scholarly journals Time to test antibacterial therapy in Alzheimer’s disease

Brain ◽  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Panza ◽  
Madia Lozupone ◽  
Vincenzo Solfrizzi ◽  
Mark Watling ◽  
Bruno P Imbimbo

Abstract Alzheimer’s disease is associated with cerebral accumulation of amyloid-β peptide and hyperphosphorylated tau. In the past 28 years, huge efforts have been made in attempting to treat the disease by reducing brain accumulation of amyloid-β in patients with Alzheimer’s disease, with no success. While anti-amyloid-β therapies continue to be tested in prodromal patients with Alzheimer’s disease and in subjects at risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease, there is an urgent need to provide therapeutic support to patients with established Alzheimer’s disease for whom current symptomatic treatment (acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and N-methyl d-aspartate antagonist) provide limited help. The possibility of an infectious aetiology for Alzheimer’s disease has been repeatedly postulated over the past three decades. Infiltration of the brain by pathogens may act as a trigger or co-factor for Alzheimer’s disease, with Herpes simplex virus type 1, Chlamydia pneumoniae, and Porphyromonas gingivalis being most frequently implicated. These pathogens may directly cross a weakened blood–brain barrier, reach the CNS and cause neurological damage by eliciting neuroinflammation. Alternatively, pathogens may cross a weakened intestinal barrier, reach vascular circulation and then cross blood–brain barrier or cause low grade chronic inflammation and subsequent neuroinflammation from the periphery. The gut microbiota comprises a complex community of microorganisms. Increased permeability of the gut and blood–brain barrier induced by microbiota dysbiosis may impact Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis. Inflammatory microorganisms in gut microbiota are associated with peripheral inflammation and brain amyloid-β deposition in subjects with cognitive impairment. Oral microbiota may also influence Alzheimer’s disease risk through circulatory or neural access to the brain. At least two possibilities can be envisaged to explain the association of suspected pathogens and Alzheimer’s disease. One is that patients with Alzheimer’s disease are particularly prone to microbial infections. The other is that microbial infection is a contributing cause of Alzheimer’s disease. Therapeutic trials with antivirals and/or antibacterials could resolve this dilemma. Indeed, antiviral agents are being tested in patients with Alzheimer’s disease in double-blind placebo-controlled studies. Although combined antibiotic therapy was found to be effective in animal models of Alzheimer’s disease, antibacterial drugs are not being widely investigated in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. This is because it is not clear which bacterial populations in the gut of patients with Alzheimer’s disease are overexpressed and if safe, selective antibacterials are available for them. On the other hand, a bacterial protease inhibitor targeting P. gingivalis toxins is now being tested in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Clinical studies are needed to test if countering bacterial infection may be beneficial in patients with established Alzheimer’s disease.

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 159-167
Author(s):  
Zahin Hafiz ◽  
Moina Malek ◽  
William Ju

The gut and the brain are in constant communication in a complex network known as the brain-gut axis. A growing body of research has found links between the brain-gut axis and Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). In this review, we will explore how the mammalian microbiome affects neuroinflammation and increases the permeability of the blood brain barrier in the context of AD. Research shows that the microbiome is associated with neuroinflammation in AD, which is presumably caused by the secretion of cytokines from specialized cells of the brain - microglia and astrocytes. On the other hand, metabolic diseases, caused by microbiota dysbiosis, can increase the permeability of the blood brain barrier. In addition, its higher permeability can allow blood plasma components to enter brain tissue and further develop AD pathology. Findings of the current research have tremendous therapeutic implications. Researchers have speculated whether the therapeutic modification of gut microbiota, through the use of antibiotics and probiotics, may show improvement in AD patients. Our understanding of the pathways and mechanisms involved in the brain-gut axis and AD is still very limited and requires further research before clinical and therapeutic interventions can occur.


Sci ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 16
Author(s):  
James David Adams

A three-part mechanism is proposed for the induction of Alzheimer’s disease: (1) decreased blood lactic acid; (2) increased blood ceramide and adipokines; (3) decreased blood folic acid. The age-related nature of these mechanisms comes from age-associated decreased muscle mass, increased visceral fat and changes in diet. This mechanism also explains why many people do not develop Alzheimer’s disease. Simple changes in lifestyle and diet can prevent Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s disease is caused by a cascade of events that culminates in damage to the blood–brain barrier and damage to neurons. The blood–brain barrier keeps toxic molecules out of the brain and retains essential molecules in the brain. Lactic acid is a nutrient to the brain and is produced by exercise. Damage to endothelial cells and pericytes by inadequate lactic acid leads to blood–brain barrier damage and brain damage. Inadequate folate intake and oxidative stress induced by activation of transient receptor potential cation channels and endothelial nitric oxide synthase damage the blood–brain barrier. NAD depletion due to inadequate intake of nicotinamide and alterations in the kynurenine pathway damages neurons. Changes in microRNA levels may be the terminal events that cause neuronal death leading to Alzheimer’s disease. A new mechanism of Alzheimer’s disease induction is presented involving lactic acid, ceramide, IL-1β, tumor necrosis factor α, folate, nicotinamide, kynurenine metabolites and microRNA.


2021 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dhara Lakdawala ◽  
Md Abdur Rashid ◽  
Farhan Jalees Ahmad

: Drug delivery to the brain has remained a significant challenge in treating neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's disease due to the presence of the blood-brain barrier, which primarily obstructs the access of drugs and biomolecules into the brain. Several methods to overcome the blood-brain barrier have been employed, such as chemical disruption, surgical intervention, focused ultrasound, intranasal delivery and using nanocarriers. Nanocarrier systems remain the method of choice and have shown promising results over the past decade to achieve better drug targeting. Polymeric nanocarriers and lipidic nanoparticles act as a carrier system providing better encapsulation of drugs, site-specific delivery, increased bioavailability and sustained release of drugs. The surface modifications and functionalization of these nanocarrier systems have greatly facilitated targeted drug delivery. The safety and efficacy of these nanocarrier systems have been ascertained by several in vitro and in vivo models. In the present review, we have elaborated on recent developments of nanoparticles as a drug delivery system for Alzheimer's disease, explicitly focusing on polymeric and lipidic nanoparticles.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong Wang ◽  
Fanglian Chen ◽  
Zhaoli Han ◽  
Zhenyu Yin ◽  
Xintong Ge ◽  
...  

Amyloid-β (Aβ) is the predominant pathologic protein in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). The production and deposition of Aβ are important factors affecting AD progression and prognosis. The deposition of neurotoxic Aβ contributes to damage of the blood–brain barrier. However, the BBB is also crucial in maintaining the normal metabolism of Aβ, and dysfunction of the BBB aggravates Aβ deposition. This review characterizes Aβ deposition and BBB damage in AD, summarizes their interactions, and details their respective mechanisms.


2017 ◽  
Vol 214 (11) ◽  
pp. 3151-3169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Axel Montagne ◽  
Zhen Zhao ◽  
Berislav V. Zlokovic

The blood–brain barrier (BBB) keeps neurotoxic plasma-derived components, cells, and pathogens out of the brain. An early BBB breakdown and/or dysfunction have been shown in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) before dementia, neurodegeneration and/or brain atrophy occur. However, the role of BBB breakdown in neurodegenerative disorders is still not fully understood. Here, we examine BBB breakdown in animal models frequently used to study the pathophysiology of AD, including transgenic mice expressing human amyloid-β precursor protein, presenilin 1, and tau mutations, and apolipoprotein E, the strongest genetic risk factor for AD. We discuss the role of BBB breakdown and dysfunction in neurodegenerative process, pitfalls in BBB measurements, and how targeting the BBB can influence the course of neurological disorder. Finally, we comment on future approaches and models to better define, at the cellular and molecular level, the underlying mechanisms between BBB breakdown and neurodegeneration as a basis for developing new therapies for BBB repair to control neurodegeneration.


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (41) ◽  
pp. eabc7031 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yutong Zhou ◽  
Feiyan Zhu ◽  
Yang Liu ◽  
Meng Zheng ◽  
Yibin Wang ◽  
...  

Toxic aggregated amyloid-β accumulation is a key pathogenic event in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), which derives from amyloid precursor protein (APP) through sequential cleavage by BACE1 (β-site APP cleavage enzyme 1) and γ-secretase. Small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) show great promise for AD therapy by specific silencing of BACE1. However, lack of effective siRNA brain delivery approaches limits this strategy. Here, we developed a glycosylated “triple-interaction” stabilized polymeric siRNA nanomedicine (Gal-NP@siRNA) to target BACE1 in APP/PS1 transgenic AD mouse model. Gal-NP@siRNA exhibits superior blood stability and can efficiently penetrate the blood-brain barrier (BBB) via glycemia-controlled glucose transporter-1 (Glut1)–mediated transport, thereby ensuring that siRNAs decrease BACE1 expression and modify relative pathways. Noticeably, Gal-NP@siBACE1 administration restored the deterioration of cognitive capacity in AD mice without notable side effects. This “Trojan horse” strategy supports the utility of RNA interference therapy in neurodegenerative diseases.


2002 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 303-313 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jasmina B Mackic ◽  
James Bading ◽  
Jorge Ghiso ◽  
Larry Walker ◽  
Thomas Wisniewski ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramon Vilar ◽  
Tiffany G Chan ◽  
Carmen Ruehl ◽  
Sophie Morse ◽  
Michelle Simon ◽  
...  

One of the key hallmarks of Alzheimer’s disease is the aggregation of the amyloid-β peptide to form fibrils. Consequently, there has been great interest in studying molecules that can disrupt...


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document