scholarly journals COVID-19: patients with stroke or risk of stroke

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_P) ◽  
pp. P25-P28
Author(s):  
Hans-Christoph Diener ◽  
Peter Berlit ◽  
Jaime Masjuan

Abstract In the context of COVID-19 infection, 0.5–2% of affected patients will suffer a stroke. The strokes are usually severe with an unfavourable prognosis. Most patients suffer from occlusion of the large brain-supplying arteries caused by the COVID-19 induced coagulation disorders. In the context of COVID-19 infection, there has been a dramatic temporary decrease in the number of stroke patients treated in stroke units.

2005 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 69-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Reid ◽  
M-J MacLeod ◽  
D Williams

Background: We aimed to study the timing of aspirin prescription in ischaemic stroke comparing patients admitted to an acute stroke unit (ASU) directly or via a general medical ward. We also analysed prescription of secondary preventive therapies in stroke patients in an ASU. Methods: Retrospective analysis was made of medical notes and prescription records of 69 patients admitted to an ASU over a three month period to establish timing of aspirin prescription with respect to onset of stroke symptoms, CT brain scan and route of admission to the ASU. Results: CT brain scans were obtained at a median of 2.1 days post stroke (IQ range 1.3–4.3). Patients directly admitted to the ASU received aspirin earlier post admission compared to those admitted via a medical ward (0.7 vs 2.2 days, p<0.01) and were also more likely to receive aspirin prior to CT scan being performed (57% vs 19%, p=0.02). 86% of stroke patients were discharged on an antiplatelet therapy, 79% on a statin, 37% on a thiazide diuretic and 32% on an ACE inhibitor or angiotensin II antagonist. Conclusion: Aspirin was given more promptly in acute stroke and more commonly prior to CT scanning in an ASU compared to a medical ward. Statin therapy is used extensively in stroke but there is a much lower rate of initiation of other secondary preventive therapies (e.g. anti-hypertensive therapy) in hospital. These findings demonstrate a hesitancy in early use of aspirin amongst general physicians and lends support for the use of stroke units.


Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
May Nour ◽  
Clayton Kazan ◽  
Nicole Steeneken ◽  
Kevin M Brown ◽  
Bryan Villareal ◽  
...  

Background: EMS 911 dispatchers must rapidly assess patient calls and allocate appropriate responding resources including, for stroke, advanced (rather than basic) life support standard ambulances and, in an increasing number of regions, specialty Mobile Stroke Units. While dispatcher accuracy in distinguishing stroke from other high risk conditions is not crucial for selecting ALS rather than BLS response, specialized MSU response necessitates a higher level of accuracy. Methods: We analyzed all transports between January 2018-August 2019 identified as stroke by dispatchers at sendout or by paramedics upon patient assessment in a large urban EMS system -LA County FD EMS, serving 4.1 million lives, 59 cities, 3,000 square miles, via 174 fire stations. Dispatchers are instructed to decide upon the appropriate diagnosis and responding resource within 60s of start of 911 call conversation. “Dispatcher Impression” (DI) and on scene paramedic “Provider Impression” (PI) were compared, and other care metrics analyzed. Results: In total, 12,528 runs were evaluated, of which 79.1% (9913) were dispatched as stroke and paramedics identified stroke in 47.6%. The sensitivity of dispatcher impression of stroke was 56.2% and the positive predictive value was 33.9%. The most common paramedic impressions in non-concordant patients dispatched as stroke were: generalized weakness in 24% (1587), altered mental status in 17% (1111), and syncope in 6% (403). In patients with a dispatcher impression of non-stroke but paramedic impression of stroke, the most common dispatcher impressions were: sick person in 29% (758), unconscious in 28.7% (750), and seizure in 4.6% (121). In dispatcher impressions of stroke, 100% were dispatched at ALS level; and in dispatcher impressions of non-stroke but eventual paramedic impression of stroke, 98.3% were dispatched at ALS level. Patient age over/under 40 & patient sex did not modify rates of dispatcher - paramedic impression concordance. Conclusions: Dispatchers identify more than half of paramedic-identified stroke patients and allocate appropriate ALS standard ambulances in almost all stroke patients. However, for efficient attaching of specialized MSU resources, improved dispatcher identification of stroke is desirable.


Author(s):  
Gert Kwakkel ◽  
Boudewijn Kollen

Knowledge about the functional prognosis of stroke patients admitted to a stroke unit has increased substantially over the past years. Prospective cohort studies suggest that the return of some finger extension and voluntary activity in the shoulder abductors within days post-stroke onset predicts a favourable recovery of the upper extremity function at 6 months. The Barthel index and the ability to sit unsupported are the main predictors for recovery of gait and activities of daily living (ADL) independency. Almost all developed prediction models identify patients with a favourable prognosis but are less suitable to predict accurately individuals who will not regain dexterity, mobility, and ADL independence following stroke. In individuals with an unfavourable prognosis, this entails measuring clinical determinants frequently and longitudinally during the post-stroke course. Moreover, future research should focus on cross-validating prediction models, which should also incorporate presently excluded stroke subtypes, such as brain stem strokes, intraparenchymal, and subarachnoid haemorrhages.


Author(s):  
Gert Kwakkel ◽  
Boudewijn Kollen

Knowledge about the functional prognosis of stroke patients admitted to a stroke unit has increased substantially over the past years. Prospective cohort studies suggest that a return of some finger extension and voluntary activity in the shoulder abductors within days post-stroke onset predicts a favourable recovery of the upper extremity function at 6 months. The Barthel Index and the ability to sit unsupported are the main predictors for recovery of gait and ADL independency. Almost all developed prediction models identify patients with a favourable prognosis but are less suitable to accurately predict individuals who will not regain dexterity, mobility, and ADL independence following stroke. In individuals with an unfavourable prognosis, this entails measuring clinical determinants frequently and longitudinally during the post-stroke course. Moreover, future research should focus on cross-validating prediction models, which should also incorporate presently excluded stroke subtypes, such as brain stem strokes, intraparenchymal and subarachnoid haemorrhages.


2007 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 191-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen M. Dewey ◽  
Lisa J. Sherry ◽  
Janice M. Collier

Background There are an estimated 62 million stroke survivors worldwide. The majority will have long-term disability. Despite this reality, there have been few large, high-quality randomized controlled trials of stroke rehabilitation interventions. Summary of review There is excellent evidence for the effectiveness of a number of stroke rehabilitation interventions, notably care of stroke patients in inpatient stroke units and stroke rehabilitation units providing organized, goal-focused care via a multidisciplinary team. Stroke units (in comparison with care on general medical wards) effectively reduce death and disability with the number needed to treat to prevent one person from failing to regain independence being 20. Unfortunately, only a minority of stroke patients have access to stroke unit care. The key principles of effective stroke rehabilitation have been identified. These include ( 1 ) a functional approach targeted at specific activities e.g. walking, activities of daily living, ( 2 ) frequent and intense practice, and ( 3 ) commencement in the first days or weeks after stroke. Conclusion The most effective approaches to restoration of brain function after stroke remain unknown and there is an urgent need for more high-quality research. In the meantime, simple, broadly applicable stroke rehabilitation interventions with proven efficacy, particularly stroke unit care, must be applied more widely.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Peter Langhorne

<b><i>Background:</i></b> The concept of stroke unit care has been discussed for over 50 years, but it is only in the last 25 years that clear evidence of its effectiveness has emerged to inform these discussions. <b><i>Summary:</i></b> This review outlines the history of the concept of stroke units to improve recovery after stroke and their evaluation in clinical trials. It describes the first systematic review of stroke unit trials published in 1993, the establishment of a collaborative research group (the Stroke Unit Trialists’ Collaboration), the subsequent analyses and updates of the evidence base, and the efforts to implement stroke unit care in routine settings. The final section considers some of the remaining challenges in this area of research and clinical practice. <b><i>Key Messages:</i></b> Good quality evidence confirms that stroke patients who are looked after in a stroke unit are more likely to survive and be independent and living at home 1 year after their stroke. The apparent benefits are independent of patient age, sex, stroke type, or initial stroke severity. The benefits are most obvious in units based in a discrete ward (stroke ward). The current challenges include integrating effective stroke units with more recent systems to deliver hyper-acute stroke interventions and implementing stroke units in lower resource regions.


Stroke ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 44 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Betty Robertson

Background: Nurses play a pivotal role in all phases of care of the stroke patient. Stroke Nurses have responded to the challenge of making stroke systems of care a reality in recent years. We wanted our stroke nurses to use evidence-based practice to organize and deliver stroke services and facilitate optimal outcomes for stroke patients. One of the most important components of a Stroke Program is having a designated unit where patients receive specialized stroke care. Nurses who are a part of a stroke center should be trained to recognize medical complications that can arise in someone who has suffered a stroke. One of the most important reasons why primary stroke centers are the premier places for the treatment of strokes is that, by having specialized stroke units, patients have better outcomes. Is weekly stroke education for RNs on the stroke floor helpful to the nurses?<br Does it influence or impact the way they care for their patients? Methods: Since information,research and even nursing staff is always changing, education needs to be provided to nurses taking care of stroke patients so they have the latest and greatest knowledge to share with their patients and loved ones. We asked the staff what topic they wanted to cover and posted a suggestion box on the unit entitled “Ask a Stroke Nurse,” analyzed the attendance and did a survey to get the nurses’ feedback. Collectively we decided the best way to capture all staff on all shifts was to do weekly in-services and education sessions covering everything from Journal articles, updates about the program, interesting case studies, breaking science and even guest speakers from other departments. Conclusion: The survey showed that 96% of RNs on the stroke floor found the weekly education very valuable. 96% found that it positively impacted their practice,additionally, 91% said it greatly increased their knowledge about stroke & TIA. We will continue weekly education and continue to get feedback from the nurses. This endeavor has proven to be a very successful. We were pleased to see the positive comments from the staff about how much they enjoy and look forward to the classes each week.


2009 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabrizio Antonio De Falco ◽  
Maurizio A. Leone ◽  
Ettore Beghi

o assess the stroke workload of Italian neurological services and to correlate it with indicators of each hospital’s emergency setting. A semi-structured questionnaire was sent to the 220 neurology units (NU) located in hospitals with an emergency room (ER) (155 responders, 71%). Stroke was the most common discharge diagnosis (29%) (273 patients/year/NU on average) and condition requiring consultation in ER (28%). A stroke unit was available in 28% of NU, bedside monitors in 45%, a 24 hour/day and 7 day/week (24/7) CT scan in 90%, a 24/7-MRI in 32%, a 24/7 on-duty neurologist in 36%. The stroke workload was correlated only with the number of ER consultations per year, and marginally to the presence of stroke units and the number of monitored beds in the univariate, but not in the multivariate analysis. The stroke workload in Italian NU is very high, but is largely unrelated to their structural and functional characteristics, in contrast with the international indications requiring several essential criteria for the best hospital management of all stroke patients.


Author(s):  
Paolo Manganotti ◽  
Marcello Naccarato ◽  
Ilario Scali ◽  
Manuel Cappellari ◽  
Bruno Bonetti ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Efficiency of care chain response and hospital reactivity were and are challenged for stroke acute care management during the pandemic period of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in North-Eastern Italy (Veneto, Friuli-Venezia-Giulia, Trentino-Alto-Adige), counting 7,193,880 inhabitants (ISTAT), with consequences in acute treatment for patients with ischemic stroke. Methods We conducted a retrospective data collection of patients admitted to stroke units eventually treated with thrombolysis and thrombectomy, ranging from January to May 2020 from the beginning to the end of the main first pandemic period of COVID-19 in Italy. The primary endpoint was the number of patients arriving to these stroke units, and secondary endpoints were the number of thrombolysis and/or thrombectomy. Chi-square analysis was used on all patients; furthermore, patients were divided into two cohorts (pre-lockdown and lockdown periods) and the Kruskal-Wallis test was used to test differences on admission and reperfusive therapies. Results In total, 2536 patients were included in 22 centers. There was a significant decrease of admissions in April compared to January. Furthermore, we observed a significant decrease of thrombectomy during the lockdown period, while thrombolysis rate was unaffected in the same interval across all centers. Conclusions Our study confirmed a decrease in admission rate of stroke patients in a large area of northern Italy during the lockdown period, especially during the first dramatic phase. Overall, there was no decrease in thrombolysis rate, confirming an effect of emergency care system for stroke patients. Instead, the significant decrease in thrombectomy rate during lockdown addresses some considerations of local and regional stroke networks during COVID-19 pandemic evolution.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 102-105
Author(s):  
António Arsénio Duarte ◽  
Ana Paula Martin ◽  
Diana Santos ◽  
Rafael Santos ◽  
Rita Viegas

Every second a person in the world suffers from a stroke, not surprising, therefore, that stroke is the leading cause of death and morbidity in Portugal. Increasingly, acute stroke is considered a medical emergency. The evidence proves that the treatment of these patients in specialized units (stroke units) is effective in acute stroke. A stroke unit is a hospital area where professionals with specific, well-defined training work, who provide care to stroke patients who are already stabilized, but are still in an acute phase(DGS, 2001). The aim of this study is to understand the role of the occupational therapist in stroke units and to identify the perspective of the multidisciplinary team on their work, clarifying what are the advantages of this professional in the team. The study falls within the qualitative paradigm, exploratory and descriptive. Semi-structured interviews were performed to 39 health professionals. The technique used was the content analysis of interviews. Based on previously established categories, other categories emerged.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document