scholarly journals EP.WE.205Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic on Loop Ileostomy Formation

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Z Farrow ◽  
T A Cook
Keyword(s):  
Primary Anastomosis ◽  
Loop Ileostomy ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Subsequent Reduction ◽  
Emergency Case ◽  
Defunctioning Stoma ◽  
Stoma Formation ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Early Phases

Abstract Aim Uncertainty during the early phases of the Covid-19 pandemic regarding availability of critical care beds and peri-operative impact of SARS-CoV-2 led to changing intercollegiate guidance in favour of increased stoma formation. This study assessed the impact the Covid-19 pandemic had on loop ileostomy formation. Methods Data were reviewed from a prospectively collected database on the number of loop ileostomies formed over a 10-month period from 1st March to 31st December 2020. Comparison was made with the same period in 2019. Details were confirmed using clinical letters. Results 114 loop ileostomies were formed in the 20-month period. There was a 10.0% reduction in loop ileostomy formation in 2020 compared with 2019. The median number of loop ileostomies formed per month over the two 10-month periods was 6. This peaked at 11 in April 2020 coinciding with the first wave of Covid-19, falling in subsequent months. All 11 of these loop ileostomies were formed in colorectal cancer patients undergoing anterior resection, after appropriate counselling. Conclusions There was a reduction in the number of ileostomies formed in 2020 compared with 2019 reflecting the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on both elective and emergency case load and presentations. These results show reactive change in surgical practice corresponding to guidance at a time of maximum uncertainty. Primary anastomosis still occurred but with an increased likelihood of a defunctioning stoma to minimise the consequences of an anastomotic leak. A subsequent reduction in stoma formation in the following months indicates that practice rapidly returned to normal.

scholarly journals TP10.1.9End Colostomy Formation: Change in Practice during the Covid-19 Pandemic

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Z Farrow ◽  
T A Cook
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
Recovery Period ◽  
Surgical Practice ◽  
Stoma Formation ◽  
Change In Practice ◽  
End Colostomy ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Early Phases

Abstract Aim Intercollegiate guidance favoured the increased stoma formation during the early phases of the Covid-19 pandemic due to uncertainty around the availability of critical care beds and peri-operative impact of SARS-CoV-2. This study assessed the impact the Covid-19 pandemic and changing guidance had on end colostomy formation. Methods Data were reviewed from a prospectively collected database on the number of end colostomies formed over a 10-month period from 1st March to 31st December 2020. Comparison was made with the same period in 2019. Details were confirmed using clinical letters. Results There was an overall 11.5% increase in the number of end colostomies formed in the in the same 10-month period in 2020 compared with 2019 (87 vs 78). The increase in end colostomy formation was most marked in the 3-month period of March to May, with 36.8% more end colostomies formed in 2020 than in 2019 (26 vs 19). The number of end colostomies formed in the remaining 7-month period of June to December was similar in the two years (61 vs 59). Conclusions There was a change in surgical practice in favour of stoma formation, which peaked in the period of March to May 2020. This coincided with a time of maximum uncertainty surrounding the Covid-19 pandemic and changing intercollegiate guidance. The change in practice has implications for patients longer term and may impact on the service in the post-Covid recovery period with patients requesting reversal procedures.

scholarly journals Liver Immune Microenvironment and Metastasis from Colorectal Cancer-Pathogenesis and Therapeutic Perspectives

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 2418
Author(s):  
Xuezhen Zeng ◽  
Simon E. Ward ◽  
Jingying Zhou ◽  
Alfred S. L. Cheng
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Liver Metastasis ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
High Recurrence Rate ◽  
Immune Microenvironment ◽  
Liver Sinusoidal Endothelial Cells ◽  
Premetastatic Niche ◽  
Cancer Pathogenesis ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients ◽  
The Impact

A drastic difference exists between the 5-year survival rates of colorectal cancer patients with localized cancer and distal organ metastasis. The liver is the most favorable organ for cancer metastases from the colorectum. Beyond the liver-colon anatomic relationship, emerging evidence highlights the impact of liver immune microenvironment on colorectal liver metastasis. Prior to cancer cell dissemination, hepatocytes secrete multiple factors to recruit or activate immune cells and stromal cells in the liver to form a favorable premetastatic niche. The liver-resident cells including Kupffer cells, hepatic stellate cells, and liver-sinusoidal endothelial cells are co-opted by the recruited cells, such as myeloid-derived suppressor cells and tumor-associated macrophages, to establish an immunosuppressive liver microenvironment suitable for tumor cell colonization and outgrowth. Current treatments including radical surgery, systemic therapy, and localized therapy have only achieved good clinical outcomes in a minority of colorectal cancer patients with liver metastasis, which is further hampered by high recurrence rate. Better understanding of the mechanisms governing the metastasis-prone liver immune microenvironment should open new immuno-oncology avenues for liver metastasis intervention.

scholarly journals 368. Clinical Characteristics of Hospitalized COVID-19 American Indian Patients in Rural Arizona

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S253-S254
Author(s):  
Amy Nham ◽  
Ryan M Close
Keyword(s):  
American Indians ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Clinic Visit ◽  
Contact Tracing ◽  
Shortness Of Breath ◽  
Early Referral ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Wbc Count ◽  
The Impact ◽  
D Dimer

Abstract Background American Indians have an increased risk of serious complications from COVID-19 due to the high prevalence of comorbidities such as diabetes, heart disease, obesity, and asthma. To date, there has been limited analysis of COVID-19 in the AI population. This study describes the characteristics of hospitalized COVID-19 patients from a well-defined AI population in eastern Arizona. Additionally, we explored the impact of early referral via contact tracing versus those who self-presented. Methods Retrospective chart reviews were completed for patients hospitalized for COVID from March 29 to May 16, 2020. Summary statistics were used to describe demographics, symptoms, pre-existing conditions, and hospitalization data. Results We observed 447 laboratory-confirmed cases of COVID-19, resulting in 71 (15.9%) hospitalizations over a 7-week period and a hospitalization rate of 159 per 1,000 persons. Of the 50 hospitalizations reviewed sequentially, 56% were female, median age of 55 (IQR 44–65). Median number of days hospitalized was 4 (2–6), with 16% requiring intensive care unit support, 15% intubated, 12% readmitted, and 10% deceased. 67% had an epidemiological link, and 32% had an emergency department or outpatient clinic visit within 7 days of hospitalization. All patients were symptomatic; the most common symptoms were cough (90%), shortness of breath (78%), and subjective fever (66%). 86% of patients had a pre-existing condition; the most common pre-existing conditions were diabetes (66%), obesity (58%), and hypertension (52%, Figure 1). All patients had elevated LDH, 94% had elevated CRP, 86% had elevated d-dimer, and 40% had lymphopenia; only 10% had an elevated WBC count and 26% had thrombocytopenia (Table 1). 26% of the patients were referred in by the tracing team (Table 2). Analysis of 500 hospitalizations will be available in October 2020. Conclusion Most AI patients hospitalized had a pre-existing condition, symptoms of cough or shortness of breath, and elevated LDH, CRP, and d-dimer. More research is needed to understand the patterns of COVID-19 related disease in vulnerable populations, like AI/AN, and to examine the utility of early referral by contact tracing teams in rural settings which may guide future tracing strategies. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Outcome of Radical Surgery for Simultaneous Liver and Lung Metastases Synchronous with Primary Colorectal Cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franz Xaver Singhartinger ◽  
Martin Varga ◽  
Tarkan Jäger ◽  
Adam Dinnewitzer ◽  
Oliver Koch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Lung Metastases ◽  
Primary Tumour ◽  
Median Number ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Curative Intent ◽  
Median Hospital Stay ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients ◽  
Primary Tumour Site

Abstract Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) leads to metastatic disease in approximately 30% of patients. In patients with newly diagnosed CRC with both liver and lung metastases, curative resection is rarely possible. The aim of this study is to evaluate the overall (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) rates of these patients after resection with curative intent. Methods This study is a retrospective analysis of colorectal cancer patients (n=8, median age 54.3 years) with simultaneous liver and lung metastasis undergoing resection with curative intent between May 1st, 2002, to December 31st, 2016, at our institution. Results Colon was the primary tumour site in 2 patients and rectum in 6 patients. The median number of liver and lung metastases was 3 and 2, respectively. Patients received various treatment sequences individualized on tumour disease burden. R0 resection was achieved after all but one procedure. Two severe Clavien-Dindo grade IIIb complications were present. Median hospital stay was 9 (3–24) days per procedure. Tumour relapse was observed in all patients with median RFS of 9 (3–28) months and median OS of 40 (17–52) months. In 4 cases, where repeated resection of recurrent metastases (3 liver and 1 lung) was possible, the median OS was 43 months. Conclusion Our data suggests that patients seem to benefit from resection with curative intent, with tendency to prolonged OS and with acceptable complication rate. Tumour recurrence occurred in all patients. Repeated resection was beneficial and led to further prolonged OS.

scholarly journals Management of colorectal cancer in the era of COVID-19: Challenges and suggestions

2021 ◽  
Vol 104 (2) ◽  
pp. 003685042110106
Author(s):  
Walid Alam ◽  
Youssef Bouferraa ◽  
Yolla Haibe ◽  
Deborah Mukherji ◽  
Ali Shamseddine
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Treatment Protocols ◽  
Cancer Management ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Huge Impact ◽  
Treatment Plans ◽  
Virus Exposure ◽  
Risk Of Exposure ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients ◽  
The Impact

The Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic had a huge impact on all sectors around the world. In particular, the healthcare system has been subject to an enormous pressure that has surpassed its ability in many instances. Additionally, the pandemic has called for a review of our daily medical practices, including our approach to colorectal cancer management where treatment puts patients at high risk of virus exposure. Given their higher median age, patients are at an increased risk for severe symptoms and complications in cases of infection, especially in the setting of immunosuppression. Therefore, a review of the routine colorectal cancer practices is needed to minimize risk of exposure. Oncologists should weigh risk of exposure versus the patient’s oncologic benefits when approaching management. In addition, treatment protocols should be modified to minimize hospital visits and admissions while maintaining the same treatment efficacy. In this review, we will focus on challenges that colorectal cancer patients face during the pandemic, while highlighting the priority in each case. We will also discuss the evidence for potential modifications to existing treatment plans that could reduce infectious exposure without compromising care. Finally, we will discuss the impact of the socio-economic difficulties faced by Lebanese patients due to a poor economy toppled by an unexpected pandemic.

The impact of myosteatosis on outcomes following surgery for gastro-intestinal malignancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15540-e15540
Author(s):  
Andrew MacCormick ◽  
Mark Puckett ◽  
Adam Streeter ◽  
Somaiah Aroori
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Group Analysis ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Cancer Specific Survival ◽  
Mesh Terms ◽  
Similar Term ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients ◽  
The Impact

e15540 Background: Recent research has demonstrated the impact that body composition parameters can have on the outcomes following cancer surgery. Adipose tissue deposition in muscle, known as myosteatosis, can be detected on pre-operative imaging. This systematic review aims to analyse the impact of pre-operative myosteatosis on long-term outcomes following surgery for gastro-intestinal malignancy. Methods: Using MeSH terms, a systematic search of the databases PubMed MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, CINAHL and AMED was performed. Studies were included if they reported hazard ratios (HR) analysing the impact of pre-operatively defined myosteatosis, or similar term, on the long-term outcomes following surgery for gastro-intestinal malignancy. A total of 39 full texts articles were reviewed for inclusion, with 19 being included after the inclusion criteria were applied. A sub-group analysis was performed for those studies reporting outcomes for colorectal cancer patients only. Results: The total number of included patients across all studies was 14,481. Patients with myosteatosis had a significantly poorer overall survival, according to univariate (HR 1.82, 95% CI 1.67 – 1.99) and multivariable (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.49 – 1.86) analysis. This was also demonstrated with regards to cancer-specific survival (univariate HR 1.62, 95% CI 1.18 – 2.22, multivariable HR 1.73, 95% CI 1.48 – 2.03) and recurrence-free survival (univariate HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.10 – 1.48, multivariable HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.07 – 1.77). Conclusions: This review demonstrates that patients with pre-operative myosteatosis have poorer long-term outcomes following surgery for gastro-intestinal malignancy. Therefore, myosteatosis should be used for pre-operative optimisation and as a prognostic tool before surgery. More standardised definitions of myosteatosis and further cohort studies of patients with non-colorectal malignancies are required.

The impact of timing of stoma closure on low anterior resection syndrome in patient who underwent low anterior resection for rectal cancer

2021 ◽  
pp. 126-134
Author(s):  
Hemn Hussain Kaka Ali ◽  
Qalandar Hussein Abdulkarim ◽  
Karzan Seerwan ◽  
Barham M. M .Salih
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Anterior Resection ◽  
Low Anterior Resection ◽  
Anal Verge ◽  
Loop Ileostomy ◽  
Low Anterior Resection Syndrome ◽  
Anterior Resection Syndrome ◽  
Closure Of Ileostomy ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Impact

This is a multi-center retrospective study of patients underwent low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Ileostomy had been done to protect low lying Colo-rectal anastomosis, closure of ileostomy had been delayed in some patients due to patient own will, surgical complications (anastomotic leak) or coarse of chemotherapy. This study aimed to find the effect of temporary ileostomy on post-operative bowel defunction which is called Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS), and include; urgency, difficulty in emptying of bowel, and incontinence for feces and flatus.  A total of 50 patients included in this study, the age ranges from the 19 to 80 years old with a mean age of 51.96 years. The total number of males was (33, %66). Majority of patients were overweight (21, 42%). The distance of tumors from the anal verge were less than 10 cm in (31,62%). The mean duration of fecal diversion was 7.17 months. Loop ileostomy were closed before six months in (27,54%). The mean duration of diversion of patients developed no LARS was 6.87 months which is shorter than those of developed LARS (7.31). Lower BMI patients are more prone to develop LARS, while Obese patients are more susceptible to develop major LARS. Nineteen cases developed LARS among those patient’s ileostomy closed before six months, and 15 cases developed LARS in those ileostomies closed after six months.    

Influence of Research Continuity on Physician-Scientists’ Career Success

Neurology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012867
Author(s):  
Jenna Brownrout ◽  
Gina Norato ◽  
Wyatt Bensken ◽  
Catherine Squirewell ◽  
Taylor Gordon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Career Success ◽  
Training Programs ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Research Topic ◽  
Research Career ◽  
H Index ◽  
Medical Scientist ◽  
Report Data ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Physician Scientists

Objective:To determine if maintaining continuity in research topic and method from early to late career yields a greater likelihood of physician-scientists’ research-career success i.e. achieving research independence and producing impactful publications.Methods:To explore the impact of maintaining continuity in research, 108 2000-2010 neurology residency graduates from former Medical Scientist Training Programs at the highest NINDS and NIH funded institutions were identified. Through comparison of Ph.D. dissertations with post-graduate work, research continuity was deemed present if there was evidence of continuity in research topic and method. With publicly available SCOPUS, PubMed, and NIH RePORT data, the correlation that degree of continuity had with h-indices, number of grants awarded, and R01 acquisition was examined.Results:Nearly half of the graduates were classified as non-continuous (45%), less than a quarter classified as somewhat continuous (22%), and roughly a third classified as very continuous (32%). The data demonstrated that research continuity increased the ability to acquire a R01, with 83% percent of R01 and/or R21 recipients having very continuous research. Very continuous graduates also had higher median number of grants received (2 [IQR: 1-3]) and a higher median h-index (17 [IQR: 10.5-20]) compared to the somewhat continuous and non-continuous groups.Conclusions:This study highlights research continuity as an important and modifiable variable during the training period of physician-scientists and one that may improve their career success and promote greater retention within the workforce.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document