scholarly journals 902 Safe Elective & Emergency Surgery During the COVID-19 Crisis: Experience of a Large Tertiary Centre During the First Wave of the Pandemic

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Giorga ◽  
J Thompson ◽  
T Lo ◽  
R Baker
Keyword(s):  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Operative Mortality ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Transmission Rate ◽  
Nosocomial Transmission ◽  
Prevention Measures ◽  
Surgical Services ◽  
Tertiary Centre ◽  
Acute Admissions ◽  
Overall Mortality

Abstract Aim In addition to a reduction in elective surgery, the COVID-19 pandemic has been associated with concerning rates of post-operative mortality in COVID-19 patients highlighting the threat of nosocomial transmission. Relocation of elective patients into a protected cold wing of a tertiary centre, vigilant testing and staff test, and trace were implemented to address these issues. Method Retrospective analysis of 5069 consecutive patients who underwent procedures in theatre from 11/03/20 – 08/09/20 was performed. Comparison of numbers of procedures was compared with the same study dates in 2019. Detailed analysis of nosocomial transmission of COVID-19 and mortality was performed using patient notes and death certificates. Results 5854 procedures were performed in 2020 compared with 13219 in 2019, representing a reduction of 55.7%. The overall mortality in 2020 was 2.7% (135/5069). COVID-19 negative mortality was 2.36% (119/5033). 74 patients tested positive for COVID-19 at any time (1.3%); mortality amongst patients who tested positive seven days pre- to 30 days post-procedure was 5.4% (4/74). Nosocomial transmission rate was 0.27% in elective admissions (10/3773) and 0.97% in acute admissions (20/2052). Conclusions The first wave of the pandemic has predictably caused a significant reduction in elective activity. Our hospital infection prevention measures have kept nosocomial transmission rates low, particularly for elective admissions. We have observed lower rates of post-operative mortality in COVID-19 patients than published in other centres. Continuation of surgical services is important for patient outcomes, and essential for training the surgeons of tomorrow.

scholarly journals TP10.2.14Safe elective & emergency surgery: experience of a large tertiary centre during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Thompson ◽  
Andrea Giorga ◽  
Terence Lo ◽  
Richard Baker
Keyword(s):  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Operative Mortality ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Transmission Rate ◽  
Nosocomial Transmission ◽  
Prevention Measures ◽  
Transmission Rates ◽  
Emergency Procedures ◽  
Tertiary Centre ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Aims To evaluate the impact of Trust infection prevention measures (including relocation of elective patients into a protected cold wing, vigilant testing and staff test and trace) on elective and emergency nosocomial transmission rates and to analyse post-operative mortality in COVID-19 patients. Additionally, we compared the numbers of elective and emergency procedures in 2020 to 2019. Method Retrospective analysis of 5069 consecutive patients who underwent procedures in theatre from 11/03/20 – 08/09/20. COVID-19 infection was defined by PCR and/or radiological confirmation. Analysis of nosocomial transmission of COVID-19 and mortality was conducted using patient notes and death certificates. The number of procedures was compared with the same study dates in 2019. Results Nosocomial transmission rate was 0.27% in elective admissions (10/3773) and 0.97% in acute admissions (20/2052). The overall mortality in 2020 was 2.7% (135/5069). Covid-negative mortality was 2.36% (119/5033). 74 patients tested positive for COVID-19 at any time (1.3%); mortality in patients who tested positive seven days pre- to 30 days post-procedure was 5.4% (4/74). There were 10282 elective procedures in 2019 compared with 3773 in the same period in 2020, representing a 63.3% reduction in elective activity. Conclusion Our hospital infection prevention measures have kept nosocomial transmission rates low, particularly for elective admissions. We have observed lower rates of post-operative mortality in COVID-19 patients than published in other centres. There has been a predictably significant reduction in elective activity, however based on our findings we believe our infection prevention measures could provide reassurances to safely increase elective surgery activity.

scholarly journals Infection prevention measures for patients undergoing hemodialysis during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan: a nationwide questionnaire survey

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuka Sugawara ◽  
◽  
Masao Iwagami ◽  
Kan Kikuchi ◽  
Yoko Yoshida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Infection Control ◽  
Questionnaire Survey ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Control Measures ◽  
Nosocomial Transmission ◽  
Third Wave ◽  
Prevention Measures ◽  
Infection Control Measures ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Dialysis Facilities

Abstract Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has become a global pandemic affecting a variety of medical treatments, including hemodialysis. This study aims to investigate the implementation of infection control measures, to examine the shortage of personal protective equipment (PPE) and disinfectants, and to quantify the number of nosocomial COVID-19 transmissions in hemodialysis facilities in Japan during the pandemic. Methods We conducted a nationwide questionnaire survey between 20 October and 16 November 2020 (i.e., between the “second wave” and “third wave” in Japan) in the 4198 dialysis facilities of the Japanese Association of Dialysis Physicians and the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy. A total of 2227 facilities (53.0%) responded. The questionnaire consisted of (i) characteristics of facilities, (ii) infection prevention measures in routine dialysis practices, (iii) shortage of PPE, (iv) feasibility of various isolation measures, and (v) nosocomial transmission. Results Half of the responding facilities were hospitals with multiple departments, and the other half were clinics specialized in dialysis. Several infection prevention measures such as health checks of staff and patients, donning of masks before and after hemodialysis, and disinfection of frequently contacted areas were implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic. There was a significant improvement in the implementation rate of these measures during the pandemic, compared to before it, which reached over 90%. More than half of the facilities reported a shortage of disposable masks (67.2%) and hand sanitizer alcohol (56.7%). Isolation of COVID-19 patients in private rooms was possible only in 52.7% of the facilities. The majority of facilities (73.3%) could not accept COVID-19 dialysis patients due to lack of space and manpower. Nosocomial transmission of COVID-19 occurred in 4.0% of the facilities. Of those infected, 51.9% were staff. Conclusions This survey revealed that most hemodialysis facilities in Japan had improved implementation of infection control measures and had shortage of PPEs and disinfectants, though some facilities did not implement infection prevention measures adequately, mainly due to the limited space of the facility. It may be recommended that each facility immediately establishes isolation measures to prepare for the pandemic of COVID-19.

Local hospital experience of emergency management in the response to SARS (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Yan
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Management ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Public Health Emergency ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Prevention Measures ◽  
Hospital Emergency ◽  
Local Hospital ◽  
Referral Network ◽  
Novel Coronavirus ◽  
Hospital Transmission

UNSTRUCTURED The ongoing outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 infection was first identified in Wuhan, China at the late of 2019. Following the acceleration of the novel coronavirus spreading, person-person transmissions in family residences, hospitals and other public environments have led to a major public hazard in China. Currently, the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak has been further developed into a public health emergency of international concern. In response to an occurring pandemic, hospitals need an emergency strategy and plan to manage their space, staff, and other essential resources, therefore, to provide optimum care to patients involved. In addition, infection prevention measures urgently need to be implemented to reduce in-hospital transmission and avoid the occurrence of virus super-spreading. For hospitals without capacity to manage severe patients, a referral network is often needed. We present our successful field experience regarding hospital emergency management and local hospitals network model in response to SARS-CoV-2 emerging epidemic.

scholarly journals Universal Masking to Control Healthcare-Associated Transmission of SARS-CoV-2

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-24
Author(s):  
Eliza R. Thompson ◽  
Faith S. Williams ◽  
Pat A. Giacin ◽  
Shay Drummond ◽  
Eric Brown ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Index Patient ◽  
Field Investigation ◽  
Point Prevalence ◽  
Control Measures ◽  
Prevention Measures ◽  
Infection Control Measures ◽  
Va Health Care System ◽  
Healthcare Associated

Abstract Objective: To assess extent of a healthcare-associated outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 and evaluate effectiveness of infection control measures, including universal masking Design: Outbreak investigation including 4 large-scale point-prevalence surveys Setting: Integrated VA Health Care System with 2 facilities and 330 beds Participants: Index patient and 250 exposed patients and staff Methods: We identified exposed patients and staff and classified them as probable and confirmed cases based on symptoms and testing. We performed a field investigation and assessment of patient and staff interactions to develop probable transmission routes. Infection prevention interventions implemented included droplet and contact precautions, employee quarantine, and universal masking with medical and cloth facemasks. Four point-prevalence surveys of patient and staff subsets were conducted using real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction for SARS-CoV-2. Results: Among 250 potentially exposed patients and staff, 14 confirmed cases of Covid-19 were identified. Patient roommates and staff with prolonged patient contact were most likely to be infected. The last potential date of transmission from staff to patient was day 22, the day universal masking was implemented. Subsequent point-prevalence surveys in 126 patients and 234 staff identified 0 patient cases and 5 staff cases of Covid-19, without evidence of healthcare-associated transmission. Conclusions: Universal masking with medical facemasks was effective in preventing further spread of SARS-CoV-2 in our facility in conjunction with other traditional infection prevention measures.

The impact of a multimodel approach to designing a new orthopedic department

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Elad Keren ◽  
Abraham Borer ◽  
Lior Nesher ◽  
Tali Shafat ◽  
Rivka Yosipovich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hand Hygiene ◽  
Antibiotic Stewardship ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Prevention Measures ◽  
Orthopedic Department ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Objective: To determine whether a multifaceted approach effectively influenced antibiotic use in an orthopedics department. Design: Retrospective cohort study comparing the readmission rate and antibiotic use before and after an intervention. Setting: A 1,000-bed, tertiary-care, university hospital. Patients: Adult patients admitted to the orthopedics department between January 2015 and December 2018. Methods: During the preintervention period (2015–2016), 1 general orthopedic department was in operation. In the postintervention period (2017–2018), 2 separate departments were created: one designated for elective “clean” surgeries and another that included a “complicated wound” unit. A multifaceted strategy including infection prevention measures and introducing antibiotic stewardship practices was implemented. Admission rates, hand hygiene practice compliance, surgical site infections, and antibiotic treatment before versus after the intervention were analyzed. Results: The number of admissions and hospitalization days in the 2 periods did not change. Seven-day readmissions per annual quarter decreased significantly from the preintervention period (median, 7 days; interquartile range [IQR], 6–9) to the postintervention period (median, 4 days; IQR, 2–7; P = .038). Hand hygiene compliance increased and surgical site infections decreased in the postintervention period. Although total antibiotic use was not reduced, there was a significant change in the breakdown of the different antibiotic classes used before and after the intervention: increased use of narrow-spectrum β-lactams (P < .001) and decreased use of β-lactamase inhibitors (P < .001), third-generation cephalosporins (P = .044), and clindamycin (P < .001). Conclusions: Restructuring the orthopedics department facilitated better infection prevention measures accompanied by antibiotic stewardship implementation, resulting in a decreased use of broad-spectrum antibiotics and a significant reduction in readmission rates.

scholarly journals The Impact of COVID-19 on Surgical Training: the Past, the Present and the Future

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marina Yiasemidou
Keyword(s):  
Infection Control ◽  
Surgical Training ◽  
New Technologies ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Control Measures ◽  
Negative Consequences ◽  
Surgical Services ◽  
The World ◽  
The Impact

AbstractThe COVID-19 pandemic and infection control measures had an unavoidable impact on surgical services. During the first wave of the pandemic, elective surgery, endoscopy, and ‘face-to-face’ clinics were discontinued after recommendations from professional bodies. In addition, training courses, examinations, conferences, and training rotations were postponed or cancelled. Inadvertently, infection control and prevention measures, both within and outside hospitals, have caused a significant negative impact on training. At the same time, they have given space to new technologies, like telemedicine and platforms for webinars, to blossom. While the recovery phase is well underway in some parts of the world, most surgical services are not operating at full capacity. Unfortunately, some countries are still battling a second or third wave of the pandemic with severely negative consequences on surgical services. Several studies have looked into the impact of COVID-19 on surgical training. Here, an objective overview of studies from different parts of the world is presented. Also, evidence-based solutions are suggested for future surgical training interventions.

scholarly journals Impact of joint management of a COVID-19 mother and her newborn on the virus transmission: a case report

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Chiara De Nardo ◽  
Anna Rita Bellomo ◽  
Francesca Perfetti ◽  
Francesco Antonino Battaglia ◽  
Miriam Lichtner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Virus Transmission ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Transplacental Transmission ◽  
Prevention Measures ◽  
Infected Mother ◽  
Case Presentation ◽  
Joint Management ◽  
Healthy Neonate

Abstract Background Since last year, COVID-19, the disease caused by the novel Sars-Cov-2 virus, has been globally spread to all the world. COVID-19 infection among pregnant women has been described. However, transplacental transmission of Sars-Cov-2 virus from infected mother to the newborn is not yet established. The appropriate management of infants born to mothers with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 and the start of early breastfeeding are being debated. Case presentation We report a case of the joint management of a healthy neonate with his mother tested positive for Covid-19 before the delivery and throughout neonatal follow-up. The infection transmission from the mother to her baby is not described, even after a long period of contact between them and breastfeeding. Conclusion It may consider an appropriate practice to keep mother and her newborn infant together in order to facilitate their contact and to encourage breastfeeding, although integration with infection prevention measures is needed.

Nosocomial Transmission of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: A Blinded Study to Establish Baseline Acquisition Rates

2003 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 415-421 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel T. Fishbain ◽  
Joseph C. Lee ◽  
Honghung D. Nguyen ◽  
Jeffery A. Mikita ◽  
Cecilia P. Mikita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Transmission Rate ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Nosocomial Transmission ◽  
Surveillance Culture ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Average Hospital ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
History Of

AbstractObjective:To define the extent of nosocomial transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in patients admitted to a tertiary-care hospital.Design:A blinded, prospective surveillance culture study of patients admitted to the hospital to determine the transmission (acquisition) rate of MRSA Risk factors associated with the likelihood of MRSA colonization on admission were investigated.Setting:Tertiary-care military medical facility.Participants:All patients admitted to the medicine, surgery, and pediatric wards, and to the medical, surgical, and pediatric intensive care units were eligible for inclusion.Results:Five hundred thirty-five admission and 374 discharge samples were collected during the study period. One hundred forty-one patients were colonized with methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and 20 patients (3.7%) were colonized with MRSA on admission. Of the 354 susceptible patients, 6 acquired MRSA during the study for a transmission rate of 1.7%. Patients colonized with MRSA on admission were more likely to be older than non-colonized or MSSA-colonized patients, to have received antibiotics within the past year, to have been hospitalized within the prior 3 years, or to have a known history of MRSA. Patients acquiring MRSA had an average hospital stay of 17.7 days compared with 5.3 days for those who did not acquire MRSA. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of the 6 MRSA isolates from patients who acquired MRSA revealed 4 distinct band patterns.Conclusions:Most patients colonized with MRSA were identified on admission samples. Surveillance cultures of patients admitted may help to prevent MRSA transmission and infection.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document