P1575Cardiovascular toxicity following modern multiple myeloma therapy in Japanese cohort

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Shibata ◽  
S Nohara ◽  
K Nagafuji ◽  
Y Fukumoto
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Troponin I ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Prior History ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
History Of

Abstract Background Multiple myeloma (MM) is a plasma cell dyscrasia accounting for approximately 13% of hematologic malignancies. Patients with MM have an increased risk of cardiovascular adverse events (CAEs) due to disease burden and/or anti-myeloma treatment-related risk factors. However, little is known about the incidence of cardiovascular toxicity of patients with MM. Methods We analyzed 42 consecutive patients (Male/Female 22/20, age 67±10 years old) who received anti-MM therapies between October 2016 and September 2018 from our University Cardio-REnal Oncology (CREO) registry. We examined the incidence of CAEs through January 2019 including congestive heart failure and cardiomyopathy (CHF/CM), ischemic cardiac event, newly symptomatic arrhythmias included atrial fibrillation or flutter requiring treatment, and venous thromboembolism (VTE). Results Within the 408-day median follow-up period (range 15–844 days), CAEs occurred in 23.8% (n=10); CHF/CM in 11.9%, newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation in 4.8%, VTE in 4.8%, vasospastic angina in 2.4%, and death in 28.6%. There were no significant differences between CAEs group and non-CAEs group in terms of sex, body mass index (BMI), incidence of hypertension, ischemic heart disease, prior history of heart failure, cardiovascular medications, left ventricular ejection fraction, serum high-sensitivity troponin-I, estimated glomerular filtration rate, blood urea nitrogen and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels at the time of enrollment. The use of various types of proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs were not associated with the increased risk of CAEs. By multivariate analysis, a history of prior anti-myeloma therapies was identified as an independent risk factor for CAEs. Conclusion CAEs were significantly associated with the recurrent MM in Japanese MM patients.

scholarly journals Prognostic value of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure and different left ventricular ejection fraction: results of the multicenter RIF-CHF register

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 4200
Author(s):  
I. V. Zhirov ◽  
N. V. Safronova ◽  
Yu. F. Osmolovskaya ◽  
S. N. Тereschenko
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Cardiovascular Mortality ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Increased Risk

Heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) are the most common cardiovascular conditions in clinical practice and frequently coexist. The number of patients with HF and AF is increasing every year.Aim. To analyze the effect of clinical course and management of HF and AF on the outcomes.Material and methods. The data of 1,003 patients from the first Russian register of patients with HF and AF (RIF-CHF) were analyzed. The endpoints included hospitalization due to decompensated HF, cardiovascular mortality, thromboembolic events, and major bleeding. Predictors of unfavorable outcomes were analyzed separately for patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (AF+HFpEF), mid-range ejection fraction (AF+HFmrEF), and reduced ejection fraction (AF+HFrEF).Results. Among all patients with HF, 39% had HFpEF, 15% — HFmrEF, and 46% — HFrEF. A total of 57,2% of patients were rehospitalized due to decompensated HF within one year. Hospitalization risk was the highest for HFmrEF patients (66%, p=0,017). Reduced ejection fraction was associated with the increased risk of cardiovascular mortality (15,5% vs 5,4% in other groups, p<0,001) but not ischemic stroke (2,4% vs 3%, p=0,776). Patients with HFpEF had lower risk to achieve the composite endpoint (stroke+MI+cardiovascular death) as compared to patients with HFmrEF and HFrEF (12,7% vs 22% and 25,5%, p<0,001). Regression logistic analysis revealed that factors such as demographic characteristics, disease severity, and selected therapy had different effects on the risk of unfavorable outcomes depending on ejection fraction group.Conclusion. Each group of patients with different ejection fractions is characterized by its own pattern of factors associated with unfavorable outcomes. The demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with mid-range ejection fraction demonstrate that these patients need to be studied as a separate cohort.

scholarly journals Atrial fibrillation and risk of incident heart failure with reduced versus preserved ejection fraction

Heart ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. heartjnl-2021-319122
Author(s):  
Charles D Nicoli ◽  
Wesley T O’Neal ◽  
Emily B Levitan ◽  
Matthew J Singleton ◽  
Suzanne E Judd ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Racial Differences ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Significant Difference

ObjectiveAssociations between atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) have been established. We compared the extent to which AF is associated with each primary subtype of HF, with reduced (HFrEF) versus preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).MethodsWe included 25 787 participants free of baseline HF from the REGARDS (REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke) cohort. Baseline AF was ascertained from ECG and self-reported history of physician diagnosis. Incident HF events were determined from physician-adjudicated review of hospitalisation medical records and HF deaths. Based on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at the time of HF event, HFrEF, HFpEF, and mid-range HF were defined as LVEF <40%, ≥50% and 40%–49%, respectively. Multivariable Cox proportional-hazards models examined the association between AF and HF. The Lunn-McNeil method was used to compare associations of AF with incident HFrEF versus HFpEF.ResultsOver a median of 9 years of follow-up, 1109 HF events occurred (356 HFpEF, 388 HFrEF, 77 mid-range and 288 unclassified). In a model adjusted for sociodemographics, cardiovascular risk factors, and incident coronary heart disease, AF was associated with increased risk of all HF events (HR 1.67, 95% CI 1.38 to 2.01). The associations of AF with HFrEF versus HFpEF events did not differ significantly (HR 1.87 (95% CI 1.38 to 2.54) and HR 1.65 (95% CI 1.20 to 2.28), respectively; p value for difference=0.581). These associations were consistent in sex and race subgroups.ConclusionsAF is associated with both HFrEF and HFpEF events, with no significant difference in the strength of association among these subtypes.

Abstract 2026: Atrial Fibrillation Predicts Ventricular Arrhythmogenicity In Heart Failure

Circulation ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 116 (suppl_16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristina Lemola ◽  
Razi Khan ◽  
Stanley Nattel ◽  
Sakari Lemola ◽  
Peter G Guerra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Primary Prevention ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
N 93

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with appropriate ICD discharges in patients with primary prevention indications. We explored potential effect modifiers impacting on ventricular arrhythmogenic risk associated with AF. Methods and Results: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 215 consecutive patients with ICDs for primary prevention having a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < <26>35% and followed for 1.3±0.7 years. Mean age was 61.0±0.7 years and 17% were women. Cox regression models were explored in subgroups of patients stratified by demographic parameters, prior medical and surgical history, physical exam features, laboratory findings, and results of diagnostic tests. Appropriate ICD discharges were received by 10% of patients. AF was associated with a 3.5 fold increased risk [95% CI (1,5, 8.1), P=0.005]. Effect modifiers for the relationship between AF and appropriate ICD discharges included QRS duration and QTc. In patients with a QRS>130 msec (N=93), 6 of 33 (18%) patients with AF received appropriate ICD discharges versus 2 of 60 (3%) without AF (P=0.03). In this subgroup, AF was associated with a hazard ratio of 5.1 (P=0.049). Among individuals with a QTc >440 msec (N=93), 6 of 32 (19%) AF patients received appropriate ICD discharges versus 1 of 61 (2%) without AF (P=0.01). AF was associated with a hazard ratio of 10.3 (P=0.031). Five of 28 patients (18%) with both prolonged QRS and QTc duration (N=77) that also having AF received appropriate ICD discharges compared to 0 of 49 of patients without AF (P=0.005). After adjusting for medical therapy, AF independently predicted appropriate ICD discharges in subgroups with and without QRS and QTc increase. Conclusion: AF portends increased risk for ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients with heart failure, particularly when associated with conduction and/or repolarization abnormalities. This finding may reflect common depolarization and repolarization defects associated with the arrhythmic milieu contributing to AF and ventricular arrhythmias, or adverse consequences of AF on the complex neurohumoral/electrophysiological substrate underlying ventricular arrhythmogenesis in heart failure.

scholarly journals Temporal trends in outcome and patient characteristics in dilated cardiomyopathy, data from the Swedish Heart Failure Registry 2003–2015

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen Sjöland ◽  
Jonas Silverdal ◽  
Entela Bollano ◽  
Aldina Pivodic ◽  
Ulf Dahlström ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Dilated Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Temporal Trends ◽  
Physical Symptoms ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Continuous Change ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Over Time

Abstract Background Temporal trends in clinical composition and outcome in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) are largely unknown, despite considerable advances in heart failure management. We set out to study clinical characteristics and prognosis over time in DCM in Sweden during 2003–2015. Methods DCM patients (n = 7873) from the Swedish Heart Failure Registry were divided into three calendar periods of inclusion, 2003–2007 (Period 1, n = 2029), 2008–2011 (Period 2, n = 3363), 2012–2015 (Period 3, n = 2481). The primary outcome was the composite of all-cause death, transplantation and hospitalization during 1 year after inclusion into the registry. Results Over the three calendar periods patients were older (p = 0.022), the proportion of females increased (mean 22.5%, 26.4%, 27.6%, p = 0.0001), left ventricular ejection fraction was higher (p = 0.0014), and symptoms by New York Heart Association less severe (p < 0.0001). Device (implantable cardioverter defibrillator and/or cardiac resynchronization) therapy increased by 30% over time (mean 11.6%, 12.3%, 15.1%, p < 0.0001). The event rates for mortality, and hospitalization were consistently decreasing over calendar periods (p < 0.0001 for all), whereas transplantation rate was stable. More advanced physical symptoms correlated with an increased risk of a composite outcome over time (p = 0.0043). Conclusions From 2003 until 2015, we observed declining mortality and hospitalizations in DCM, paralleled by a continuous change in both demographic profile and therapy in the DCM population in Sweden, towards a less affected phenotype.

scholarly journals Left ventricular ejection fraction reduction due to atrial fibrillation: clinical and echocardiographic predictors

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Marcusohn ◽  
O Kobo ◽  
M Postnikov ◽  
D Epstein ◽  
Y Agmon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Lv Function ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Prosthetic Valves ◽  
Ventricular Response ◽  
History Of

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background  The diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (AF) induced cardiomyopathy can be challenging. It relies on ruling out other causes of dilated cardiomyopathy, upon recovery of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) following return to sinus rhythm (SR). Aim  The aim of this study was to identify clinical and echocardiographic predictors for developing new dilated cardiomyopathy in patients with AF or atrial flutter (AFL). Methods  This is a retrospective study conducted in a large tertiary care center. Patients that suffered deterioration of LVEF under 50% during AF demonstrated by pre-cardioversion trans-esophageal echocardiography (TEE) were compared to those with preserved LV function during AF. All patients had documented preserved LVEF at baseline (EF &gt;50%) while in SR. Patients with a previous history of reduced LVEF during SR were excluded. Results From a total of 482 patients included in the final analysis, 80 (17%) patients had reduced LV function and 402 (83%) had preserved LV function during the pre-cardioversion TEE. Patients with reduced LVEF were more likely to be male and with a more rapid ventricular response during AF/AFL. A history of prosthetic valves was also identified as a risk factor for reduced LVEF. Patients with reduced LVEF also had higher incidence of TR and RV dysfunction. Conclusion In "real world" experience, male patients with rapid ventricular response during AF or AFL are more prone to LVEF reduction. Patients with prosthetic valves are also at risk for LVEF reduction during AF/AFL. Lastly, TR and RV dysfunction may indicate relatively long-standing AF with an associated reduction in LVEF.

Predictive value of atrial fibrillation catheter ablation on cognitive functions in patients with chronic heart failure

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 75-81
Author(s):  
T. V. Zolotarova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Cognitive Function ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Chronic Heart Failure ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Cognitive Functions ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Atrial fibrillation (AF) directly leads to a cognitive function decline regardless of the cerebrovascular fatal events, but it is unclear whether the sinus rhythm restoration and reducing the AF burden can reduce the rate of this decreasement. Data on the effect of radiofrequency ablation on patients’ cognitive functions are conflicting and need to be studied. The aim of the study was to evaluate the prognostic value of atrial fibrillation radiofrequency catheter ablation on cognitive functions in patients with chronic heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. The impact of AF radiofrequency catheter ablation on cognitive function in 136 patients (mean age 59.7 ± 8.6 years) with chronic heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction and compared with 58 patients in the control group (58.2 ± 8.1 years), which did not perform ablation and continued the tactics of drug antiarrhythmic therapy was investigated. Cognitive function was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Test (MoCA) at the enrollment stage and 2 years follow-up. Decreased cognitive function was defined as a MoCA test score < 26 points, cognitive impairment < 23 points. Two years after the intervention, there was a positive dynamics (baseline MoCA test — 25,1 ± 2,48, 2-year follow-up — 26,51 ± 2,33, p < 0,001) in the ablation group and negative in the control group (25,47 ± 2,85 and 24,57 ± 3,61, respectively, p < 0,001). Pre-ablation cognitive impairment was significantly associated with improved cognitive function 2 years after AF ablation according to polynomial regression analysis. The obtained data suggest a probable positive effect of AF radiofrequency ablation on cognitive functions in patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.

scholarly journals Early Rhythm Control Therapy in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure

Circulation ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Rillig ◽  
Christina Magnussen ◽  
Ann-Kathrin Ozga ◽  
Anna Suling ◽  
Axel Brandes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Rhythm Control ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Heart Failure Patients ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
Control Therapy

Background: Even on optimal therapy, many patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation experience cardiovascular complications. Additional treatments are needed to reduce these events, especially in patients with heart failure and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (HFpEF). Methods: This prespecified subanalysis of the randomized EAST - AFNET 4 trial assessed the effect of systematic, early rhythm control therapy (ERC; using antiarrhythmic drugs or catheter ablation) compared to usual care (UC, allowing rhythm control therapy to improve symptoms) on the two primary outcomes of the trial and on selected secondary outcomes in patients with heart failure, defined as heart failure symptoms NYHA II-III or left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] <50%. Results: This analysis included 798 patients (300 (37.6%) female, median age 71.0 [64.0, 76.0] years, 785 with known LVEF). The majority of patients (n=442) had HFpEF (LVEF≥50%; mean LVEF 61% ± 6.3%), the others had heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction (n=211; LVEF40-49%; mean LVEF 44% ± 2.9%) or heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (n=132; LVEF<40%; mean LVEF 31% ± 5.5%). Over the 5.1-year median follow-up, the composite primary outcome of cardiovascular death, stroke or hospitalization for worsening of heart failure or for acute coronary syndrome occurred less often in patients randomized to ERC (94/396; 5.7 per 100 patient-years) compared with patients randomized to UC (130/402; 7.9 per 100 patient-years; hazard ratio 0.74 [0.56-0.97], p=0.03), not altered by heart failure status (interaction p-value=0.63). The primary safety outcome (death, stroke, or serious adverse events related to rhythm control therapy) occurred in 71/396 (17.9%) heart failure patients randomized to ERC and in 87/402 (21.6%) heart failure patients randomized to UC (hazard ratio 0.85 [0.62-1.17], p=0.33). LV ejection fraction improved in both groups (LVEF change at two years: ERC 5.3%±11.6%, UC 4.9%±11.6%, p=0.43). ERC also improved the composite outcome of death or hospitalization for worsening of heart failure. Conclusions: Rhythm control therapy conveys clinical benefit when initiated within one year of diagnosing atrial fibrillation in patients with signs or symptoms of heart failure. Clinical Trial Registration: Unique Identifiers: ISRCTN04708680, NCT01288352, EudraCT2010-021258-20, Study web site www.easttrial.org; URLs: www.controlled-trials.com; https://clinicaltrials.gov; https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document