◽  
D. N. Ferro
Keyword(s):  
Soil Type ◽  
Second Generation ◽  
Sandy Loam ◽  
Block Design ◽  
Insect Control ◽  
Egg Hatch ◽  
Egg Masses ◽  
Fine Sandy Loam ◽  
Randomized Complete Block Design ◽  
Potato Insect

Abstract Potatoes were planted on 1 May in South Deerfield, Massachusetts. Fertilizer (600 lbs 10N:10P:10K/ acre) was banded into the furrow at planting. Soil type was a fine sandy loam with a pH of 5.6. Manzate (fungicide) was applied at 1 lb. Al/acre on 1 Jul. CPB densities on 4 Jun were 1.2 adults, 50 eggs, 0.3 early instars per plant, and CPB densities on 15 Jun were 3.3 adults, 167 eggs, 6 early instars and 1.7 late instars per plant. Treatments were replicated 4 times in a randomized complete block design. Each plot consisted of two 30 ft. rows with a 6 ft. fallow area between plots. Treatments were applied with CO2-pressurized sprayers at 40 psi, delivering 70 gal/acre. Novodor and Foil OF were applied on 5 (first hatch), 15 (30% hatch) and 22 (50% hatch and 4th instar observed) Jun. All other applications were made on 15, 22, and 29 Jun. For second generation larvae, percentage egg hatch was based on flagging 10 egg masses at the beginning of the ovipositional period, using the percentage hatch based on these eggs. For second generation, Novodor and Foil OF were applied on 6 (first hatch), 8 (30% hatch) and 10 (50% hatch) Jul. All other treatments were applied on 13 (observed 3rd instars) and 24 Jul.

scholarly journals Potato Insect Control, 1993

1994 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 128-128
Author(s):  
A. C. Slocombe ◽  
D. N. Ferro
Keyword(s):  
Soil Type ◽  
Sandy Loam ◽  
Block Design ◽  
Insect Control ◽  
Population Densities ◽  
Egg Masses ◽  
Fine Sandy Loam ◽  
Randomized Complete Block Design ◽  
Potato Insect

Abstract Potatoes were planted on 5 May in South Deerfield, Massachusetts. Fertilizer (600 lbs 10N:10P:10K/ acre) was banded into the furrow at planting. Soil type was a fine sandy loam with a pH of 5.6. Manzate (fungicide) was applied at 1 lb Al/acre on 24 Jun and 6 Jul. CPB densities on 15 Jun were 1.4 adults, 3.3 egg masses and 2.9 early instars per plant. Treatments were replicated 4 times in a randomized complete block design. Each plot consisted of two 30 ft. rows with a 6 ft. fallow area separating each plot. All samples were taken from the center plants in each plot. Treatments were applied with CO2-pressurized sprayers at 40 psi, delivering about 70 gal/acre. CPB population densities were determined by counting larvae on 5 whole stalks in each plot. The number of early instars (first and second) or late instars (third and fourth) were recorded. All treatments were first applied on 16 Jun, and again on 23 and 30 Jun, and 7 and 14 Jul.

scholarly journals Potato Insect Control, 1994

1995 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 120-121
Author(s):  
Andrew C. Slocombe ◽  
David N. Ferro
Keyword(s):  
Soil Type ◽  
Sandy Loam ◽  
Block Design ◽  
Insect Control ◽  
Population Densities ◽  
Fine Sandy Loam ◽  
Randomized Complete Block Design ◽  
Separate Treatment ◽  
Potato Insect

Abstract Potatoes were planted on 30 Apr in South Deerfield, Massachusetts. Fertilizer (600 lbs 1 ON: 10P:1 OK/acre) was banded into the furrow at planting, and an additional 200 lbs was applied at hilling on 30 Jun. Soil type was a fine sandy loam with a pH of 5.6. Manzate (fungicide) was applied at 1 lb. Al/acre on 30 Jun and 25 Jul. Treatments were replicated 4 times in a randomized complete block design. Each plot consisted of two 30 ft. rows with a 6 ft. fallow area separating each plot. Treatments were applied with CO2-pressurized sprayers at 40 psi, delivering about 70 gal/acre. CPB population densities were determined by counting larvae on 5 plants or whole stalks in each plot. The number of early instars (first and second) or late instars (third and fourth) were recorded. Admire was applied in the furrow at planting (136 g AI/A), and in a separate treatment it was applied to the base of the plants on 8 Jun (91 g AI/A). All foliar treatments were first applied on 15 Jun, and the 7 day treatments were applied again on 22, 29 Jun, 6, 13, 20 and 27 Jul. The 14 day treatments were applied on 15, 29 Jun, 13 and 27 Jul.

scholarly journals Potato Insect Control, 1994

1995 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 122-122
Author(s):  
Andrew C. Slocombe ◽  
David N. Ferro
Keyword(s):  
Soil Type ◽  
Sandy Loam ◽  
Block Design ◽  
Insect Control ◽  
Single Application ◽  
Population Densities ◽  
Fine Sandy Loam ◽  
Randomized Complete Block Design ◽  
Potato Insect ◽  
Whole Plants

Abstract Potatoes were planted on 30 Apr in South Deerfield, Massachusetts. Fertilizer (600 lbs 10N:10P:10K/acre) was banded into the furrow at planting, and an additional 200 lbs was applied at hilling on 30 Jun. Soil type was a fine sandy loam with a pH of 5.6. Manzate (fungicide) was applied at 1 lb. Al/acre on 30 Jun and 25 Jul. Treatments were replicated 4 times in a randomized complete block design. Each plot consisted of two 30 ft. rows with a 6 ft. fallow area separating each plot. All samples were taken from the center two rows. Treatments were applied with CO2-pressurized sprayers at 40 psi, delivering about 70 gal/acre. CPB population densities were determined by counting larvae on 5 whole plants or stalks in each plot. The number of early instars (first and second) or late instars (third and fourth) were recorded. Admire was applied to the base of plants on 8 Jun; plants were about 8” tall. The foliar treatments were first applied on 15 Jun, and then again on 22, 29 Jun, 6, 13, 20 and 27 Jul. The first two abamectin treatments were treated with Novodor at 2.5 qt/acre on 15 and 22 Jun followed by a single application of abamectin on 29 Jun, while the last two abamectin treatments were treated with Novodor at 2.5 qt/acre weekly from 15 Jun through 13 Jul and then on 20 Jul received a single application of abamectin. Fipronil treatments were applied on 15, 29 Jun, 13 and 27 Jul.

Effect of Bio and Organic Fertilizers on Pumpkin's (Cucurbita pepo L.) Leave Content of N, P, and K

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 241-245
Author(s):  
Ammar Hameed Madi ◽  
Jawad A. Kamal Al-Shibani
Keyword(s):  
Cucurbita Pepo ◽  
Sandy Loam ◽  
Block Design ◽  
Organic Fertilizers ◽  
Flowering Stage ◽  
College Of Agriculture ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Randomized Complete Block Design ◽  
Loam Soil ◽  
Four Levels

This study was conducted to investigate the effect of bacterial bio-fertilization A. chroococcum and P. putide and four levels of compost (0, 1, 2, 3) tons.h-1 on the leaves content of N.P.K elements. The experiment was carried out in one of the greenhouses of the College of Agriculture - University of Al-Qadisiyah during fall season 2018-2019. It designed in accordance with the Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replicates in sandy loam soil. The means of treatments were compared with the least significant difference (LSD) at (5)% probability level. The results present that the treatments of A. chroococcum, P. putide and compost at (3) tons.kg-1 significantly increases the leaves content of K.P.K compared to all other treatments in the flowering stage (4.970, 0.5000, and 4.930) mg.kg-1, respectively. This treatment was followed by the effect of the treatment of A. chroococcum and compost at (3) tons.kg-1, which increases the values of all traits except the leaf content of (P). Bio-fertilizer with P. putide + A. chroococcum significantly increases the leaves' content of P.

scholarly journals Colorado Potato Beetle Control on Potatoes with In-Furrow Treatments, 1994

1995 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-115
Author(s):  
James J. Linduska ◽  
Marylee Ross ◽  
Karen Mulford ◽  
John Nottingham
Keyword(s):  
Colorado Potato Beetle ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Block Design ◽  
Compressed Air ◽  
Single Treatment ◽  
Egg Masses ◽  
Row Crop ◽  
Potato Beetle ◽  
Randomized Complete Block Design ◽  
Direct Counts

Abstract ‘Kennebec’ potatoes were planted in 20 foot rows on 25 Apr, ‘94. Plots consisted of a single treatment row. The distance between rows was 64 inches and the distance between plants within the row was 10 inches. Plots were arranged in a randomized complete block design with 4 replications. The soil was a Norfolk "A" loamy sand. Initial furrow treatments were applied to the seed at the rate of 20 gal per acre with a small watering can. Admire foliar treatments were applied at a rate of 50 gal per acre on 8, 23 and 29 Jun with a custom built compressed air row crop sprayer with each row being covered by 6 drop nozzles delivering 50 gal/acre at 30 psi. In evaluating the treatments, direct counts of the number of Colorado potato beetle adults, larvae and egg masses/10 plants and the % defoliation were recorded. Defoliation categories were assigned using a pretransformed defoliation rating scale, based on dividing 90° into 13 steps corresponding to arcsin transformation values (Little & Hills 1978). Yields were taken on 20 Jul from 20-ft of row.

scholarly journals Colorado Potato Beetle Control, 1993

1994 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 110-110
Author(s):  
Casey W. Hoy ◽  
Michael J. Dunlap
Keyword(s):  
Seed Piece ◽  
Colorado Potato Beetle ◽  
First Generation ◽  
Block Design ◽  
Plant Spacing ◽  
Single Application ◽  
Hollow Cone ◽  
Potato Beetle ◽  
Randomized Complete Block Design ◽  
Vine Killer

Abstract ‘Gemchip’ potatoes were planted 26 May at the Fry Farm, OARDC, Wooster, OH. Plant spacing was 36 inches between rows and 9 inches between plants. Three Admire 2F seed piece treatments were applied at planting using a CO2 compression sprayer at 40 psi with an 8004 flat fan nozzle delivering the insecticide into the seed furrow. The field was treated on 16 Jun with 0.75 lb/ acre of Sencor DF. Fungicide, Dithane at 2.0 lb/acre, was applied 9 Aug. Paraquat, 1 pt/acre, was applied 7 Sep as a vine killer. Plots were two rows wide and 40 ft in length, with 10 ft alleys separating plots and 6 ft alleys separating blocks. Treatments were arranged in a randomized complete block design. Foliar treatments were initiated when the first generation larvae were increasing in the plots in early Jul. Foliar applications were made 3 and 12 Jul and 3 and 12 Aug. The Trigard single application treatment was applied only on 3 Jul and 3 Aug. Foliar treatments were applied with a tractor mounted drop nozzle boom sprayer delivering 50 gal/acre at 50 psi with three D-4 hollow cone nozzles/row. Bond spreader sticker was added at 4 oz/ 100 gal solution to all rates of the following insecticides: Prokill Cryolite 96, AC303,630, M-Trak, and Novodor. Number of eggs, small larvae (instar 1-2), large larvae (instar 3-4), and adults were counted, and percent defoliation was visually estimated, in five 1-m lengths of row per plot approximately five days after each application.

scholarly journals Phytotoxicity of herbicides on Cynodon dactylon

2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 832-835
Author(s):  
Siddappa Siddappa ◽  
B. L. Geeta ◽  
Raj Likhitha ◽  
K. V. Jayaprasad ◽  
Revannappa R. Bandri
Keyword(s):  
Cynodon Dactylon ◽  
Sandy Loam ◽  
Block Design ◽  
Experimental Plot ◽  
Randomized Complete Block Design ◽  
Broad Leaf ◽  
Dimethyl Amine ◽  
Phytotoxic Effect ◽  
Loam Soil ◽  
Hand Weeding

Field experiment was conducted to manage the sedge and broad leaf weeds in lawn during November to December 2013 to February to March 2014. Experimental plot was red sandy loam soil with pH 6.50.The experimental plot consisted of bermuda grass Cynodon dactylon which was established through turfing. The experimental plot was laid out in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) having 17 treatments with three replications. Herbicide treatments include 2, 4-D sodium salt 80 WP at (2, 3 and 4g/lit of water), 2, 4-D dimethyl amine salt 58% EC at (5, 7.5 and 10 ml/lit of water), carfentrozone ethyl 40 DF at (0.25, 0.5 and 1 g/lit of water), fluroxypyr meptyl 48% EC at (1.5, 3 and 6 ml/lit of water) and chlorimuron methyl + metasulfuron methyl at (0.3, 0.4 and 0.5 g/lit of water). Hand weeding was done at every 20 days interval at 20 days after application of herbicides and also maintained one unweeded control in during November to December and February to March. The phytotoxic symptoms were observed only fluroxypyr meptyl 48% EC applied at 6 ml/lit of water at 3, 7, 10, 15 and 25 days after application of herbicides (DAAH) but it recovered at later stages. However, the other herbicides did not cause any phytotoxic effect on C. dactylon.

scholarly journals UJI KETAHANAN GALUR-GALUR KENTANG TRANSGENIK HASIL TRANSFORMASI DENGAN GEN RB TERHADAP PENYAKIT HAWAR DAUN (PHYTOPHTHORA INFESTANS) DI KP PASIRSARONGGE, CIANJUR

2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 141-150
Author(s):  
Edy Listanto ◽  
M. Herman ◽  
Eri Sofiari
Keyword(s):  
Late Blight ◽  
Phytophthora Infestans ◽  
First Generation ◽  
Block Design ◽  
Transgenic Potato ◽  
Resistant Plant ◽  
Randomized Complete Block Design ◽  
Transgenic Lines ◽  
Transgenic Potatoes ◽  
Rb Gene

Resistance test strains of transgenic potatoes transformed with RB gene to late blight (Phytophthora infestan) in KP Pasirsarongge, Cianjur.  Potato late blight caused by Phytophthora infestans (P. infestans) (Mönt.) de Barry continues to be one of the most important crop diseases of all time. Genetic engineering of potato using RB gene for resistant plant to this disease is the most effective and environmental friendly to prevent widespread of late blight. This research aims to perform resistance of transgenic potato lines containing RB gene to lateblight (P. infestans) in Pasirsarongge, Cianjur field trial station. The first generation of transgenic lines were planted on polybag containing soil:manures using randomized complete block design. Tested plant inoculation was done naturaly from inoculum source from border row (Granola) that has been planted at one month before. The symptom was observed at one month after planting and damage scoring was done every three days for five times. Twenty two transgenic lines of tested plant showed various resistance respond to late blight (P. infestans) attack. Three transgenic lines showed highly resistance to late blight (P. infestans) were lines 11, 24, and 25, one transgenic line has resistant level was line 6.

scholarly journals Comparison of Cyromazine (Trigard) and Bacillus Thuringiensis (Novodor) Foliar Sprays for CPB Control on Potatoes, Painter, VA

1995 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 128-128
Author(s):  
John Speese
Keyword(s):  
First Generation ◽  
Agricultural Research ◽  
Block Design ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Row Spacing ◽  
Life Stages ◽  
Hollow Cone ◽  
Egg Hatch ◽  
Randomized Complete Block Design ◽  
Extension Center

Abstract Potatoes were planted on 8 April at the Eastern Shore Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Painter, VA. Each plot consisted of six 30 ft long rows on 3 ft row spacing, replicated 4 times in a randomized, complete block design. Sprays were applied using either a tractor-mounted sprayer or a 3-hollow cone nozzle boom backpack sprayer if the ground was too wet for the tractor. Sprays were applied in 40 gal/acre water. Spray dates are indicated in the tables. The entire test was sprayed out on 20 Jun with Vydate L at 0.5 lb (AI)/acre and Furadan 4F at 1.0 lb (AI)/acre to control first generation CPB adults. Evaluation criteria consisted of weekly counts of all CPB life stages present on 10 randomly chosen plants/plot, and the first sprays were applied at peak CPB egg hatch. Percent defoliation for each plot was rated on 20 Jun, and the center two rows of each plot were harvested and graded on 1 Jul to determine yields.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document