scholarly journals Higher CICU mechanical ventilation volumes are associated with lower in-hospital mortality

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Nandiwada ◽  
S Islam ◽  
J Jentzer ◽  
PE Miller ◽  
CB Fordyce ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Annual Volume ◽  
Low Volume

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background  The incidence of respiratory failure and the provision of invasive and non-invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) in patients admitted to cardiac intensive care units (CICU) are increasing. While institutional MV volumes are associated with reduced mortality in medical and surgical ICUs, this relationship has not been characterized in the CICU population. Purpose  By describing the relationship between institutional MV volume and outcomes in the CICUs, we hope to shed light on minimum volume benchmarks for providing MV. Methods  National Canadian population-based data from 2005 to 2015 was used to identify patients admitted to CICUs requiring MV. CICUs were categorized into low (≤100), intermediate (101-300), and high (>300) volume centers based on spline knots identified in the association between annual MV volume and mortality (Figure). Outcomes of interests included all-cause in-hospital mortality, the proportion of patients requiring prolonged MV (>96 hours) and CICU length of stay (LOS). Results  Among the 47,173 CICU admissions that required MV, 89.5% (42,200) required invasive mechanical ventilation. The median annual CICU MV volume was 127 (range 1-490). In-hospital mortality was lower in intermediate (29.2%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.84, 95% CI 0.72-0.97, p = 0.019) and high-volume (18.2%; aOR 0.82, 95% CI 0.66-1.02, p = 0.076) centers, compared to low volume centers (35.9%). The proportion of patients requiring prolonged MV was higher in low-volume (29.2%) compared to high-volume (14.8%, OR 0.70, 95% 0.55-0.89, p = 0.003) centers. Point estimates for mortality and prolonged MV were lower in PCI-capable and academic centers (Table). Significantly (p <0.01) lower CICU LOS was observed only in the subgroup of PCI-capable intermediate- and high-volume hospitals. Conclusions  In a national dataset, we observed that higher CICU MV hospital volumes were associated with lower in-hospital mortality, CICU LOS, and fewer episodes of prolonged MV. Pending further validation, these data suggest minimum MV volume benchmarks for CICUs caring for patients with respiratory failure. Further research is warranted to explore these associations in more detail. Unadjusted volume-outcome relationshipsOutcomesGroup 1 Annual Volume ≤100Group 2 Annual Volume 101-300Group 3 Annual Volume >300Totalp-valueTotal N1770224351512047173In-hospital mortality6357 (35.0%)7122 (29.2%)933 (18.2%)14412 (30.6%)p < 0.0001Median CICU LOS(hours)85796679p < 0.0001Episodes of prolonged MV5161 (29.2%)5608 (23.0%)758 (14.8%)11527 (24.4%)p < 0.0001Abbreviations OR (odds ratio), RD (risk difference), CI (confidence interval), PCI (percutaneous coronary intervention), LOS (length of stay)Abstract Figure. Annual CICU MV volume and mortality

scholarly journals High-flow nasal oxygen in patients with COVID-19-associated acute respiratory failure

Critical Care ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricard Mellado-Artigas ◽  
◽  
Bruno L. Ferreyro ◽  
Federico Angriman ◽  
María Hernández-Sanz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Acute Respiratory Failure ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
High Flow ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Icu Length Of Stay ◽  
Early Intubation

Abstract Purpose Whether the use of high-flow nasal oxygen in adult patients with COVID-19 associated acute respiratory failure improves clinically relevant outcomes remains unclear. We thus sought to assess the effect of high-flow nasal oxygen on ventilator-free days, compared to early initiation of invasive mechanical ventilation, on adult patients with COVID-19. Methods We conducted a multicentre cohort study using a prospectively collected database of patients with COVID-19 associated acute respiratory failure admitted to 36 Spanish and Andorran intensive care units (ICUs). Main exposure was the use of high-flow nasal oxygen (conservative group), while early invasive mechanical ventilation (within the first day of ICU admission; early intubation group) served as the comparator. The primary outcome was ventilator-free days at 28 days. ICU length of stay and all-cause in-hospital mortality served as secondary outcomes. We used propensity score matching to adjust for measured confounding. Results Out of 468 eligible patients, a total of 122 matched patients were included in the present analysis (61 for each group). When compared to early intubation, the use of high-flow nasal oxygen was associated with an increase in ventilator-free days (mean difference: 8.0 days; 95% confidence interval (CI): 4.4 to 11.7 days) and a reduction in ICU length of stay (mean difference: − 8.2 days; 95% CI − 12.7 to − 3.6 days). No difference was observed in all-cause in-hospital mortality between groups (odds ratio: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.25 to 1.64). Conclusions The use of high-flow nasal oxygen upon ICU admission in adult patients with COVID-19 related acute hypoxemic respiratory failure may lead to an increase in ventilator-free days and a reduction in ICU length of stay, when compared to early initiation of invasive mechanical ventilation. Future studies should confirm our findings.

scholarly journals High flow nasal oxygen in patients with COVID-19 associated acute respiratory failure

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricard Mellado Artigas ◽  
Bruno L. Ferreyro ◽  
Federico Angriman ◽  
María Hernández-Sanz ◽  
Egoitz Arruti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Acute Respiratory Failure ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
High Flow ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Icu Length Of Stay ◽  
Early Intubation

Abstract Purpose: Whether the use of high-flow nasal oxygen in adult patients with COVID-19 associated acute respiratory failure improves clinically relevant outcomes remains unclear. We thus sought to assess the effect of high-flow nasal oxygen on ventilator-free days, compared to early initiation of invasive mechanical ventilation, on adult patients with COVID-19.Methods: We conducted a multicentre cohort study using a prospectively collected database of patients with COVID-19 associated acute respiratory failure admitted to 36 Spanish and Andorran intensive care units (ICUs). Main exposure was the use of high-flow nasal oxygen (conservative group), while early invasive mechanical ventilation (within the first day of ICU admission; early intubation group) served as the comparator. The primary outcome was ventilator-free days at 28 days. ICU length of stay and all-cause in-hospital mortality served as secondary outcomes. We used propensity score matching to adjust for measured confounding.Results: Out of 468 eligible patients, a total of 122 matched patients were included in the present analysis (61 for each group). When compared to early intubation, the use of high-flow nasal oxygen was associated with an increase in ventilator-free days (mean difference: 8.0 days; 95% confidence interval (CI): 4.4 to 11.7 days), and a reduction in ICU length of stay (mean difference: -8.2 days; 95% CI -12.7 to -3.6 days). No difference was observed in all-cause in-hospital mortality between groups (odds ratio: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.25 to 1.64).Conclusions: The use of high-flow nasal oxygen upon ICU admission in adult patients with COVID-19 related acute hypoxemic respiratory failure may lead to an increase in ventilator-free days and a reduction in ICU length of stay, when compared to early initiation of invasive mechanical ventilation. Future studies should confirm our findings.

scholarly journals Cancer-Related Characteristics Associated With Invasive Mechanical Ventilation or In-Hospital Mortality in Patients With COVID-19 Admitted to ICU: A Cohort Multicenter Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pedro Caruso ◽  
Renato Scarsi Testa ◽  
Isabel Cristina Lima Freitas ◽  
Ana Paula Agnolon Praça ◽  
Valdelis Novis Okamoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Metastatic Tumor ◽  
Poor Performance Status ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Active Cancer

BackgroundCoexistence of cancer and COVID-19 is associated with worse outcomes. However, the studies on cancer-related characteristics associated with worse COVID-19 outcomes have shown controversial results. The objective of the study was to evaluate cancer-related characteristics associated with invasive mechanical ventilation use or in-hospital mortality in patients with COVID-19 admitted to intensive care unit (ICU).MethodsWe designed a cohort multicenter study including adults with active cancer admitted to ICU due to COVID-19. Seven cancer-related characteristics (cancer status, type of cancer, metastasis occurrence, recent chemotherapy, recent immunotherapy, lung tumor, and performance status) were introduced in a multilevel logistic regression model as first-level variables and hospital was introduced as second-level variable (random effect). Confounders were identified using directed acyclic graphs.ResultsWe included 274 patients. Required to undergo invasive mechanical ventilation were 176 patients (64.2%) and none of the cancer-related characteristics were associated with mechanical ventilation use. Approximately 155 patients died in hospital (56.6%) and poor performance status, measured with the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score was associated with increased in-hospital mortality, with odds ratio = 3.54 (1.60–7.88, 95% CI) for ECOG =2 and odds ratio = 3.40 (1.60–7.22, 95% CI) for ECOG = 3 to 4. Cancer status, cancer type, metastatic tumor, lung cancer, and recent chemotherapy or immunotherapy were not associated with in-hospital mortality.ConclusionsIn patients with active cancer and COVID-19 admitted to ICU, poor performance status was associated with in-hospital mortality but not with mechanical ventilation use. Cancer status, cancer type, metastatic tumor, lung cancer, and recent chemotherapy or immunotherapy were not associated with invasive mechanical ventilation use or in-hospital mortality.

scholarly journals The Impact of Hyperoxia on Outcome of Patients Treated with Noninvasive Respiratory Support

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Seyhan Pala Cifci ◽  
Yasemin Urcan Tapan ◽  
Bengu Turemis Erkul ◽  
Yusuf Savran ◽  
Bilgin Comert
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Oxygen Therapy ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Respiratory Support ◽  
High Flow Oxygen ◽  
The Impact

Objective. Oxygen therapy is one of the most common treatment modalities for hypoxemic patients, but target goals for normoxemia are not clearly defined. Therefore, iatrogenic hyperoxia is a very common situation. The results from the recent clinical researches about hyperoxia indicate that hyperoxia can be related to worse outcomes than expected in some critically ill patients. According to our literature knowledge, there are not any reports researching the effect of hyperoxia on clinical course of patients who are not treated with invasive mechanical ventilation. In this study, we aimed to determine the effect of hyperoxia on mortality, and length of stay and also possible side effects of hyperoxia on the patients who are treated with oxygen by noninvasive devices. Materials and Methods. One hundred and eighty-seven patients who met inclusion criteria, treated in Dokuz Eylul University Medical Intensive Care Unit between January 1, 2016, and October 31, 2018, were examined retrospectively. These patients’ demographic data, oxygen saturation (SpO2) values for the first 24 hours, APACHE II (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II) scores, whether they needed intubation, if they did how many days they got ventilated, length of stay in intensive care unit and hospital, maximum PaO2 values of the first day, oxygen treatment method of the first 24 hours, and the rates of mortality were recorded. Results. Hyperoxemia was determined in 62 of 187 patients who were not treated with invasive mechanic ventilation in the first 24 hours of admission. Upon further investigation of the relation between comorbid situations and hyperoxia, hyperoxia frequency in patients with COPD was detected to be statistically low (16% vs. 35%, p<0.008). Hospital mortality was significantly high (51.6% vs. 35.2%, p<0.04) in patients with hyperoxia. When the types of oxygen support therapies were investigated, hyperoxia frequency was found higher in patients treated with supplemental oxygen (nasal cannula, oronasal mask, high flow oxygen therapy) than patients treated with NIMV (44.2% vs. 25.5%, p<0.008). After exclusion of 56 patients who were intubated and treated with invasive mechanical ventilation after the first 24 hours, hyperoxemia was determined in 46 of 131 patients. Mortality in patients with hyperoxemia who were not treated with invasive mechanical ventilation during hospital stay was statistically higher when compared to normoxemic patients (41.3% vs 15.3%, p<0.001). Conclusion. We report that hyperoxemia increases the hospital mortality in patients treated with noninvasive respiratory support. At the same time, we determined that hyperoxemia frequency was lower in COPD patients and the ones treated with NIMV. Conservative oxygen therapy strategy can be suggested to decrease the hyperoxia prevalence and mortality rates.

scholarly journals Association between preoperative respiratory support and outcomes in paediatric cardiac surgery

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-73
Author(s):  
Elizabeth C. Ciociola ◽  
Karan R. Kumar ◽  
Kanecia O. Zimmerman ◽  
Elizabeth J. Thompson ◽  
Melissa Harward ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Operative Mortality ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
High Flow ◽  
Nasal Cannula ◽  
Respiratory Support ◽  
High Flow Nasal Cannula ◽  
Prolonged Length

AbstractBackground:Preoperative mechanical ventilation is associated with morbidity and mortality following CHD surgery, but prior studies lack a comprehensive analysis of how preoperative respiratory support mode and timing affects outcomes.Methods:We retrospectively collected data on children <18 years of age undergoing cardiac surgery at an academic tertiary care medical centre. Using multivariable regression, we examined the association between modes of preoperative respiratory support (nasal cannula, high-flow nasal cannula/noninvasive ventilation, or invasive mechanical ventilation), escalation of preoperative respiratory support, and invasive mechanical ventilation on the day of surgery for three outcomes: operative mortality, postoperative length of stay, and postoperative complications. We repeated our analysis in a subcohort of neonates.Results:A total of 701 children underwent 800 surgical procedures, and 40% received preoperative respiratory support. Among neonates, 243 patients underwent 253 surgical procedures, and 79% received preoperative respiratory support. In multivariable analysis, all modes of preoperative respiratory support, escalation in preoperative respiratory support, and invasive mechanical ventilation on the day of surgery were associated with increased odds of prolonged length of stay in children and neonates. Children (odds ratio = 3.69, 95% CI 1.2–11.4) and neonates (odds ratio = 8.97, 95% CI 1.31–61.14) on high-flow nasal cannula/noninvasive ventilation had increased odds of operative mortality compared to those on room air.Conclusion:Preoperative respiratory support is associated with prolonged length of stay and mortality following CHD surgery. Knowing how preoperative respiratory support affects outcomes may help guide surgical timing, inform prognostic conversations, and improve risk stratification models.

scholarly journals 3541 The association of corticosteroid use with inpatient mortality in acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (s1) ◽  
pp. 127-128
Author(s):  
Erica Farrand ◽  
Eric Vittinghoff ◽  
Brett Ley ◽  
Harold Collard
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Acute Respiratory Failure ◽  
Corticosteroid Therapy ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Corticosteroid Treatment ◽  
Time Dependent ◽  
Icu Admission

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: Objective: To assess the impact of corticosteroid therapy on in-hospital mortality in IPF patients admitted with acute respiratory failure. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Methods: Patients with IPF were retrospectively identified in the University of California San Francisco medical center’s electronic health records from January 1, 2010 to June 1, 2018. Cases with IPF were defined as age 50 years or older, having at least two codes one month apart for idiopathic fibrosing alveolitis or post-inflammatory fibrosis (ICD-9 516.3, 516.31 or 515.0 or ICD-10 codes J84.9, J84.10, J84.111 or J84.112), and a subsequent hospitalization for acute respiratory failure or acute respiratory symptoms. The prevalence of pre-selected co-morbidities, clinical events (ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, lung transplantation) and clinical outcomes were assessed. A propensity score model for corticosteroid use was constructed using a multivariable logistic regression with inclusion of corticosteroid-associated demographic and baseline variables (univariate p-value < 0.25). A marginal structural model (MSM) was used to address time-dependent confounding and mediating effects of ICU admission and mechanical ventilation by applying inverse probability weighting for receipt of corticosteroid treatment. Secondary outcome analysis was performed on patients who survived hospital admission. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Results: A total of 132 patients with IPF and an acute respiratory admission were identified. 48 patients (36%) received corticosteroids during their admission. Applying inverse weighting to time-dependent co-variates (ICU admission and invasive mechanical ventilation) in a MSM, corticosteroid therapy was not associated with risk of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 1.82; 95% CI, 0.47-6.99; p = 0.39). After adjusting for corticosteroid therapy using a propensity score, corticosteroid therapy remained unassociated with in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 1.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37, 6.29; p = 0.55). There was no difference in discharge disposition or time to hospital readmission by corticosteroid treatment. There was a possible increase in time to death following discharge in patients receiving corticosteroids (Figure). DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Conclusions: This study suggests that treatment of acute exacerbations of interstitial lung disease with corticosteroids does not improve short-term outcomes, including in-hospital mortality, all-cause non-elective re-hospitalization or death within 6 months of discharge. Further research in larger cohorts is needed to more definitively assess this relationship.

High-Volume Hospitals with High-Volume and Low-Volume Surgeons: Is There a “Field Effect” for Pancreaticoduodenectomy?

2016 ◽  
Vol 82 (5) ◽  
pp. 407-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas W. Wood ◽  
Sharona B. Ross ◽  
Ty A. Bowman ◽  
Amanda Smart ◽  
Carrie E. Ryan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Field Effect ◽  
Hospital Volume ◽  
Patient Discharge ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Surgeon Volume ◽  
Hospital Charges ◽  
Leapfrog Group ◽  
Discharge Status ◽  
Low Volume

Since the Leapfrog Group established hospital volume criteria for pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), the importance of surgeon volume versus hospital volume in obtaining superior outcomes has been debated. This study was undertaken to determine whether low-volume surgeons attain the same outcomes after PD as high-volume surgeons at high-volume hospitals. PDs undertaken from 2010 to 2012 were obtained from the Florida Agency for Health Care Administration. High-volume hospitals were identified. Surgeon volumes within were determined; postoperative length of stay (LOS), in-hospital mortality, discharge status, and hospital charges were examined relative to surgeon volume. Six high-volume hospitals were identified. Each hospital had at least one surgeon undertaking ≥ 12 PDs per year and at least one surgeon undertaking < 12 PDs per year. Within these six hospitals, there were 10 “high-volume” surgeons undertaking 714 PDs over the three-year period (average of 24 PDs per surgeon per year), and 33 “low-volume” surgeons undertaking 225 PDs over the three-year period (average of two PDs per surgeon per year). For all surgeons, the frequency with which surgeons undertook PD did not predict LOS, in-hospital mortality, discharge status, or hospital charges. At the six high-volume hospitals examined from 2010 to 2012, low-volume surgeons undertaking PD did not have different patient outcomes from their high-volume counterparts with respect to patient LOS, in-hospital mortality, patient discharge status, or hospital charges. Although the discussion of volume for complex operations has shifted toward surgeon volume, hospital volume must remain part of the discussion as there seems to be a hospital “field effect.”

scholarly journals Incidence and Outcomes of Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Admitted to Hospital With COVID-19: A Retrospective Cohort Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 205435812110277
Author(s):  
Tyler Pitre ◽  
Angela (Hong Tian) Dong ◽  
Aaron Jones ◽  
Jessica Kapralik ◽  
Sonya Cui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Disease Severity ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Icu Admission

Background: The incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients with COVID-19 and its association with mortality and disease severity is understudied in the Canadian population. Objective: To determine the incidence of AKI in a cohort of patients with COVID-19 admitted to medicine and intensive care unit (ICU) wards, its association with in-hospital mortality, and disease severity. Our aim was to stratify these outcomes by out-of-hospital AKI and in-hospital AKI. Design: Retrospective cohort study from a registry of patients with COVID-19. Setting: Three community and 3 academic hospitals. Patients: A total of 815 patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 between March 4, 2020, and April 23, 2021. Measurements: Stage of AKI, ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, and in-hospital mortality. Methods: We classified AKI by comparing highest to lowest recorded serum creatinine in hospital and staged AKI based on the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) system. We calculated the unadjusted and adjusted odds ratio for the stage of AKI and the outcomes of ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, and in-hospital mortality. Results: Of the 815 patients registered, 439 (53.9%) developed AKI, 253 (57.6%) presented with AKI, and 186 (42.4%) developed AKI in-hospital. The odds of ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, and death increased as the AKI stage worsened. Stage 3 AKI that occurred during hospitalization increased the odds of death (odds ratio [OR] = 7.87 [4.35, 14.23]). Stage 3 AKI that occurred prior to hospitalization carried an increased odds of death (OR = 5.28 [2.60, 10.73]). Limitations: Observational study with small sample size limits precision of estimates. Lack of nonhospitalized patients with COVID-19 and hospitalized patients without COVID-19 as controls limits causal inferences. Conclusions: Acute kidney injury, whether it occurs prior to or after hospitalization, is associated with a high risk of poor outcomes in patients with COVID-19. Routine assessment of kidney function in patients with COVID-19 may improve risk stratification. Trial registration: The study was not registered on a publicly accessible registry because it did not involve any health care intervention on human participants.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document