P1038Device implantation after catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation with coexisting sick sinus syndrome: Insights from the Kansai Plus Atrial Fibrillation (KPAF) study

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
I Morishima ◽  
Y Morita ◽  
K Takagi ◽  
Y Kanzaki ◽  
A Kobori ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Sick Sinus Syndrome ◽  
Female Gender ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Atrial Tachyarrhythmia ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Af Ablation ◽  
Device Implantation

Abstract Background Sick sinus syndrome (SSS) and atrial fibrillation (AF) frequently coexist and interact to initiate and perpetuate each other. Several retrospective or small cohort studies have suggested that successful catheter ablation of AF may help to waive device implantations in patients with paroxysmal AF plus SSS, however, no prospective large studies are so far available on this scenario. Purpose We aimed to elucidate the device implantation-free survival after catheter ablation of paroxysmal AF with coexisting SSS in a prospective large-scale registry. We also determined the risk factors for device implantations after catheter ablation of paroxysmal AF. Methods The Kansai Plus Atrial Fibrillation (KPAF) study is a multi-center prospective registry that enrolled 5,019 consecutive patients that underwent an initial pulmonary vein isolation-based radiofrequency catheter ablation of AF. This study was comprised of 3,226 patients with paroxysmal AF registered in the KPAF study (age, 64.8±10.5 years old; female, n=999 [31.0%]; left atrial diameter [LAD], 37.5±8.0 mm; left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF], 65.3±8.4%, CHADS2 score, 1.09±1.05). The atrial tachyarrhythmia-free and device-free survivals after catheter ablation were compared between patients with SSS (n=368; tachy-brady syndrome, 88%) and without SSS (control; n=2,858). Results The atrial tachyarrhythmia-free survival was almost identical between the two groups both after the first ablation session (Fig.1A) and after the last procedure with an average of 1.3±0.5 sessions. At baseline, the devices had already been implanted in 53 (14.4%) SSS and 36 (1.3%) control patients. In the remaining patients, devices were newly implanted in 54 (17.1%) SSS and 62 (2.2%) control patients during the follow-up of 3 years after the catheter ablation (Figure 1B). In the SSS group, devices were implanted predominantly within 6 months after the catheter ablation, and atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence preceded the device implantation in 48 (89%) patients. Multivariate predictors of device implantations after the paroxysmal AF ablation included: SSS (hazard ratio [HR] 6.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.61–10.19, p<0.001), an age>75 years old (HR 1.69, 95% CI 1.08–2.64, p=0.019), a female gender (HR 2.16, 95% CI 1.44–3.24, p<0.001), the LAD (mm) (HR 1.05, 95% CI 1.02–1.08, p=0.006), and the LVEF (%) (95% CI 0.96, 95% CI 0.94–0.98, p<0.001). Figure 1 Conclusions Device implantations could be waived in >80% of patients with SSS at 3 years of follow-up after the catheter ablation of paroxysmal AF in this real world all comer prospective registry. In addition to coexisting SSS, predictors of device implantations after paroxysmal AF ablation included: the elderly, a female gender, a large LA, and a reduced LVEF. Acknowledgement/Funding None

P5650Improvement in ejection fraction predicts heart failure after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction: from the KPAF registry

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
H Fujimoto ◽  
N Doi ◽  
K Hirai ◽  
M Naito ◽  
S Shizuta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Af Ablation ◽  
Study Population ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Introduction The presence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is associated with increased risks of mortality and hospitalization for heart failure (HF). Although prior studies reported that catheter ablation (CA) for AF in low LVEF patients reduced risks of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization, the predictors of worsening HF after ablation has not been adequately evaluated. Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of improvement in LVEF after AF ablation on the incidence of subsequent HF hospitalization in patients with low LVEF. Methods The Kansai Plus Atrial Fibrillation (KPAF) Registry is a multicenter registry enrolling 5,013 consecutive patients undergoing first-time ablation for AF. The current study population consisted of 1,031 patients with reduced LVEF of <60%. We divided the study population into 3 groups according to LVEF at follow-up; 678 patients (65.8%) with improved LVEF (≥5 U change in LVEF), 288 patients (27.9%) with unchanged LVEF (−5 U ≤ change in LVEF <5 U) and 65 patients (6.3%) with worsened LVEF (<−5 U change in LVEF). Results During the median follow-up of 1067 [879–1226] days, patients improved LVEF had lower rate of HF hospitalization, compared with those with unchanged and worsened LVEF (2.1%, 8.0%, and 21.5%, respectively, P<0.0001). Recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias were documented in 43.5%, 47.2% and 67.7%, respectively (P=0.0008). Figure 1 Conclusion Among patients with reduced LVEF undergoing AF ablation, patients with subsequently improved LVEF in association with maintained sinus rhythm had markedly lower risk of HF hospitalization during follow-up as compared with those with unchanged or worsened LVEF.

Clinical outcome of non-use of touch-up focal ablation catheters strategy during cryoballoon atrial fibrillation ablation

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Matsunaga ◽  
Y Egami ◽  
M Yano ◽  
M Yamato ◽  
R Shutta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Pulmonary Veins ◽  
Conventional Group ◽  
Atrial Tachyarrhythmia ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Af Ablation ◽  
Frequent Use ◽  
Class 1 ◽  
Focal Ablation

Abstract Background It has been reported that frequent use of touch-up focal ablation catheters was related to worse outcomes after cryoballoon (CB) atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. It is unknown whether non-use of touch-up focal ablation catheters strategy affects the outcome of AF ablation. Therefore, this study aimed to assess whether non-use of touch-up focal ablation catheters strategy improve clinical outcome after AF ablation using CB. Methods A total of 151 consecutive patients who received CB ablation from February 2017 to August 2019 were enrolled. Non-use of a touch-up focal ablation catheters strategy was started from February 2018. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the type of strategy. In the non-touch-up group, pulmonary veins were isolated without touch-up focal ablation catheters as much as possible and in conventional group, touch-up focal ablation catheters were used as required. The 1-year atrial tachyarrhythmia free survival without class 1 or 3 antiarrhythmic drugs after a 90-day blanking period was assessed between the 2 groups. Results The conventional group consisted of 76 patients and the non-touch-up group consisted of 75 patients. Baseline characteristics were comparable between 2 groups. Touch-up focal ablation catheters were used more in the conventional group (11 patients, 14%) than non-touch-up group (0 patients, 0%) (p&lt;0.001). Pulmonary isolation was achieved in all patients of both groups. Atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence occurred more frequently in the non-touch-up group (15/75 patients, 20%) than conventional group (7/76 patients, 9%) (p=0.045). Conclusion Non-use of a touch-up focal ablation catheters strategy may be related to worse outcome after CB AF ablation. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Catheter ablation for lone atrial fibrillation in individuals aged under 35 years

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 643-648 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jindong Chen ◽  
Hao Wang ◽  
Mengmeng Zhou ◽  
Liang Zhao
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Pulmonary Vein ◽  
Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation ◽  
Atrial Tachyarrhythmia ◽  
Lone Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Significant Independent Predictor ◽  
Atrial Size

AbstractBackground:To assess the effectiveness of radiofrequency catheter ablation for lone atrial fibrillation in young adults.Methods:This single-centre, retrospective, observational study enrolled 75 consecutive patients (86.7% men) under 35 (median, 30) years old with lone atrial fibrillation (68% paroxysmal, 26.7% persistent, and 5.3% long-standing persistent) without other cardiopulmonary diseases who underwent catheter ablation between April 2009 and May 2017. Procedural endpoints were circumferential pulmonary vein ablation for atrial fibrillation with pulmonary vein trigger, and target ablation or bidirectional block of lines and disappearance of complex fractionated atrial electrograms for atrial fibrillation with clear and unclear non-pulmonary vein triggers, respectively.Results:Main study outcome was rate of survival free from atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence, which at median 61 (range, 5–102) months follow-up was 62.7% (64.7 and 58.3% for paroxysmal and non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, respectively) after single ablation, and 69.3% (68.6 and 70.8% for paroxysmal and non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, respectively) after mean 1.2 ablations (two and three ablations in 11 and 2 patients, respectively). In multivariate analysis, non-pulmonary vein trigger was a significant independent predictor of recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia (OR, 10.60 [95%CI, 2.25–49.96]; p = 0.003). There were no major periprocedural adverse events.Conclusions:In patients under 35 years old with lone atrial fibrillation, radiofrequency catheter ablation appeared effective particularly for atrial fibrillation with pulmonary vein trigger and regardless of left atrial size or atrial fibrillation duration or type. Atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence after multiple ablations warrants further study.

scholarly journals Thoracoscopic surgical atrial fibrillation ablation in patients with an extremely enlarged left atrium

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jolien Neefs ◽  
Robin Wesselink ◽  
Nicoline W. E. van den Berg ◽  
Jonas S. S. G. de Jong ◽  
Femke R. Piersma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Antiarrhythmic Drugs ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Volume Index ◽  
Substantial Part ◽  
Atrial Tachyarrhythmia ◽  
Af Ablation ◽  
Male Patients

Abstract Purpose Efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation (AF) decreases as left atrial (LA) volume increases. However, surgical AF ablation with unknown efficacy is being performed in patients with a giant LA (GLA). We determined efficacy of thoracoscopic AF ablation in patients with compared to without a GLA. Methods Patients underwent thoracoscopic PVI with additional left atrial ablations lines (in persistent AF) and were prospectively followed up. GLA was defined as LA volume index (LAVI) ≥ 50 ml/m2. Follow-up was performed with ECGs and 24-h Holters every 3 months. After a 3-month blanking period, all antiarrhythmic drugs were discontinued. The primary outcome was freedom of any atrial tachyarrhythmia ≥ 30 s during 2 years of follow-up. Results At baseline, 68 (15.4%) patients had a GLA (LAVI: 56.7 [52.4–62.8] ml/m2), while 374 (84.6%) had a smaller LA (LAVI: 34.8 [29.2–41.3] ml/m2). GLA patients were older (61.9 ± 6.9 vs 59.4 ± 8.8 years, p = 0.02), more often diagnosed with persistent AF (76.5% vs 58.6%, p = 0.008). Sex was equally distributed (with approximately 25% females). GLA patients had more recurrences compared to non-GLA patients at 2-year follow-up (42.6% vs 57.2%, log rank p = 0.02). Freedom of AF was 69.0% in non-GLA paroxysmal AF patients compared to 43.8–49.3% in a combined group of GLA and/or persistent AF patients(log rank p < 0.001). Furthermore, freedom was 62.4% in non-GLA male patients, compared to 43.8–47.4 in a combined group of GLA and/or female sex(log rank p = 0.02). Conclusion Thoracoscopic AF ablation is an effective therapy in a substantial part of GLA patients. Thoracoscopic AF ablation may serve as a last resort treatment option in these patients.

Abstract 16237: Zero Fluoroscopy Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: A Safety and Feasibility Study

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Luigi Di Biase ◽  
Rodney Horton ◽  
Chintan Trivedi ◽  
Prasant Mohanty ◽  
Sanghamitra Mohanty ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Pulmonary Veins ◽  
Radiation Risk ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Af Ablation ◽  
And Control ◽  
Zero Fluoroscopy

Introduction: Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation is performed under fluoroscopic guidance and therefore carries radiation risk exposure for the both the patient and the operator. Three-dimensional mapping systems and newer technologies to allow non-fluoroscopic catheter visualization together with intracardiac echo have reduced but not abolished the fluoroscopy exposure. We aim to demonstrate the feasibility, the safety and the efficacy of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation without the use of fluoroscopy. Methods: A totally fluoro-less approach was developed for AF ablation at our Institution. 94 consecutive AF patients underwent zero fluoroscopy catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. In the zero fluoroscopy cases, the fluoroscopy arm was kept far away from the patient table. Access including double trans-septal, mapping with the Carto 3 system and ablation were all performed without fluoroscopy with the use of ICE and the Carto 3 system. These 94 patients were compared with 94 control patients matched for age, sex and type of AF who underwent AF ablation by the same operator with the use of fluoroscopy. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar between fluoroless (N=94, Age=64.5 ± 10.1, 75.5% male, 48% paroxysmal) and control (N=94, Age=65.1 ± 9.9, 72.3% male, 50% paroxysmal) group. Non-PV triggers were detected and ablated in 51 (54.3%) and 56 (59.6%) patients in fluoroless and control group respectively (p=0.5). Average fluoro time in control group was 10.1 ± 4.7 minutes. Procedure duration was comparable (120.4 ± 25.8 vs. 122.2 ± 28.7, p =0.6). After the short term median follow-up of 4.5 (4 – 6.5) months, 10 (10.6 %) patients in flourless and 9 (9.6%) patients in control group experienced recurrences (p=0.8).One pericardial effusion requiring pericardiocenteis occurred in the fluoroless group. Conclusions: Our series show that zero fluoroscopy ablation of atrial fibrillation with the use of newer technologies is feasible, safe and efficacious at the short term follow up. Importantly in our series the double transeptal was performed without fluoroscopy and the ablation was not limited to the pulmonary veins only but included ablation of the posterior wall, the coronary sinus and the left atrial appendage.

Abstract 17223: Castle of Stone or Straw, Radiofrequency Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure?

Circulation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 138 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian D McCauley ◽  
Esseim Sharma ◽  
John Dudley ◽  
Antony Chu
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Sinus Rhythm ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Prospective Trials

Introduction: Based on the data from CASTLE-AF trial, in patient with Atrial Fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) catheter ablation may offer a significant reduction in both death, and hospitalization, while promoting maintenance of sinus rhythm as well as improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). This multi-center randomized trial is hailed as a paradigm shifting study in catheter ablation, however it is not without fault. One of the critiques of the CASTLE-AF trial was the high frequency of crossover between the treatment arms. To help sort out this potential source of confounding, we performed a systematic meta-analysis of prospective trials for catheter ablation in AF in patients with Class II through IV heart failure. Hypothesis: The reduction in death, and hospitalization, as well as the maintenance in sinus rhythm and improvement in LVEF seen CASTLE-AF trial are support by other similarly designed AF ablation trials. Methods: Using the inclusion/exclusion criteria from the CASTLE-AF trial, we performed a systematic meta-analysis of 28 published studies. Randomized and non-randomized observational studies comparing the impact of catheter ablation of AF in HF. Studies were identified using the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and PubMed. Results: A total of 29 studies were identified (n =2,339). Mean follow-up was 25 (95% confidence interval, 18-40) months. Efficacy in maintaining sinus rhythm at follow-up end was 60% (43%-76%). Left ventricular ejection fraction improved significantly during follow-up by 15% (P<0.001). Conclusions: Following our meta-analysis, we found data to support the findings of improved LVEF and maintenance of sinus rhythm reported in the CASTLE-AF trial. However, due to differences in study design, we were unable to further validate the reduction in both hospitalization and death seen in CASTLE-AF. We recommend future prospective trials be conducted without cross over to further explore this topic.

scholarly journals Short coupling with high burden of atrial ectopy in twenty-four hour holter recording predicts recurrence of atrial arrhythmia after atrial fibrillation ablation

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Okajima ◽  
H Imai ◽  
Y Murase ◽  
N Kano ◽  
Y Ogawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Atrial Arrhythmia ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Ablation Procedure ◽  
High Burden ◽  
Af Ablation ◽  
Atrial Ectopy ◽  
Holter Recordings

Abstract Background Atrial arrhythmia recurrence is experienced in up to 20% of patients after initially receiving a catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). Therefore, it is important to define predictors of atrial arrhythmia recurrence. Atrial ectopy (AE) with short coupling interval (S-AE) has been reported to be a trigger of AF. On the other hand, high burden of AE has been reported to be a useful predictor of atrial arrhythmia recurrences after AF ablation. Thus, the combination of the incidence of S-AE and AE burden during a 24-hour Holter recording could be a useful predictor of atrial arrhythmia recurrence after AF ablation. Purpose To investigate this hypothesis, we performed a retrospective case-controlled study. Methods We enrolled 180 patients who underwent their first catheter ablation procedure for AF and performed a 24-hour Holter recording between 90 to 365 days after their ablation procedure. Patients who performed an additional ablation procedure before the Holter recording were excluded. Finally, we analyzed 173 patients (age: 65±10 years, female: 28.3%, non-paroxysmal: 27.7%). The Holter recordings were analyzed by the same experienced technicians. We defined AE as a narrow QRS complex occurring &gt;25% than prior R-R interval, and S-AE as AE occurring &gt;55% earlier than expected. The relationship between the characteristics of AE during the Holter recording and atrial arrhythmia recurrences was investigated. Results The Holter recordings were performed at a median of 103 (IQR: 98–138) days after ablation. The median number of AE were 144 (IQR: 54–699) beats per day, and S-AE was recorded in 49 patients (28.3%). Forty-two patients (24.3%) had a recurrence of atrial arrhythmia during a median 488-day follow up period. Patients with S-AE had a recurrence of atrial arrhythmia more frequently than those without S-AE (44.9% vs 16.1%, p&lt;0.001). We found the cut-off point of AE burden as 241 beats per day by the receiver operating characteristic curve with 74% sensitivity and 70% specificity to predict atrial arrhythmia recurrence. We divided the patients into four groups according to the presence or absence of S-AE and high AE burden. In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, patients with S-AE and high AE burden had the highest atrial arrhythmia recurrence rate (Log-rank test: p&lt;0.001). In the Cox multivariate analysis, S-AE with high AE burden was an independent predictor of atrial arrhythmia recurrence (HR: 4.27, 95% CI: 2.32–7.85, p&lt;0.001). Conclusion For AF patients who underwent their first catheter ablation, S-AE (&gt;55% earlier than expected) with high AE burden (&gt;241 beats per day) during the 24-hour Holter recording predicted recurrences of atrial arrhythmia. These results can help to develop follow-up strategies after AF ablation. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Predictive factors of recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia after multiple procedures of radiofrequency catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: Kansai Plus Atrial Fibrillation Registry (KPAF)

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Tanaka ◽  
S Shizuta ◽  
K Inoue ◽  
A Kobori ◽  
K Kaitani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation ◽  
Validation Cohort ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Atrial Tachyarrhythmia ◽  
Derivation Cohort ◽  
Stage 4

Abstract Background The predictors of arrhythmia recurrence after radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) have not yet been fully evaluated. Purpose The aim of this study was to develop and validate a risk scoring system to predict the incidence of recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia after the final RFCA for PAF. Methods The study population consisted of 3223 consecutive patients undergoing first-time RFCA for PAF from November 2011 to March 2014 in 26 cardiovascular centers in Japan who were enrolled in the Kansai Plus Atrial Fibrillation (KPAF) registry. We developed a scoring system in a derivation cohort with 2149 patients and assessed its reproducibility in a validation cohort with 1074 patients. The primary endpoint was recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia lasting for ≥30 seconds after 91 days post the final ablation. Results During a median follow-up period of 3.1 years, 404 (18.8%) patients of the derivation cohort had AF recurrence after the final RFCA. The baseline patient characteristics of the derivation cohort were as follows: mean age 64.7 years, male 1480 (68.9%), mean body mass index (BMI) 23.6 kg/m2, hypertension 1122 (52.2%), prior heart failure 182 (8.5%), diabetes mellitus 203 (9.5%), prior stroke and/or transient ischemic attack 21 (1.0%), prior vascular disease 209 (9.7%), prior valvular disease 105 (4.9%), median CHADS2 score 1.1, median CHA2DS2-VASc score 2.1, mean number of ineffective antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD) 0.80, median duration of history of AF episodes 2.1 years, mean left atrial diameter (LAD) 38.2 mm, mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 65.3%, and mean eGFR 68.7 mL/min/1.73m2. There was no significant difference in the baseline characteristics between derivation and validation cohorts. The results of the multivariate logistic regression models identified 5 independent variables of recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia after the final RFCA: female (odds ratio (OR) = 1.45, p=0.0017), BMI &lt;25 kg/m2 (OR=1.40, p=0.0081), duration of AF history 3 years≤ (OR=1.39, p&lt;0.0034), chronic kidney disease (CKD) (OR=2.1, p=0.005, for stage 2/3CKD, OR=2.6, p=0.018 for stage 4/5 CKD), and LVEF (OR=2.1, p=0.039 for LVEF &lt;50%, OR=1.5, p=0.022 for LVEF 50–60%). The predictive score for each factor was 3 points for CKD stage 4/5, 2 for CKD stage2/3 and LVEF &lt;50%, and 1for the others (11 points in total). The arrhythmia-free rates after the final RCFA in the derivation cohort according to the score were as follows: 0–2 points = 91.7%, 3–4 = 80.7%, 5&lt; = 72.6%, respectively. The similar results were reproduced in the validation cohort (Figure 1). Conclusion Our newly developed scoring system, composed of female, BMI, AF duration, CKD, and LVEF, could reproducibly predict arrhythmia recurrence after the final RFCA for PAF. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Abstract 17846: Prognosis of High Sinus Heart Rate After Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hee Tae Yu ◽  
Tae-Hoon Kim ◽  
Jae-Sun Uhm ◽  
Jong-Youn Kim ◽  
Boyoung Joung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Reverse Remodeling ◽  
Clinical Recurrence ◽  
Af Ablation ◽  
Vagal Modulation ◽  
Β Blocker

Introduction: Although radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) increases a sinus heart rate (HR) after rhythm control, its mechanism and prognosis have not yet been clearly elucidated. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that post-procedural high sinus HR is associated with better clinical outcome of AF ablation without hemodynamic adverse effects. Methods: We included 991 AF patients (75% male, 58 ± 11 years old, 70% paroxysmal AF [PAF]) who had analyzable HR variability (HRV) at 3-months and 1-year after RFCA, and pre- and post-1-year echocardiogram. Average HR measured by 24-hour Holter greater than 2SD (≥92bpm) was defined as post-ablation high sinus HR. Results: 1. Average heart rate was increased significantly (68.8±13.1 to 71.4±10.7bpm, p<0.001), and high sinus HR (≥92bpm) was observed in 28 patients (2.8%) at 3-months after AF ablation. All of them tolerated well, 21% (6/28) were taking low dose β-blocker, and 36% (10/28) kept average HR≥92bpm at 1-year after RFCA. 2. High sinus HR was independently associated with pre-procedural high average HR (OR 1.097; 95% CI 1.029 to 1.169, p=0.005), high left atrial (LA) voltage (OR 3.545; 95% CI 1.183 to 10.618, p=0.024), and reduced rMSSD at 3-months HRV (OR 0.959; 95% CI 0.919 to 0.999, p=0.047). 3. At 1-year follow-up echocardiogram, LA reverse remodeling (ΔLA; -1.1±3.7 vs. -3.0±4.6mm, p=0.055) and the improvement of ejection fraction (ΔEF; 0.7±8.4 vs. 1.7±7.7%, p=0.529) were not significantly different between the patients with high sinus HR and those without. 4. During 27±17 months of follow-up, the patients with high sinus HR at 3-months after RFCA showed significantly lower clinical recurrence than those without (log rank, p=0.020). Conclusions: High sinus HR 3-months after AF ablation is observed in patients with less remodeled LA with significant post-procedure vagal modulation. High sinus HR after AF ablation did not show hemodynamic adverse effect and was associated with lower clinical recurrence rate of AF after RFCA.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document