scholarly journals SP2.2.17The leaning tower of pasta: lessons in team performance and creativity from a core surgical training boot camp design challenge

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Eley ◽  
Katie Mellor ◽  
Oliver Luton ◽  
Osian James ◽  
David Robinson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Training ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Boot Camp ◽  
Task Completion ◽  
Gender Ratio ◽  
Surgical Specialty ◽  
Simulation Performance ◽  
Design Challenge ◽  
Tower Height ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Aims Unity of effort is an important component of strategic leadership and management theory associated with Core Surgical Training (CST) outcome. The aim was to determine the impact of team diversity on task completion: a creative design challenge, during CST Boot camp. Methods Attendees (n = 44) at a single Statutory Education Body’s CST Boot camp were stratified into teams related to specialty theme, and set a design challenge as described by Peter Skillman, to build the tallest free-standing tower out of spaghetti (20 pieces), tape (1 m), and string (1 m), with a marshmallow on top in 18 minutes. Primary outcome measure was tower height. Results Five teams (50%) completed the task with the tallest tower measuring 70cm (median 51, range 0-70). Median satisfaction with the simulation exercise was 4 (2-5) on a scale of zero to five, with five corresponding with highest satisfaction. Successful task completion was associated with team surgical specialty (p = 0.032), ethnicity ratio (p = 0.010,), and gender ratio (p = 0.003), respectively. On multivariable analysis, only team gender ratio was independently associated with tower height (HR 0.515, 95% CI 0.350 - 0.759, p = 0.001). Conclusion Modern leadership theory emphasises the important dynamic relationship between individual team members, the team, and task completion. General surgery themed teams with a gender mix were most successful in completing the design challenge; whether relative simulation performance predicts strategic organisational skill and career progression will be the next question.

scholarly journals The perceived global impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on doctors’ medical and surgical training: an international survey

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
. TMS Collaborative ◽  
Ryan Laloo ◽  
Rama Santhosh Karri ◽  
Kasun Wanigasooriya ◽  
William Beedham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Training ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Global Network ◽  
International Survey ◽  
Surgical Specialty ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Significant Burden ◽  
Training Post

Abstract Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a significant burden on healthcare systems causing disruption to medical and surgical training of doctors globally. Aims and objectives This is the first international survey assessing the perceived impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on training of doctors of all grades and specialties. Methods An online global survey was disseminated using Survey Monkey® between 4th August 2020 and 17th November 2020. A global network of collaborators facilitated participant recruitment. Data was collated anonymously with informed consent and analysed using univariate and adjusted multivariable analysis. Results 743 doctors of median age 27 (IQR: 25-30) were included with the majority (56.8%, n=422) being male. Two-thirds of doctors were in a training post (66.5%, n=494), 52.9% (n=393) in a surgical specialty and 53.0% (n= 394) in low- and middle-income countries. 69.2% (n=514) reported an overall perceived negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on their training. A significant decline was noted among non-virtual teaching methods such as face-to-face lectures, tutorials, ward-based teaching, theatre sessions, conferences, simulation sessions and morbidity and mortality meetings (p≤0.05). Doctors from low or middle-income countries were associated with perceived inadequate supervision while performing invasive procedures under general, local or regional anaesthetic. (p≤0.05) Conclusion In addition to the detrimental impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare infrastructure, there has been an indirect consequence of disrupted training within medical and surgical subspecialties. A focus on reconfiguration of training programs through a variety of additional resources will become imperative to reduce the long-term sequalae of COVID-19 on doctors’ training.

SP2.2.1Improving surgical training: core programme performance related to rotation theme, design, and trainee protocol engagement

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Katie Mellor ◽  
David B Robinson ◽  
Osian P James ◽  
Arfon GMT Powell ◽  
Richard J Egan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Management ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Surgical Training ◽  
General Surgery ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Scientific Article ◽  
Specialty Training ◽  
Surgical Specialty ◽  
National Training

Abstract Aims Core Surgical Training (CST) and Improving ST (IST) programmes are in flux and their design controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the relative performance of a single Statutory Education Board’s (SEB) CST and IST programmes related to rotation design, theme, and protocol engagement. Methods Individual rotations numbering 181 were analysed prospectively over six-years (2014 to 2020). Primary outcome measures were MRCS pass and specialty National Training Number (NTN) appointment. Results Overall MRCS pass was 68.5% and NTN appointment 39.2%. NTN appointment related to rotation design varied from zero to 100% (median 40.0%). Conversion to NTN varied by specialty theme and ranged from: General surgery CST 35.6% to General surgery (IST pilot) 87.5% (p = 0.004). Multivariable analysis revealed NTN appointment was associated with: operative logbook caseload >464 (OR 3.02, p = 0.068), scientific article publication (OR 4.82, p = 0.006), and universal ARCP Outcome 1 (OR 37.83, p < 0.001), and IST (OR 55.54, p = 0.006). Conclusions Focused rotational design allied to enhanced performance management, and protocol engagement, were associated with improved conversion to higher surgical specialty training.

scholarly journals SP10.2.6 The Quantitative Impact of COVID-19 on surgical training in the United Kingdom

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua Clements ◽  
Joshua Burke ◽  
Carly Hope ◽  
Deirdre Nally ◽  
Gareth Griffiths ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United Kingdom ◽  
Surgical Training ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Outcome Data ◽  
Annual Review ◽  
Surgical Specialty ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Surgical Trainees ◽  
Rate Ratios ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Aims COVID-19 has had a global impact on all aspects of healthcare including surgical teaching and training. This study aimed to quantify the impact of COVID-19 on operative case numbers recorded by surgeons in training, and annual review of competency progression (ARCP) outcomes in the United Kingdom. Methods Anonymised operative logbook numbers were collated from e-logbook and ARCP outcome data were collated from the Intercollegiate Surgical Curriculum Programme (ISCP) database for trainees across core and the ten higher surgical specialities. Operative logbook numbers and ARCP outcomes were compared between pre-COVID dates. Effect sizes are reported as incident rate ratios (IRR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results 5599 surgical trainees in 2019 and 5310 in 2020 in surgical specialty training were included. The IRR was reduced across all subspecialties because of the COVID-19 pandemic (0.55; 95% CI 0.53-0.57). Elective surgery (0.60; 95% CI 0.59-0.61) was affected more than emergency surgery (0.88; 95% CI 0.86-0.89). Regional variance with reduced operative activity was demonstrated across all specialities. 1 in 8 in their final year of training have not been able to achieve curriculum requirements and have had training extended. 1 in 4 trainees entering their final year of training are behind their expected training trajectory. Conclusion COVID-19 continues to have a significant impact on surgical training in the UK. Urgent, co-ordinated action is required by key stakeholders to mitigate for these effects and maintain future surgical training.

The Leaning Tower of Pasta: Lessons in Team Performance and Creativity From a Core Surgical Training Boot Camp Design Challenge

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Eley ◽  
Katie Mellor ◽  
Oliver Luton ◽  
Osian P. James ◽  
Chris R. Bowman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Training ◽  
Team Performance ◽  
Boot Camp ◽  
Design Challenge

scholarly journals SP10.2.4 COVID-19 impact on Surgical Training and Recovery Planning (COVID-STAR) - A Cross-Sectional Observational Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Training ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Weighted Average ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Training Experience ◽  
Surgical Trainee ◽  
Surgical Specialty ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Surgical Workforce ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Aims The COVID-19 pandemic has led to changes in the delivery of surgical services which impact on surgical training. This study aimed to investigate the qualitative impact of COVID-19 on surgical training in the United Kingdom (UK) & Republic of Ireland (ROI) Methods A national, collaborative, cross-sectional study involving 13 surgical trainee associations distributed a pan-surgical specialty questionnaire on the impact of COVID-19 on surgical training (11th May - 8th June 2020). Various aspects of training were assessed. This study was reported according to STROBE guidelines. Results 810 completed responses were analysed (M:401/F:390) from all deaneries and training grades. A significant negative impact of the pandemic on surgical training experience was observed. (Weighted average = 8.66). 41% of respondents (n = 301) were redeployed. Complete loss of training was reported in elective operating (69.5%), outpatient activity (67.3%) and endoscopy (69.5%). A reduction of > 50% was reported in emergency operating (48%) and completion of work-based assessments (WBAs) (46%). 3.3% (n = 17) of respondents reported plans to leave medicine altogether. Cancellations in study leave and regional teaching programmes without rescheduling were reported in 72% and 60% of the cohort respectively. Elective operative exposure and WBAs completion were the primary reported factors affecting potential trainee progression. Overall, > 50% of trainees (n = 377) felt they would not meet the competencies required for that training period. Conclusions COVID-19 has had a negative impact on surgical training across all grades and specialties, with implications for trainee progression, recruitment and retention of the surgical workforce.

The impact of SPY angiography on intraoperative decision making and outcomes for post-mastectomy reconstruction

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Skin Necrosis ◽  
Regression Models ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
P Value ◽  
Flap Necrosis ◽  
Single Institution ◽  
Logistic Regression Models ◽  
The Impact

Objective: While the use of intraoperative laser angiography (SPY) is increasing in mastectomy patients, its impact in the operating room to change the type of reconstruction performed has not been well described. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether SPY angiography influences post-mastectomy reconstruction decisions and outcomes. Methods and materials: A retrospective analysis of mastectomy patients with reconstruction at a single institution was performed from 2015-2017.All patients underwent intraoperative SPY after mastectomy but prior to reconstruction. SPY results were defined as ‘good’, ‘questionable’, ‘bad’, or ‘had skin excised’. Complications within 60 days of surgery were compared between those whose SPY results did not change the type of reconstruction done versus those who did. Preoperative and intraoperative variables were entered into multivariable logistic regression models if significant at the univariate level. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant. Results: 267 mastectomies were identified, 42 underwent a change in the type of planned reconstruction due to intraoperative SPY results. Of the 42 breasts that underwent a change in reconstruction, 6 had a ‘good’ SPY result, 10 ‘questionable’, 25 ‘bad’, and 2 ‘had areas excised’ (p<0.01). After multivariable analysis, predictors of skin necrosis included patients with ‘questionable’ SPY results (p<0.01, OR: 8.1, 95%CI: 2.06 – 32.2) and smokers (p<0.01, OR:5.7, 95%CI: 1.5 – 21.2). Predictors of any complication included a change in reconstruction (p<0.05, OR:4.5, 95%CI: 1.4-14.9) and ‘questionable’ SPY result (p<0.01, OR: 4.4, 95%CI: 1.6-14.9). Conclusion: SPY angiography results strongly influence intraoperative surgical decisions regarding the type of reconstruction performed. Patients most at risk for flap necrosis and complication post-mastectomy are those with questionable SPY results.

scholarly journals Telemedicine Experience of General Surgery Trainees: Impact on Patient Care and Education

2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482110234
Author(s):  
Brandon J Nakashima ◽  
Navpreet Kaur ◽  
Chelsey Wongjirad ◽  
Kenji Inaba ◽  
Mohd Raashid Sheikh
Keyword(s):  
Patient Care ◽  
Surgical Training ◽  
General Surgery ◽  
Southern California ◽  
University Of Southern California ◽  
General Surgery Residency ◽  
Surgical Training Program ◽  
Current Utilization ◽  
Surgery Resident ◽  
The Impact

Objective The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on patient care, including the increased utilization of contact-free clinic visits using telemedicine. We looked to assess current utilization of, experience with, and opinions regarding telemedicine by general surgery residents at an academic university–based surgical training program. Design A response-anonymous 19-question survey was electronically distributed to all general surgery residents at a single academic university–based general surgery residency program. Setting University of Southern California (USC) general surgery residency participants: Voluntarily participating general surgery residents at the University of Southern California. Results The response rate from USC general surgery residents was 100%. A majority of residents (76%) had utilized either video- or telephone-based visits during their careers. No resident had undergone formal training to provide telemedicine, although most residents indicated a desire for training (57.1%) and acknowledged that telemedicine should be a part of surgical training (75.6%). A wide variety of opinions regarding the educational experience of residents participating in telemedicine visits was elicited. Conclusions The COVID-19 pandemic brought telemedicine to the forefront as an integral part of future patient care, including for surgical patients. Additional investigations into nationwide telemedicine exposure and practice among United States general surgery residencies is imperative, and the impact of the implementation of telemedicine curricula on general surgery resident telemedicine utilization, comfort with telemedicine technology, and patient outcomes are further warranted. Competencies Practice-based learning, systems-based practice, interpersonal and communication skills

The decision-making of treatment and outcome in elderly patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Q Zhao ◽  
H Xu ◽  
J Lv ◽  
Y Wu
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Science And Technology ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Lower Mortality ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background The prevalence of aortic stenosis (AS) steadily increases with age. There is a consensus that intervention should be advised in patients with symptomatic severe AS. However, decision to operate raises complex issues in the elderly due to the increasing operative comorbidity and mortality. There is limited information regarding the characteristics and outcome of elderly patients with symptomatic severe AS who were denied intervention and the reasons leading to the denial. Purpose To analyze the decision-making and the prognosis in elderly patients with symptomatic severe AS. Methods In a cohort of 8929 patients aged ≥60 years with significant valvular heart disease, we divided patients with severe (valve area ≤1 cm2 or peak velocity ≥4.0 m/s or mean gradient ≥40 mmHg), symptomatic (angina or NYHA II-IV or syncope) AS into three groups by final treatment decision: intervention group, doctor-deny group, patient-deny group. The impact of characteristics on decision-making was evaluated and 1-year mortality among three groups were compared. Results Among 546 patients with severe symptomatic AS, the interventional decision was taken in 338 patients (61.9%), 134 patients (24.5%) were denied intervention by doctor after evaluation and 74 patients (13.5%) refused intervention due to personal preference. In multivariable analysis, age [OR=1.104, 95% CI (1.068–1.142)], multi-comorbidities [OR=4.706, 95% CI (2.355–9.403)] and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) [OR=1.021, 95% CI (1.001–1.042)] were markedly associated with the conservative decision made by doctor, while LVEF &gt;50% [OR=0.260, 95% CI (0.082–0.823)] was significantly linked with the interventional decision. Lower mortality was observed in intervention group during 1-year follow-up compared with either doctor-deny group or patient-deny group (both P&lt;0.001 after adjustment). Further, diabetes [HR=2.513, 95% CI (1.243–5.084)], syncope [HR=2.856, 95% CI (1.338–6.098)], atrial fibrillation (AF) [HR=2.764, 95% CI (1.305–5.855)], stroke [HR=2.921, 95% CI (1.252–6.851)] and multi-comorbidities [HR=3.120, 95% CI (1.363–7.142)] were strong 1-year mortality predictors, whereas interventional treatment [HR=0.195, 95% CI (0.091–0.417)] and LEVF &gt;50% [HR=0.960, 95% CI (0.938–0.984)] were related to lower mortality. Conclusions Intervention was denied in about forty percent of elderly patients with symptomatic severe AS. Patients with advanced age, multi-comorbidities and increased LVEDD tended to be denied intervention by doctors, whereas interventions were more likely to be performed on patients with normal LVEF. Diabetes, syncope, AF, stroke and multi-comorbidities were the predictive factors of 1-year mortality. Elderly patients with symptomatic severe AS could benefit from intervention. Patient education needs to be strengthened, to encourage more patients accept the appropriate intervention. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): National Twelfth Five-year Science and Technology Support Projects by Ministry of Science and Technology of China

scholarly journals Riding the waves: the ongoing impact of COVID-19 on a national surgical training cohort

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Orla Hennessy ◽  
Amy Lee Fowler ◽  
Conor Hennessy ◽  
David Brinkman ◽  
Aisling Hogan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Training ◽  
World Health Organisation ◽  
World Health ◽  
Training Methods ◽  
Viral Spread ◽  
Surgical Services ◽  
Global Pandemic ◽  
Surgical Trainees ◽  
Secondary Survey ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background The World Health Organisation declared a global pandemic on the 11 March 2020 resulting in implementation of methods to contain viral spread, including curtailment of all elective and non-emergent interventions. Many institutions have experienced changes in rostering practices and redeployment of trainees to non-surgical services. Examinations, study days, courses, and conferences have been cancelled. These changes have the potential to significantly impact the education and training of surgical trainees. Aim To investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on training, educational, and operative experiences of Irish surgical trainees. Methods Surgical trainees were surveyed anonymously regarding changes in working and educational practices since the declaration of the COVID-19 pandemic on 11 March 2020. The survey was circulated in May 2020 to both core and higher RCSI surgical trainees, when restrictions were at level five. Questions included previous and current access to operative sessions as well as operative cases, previous and current educational activities, access to senior-led training, and access to simulation-/practical-based training methods. A repeat survey was carried out in October 2020 when restrictions were at level two. Results Overall, primary and secondary survey response rates were 29% (n = 98/340) and 19.1% (n = 65/340), respectively. At the time of circulation of the second survey, the number of operative sessions attended and cases performed had significantly improved to numbers experienced pre-pandemic (p < 0.0001). Exposure to formal teaching and education sessions returned to pre-COVID levels (p < 0.0001). Initially, 23% of trainees had an examination cancelled; 53% of these trainees have subsequently sat these examinations. Of note 27.7% had courses cancelled, and 97% of these had not been rescheduled. Conclusion Surgical training and education have been significantly impacted in light of COVID-19. This is likely to continue to fluctuate in line with subsequent waves. Significant efforts have to be made to enable trainees to meet educational and operative targets.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document