scholarly journals ICD implantation and device therapy: Fabry vs hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Vijapurapu ◽  
A Zegard ◽  
F Leyva ◽  
W Bradlow ◽  
A Jovanovic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Primary Prevention ◽  
Shock Therapy ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Device Therapy ◽  
Icd Implantation ◽  
Device Implantation ◽  
Cardiac Devices ◽  
Lv Mass

Abstract Background Cardiac involvement of Fabry disease (FD) includes left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), inflammation, arrhythmia and sudden death. There are limited data regarding potential risk predictors and no definitive criteria exist to guide implantation of cardiac devices for primary prevention. Despite phenotypic similarities between FD and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), FD is specifically excluded from the ESC sudden cardiac death risk prediction tool used for HCM. Purpose To evaluate differences in device implantation and arrhythmic burden between advanced Fabry cardiomyopathy and HCM. Methods This multi-centre, retrospective study including genetically confirmed FD and age/gender-matched HCM patients all of whom had an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). Data was collected prior to device implantation on disease characteristics, biomarkers and CMR imaging. Arrhythmia burden and changes in therapy were captured following implantation. Results Of the UK FD population under follow-up, 50/880 had an ICD implanted (80% males, 51% non-classical mutation, mean age at device implantation 57±12 years). A comparator group included 64 age- and gender-matched HCM patients (67% males, mean age at implant 46±39 years). Baseline LV mass was greater in FD (291±97g/m2 vs 218±78g/m2, p=0.012). FD patients had higher troponin (95 vs 19ng/l, p<0.001) but similar NT-pro-BNP (1687 vs 888ng/l, p=0.086) levels. Indications for ICD insertion in FD included: presumed HCM dual pathology 14%, symptomatic NSVT 18%, asymptomatic NSVT 24%, co-existing long QT 2%, CRT-D 14%, no clear indication (primary prevention in the presence of multiple potential arrhythmic risk factors) 28%. All HCM patients were risk stratified and underwent device implantation based on an estimated 5-year SCD risk >4%. All FD patients had a SCD risk >4% using this risk calculator. Arrhythmia were more common in FD over shorter follow-up (37/50, 74% over 4.3±3.0 years vs 28/64 in HCM, 44% over 6.5±2.9 years, p=0.001). Notably, VT requiring anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) +/− defibrillation therapy from the ICD was more frequent (FD: 14/50, 28% vs HCM: 8/64, 12%, p=0.055), as was immediate shock therapy for sustained VT (p=0.009, figure panel B). FD patients with arrhythmia were often older, had greater LV mass, a larger left atrium and a broader QRS duration. These clinical features tended to occur more frequently in FD than in the HCM group. Conclusion This study has shown that delivery of device therapy in Fabry cardiomyopathy is higher than in HCM. Despite similar rates of asymptomatic NSVT, a higher rate of ventricular arrhythmia requiring ATP/defibrillation therapy occurred in FD. Although both FD and HCM had similar risk percentages according to the ESC calculator, active troponitis in FD was double that of HCM. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals Cardiac device implantation and device usage in Fabry and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

2022 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ravi Vijapurapu ◽  
William Bradlow ◽  
Francisco Leyva ◽  
James C. Moon ◽  
Abbasin Zegard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Prevention ◽  
Premature Death ◽  
Shock Therapy ◽  
Risk Models ◽  
Icd Implantation ◽  
Cardiac Device ◽  
Device Implantation ◽  
Potential Risk Factors ◽  
The Uk

Abstract Background Fabry disease (FD) is a treatable X-linked condition leading to progressive cardiac disease, arrhythmia and premature death. We aimed to increase awareness of the arrhythmogenicity of Fabry cardiomyopathy, by comparing device usage in patients with Fabry cardiomyopathy and sarcomeric HCM. All Fabry patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implanted in the UK over a 17 year period were included. A comparator group of HCM patients, with primary prevention ICD implantation, were captured from a regional registry database. Results Indications for ICD in FD varied with 72% implanted for primary prevention based on multiple potential risk factors. In FD and HCM primary prevention devices, arrhythmia occurred more frequently in FD over shorter follow-up (HR 4.2, p < 0.001). VT requiring therapy was more common in FD (HR 4.5, p = 0.002). Immediate shock therapy for sustained VT was also more common (HR 2.5, p < 0.001). There was a greater burden of AF needing anticoagulation and NSVT in FD (AF: HR 6.2, p = 0.004, NSVT: HR 3.1, p < 0.001). Conclusion This study demonstrates arrhythmia burden and ICD usage in FD is high, suggesting that Fabry cardiomyopathy may be more ‘arrhythmogenic’ than previously thought. Existing risk models cannot be mutually applicable and further research is needed to provide clarity in managing Fabry patients with cardiac involvement.

scholarly journals Cardiac Device Implantation and Device Usage in Fabry and Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ravi Vijapurapu ◽  
William Bradlow ◽  
Francisco Leyva ◽  
James C Moon ◽  
Abbasin Zegard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Prevention ◽  
Premature Death ◽  
Shock Therapy ◽  
Risk Models ◽  
Icd Implantation ◽  
Cardiac Device ◽  
Device Implantation ◽  
Potential Risk Factors ◽  
The Uk

Abstract BackgroundFabry disease (FD) is a treatable X-linked condition leading to progressive cardiac disease, arrhythmia and premature death. We aimed to increase awareness of the arrhythmogenicity of Fabry cardiomyopathy, by comparing device usage in patients with Fabry cardiomyopathy and sarcomeric HCM. All Fabry patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implanted in the UK over a 17 year period were included. A comparator group of HCM patients, with primary prevention ICD implantation, were captured from a regional registry database. ResultsIndications for ICD in FD varied with 82% implanted for primary prevention based on multiple potential risk factors. In FD and HCM primary prevention devices, arrhythmia occurred more frequently in FD over shorter follow-up (HR 4.2,p<0.001). VT requiring therapy was more common in FD (HR 4.5,p=0.002). Immediate shock therapy for sustained VT was also more common (HR 2.5,p<0.001). There was a greater burden of AF needing anticoagulation and NSVT in FD (AF: HR 6.2,p=0.004, NSVT: HR 3.1,p<0.001). ConclusionThis study demonstrates arrhythmia burden and ICD usage in FD is high, suggesting that Fabry cardiomyopathy may be more ‘arrhythmogenic’ than previously thought. Existing risk models cannot be mutually applicable and further research is needed to provide clarity in managing Fabry patients with cardiac involvement.

Abstract 107: Predictors and Frequency of ICD Implantation for Primary Prevention in ICD Eligible Patients: Results from a Prospective Multicenter Registry

2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rory Hachamovitch ◽  
Benjamin Nutter ◽  
Manuel D Cerqueira ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Primary Prevention ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Myocardial Imaging ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
Icd Implantation ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Multicenter Registry

Background . The use of implantable cardiac defibrillators has been associated with improved survival in several well-defined patient (pt) subsets. Its utilization for primary prevention in eligible pts, however, is unclear. We sought to examine the frequency of ICD implantation (ICD-IMP) for primary prevention in a cohort prospectively enrolled in a prospective, multicenter registry of ICD candidates. Methods . We identified 961 pts enrolled in the AdreView Myocardial Imaging for Risk Evaluation in Heart Failure (ADMIRE-HF) study, a prospective, multicenter study evaluating the prognostic usefulness of 123I-mIBG scintigraphy in a heart failure population. Inclusion criteria limited patients to those meeting guideline criteria for ICD implantation; these criteria included left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% and New York Heart Association functional class II-III. We excluded pts with an ICD at the time of enrollment, leaving a study cohort of 934 patients. Pts were followed up for 24 months after enrollment. Pts undergoing ICD-IMP after enrollment for secondary prevention were censored at the time of intervention. The association between ICD-IMP utilization and demographic, clinical, laboratory, and imaging data was examined using Cox proportional hazards analysis (CPH). Results . Of 934 pts, 196 (21%) were referred for ICD-IMP over a mean follow-up of 612±242 days. Implantations occurred 167±164 days after enrollment. Patients referred for ICD were younger (61±12 vs. 63±12), but did not differ with respect to proportion female (17% vs. 21%), African-American race (12% vs. 15%), diabetics (37% vs. 36%) (All p=NS). The frequency of ICD-IMP did not differ as a function of age, race, sex, LVEF, or imaging result (All p=NS). CPH revealed that a model including age, race, sex, diabetes, smoking, BMI, NYHA class, hypertension, heart failure etiology, and prior MI identified none of these as predictive of ICD-IMP. Conclusion: This analysis of prospective registry data reveals that in patients who are guideline-defined candidates for ICD-IMP, only about one in five receive an ICD over a two year follow-up interval. Multivariable modeling failed to identify any factor associated with ICD use.

Abstract 16238: Mortality and Predictors of Appropriate ICD Therapy in Japanese Primary Prevention Patients: A 13-year Experience Based on the MADIT2 Criteria

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshimori An ◽  
Kenji Ando ◽  
Michio Nagashima ◽  
Masato Fukunaga ◽  
Kenichi Hiroshima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Prevention ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Biventricular Pacing ◽  
Nyha Class ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Icd Implantation ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Icd Therapy

Background: There are still limited data on the mortality for a long-term follow-up and the clinical factors influencing appropriate therapies in Japanese patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) for primary prevention, who satisfied the criteria in Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial 2 (MADIT2). Methods: Between January 2000 and December 2012, a total of 436 patients without prior ventricular arrhythmic event underwent ICD implantation for primary prevention at our institution. Among these patients, we enrolled consecutive 122 patients (69±10 years, male: 84%, biventricular-pacing: 54%, median follow-up: 1390 days) who met the MADIT2 criteria; left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤30% with ischemic heart disease, more than 4 weeks after myocardial infarction. Results: At the 3 years of follow-up, the mortality rate (21%) was comparable with that of the original MADIT2 ICD group (20%). The Kaplan-Meier event rate for appropriate ICD therapy (shock and anti-tachycardia pacing therapy) (35%) was also similar to that of the original MADIT2 ICD group (32%). Multivariate analysis by Cox regression model revealed that left ventricular diastolic diameter (LVDd) ≥60mm (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 1.65, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.16-2.14, P=0.004) and non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) (HR: 1.55, 95%CI: 1.13-2.15, P=0.007) were independent predictors for appropriate ICD therapy. On the other hand, LVEF, NYHA class, biventricular-pacing, amiodarone or inducibility of ventricular arrhythmia was not associated with appropriate ICD therapy. Conclusion: Appropriate ICD therapy was delivered in Japanese primary prevention patients as often as in the original MADIT2 ICD group and strongly predicted by dilated left ventricle and NSVT.

scholarly journals 1228 New predictors of sudden cardiac death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
D M Adamczak ◽  
A Rogala ◽  
M Antoniak ◽  
Z Oko-Sarnowska
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Sudden Cardiac Death ◽  
Cardiac Death ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Volume Index ◽  
Lv Function ◽  
Icd Implantation ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract BACKGROUND Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a heart disease characterized by hypertrophy of the left ventricular myocardium. HCM is the most common cause of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in young people and competitive athletes due to fatal ventricular arrhythmias. However, in most patients, HCM has a benign course. That is why it is of utmost importance to properly evaluate patients and identify those who would benefit from a cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation. The HCM SCD-Risk Calculator is a useful tool for estimating the risk of SCD. The parameters included in the model at evaluation are: age, maximum left ventricular (LV) wall thickness, left atrial (LA) dimension, maximum gradient in left ventricular outflow tract, family history of SCD, non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (nsVT) and unexplained syncope. Nevertheless, there is potential to improve and optimize the effectiveness of this tool in clinical practice. Therefore, the following new risk factors are proposed: LV global longitudinal strain (GLS), LV average strain (ASI) and LA volume index (LAVI). GLS and ASI are sensitive and noninvasive methods of assessing LV function. LAVI more accurately characterizes the size of the left atrium in comparison to the LA dimension. METHODS 252 HCM patients (aged 20-88 years, of which 49,6% were men) treated in our Department from 2005 to 2018, were examined. The follow-up period was 0-13 years (average: 3.8 years). SCD was defined as sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) or an appropriate ICD intervention. All patients underwent an echocardiographic examination. The medical and family histories were collected and ICD examinations were performed. RESULTS 76 patients underwent an ICD implantation during the follow-up period. 20 patients have reached an SCD end-point. 1 patient died due to SCA and 19 had an appropriate ICD intervention. There were statistically significant differences of GLS and ASI values between SCD and non-SCD groups; p = 0.026389 and p = 0.006208, respectively. The average GLS in the SCD group was -12.4% ± 3.4%, and -15.1% ± 3.5% in the non-SCD group. The average ASI values were -9.9% ± 3.8% and -12.4% ± 3.5%, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between LAVI values in SCD and non-SCD groups; p = 0.005343. The median LAVI value in the SCD group was 45.7 ml/m2 and 37.6 ml/m2 in the non-SCD group. The ROC curves showed the following cut-off points for GLS, ASI and LAVI: -13.8%, -13.7% and 41 ml/m2, respectively. Cox’s proportional hazards model for the parameters used in the Calculator was at the borderline of significance; p = 0.04385. The model with new variables (GLS and LAVI instead of LA dimension) was significant; p = 0.00094. The important factors were LAVI; p = 0.000075 and nsVT; p = 0.012267. CONCLUSIONS The proposed new SCD risk factors were statistically significant in the study population and should be taken into account when considering ICD implantation.

scholarly journals Genetic Clues on Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Placement in Young-Age Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Case Report of Novel MYH7 Mutation and Literature Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xing Li ◽  
Jie Tang ◽  
Jinhui Li ◽  
Sha Lin ◽  
Tao Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Interventricular Septum ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Heterozygous Mutation ◽  
Icd Implantation ◽  
Cardioverter Defibrillator

Background: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the second most common cardiomyopathy in childhood with a life-threatening risk. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) placement is recommended for early prevention if there are two or more clinical risk factors. Pediatric patients with HCM are at a higher risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD), but there are limited reports on indications for ICD implantation in children. Herein we describe the case of Myh7 mutation-induced HCM and cardiac arrest in a patient and evaluated information originating from genetic background to guide ICD administration.Case Presentation: The patient was a girl aged 7 years and 8 months who had been diagnosed with cardiomyopathy in utero 8 years prior. She had had recurrent cardiac arrests within the last 4 years. Electrocardiography indicated abnormalities in conduction, and ST segment changes. Echocardiography indicated significant left ventricular hypertrophy and hypertrophic systolic interventricular septum. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging depicted general heart enlargement with hypertrophy, and delayed enhancement in myocardium with perfusion defect was also evident. Whole exon sequencing identified a de novo c.2723T&gt;C (p.L908P) heterozygous mutation in the MYH7 gene. MYH7 p.L908P predicted unstable protein structure and impaired function. The patient was scheduled for ICD implantation. There were no complications after ICD implantation, and she was discharged from hospital on the 10th day. Regular oral beta-blockers, amiodarone, spironolactone, and enalapril were administered, and she was required to attend hospital regularly for follow-up. During follow-up there were no cardiac arrests. Literature review of clinical prognoses associated with genetic mutations of MYH7, MYBPC3, TNNI3, TNNT2, and TPM1 in pediatric HCM patients with and without ICD implantation indicated that they were totally differently. Previous reports also indicated that gene mutations predicted earlier onset of cardiac hypertrophy, and increase likelihood of SCD.Conclusion: Variant burden and variant type contribute to the risk of adverse events in pediatric HCM. Early recognition and intervention are vital in children. Gene mutation could be considered an indication for early ICD placement during standard risk stratification of HCM patients. Whether this extends to the majority of pediatric patients requires further investigation.

scholarly journals Prevention of sudden cardiac death by the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in adults with inherited heart disease. long term follow-up

EP Europace ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Herruzo Rojas ◽  
A Gomez Lopez ◽  
MA Martin Toro ◽  
PJ Gonzalez Perez ◽  
FJ Morales Ponce
Keyword(s):  
Heart Disease ◽  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Primary Prevention ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Sudden Cardiac Death ◽  
Cardiac Death ◽  
Supraventricular Arrhythmias ◽  
Icd Implantation

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. BACKGROUND Inherited heart diseases include all inheritable channelopathies or cardiomyopathies. Sudden cardiac death (SCD) might be the first and last clinical presentation. ICD implantation  is established as a therapeutic tool according to risk criteria. OBJETIVES The aim of this study is to analyze the population characteristics in ICD/ CRT-ICD recipients in patients with inherited heart disease and establish possible risk predictor factors of arrhytmogenic events during follow-up. MÉTHODS: This is a prospective single-center registry. We included all patients from January1, 2012, to December 31, 2020 who subsequently underwent ICD/ ICD-CRT implantation. RESULTS A total of 172 patients were included with a mean age of 60.47 ± 13,1 years and a mean follow-up duration of 49.71 ± 41.8 months. The most frequent underlying cardiac condition was dilated cardiomyopathy (58.1%), followed by hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (15.7%), arrythmogenic cardiomyopathy (2.3%), long QT syndrome (1.7%), Brugada syndrome (1.2%), catecholaminergic (2.9%) , idiopathic (7%) and others (11%). 89 ICDs (51.7%) and 83 ICD-CRTs (48.2%) were implanted for primary prevention of SCD. During follow-up, 13.4% of the patients experienced arrhythmogenic events. Only 4.1% of the patients experienced inappropriate shock, secondary to supraventricular arrhythmias all of them. Genetic testing was done in only 14.1% of our patients. In the 27 cases of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, 25 (92.6%) underwent ICD implantation for primary prevention. 14 patients (51.9%) had family history of SCD, 8 (29.6%) had unexplained syncope and 16 (59.3%) had ventricular tachycardia in the Holter monitoring. The mean left atrial size was 44.15 ± 7.2mm, mean maximum LV-wall thickness 22.85 ± 5,25mm, and a mean LVOT gradient of 30.56 ± 31.3mmHg, with a mean actual HCM SCD-score of SCD over 5 years of 5.84 ± 3.53%. According to traditional parameters, 100% of the HCM sample meet criteria for ICD implantation in primary prevention compared to 66.7% according to the new score. During follow-up 2 patients (7.4% ) experienced arrhythmogenic events, and 3 patients (11.1%) had inappropriate shocks secondary to supraventricular arrhythmias. Genetic testing was done in 22.2% of the patients and was positive for a known pathogenic mutation in half of the cases. None of the parameters evaluated in the current score, a high risk of SCD according to it, having old high risk criteria or implanted of ICD in secondary prevention were related in our study with more arrhytmogenic events. CONCLUSIONS ICD implatation for primary prevention is the main indication in our population. Either classic factors or the new HCM SCD-score were no related in our study with the presence of arrhytmogenic events during follow-up.

scholarly journals POSTERS (2)96CONTINUOUS VERSUS INTERMITTENT MONITORING FOR DETECTION OF SUBCLINICAL ATRIAL FIBRILLATION IN HIGH-RISK PATIENTS97HIGH DAY-TO-DAY INTRA-INDIVIDUAL REPRODUCIBILITY OF THE HEART RATE RESPONSE TO EXERCISE IN THE UK BIOBANK DATA98USE OF NOVEL GLOBAL ULTRASOUND IMAGING AND CONTINUEOUS DIPOLE DENSITY MAPPING TO GUIDE ABLATION IN MACRO-REENTRANT TACHYCARDIAS99ANTICOAGULATION AND THE RISK OF COMPLICATIONS IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING VT AND PVC ABLATION100NON-SUSTAINED VENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA FREQUENTLY PRECEDES CARDIAC ARREST IN PATIENTS WITH BRUGADA SYNDROME101USING HIGH PRECISION HAEMODYNAMIC MEASUREMENTS TO ASSESS DIFFERENCES IN AV OPTIMUM BETWEEN DIFFERENT LEFT VENTRICULAR LEAD POSITIONS IN BIVENTRICULAR PACING102CAN WE PREDICT MEDIUM TERM MORTALITY FROM TRANSVENOUS LEAD EXTRACTION PRE-OPERATIVELY?103PREVENTION OF UNECESSARY ADMISSIONS IN ATRIAL FIBRILLATION104EPICARDIAL CATHETER ABLATION FOR VENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA ON UNINTERRUPTED WARFARIN: A SAFE APPROACH?105HOW WELL DOES THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CLINICAL EXCELLENCE (NICE) GUIDENCE ON TRANSIENT LOSS OF CONSCIOUSNESS (T-LoC) WORK IN A REAL WORLD? AN AUDIT OF THE SECOND STAGE SPECIALIST CARDIOVASCULAT ASSESSMENT AND DIAGNOSIS106DETECTION OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION IN COMMUNITY LOCATIONS USING NOVEL TECHNOLOGY'S AS A METHOD OF STROKE PREVENTION IN THE OVER 65'S ASYMPTOMATIC POPULATION - SHOULD IT BECOME STANDARD PRACTISE?107HIGH-DOSE ISOPRENALINE INFUSION AS A METHOD OF INDUCTION OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION: A MULTI-CENTRE, PLACEBO CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL IN PATIENTS WITH VARYING ARRHYTHMIC RISK108PACEMAKER COMPLICATIONS IN A DISTRICT GENERAL HOSPITAL109CARDIAC RESYNCHRONISATION THERAPY: A TRADE-OFF BETWEEN LEFT VENTRICULAR VOLTAGE OUTPUT AND EJECTION FRACTION?110RAPID DETERIORATION IN LEFT VENTRICULAR FUNCTION AND ACUTE HEART FAILURE AFTER DUAL CHAMBER PACEMAKER INSERTION WITH RESOLUTION FOLLOWING BIVENTRICULAR PACING111LOCALLY PERSONALISED ATRIAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY MODELS FROM PENTARAY CATHETER MEASUREMENTS112EVALUATION OF SUBCUTANEOUS ICD VERSUS TRANSVENOUS ICD- A PROPENSITY MATCHED COST-EFFICACY ANALYSIS OF COMPLICATIONS & OUTCOMES113LOCALISING DRIVERS USING ORGANISATIONAL INDEX IN CONTACT MAPPING OF HUMAN PERSISTENT ATRIAL FIBRILLATION114RISK FACTORS FOR SUDDEN CARDIAC DEATH IN PAEDIATRIC HYPERTROPHIC CARDIOMYOPATHY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS115EFFECT OF CATHETER STABILITY AND CONTACT FORCE ON VISITAG DENSITY DURING PULMONARY VEIN ISOLATION116HEPATIC CAPSULE ENHANCEMENT IS COMMONLY SEEN DURING MR-GUIDED ABLATION OF ATRIAL FLUTTER: A MECHANISTIC INSIGHT INTO PROCEDURAL PAIN117DOES HIGHER CONTACT FORCE IMPAIR LESION FORMATION AT THE CAVOTRICUSPID ISTHMUS? INSIGHTS FROM MR-GUIDED ABLATION OF ATRIAL FLUTTER118CLINICAL CHARACTERISATION OF A MALIGNANT SCN5A MUTATION IN CHILDHOOD119RADIOFREQUENCY ASSOCIATED VENTRICULAR FIBRILLATION120CONTRACTILE RESERVE EXPRESSED AS SYSTOLIC VELOCITY DOES NOT PREDICT RESPONSE TO CRT121DAY-CASE DEVICES - A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY USING PATIENT CODING DATA122PATIENTS UNDERGOING SVT ABLATION HAVE A HIGH INCIDENCE OF SECONDARY ARRHYTHMIA ON FOLLOW UP: IMPLICATIONS FOR PRE-PROCEDURE COUNSELLING123PROGNOSTIC ROLE OF HAEMOGLOBINN AND RED BLOOD CELL DITRIBUTION WIDTH IN PATIENTS WITH HEART FAILURE UNDERGOING CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY124REMOTE MONITORING AND FOLLOW UP DEVICES125A 20-YEAR, SINGLE-CENTRE EXPERIENCE OF IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATORS (ICD) IN CHILDREN: TIME TO CONSIDER THE SUBCUTANEOUS ICD?126EXPERIENCE OF MAGNETIC REASONANCE IMAGING (MEI) IN PATIENTS WITH MRI CONDITIONAL DEVICES127THE SINUS BRADYCARDIA SEEN IN ATHLETES IS NOT CAUSED BY ENHANCED VAGAL TONE BUT INSTEAD REFLECTS INTRINSIC CHANGES IN THE SINUS NODE REVEALED BY I (F) BLOCKADE128SUCCESSFUL DAY-CASE PACEMAKER IMPLANTATION - AN EIGHT YEAR SINGLE-CENTRE EXPERIENCE129LEFT VENTRICULAR INDEX MASS ASSOCIATED WITH ESC HYPERTROPHIC CARDIOMYOPATHY RISK SCORE IN PATIENTS WITH ICDs: A TERTIARY CENTRE HCM REGISTRY130A DGH EXPERIENCE OF DAY-CASE CARDIAC PACEMAKER IMPLANTATION131IS PRE-PROCEDURAL FASTING A NECESSITY FOR SAFE PACEMAKER IMPLANTATION?

EP Europace ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (suppl 2) ◽  
pp. ii36-ii47
Author(s):  
T. Philippsen ◽  
M. Orini ◽  
C.A. Martin ◽  
E. Volkova ◽  
J.O.M. Ormerod ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ventricular Tachycardia ◽  
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Pacemaker Implantation ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Day Case ◽  
Single Centre ◽  
Subcutaneous Icd

Prognostic value of peak stress cardiac power in patients with normal ejection fraction undergoing exercise stress echocardiography

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vidhu Anand ◽  
Garvan C Kane ◽  
Christopher G Scott ◽  
Sorin V Pislaru ◽  
Rosalyn O Adigun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Stress Echocardiography ◽  
Stress Test ◽  
Peak Stress ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Exercise Stress ◽  
Cardiac Power ◽  
Exercise Stress Echocardiography ◽  
Lv Mass

Abstract Aims  Cardiac power is a measure of cardiac performance that incorporates both pressure and flow components. Prior studies have shown that cardiac power predicts outcomes in patients with reduced left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF). We sought to evaluate the prognostic significance of peak exercise cardiac power and power reserve in patients with normal EF. Methods and results  We performed a retrospective analysis in 24 885 patients (age 59 ± 13 years, 45% females) with EF ≥50% and no significant valve disease or right ventricular dysfunction, undergoing exercise stress echocardiography between 2004 and 2018. Cardiac power and power reserve (developed power with stress) were normalized to LV mass and expressed in W/100 g of LV myocardium. Endpoints at follow-up were all-cause mortality and diagnosis of heart failure (HF). Patients in the higher quartiles of power/mass (rest, peak stress, and power reserve) were younger and had higher peak blood pressure and heart rate, lower LV mass, and lower prevalence of comorbidities. During follow-up [median 3.9 (0.6–8.3) years], 929 patients died. After adjusting for age, sex, metabolic equivalents (METs) achieved, ischaemia/infarction on stress test results, medication, and comorbidities, peak stress power/mass was independently associated with mortality [adjusted hazard ratio (HR), highest vs. lowest quartile, 0.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.4–0.6, P &lt; 0.001] and HF at follow-up [adjusted HR, highest vs. lowest quartile, 0.4, 95% CI (0.3, 0.5), P &lt; 0.001]. Power reserve showed similar results. Conclusion  The assessment of cardiac power during exercise stress echocardiography in patients with normal EF provides valuable prognostic information, in addition to stress test findings on inducible myocardial ischaemia and exercise capacity.

Is alcohol septal ablation in women performed too late?

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Batzner ◽  
D Aicha ◽  
H Seggewiss
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Pacemaker Implantation ◽  
Posterior Wall ◽  
Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Icd Implantation ◽  
Alcohol Septal Ablation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Surgical Myectomy

Abstract Introduction Alcohol septal ablation (PTSMA) was introduced as interventional alternative to surgical myectomy for symptomatic patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) 25 years ago. As gender differences in diagnosis and treatment of HOCM are still unclear we analyzed baseline characteristics and results of PTSMA in a large single center cohort with respect to gender. Methods and results Between 05/2000 and 06/2017 first PTSMA in our center was performed in 952 patients with symptomatic HOCM. We treated less 388 (40.8%) women and 564 (59.2%) men. All patients underwent clinical follow-up. At the time of the intervention women were older (61.2±14.9 vs. 51.9±13.7 years; p&lt;0.0001) and suffered more often from NYHA grade III/IV dyspnea (80.9% vs. 68.1%; p&lt;0.0001), whereas angina pectoris was comparable in women (62.4%) and men (59.9%). Echocardiographic baseline gradients were comparable in women (rest 65.0±38.1 mmHg and Valsalva 106.2±45.7 mmHg) and men (rest 63.1±38.3 mmHg and Valsalva 103.6±42.8 mmHg). But, women had smaller diameters of the left atrium (44.3±6.9 vs. 47.2±6.5 mm; p&lt;0001), maximal septum thickness (20.4±3.9 vs. 21.4±4.5 mm; p&lt;0.01), and maximal thickness of the left ventricular posterior wall (12.7±2.8 vs. 13.5±2.9 mm; p&lt;0.0001). In women, more septal branches (1.3±0.6 vs. 1.2±0.5; p&lt;0.05) had to be tested to identify the target septal branch. The amount of injected alcohol was comparable (2.0±0, 4 in women vs. 2.1±0.4 ml in men). The maximum CK increase was lower in women (826.0±489.6 vs. 903.4±543.0 U / l; p&lt;0.05). During hospital stay one woman and one man died, each (n.s.). The frequency of total AV blocks in the cathlab showed no significant difference between women (41.5%) and men (38.3%). Furthermore, the rate of permanent pacemaker implantation during hospital stay did not differ (12.1% in women vs. 9.4% in men). Follow-up periods of all patients showed no significant difference between women (5.7±4.9 years) and men (6.2±5.0 years). Overall, 37 (9.5%) women died during this period compared to only 33 (5.9%) men (p&lt;0.05). But, cardiovascular causes of death were not significantly different between women (2.8%) and men (1.6%). Furthermore, the rates of surgical myectomy after failed PTSMA (1.3% in women vs. 2.3% in men), ICD implantation for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death according to current guidelines (4.1% in women vs. 5.9% in men) or pacemaker implantation (3.6% in women vs. 2.0% in men) showed no significant differences. Summary PTSMA in women with HOCM was performed at more advanced age with more pronounced symptoms compared to men. While there were no differences in acute outcomes, overall long-term mortality was higher in women without differences in cardiovascular mortality. Therefore, women may require more intensive diagnostic approaches in order not to miss the correct time for gradient reduction treatment. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document