scholarly journals A comparative longitudinal quality of life study using the Spitzer quality of life index in a randomized multicenter phase III trial (FFCD 9102): chemoradiation followed by surgery compared with chemoradiation alone in locally advanced squamous resectable thoracic esophageal cancer

2006 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 827-834 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Bonnetain ◽  
O. Bouché ◽  
P. Michel ◽  
C. Mariette ◽  
T. Conroy ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 09 (01) ◽  
pp. 6
Author(s):  
Yang Liu ◽  
Michael K Gibson ◽  
◽  

With the decrease of cancer incidences in a few major cancers, such as breast cancer and lung cancer, the incidence of esophageal cancer has still been climbing up steadily for the past decades, especially adenocarcinoma. Our views on esophageal cancer have been evolving as well. Modifications of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging has been implemented in its recent edition in 2010. Diagnostic and follow-up standards are changing with more and more physicians and hospitals considering endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy as a minimal requirement for definitive diagnosis and accurate staging. In some large centers and by some physicians, laproscopic/ thorascopic biopsy are attempted to diagnose esophageal cancer with more accurate definitive staging. The widespread use of imaging studies, such as computed tomography and/or positon emission tomography, has improved the diagnosis in guiding the therapeutic options. In early stage esophageal cancer management, the acceptable modalities are still radiofrequency ablation, endoscopic mucosal resection, and photodynamic therapy. The advantages and disadvantages are discussed in this article. Surgical resection of early esophageal cancer of T2 or greater staging or N1 is still considered standard with potential to ‘cure’ while minimal invasive laproscopic surgery showed acceptable improved effects and quality of life but are still limited to some tertiary centers. Multi-modality therapies of esophageal cancer in locally advanced stage, both resectable and unresectable, are discussed in this review. For operable diseases, neoadjuvant therapy, peri-surgery therapy, adjuvant therapy, chemotherapy, and/or radiation therapy are discussed. Unresectable esophageal cancer of both adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma as well as cancer with Her2/neu expression are also considered. The attached table listed the major landmark phase III clinical trials involving esophageal carcinoma. Metastatic cancer management, including the importance of quality of life management among the survivors is also examined.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 162-162
Author(s):  
Kazuo Koyanagi ◽  
Ken Kato ◽  
Yoshinori Ito ◽  
Hiroyuki Daiko ◽  
Soji Ozawa ◽  
...  

162 Background: We have conducted randomized three-arm phase III trial comparing cisplatin plus 5-FU (CF) versus docetaxel plus CF (DCF) versus radiation with CF (CF-RT) as preoperative therapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer, which is on-follow-up for primary analysis planned in 2023 (JCOG 1109). This study aimed to evaluate the influence of preoperative therapies on perioperative complications and risk factors for perioperative complications after three-arm preoperative therapies. Methods: Patients with potentially resectable advanced thoracic esophageal cancer were randomly assigned to three preoperative therapies and followed by open or thoracoscopic esophagectomy with regional lymphadenectomy. Clinical data, surgical results, and perioperative complications in the patients received DCF and CF-RT were compared with those in the patients received CF. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to explore the risk factors of perioperative complications. Results: Between December 2012 and July 2018, 601 patients were randomized (CF/DCF/CF-RT; 199/202/200). Of 589 eligible patients, 546 patients underwent surgery (185/183/178). Patients` characteristics were not different between arms. Median number of harvested lymph node in patients received CF-RT was significantly lower than that in patients received CF (49 vs. 58; P < 0.0001). Incidence of ≥ Grade 2 perioperative complications in patients received DCF was lower than that in patients received CF (44.8% vs. 56.2%; P = 0.036). Incidence of ≥ Grade 2 chylothorax in patients received CF-RT was higher than that in patients received CF (5.1% vs. 1.1%; P = 0.032). Incidence of reoperation and intra-hospital death in patients received DCF and CF-RT did not differ from that in patients received CF. Multivariate analysis showed that operation time (≥ median) and open esophagectomy were independently associated with an increase in ≥ Grade 2 perioperative complications. CF-RT was associated with an increase in occurrence of ≥ Grade 2 chylothorax (Relative Risk 4.84; P = 0.043). Conclusions: Preoperative DCF and CF-RT does not increase the risk of perioperative complications and mortality when compared with standard preoperative CF therapy, but CF-RT increases the risk of chylothorax after esophagectomy for advanced thoracic esophageal cancer.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document