P631Socioeconomic status; how does it influence referral to cardiac rehabilitation after acute myocardial infarction?

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
C B Graversen ◽  
M B Johansen ◽  
S P Johnsen ◽  
S Riahi ◽  
T Holmberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Cardiac Rehabilitation ◽  
Low Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Occupational Status ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Referral Process ◽  
Willingness To Participate ◽  
Number Of Patients

Abstract Background The number of patients with low socioeconomic status who are referred to cardiac rehabilitation (CR) has been documented to be relative lower than patients with high SES among all patients hospitalised with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Purpose The aims of this study were to evaluate the referral process to CR and how it is influenced by socioeconomic variables. Methods In 2011–2014, 1229 patients were hospitalised with AMI at Department of Cardiology of our University Hospital, Denmark. All were evaluated for participation to CR. Socioeconomic status was measured by personal income, educational level, marital status, and employment and obtained from national registers. Multiple logistic regression assessed socioeconomic determinants in three phases of the referral process to CR: 1. information about CR, 2. wish to participate in CR, and 3. referral to specialiced- or municipality-based CR. All analyses were adjusted for sex, age, and comorbidities. Results A total of 1123 (91.4%) patients received information regarding CR. Of these, 854 (69.5%) patients wished to participate in the programme. Income was the most important socioeconomic variable when looking at who were informed about CR (OR 2.17, 95%-CI: 1.0- 4.64) and who wished to participate in CR (OR 1.55, 95%-CI: 1.02–2.35). Characteristics of study participants Characteristics All participants STEMI NSTEMI UAP n=1229 n=402 n=711 n=116 Male (n, %) 907 (73.8) 322 (80.1) 503 (70.7) 82 (70.7) Age Group (yrs)   <65 591 (48.1) 227 (56.5) 308 (43.3) 56 (48.3)   65–74 371 (30.2) 116 (28.9) 215 (30.2) 40 (34.5)   ≥75 267 (21.7) 59 (14.7) 188 (26.4) 20 (17.2) Baseline Comorbidity   Hypertension 241 (19.6) 62 (15.4) 148 (20.8) 31 (26.7)   Diabetes 14 (1.1) <5 (<1) 8 (1.1) <5 (<1) Charlson Comorbidity Index   Low (0 points) 1088 (88.5) 358 (89.1) 630 (88.6) 100 (86.2)   Moderate/High (>0) 141 (11.5) 44 (10.9) 81 (11.4) 16 (13.8) Civil status (n, %)   Married/Partnership 793 (64.5) 253 (62.9) 449 (63.2) 91 (78.4)   Divorced/Unmarried/Widow 436 (35.5) 149 (37.1) 262 (36.8) 25 (21.6) Occupational status (n, %)   Employed 479 (39.0) 195 (48.5) 240 (33.8) 44 (37.9)   Unemployed/Retired 750 (61.0) 207 (51.5) 471 (66.2) 72 (62.1) Educational status (n, %)   Low 516 (42.0) 144 (35.8) 322 (45.3) 50 (43.1)   Medium 539 (43.9) 201 (50.0) 293 (41.2) 45 (38.8)   High 174 (14.2) 57 (14.2) 96 (13.5) 21 (18.1) Gross income, tertile (n, %)   Low 405 (33.0) 113 (28.1) 251 (35.3) 41 (35.3)   Medium 406 (33.0) 124 (30.8) 247 (34.7) 35 (30.2)   High 418 (34.0) 165 (41.0) 213 (30.0) 40 (34.5) STEMI: ST-elevated myocardial infarction; NSTEMI: non-ST-elevated myocardial infarction; UAP: unstable angina pectoris. Conclusion Two out of three patients received referral to CR. However, higher income was proportional with the likelihood of receiving information about CR and willingness to participate in the programme. Acknowledgement/Funding the Danish Heart Foundation

scholarly journals See You in 7: improving acute myocardial infarction follow-up care

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. e000296
Author(s):  
Alex Batten ◽  
Cassie Jaeger ◽  
David Griffen ◽  
Paula Harwood ◽  
Karen Baur
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Cardiac Rehabilitation ◽  
Hospital Discharge ◽  
Recovery Process ◽  
Appointment Scheduling ◽  
Academic Medical Centre ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Follow Up Care

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) follow-up care is a crucial part of the AMI recovery process. The American College of Cardiology’s ‘See You in 7 Challenge’ advocates that all patients discharged with a diagnosis of AMI have a cardiac rehabilitation referral made and outpatient cardiac rehabilitation appointment scheduled to occur within 7 days of hospital discharge. A streamlined AMI cardiac rehabilitation referral and appointment scheduling process was not in place at this urban academic medical centre. To develop the streamlined processes, a Six Sigma project was initiated. Four months before the intervention, 1/38 patients with AMI (2.6%) were scheduled to have the initial outpatient cardiac rehabilitation appointment occur within 7 days of hospital discharge, with an average 18.7 days from hospital discharge to the scheduled initial outpatient cardiac rehabilitation appointment. To reduce the time to this initial appointment, availability of outpatient cardiac rehabilitation appointments was increased, additional staff were trained in appointment scheduling and insurance verification processes and appointments were scheduled prior to hospital discharge. After intervention, the number of patients scheduled to attend an outpatient cardiac rehabilitation appointment within 7 days of hospital discharge improved to 72/79 (91.1%) (two-proportion test, p<0.001). Days from hospital discharge to first scheduled outpatient cardiac rehabilitation appointment were reduced from 18.7 days to 6.3 days (a 66.3% reduction) (Mann-Whitney U test, p<0.01). Initial outpatient cardiac rehabilitation attendance within 7 days of hospital discharge increased from 1/38 (2.6%) to 42/79 (53.2%) (a 50.6% increase) (two-proportion test, p<0.001).

P2518Failure of completion of post-myocardial infarction rehabilitation programme - Who and why? Single center experience with novel Coordinated Comprehensive Care program in Poland

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
W Telec ◽  
P Kalmucki ◽  
H Krysztofiak ◽  
A Szyszka ◽  
A Baszko
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Cardiac Rehabilitation ◽  
Laboratory Data ◽  
Care Program ◽  
Rehabilitation Programme ◽  
Comprehensive Care ◽  
Invasive Treatment ◽  
Laboratory Test Results ◽  
Number Of Patients

Abstract Background Rehabilitation after acute myocardial infarction is a well-proven strategy to improve outcomes and reduce complications rate. Poland recently introduced a novel, fully-reimbursed Coordinated Comprehensive Care (CCC) program after myocardial infarction, a significant portion of which comprises access to free-of-charge cardiac rehabilitation. Purpose The purpose of the study was to analyze all patients qualified for the Coordinated Comprehensive Care Program and evaluate reasons for not completing rehabilitation. We compared two groups of patients - those who completed the rehabilitation and those that did not - in terms of clinical, demographic and laboratory characteristics. Methods All patients (n=169) referred from the cardiology department for the CCC program were included in the study. They were divided into two groups, depending on single, strict criterium of completion or non-completion of the rehabilitation program. Demographic, clinical and laboratory data were collected and analyzed. Results The majority of the patients (n=100, 59.2%) did not undergo cardiac rehabilitation. 61 of them were not qualified for rehabilitation programme by the consortium of doctors: 33 of them due to the need for further invasive treatment, the remainder 28 were disqualified due to severe comorbidities. 32 patients did not commence the program despite referral and encouragement, mostly (n=25) due to personal reasons, 7 patients did not specify reasons for not participating in the rehabilitation. 7 patients were lost to follow-up. Patients who completed rehabilitation (n=69, 40.8%) were younger that those who did not (64.4±9.8 vs. 67.1±9.5 years, respectively; p=0.076), had significantly higher baseline LVEF (49.1±9.4 vs. 44.7±11.9%, p<0.03), and had lower serum creatinine level (0.99±0.28 vs. 1.15±0.59 mg/dl; p<0.03). There were more patients with LVEF<35% (n=23; 23%) in the no-rehabilitation, than in the other group (n=5; 7.25%; p<0.01). Rehabilitation completed (n=69) Rehabilitation NOT completed (n=100) p Gender – male 40 (35.4%) 73 (64.6%) <0.05 LVEF- % 49.12 (±9.43) 44.69 (±11.97) <0.03 No. of patients with EF <35% 5 (7.25%) 23 (23%) <0.01 Conclusion Although fully-reimbursed cardiac rehabilitation is provided for all patients following acute myocardial infarction, there is a significant number of patients who fail to complete the programme. This group comprises more male patients with worse clinical and laboratory test results, especially LVEF and renal function. Efforts should be made to address the problem and modify the programme accordingly.

scholarly journals A kardiológiai rehabilitáció teljesítménymutatói Magyarországon

2019 ◽  
Vol 160 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 6-12
Author(s):  
Imre Boncz ◽  
Andor Sebestyén ◽  
Tímea Csákvári ◽  
István Ágoston ◽  
Eszter Szabados ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Health Insurance ◽  
Cardiac Rehabilitation ◽  
Insurance Fund ◽  
Moderate Increase ◽  
Rehabilitation Care ◽  
Rehabilitation Hospital ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Hospital Beds

Introduction: With the improvement of the survival of acute cardiac events and the increasing age, there is a higher demand for cardiac rehabilitation care. Aim: The aim of our study is to analyse the performance indicators of cardiac inpatient rehabilitation care in Hungary financed by the statutory public health insurance system. Data and methods: Data were derived from the financial database of the National Health Insurance Fund of Hungary. We analysed the period between 2014 and 2017. We investigated the distribution of cardiac rehabilitation hospital beds, the patient turnover and the rehabilitation rate following acute care. Results: In 2017, there were 1765 publicly financed cardiac rehabilitation hospital beds in Hungary (1.8 beds/10 000 population). We observed the lowest number of hospital bed number in Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg (0.27 beds/10 000 population), Hajdú-Bihar (0.28) and Fejér (0.6) counties. We found the highest number of hospital beds in Veszprém (11.47 beds/10 000 population), Győr-Moson-Sopron (4.94) counties and in Budapest (2.27). Between 2014 and 2017, the annual number of patients was between 24 834 and 26 146, while the number of nursing days varied between 510 thousand and 542 thousand. The average length of stay showed a moderate increase from 19.2 days/patient (2014) to 20.2 days/patient (2017). Only 6.6–7.6% of the patients who underwent acute myocardial infarction received cardiac rehabilitation care. Conclusion: We found significant regional inequalities in both the capacities and the access to and utilization of cardiac rehabilitation healthcare services, which should be mitigated by health policy activities. The low proportion (6.6–7.6%) of patients who underwent acute myocardial infarction and received cardiac rehabilitation care, should be increased. Orv Hetil. 2019; 160(Suppl 1): 6–12.

scholarly journals Individuals with familial hypercholesterolemia have increased risk of re-hospitalization after acute myocardial infarction compared with controls

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Svendsen ◽  
H.W Krogh ◽  
J Igland ◽  
G.S Tell ◽  
L.J Mundal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Familial Hypercholesterolemia ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Public Institution ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Hazard Ratios ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
University Of Oslo

Abstract Background and aim We have previously reported that individuals with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) have a two-fold increased risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) compared with the general population. The consequences of having an AMI on re-hospitalization and mortality are however less known. The aim of the present study was to compare the risk of re-hospitalization with AMI and CHD and risk of mortality after incident (first) AMI-hospitalization between persons with and without FH (controls). Methods The original study population comprised 5691 persons diagnosed with FH during 1992–2014 and 119511 age and sex matched controls randomly selected from the general Norwegian population. We identified 221 individuals with FH and 1947 controls with an incident AMI registered in the Norwegian Patient Registry (NPR) or the Cardiovascular Disease in Norway Project during 2001–2017. Persons with incident AMI were followed until December 31st 2017 for re-hospitalization with AMI or coronary heart disease (CHD) registered in the NPR, and for mortality through linkage to the Norwegian Cause of Death Registry. Risk of re-hospitalization was compared with sub-hazard ratios (SHR) from competing risk regression with death as competing event, and mortality was compared using hazard ratios (HR) from Cox regression. All models were adjusted for age. Results Risk of re-hospitalization was 2-fold increased both for AMI [SHR=2.53 (95% CI: 1.88–3.41)] and CHD [SHR=1.82 (95% CI: 1.44–2.28)]. However, persons with FH did not have increased 28-day mortality following an incident AMI (HR=1.05 (95% CI: 0.62–1.78), but the longer-term (&gt;28 days) mortality after first AMI was increased in FH [HR=1.45 (95% CI: 1.07–1.95]. Conclusion This study yields the important finding that persons with FH have increased risk of re-hospitalization of both AMI and CHD after incident AMI. These findings call for more intensive follow-up of individuals with FH after an AMI. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospital

Primary care physician services and the frequency of comorbidities in patients with acute myocardial infarction

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R King ◽  
D Giedrimiene
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Primary Care Physician ◽  
Care Physician ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background The management of patients with multiple comorbidities represents a significant burden on healthcare each year. Despite requiring regular medical care to treat chronic conditions, a large number of these patients may not receive proper care. Significant disparities have been identified in patients with multiple comorbidities and those who experience acute coronary syndrome or acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Only limited data exists to identify the impact of comorbidities and utilization of primary care physician (PCP) services on the development of adverse outcomes, such as AMI. Purpose The primary objective was to analyze how PCP services utilization can be associated with comorbidities in patients who experienced an AMI. Methods This study was based on retrospective data analysis which included 250 patients admitted to the Hartford Hospital Emergency Department (ED) for an AMI. Out of these, 27 patients were excluded due to missing documentation. Collected data included age, gender, medications and recorded comorbidities, such as hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus (DM), chronic kidney disease (CKD) and previous arrhythmia. Each patient was assessed regarding utilization of PCP services. Statistical analysis was performed in order to identify differences between patients with documented PCP services and those without by using the Chi-square test. Results The records allowed for identification of documented PCP services for 172 out of 223 (77.1%) patients. The most common comorbidities were hypertension and hyperlipidemia: in 165 (74.0%) and 157 (70.4%) cases respectively. The most frequent comorbidity was hypertension: 137 out of 172 (79.7%) in pts with PCP vs 28 out of 51 (54.9%) without PCP, and significantly more often in patients with PCP, p&lt; 0.001. Hyperlipidemia was the second most frequent comorbidity: in 130 out of 172 (75.6%) vs 27 out of 51 (52.9%) accordingly, and also significantly more often (p&lt; 0.002) in patients with PCP services. The number of comorbidities ranged from 0-5, including 32 (14.3%) patients without comorbidities: 16 (9.3%) with a PCP and 16 (31.4%) without PCP services. The majority of patients - 108 (48.5% of 223), had 2-3 documented comorbidities: 89 (51.8%) had two and 19 (34.6%) had three. The remaining 40 (17.9%) patients had 4-5 comorbidities: 37 (21.5%) of them with a PCP and 3 (10.3%) without, with a significant difference (p &lt; 0.001) found for patients with a higher number of comorbidities who utilized PCP services. Conclusions Our study shows that the majority of patients who presented with an AMI had one or more comorbidities. Furthermore, patients who did not utilize PCP services had fewer identified comorbidities. This suggests that there may be a significant number of patients who experienced AMI with undiagnosed comorbidities due to not having access to PCP services.

scholarly journals Participation in Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs Among Older Patients After Acute Myocardial Infarction

2015 ◽  
Vol 175 (10) ◽  
pp. 1700 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob A. Doll ◽  
Anne Hellkamp ◽  
P. Michael Ho ◽  
Michael C. Kontos ◽  
Mary A. Whooley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Cardiac Rehabilitation ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Rehabilitation Programs

CLINICAL OUTCOMES OF PATIENTS WITH ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION AFTER PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION AMONG CARDIAC REHABILITATION AND NON CARDIAC REHABILITATION GROUPS-A PROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY

2021 ◽  
pp. 25-27
Author(s):  
Saroj Mandal ◽  
Vignesh. R ◽  
Sidnath Singh
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Cardiac Rehabilitation ◽  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Cardiac Mortality ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
All Cause Mortality

OBJECTIVES To determine clinical outcome and to nd out the association between participation of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in cardiac rehabilitation programme. DESIGN A Prospective observational study. STUDY AREA : Department of Cardiology, Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research,Kolkata. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged ≥18 years who underwent PCI due to AMI. OUTCOME MEASURES The outcomes were subsequent myocardial infarction, revascularisation, all-cause readmission, cardiac readmission, all-cause mortality and cardiac mortality. RESULT: The data of 1107 patients were included and 60.07%% of them participated in CR program. The risks of revascularisation, all cause readmission and cardiac readmission among CR participants were compared. The results of those analysis were consistent and showed that the CR participants had lower allcause mortality ,cardiac mortality,all cause readmission, cardiac admission. However no effect was observed for subsequent myocardial infarction or revascularisation. CONCLUSIONS: It was suggested CR participation may reduce the risk of all-cause mortality ,cardiac mortality, all cause readmission and cardiac admission.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document