132 Clinical characteristics and outcomes of a contemporary, real-world, single-centre cohort of patients with advanced heart failure

Abstract Aims An increasing number of patients with heart failure (HF) progresses to an advanced stage, characterized by persistent and sever symptoms and worse prognosis. A detailed characterization of patients with advanced HF is needed to optimize clinical management and timely refer for heart transplant or left ventricular assist device implantation. Methods and results A retrospective analysis was performed on patients with HF who were admitted to hospital or performed an outpatient visit at our centre (Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy) from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2020, and who had at least one of the following high-risk characteristics: (1) previous or ongoing requirement for inotropes; (2) persisting New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV and/or persistently high natriuretic peptides (BNP or NT-proBNP); (3) end-organ dysfunction, defined as worsening renal or liver dysfunction in the setting of HF; (4) ejection fraction (EF) <20%; (5) recurrent appropriate defibrillator shocks; (6) more than 1 hospitalization for HF in the last year; (7) persisting fluid overload and/or increasing diuretic requirement; (8) consistently low blood pressure (systolic blood pressure <90–100 mmHg); and (9) inability to up-titrate or need to decrease/cease HF therapies, such as beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors, or mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. The updated 2018 Heart Failure Association (HFA)—European Society of Cardiology (ESC) criteria for defining advanced HF were evaluated. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality; secondary endpoints were a composite of all-cause mortality or hospitalization for HF and a composite of all-cause mortality or hospitalization for any reason. Among 493 patients with HF who were hospitalized or performed an outpatient visit in 2020, 230 (46.7%) had at least one high risk criterion and were included in the study. Mean age was 75.5 ± 11.9 years, 156 patients (67.8%) were men, and 160 patients (69.6%) were hospitalized and included as inpatients. Median EF was 38% [interquartile range (IQR): 25–50%] and 117 patients (50.9%) had HF with reduced EF (<40%); median NT-proBNP was 4044 (IQR: 2262–7664) pg/mL. Among the included 230 patients, 38 (16.5%) had all four updated HFA-ESC criteria defining advanced HF, 53 (23.0%) had American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) stage D, 21 (9.1%) had INTERMACS profile 1–3. In-hospital mortality was 10.6% (among inpatients). After a median follow-up of 301 (214–442) days, a total of 62 patients died (27.0%), and the secondary endpoints of all-cause death or HF hospitalization and all-cause death or any hospitalization were observed in 107 (46.5%) and 139 (60.4%) patients, respectively. Patients fulfilling all four updated HFA-ESC criteria for advanced HF had a higher risk of all-cause mortality (unadjusted HR: 2.06; 95% CI: 1.18–3.60; P = 0.011), also after adjustment for covariates of interest (adjusted HR: 2.20; 95% CI: 1.03, 4.70; P = 0.041). Conclusions In our contemporary, real-world cohort of HF patients with high-risk characteristics, mid-term prognosis was poor, and the use of updated HFA-ESC criteria defining advanced HF identified a subset at increased risk of mortality.

Download Full-text

Real-world treatment switching to sacubitril/valsartan in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: A cohort study

Open Heart ◽

10.1136/openhrt-2020-001305 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (2) ◽

pp. e001305

Author(s):

Sashiananthan Ganesananthan ◽

Nisar Shah ◽

Parin Shah ◽

Hossam Elsayed ◽

Julie Phillips ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Heart Failure ◽

Blood Pressure ◽

Clinical Trial ◽

Ejection Fraction ◽

Real World ◽

Left Ventricular ◽

Left Ventricular Ejection ◽

Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽

Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽

Treatment Switching

BackgroundSacubitril/valsartan is an effective treatment for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) based on clinical trial data. However, little is known about its use or impact in real-world practice. The aim of this study was to describe our routine clinical experience of switching otherwise optimally treated patients with HFrEF to sacubitril/valsartan with respect to patient outcomes such as quality of life (QoL) and echocardiographic variables.Methods and resultsFrom June 2017 to May 2019, 80 consecutive stable patients with HFrEF on established and maximally tolerated guideline-directed HF therapies were initiated on sacubitril/valsartan with bimonthly uptitration. Clinical assessment, biochemistry, echocardiography and QoL were compared pretreatment and post-treatment switching. We were able to successfully switch 89% of patients from renin–angiotensin axis inhibitors to sacubitril/valsartan (71 of 80 patients). After 3 months of switch therapy, we observed clinically significant and incremental improvements in blood pressure (systolic blood pressure 123 vs 112 mm Hg, p<0.001; diastolic blood pressure 72 vs 68 mm Hg, p=0.004), New York Heart Association functional classification score (2.3 vs 1.9, p<0.001), Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire score (46 vs 38, p=0.016), left ventricular ejection fraction (26% vs 33%, p<0.001) and left ventricular end systolic diameter (5.2 vs 4.9 cm, p=0.013) compared with baseline. There were no significant changes in renal function or serum potassium.ConclusionThis study provides real-world clinical practice data demonstrating incremental improvements in functional and echocardiographic outcomes in optimally treated patients with HFrEF switched to sacubitril/valsartan. The data provide evidence beyond that observed in clinical trial settings of the potential benefits of sacubitril/valsartan when used as part of a multidisciplinary heart failure programme.

Download Full-text

Effectiveness of Intensive Cardiac Rehabilitation in High-Risk Patients with Cardiovascular Disease in Real-World Practice

Nutrients ◽

10.3390/nu13113883 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 13 (11) ◽

pp. 3883

Author(s):

Iwona Świątkiewicz ◽

Salvatore Di Somma ◽

Ludovica De Fazio ◽

Valerio Mazzilli ◽

Pam R. Taub

Keyword(s):

Heart Failure ◽

Blood Pressure ◽

Cardiovascular Disease ◽

High Risk ◽

Cardiac Rehabilitation ◽

Real World ◽

Low Density Lipoprotein ◽

Density Lipoprotein ◽

Cardiac Events ◽

Supervised Exercise

Structured lifestyle interventions through cardiac rehabilitation (CR) are critical to improving the outcome of patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cardiometabolic risk factors. CR programs’ variability in real-world practice may impact CR effects. This study evaluates intensive CR (ICR) and standard CR (SCR) programs for improving cardiometabolic, psychosocial, and clinical outcomes in high-risk CVD patients undergoing guideline-based therapies. Both programs provided lifestyle counseling and the same supervised exercise component. ICR additionally included a specialized plant-based diet, stress management, and social support. Changes in body weight (BW), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and exercise capacity (EC) were primary outcomes. A total of 314 patients (101 ICR and 213 SCR, aged 66 ± 13 years, 75% overweight/obese, 90% coronary artery disease, 29% heart failure, 54% non-optimal LDL-C, 43% depressive symptoms) were included. Adherence to ICR was 96% vs. 68% for SCR. Only ICR resulted in a decrease in BW (3.4%), LDL-C (11.3%), other atherogenic lipids, glycated hemoglobin, and systolic blood pressure. Both ICR and SCR increased EC (52.2% and 48.7%, respectively) and improved adiposity indices, diastolic blood pressure, cholesterol intake, depression, and quality of life, but more for ICR. Within 12.6 ± 4.8 months post-CR, major adverse cardiac events were less likely in the ICR than SCR group (11% vs. 17%), especially heart failure hospitalizations (2% vs. 8%). A comprehensive ICR enhanced by a plant-based diet and psychosocial management is feasible and effective for improving the outcomes in high-risk CVD patients in real-world practice.

Download Full-text

P1630Improved outcome by guideline-directed medical therapy in real-world heart failure patients despite low blood pressure and renal dysfunction

European Heart Journal ◽

10.1093/eurheartj/ehz748.0389 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽

Author(s):

X Chen ◽

U L F Dahlstrom ◽

A Pivodic ◽

M Fu

Keyword(s):

Heart Failure ◽

Blood Pressure ◽

Ejection Fraction ◽

Renal Dysfunction ◽

Medical Therapy ◽

Real World ◽

Term Survival ◽

Aldosterone Antagonists ◽

All Cause Mortality ◽

Low Blood Pressure

Abstract Background Among patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI/ARB), β-adrenergic receptor blockers (BB) and aldosterone antagonists (AA) are guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) to improve prognosis and well-being. However, low blood pressure (BP) and renal dysfunction are often challenges and barriersof the clinical implementation in real-world. Purpose To investigate whether it is beneficial to apply GDMT in real-world patients with HFrEF despite low blood pressure and renal dysfunction. Methods This study initially included 51060 HF patients from the Swedish Heart Failure Registry. After the exclusion of patients with ejection fraction ≥40% (53.4%), systolic BP>100mmHg (40.0%), eGFR>45ml/min/1.73m2 (3.3.%) and those died during hospitalization (0.3%), 1386 patients were ultimately enrolled in this study. Patients were grouped into five subgroups (ACEI/ARB+BB+AA, ACEI/ARB+BB, ACEI/ARB+AA, ACEI/ARB and BB). Outcome is all cause mortality. Results Among the study patients, 485 (35.0%) were treated with ACEI/ARB+BB+AA, 672 (48.5%) with ACEI/ARB+BB, 41 (3.0%) with ACEI/ARB+AA, 68 (4.9%) with ACEI/ARB and 120 (8.7%) with BB. Patients in ACEI/ARB+BB+AA group were younger (72.9±9.7 vs. 76.1±9.2 vs. 73.9±9.7 vs. 79.5±8.0 vs. 79.3±8.9), with higher BMI (25.4±4.5 vs. 25.5±4.7 vs. 23.7±4.2 vs. 23.4±3.8 vs. 24.7±6.3), more in NYHA I/II (30.8% vs. 33.3% vs. 1.7% vs. 18.9% vs. 24.3%). During the follow-up, all cause mortality was lowest in patients treated with ACEI/ARB+BB+AA (59% vs. 60.4% vs. 75.6% vs. 75% vs. 79.2%). After adjustement for age and gender, when compared with the ACEI/ARB+BB+AA group, the hazard ratio for ACEI/ARB+BB is 1.05 (0.91–1.23), ACEI/ARB+AA 1.16 (0.80–1.68), ACEI/ARB 1.51 (1.11–2.04), and BB 2.36 (1.86–2.98) respectively Conclusions In real-world HFrEF patients with low blood pressure and renal dysfunction, full medication of GDMT is associated with improved long-term survival.

Download Full-text

Long-term systolic blood pressure and all-cause mortality in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: an analysis of the TOPCAT trial

European Heart Journal ◽

10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.0983 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽

Author(s):

P Huang ◽

C Liu

Keyword(s):

Heart Failure ◽

Blood Pressure ◽

Ejection Fraction ◽

Funding Source ◽

Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽

Risk Of Mortality ◽

All Cause Mortality ◽

History Of

Abstract Background Lower systolic blood pressure (SBP) at admission or discharge was associated with poor outcomes in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, the optimal long-term SBP for HFpEF was less clear. Purpose To examine the association of long-term SBP and all-cause mortality among patients with HFpEF. Methods We analyzed participants from the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist (TOPCAT) study. Participants had at least two SBP measurements of different times during the follow-up were included. Long-term SBP was defined as the average of all SBP measurements during the follow-up. We stratified participants into four groups according to long-term SBP: <120mmHg, ≥120mmHg and <130mmHg, ≥130mmHg and <140mmHg, ≥140mmHg. Multivariable adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for all-cause mortality associated with SBP level. To assess for nonlinearity, we fitted restricted cubic spline models of long-term SBP. Sensitivity analyses were conducted by confining participants with history of hypertension or those with left ventricular ejection fraction≥50%. Results The 3338 participants had a mean (SD) age of 68.5 (9.6) years; 51.4% were women, and 89.3% were White. The median long-term SBP was 127.3 mmHg (IQR 121–134.2, range 77–180.7). Patients in the SBP of <120mmHg group were older age, less often female, less often current smoker, had higher estimated glomerular filtration rate, less often had history of hypertension, and more often had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and atrial fibrillation. After multivariable adjustment, long-term SBP of 120–130mmHg and 130–140mmHg was associated with a lower risk of mortality during a mean follow-up of 3.3 years (HR 0.65, 95% CI: 0.49–0.85, P=0.001; HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.50–0.88, P=0.004, respectively); long-term SBP of <120mmHg had similar risk of mortality (HR 1.03, 95% CI: 0.78–1.36, P=0.836), compared with long-term SBP of ≥140mmHg. Findings from restricted cubic spline analysis demonstrate that there was J-shaped association between long-term SBP and all-cause mortality (P=0.02). These association was essentially unchanged in sensitivity analysis. Conclusions Among patients with HFpEF, long-term SBP showed a J-shaped pattern with all-cause mortality and a range of 120–140 mmHg was significantly associated with better outcomes. Future randomized controlled trials need to evaluate optimal long-term SBP goal in patients with HFpEF. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Foundation. Main funding source(s): China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Grant (2019M660229 and 2019TQ0380)

Download Full-text

Time interval from left ventricular stimulation to QRS onset is a predictor of mortality in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy

European Heart Journal ◽

10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.0806 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽

Author(s):

D Yagishita ◽

Y Yagishita ◽

S Kataoka ◽

K Yazaki ◽

M Kanai ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Heart Failure ◽

Independent Predictor ◽

Total Mortality ◽

Left Ventricular ◽

Cardiac Resynchronization ◽

Time Interval ◽

Heart Failure Hospitalization ◽

Conduction Disturbance ◽

Secondary Endpoints ◽

Fibrotic Lesion

Abstract Introduction In our previous report, the time interval from left ventricular (LV) pacing to the earliest onset of QRS (S-QRS interval) has been found to be an independent predictor of mechanical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The S-QRS interval may indicate the conduction disturbance relevant to the localized tissue property such as scar or fibrotic lesion. Therefore, S-QRS interval longer than 37ms was associated with poor response to CRT, and proposed as suboptimal LV lead position. Then, we hypothesized that the longer S-QRS interval at the LV pacing site could be related to long term mortality and heart failure events in patients with CRT. Methods This retrospective study included 82 consecutive heart failure patients with sinus rhythm, reduced LV ejection fraction (≤35%), and a wide QRS complex (≥120ms), who undergone CRT implantation between 2012 January and 2017 December. Patients were divided into Short S-QRS group (<37ms, SS-QRS) and Long S-QRS group (≥37ms, LS-QRS) according to the previously reported optimal cut off value. A responder was defined as one with ≥15% reduction in LV end-systolic volume assessed by echocardiography at 6 months after CRT. The primary endpoint was total mortality, which included LV assist device implantation or heart transplantation. The secondary endpoints included the composite endpoint of total mortality or heart failure hospitalization. Results The study patients were divided into SS-QRS (N=43, age 65.9±13.2 years, 77% male) and LS-QRS (N=39, age 63.0±13.4, 85% male). In the electrocardiographic measurements, there were no significant differences in baseline QRS duration (162.4±30.3ms in SS-QRS vs. 154.5±31.6ms in LS-QRS, P=0.19) and LV local activation time assessed as Q-LV interval (118.3±34.3ms in SS-QRS vs. 115.3±32.0ms in LS-QRS, P=0.71). S-QRS interval was 25.9±5.3ms in SS-QRS and 51.5±13.7ms in LS-QRS (P<0.01), and the responder rate was significantly higher in SS-QRS compared with LS-QRS (79% vs. 29%, P<0.01). During mean follow up of 47.7±22.4 months, 24 patients (29%) reached to the primary endpoint, while the secondary endpoints were observed in 47 patients (57%). LS-QRS patients had significantly worse event-free survival for both primary and secondary endpoints (Figure). After the multivariate Cox regression analysis, LS-QRS (≥37ms) was an independent predictor of total mortality (HR=2.6, 95% CI: 1.11 to 6.12, P=0.03) and the secondary composite events (HR=2.4, 95% CI: 1.31 to 4.33, P<0.01). Conclusion The S-QRS interval longer than 37ms, which may reflect the conduction disturbance relevant to the scar or fibrotic lesion at the LV pacing site, was a significant predictor of the total mortality and heart failure hospitalization. These findings have implications for the optimal LV lead placement in patients with CRT device. Clinical outcomes according to S-QRS Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Download Full-text

Systolic blood pressure and outcome in patients admitted with acute heart failure: a pooled analysis from 4 randomized clinical trials

European Heart Journal Acute Cardiovascular Care ◽

10.1093/ehjacc/zuab020.045 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 10 (Supplement_1) ◽

Author(s):

J Grand ◽

K Miger ◽

A Sajadieh ◽

L Kober ◽

C Torp-Pedersen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Heart Failure ◽

Composite Endpoint ◽

Left Ventricular ◽

Left Ventricular Ejection ◽

Term Outcome ◽

Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽

Long Term Outcome ◽

All Cause Mortality ◽

Short And Long Term

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): The Danish Heart Foundation Background In acute heart failure (AHF), low systolic blood pressure (SBP) has been associated with poor outcome. Less is known of the risk related to normal versus elevated SBP and interaction with left ventricular ejection fraction. Purpose The aim of the present study was to assess the association between baseline SBP and short- and long-term outcome in a large cohort of AHF-patients. Methods A pooled cohort of four randomized controlled trials investigating the vasodilator serelaxin versus placebo in patients admitted with AHF and an SBP from 125 to 180 mmHg. Endpoints were 180-day all-cause mortality and a short-term composite endpoint (worsening heart failure, all-cause mortality or hospital readmission for HF through Day 14). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was categorized into HFrEF (<40%) and HFpEF (= >40%). Multivariable Cox regression was used and adjusted for age, sex, baseline body mass index, HFrEF, serum estimated glomerular filtration rate, allocated treatment (placebo/serelaxin), diabetes mellitus, ischemic heart disease, and atrial fibrillation/flutter. Measurements and Main Results A total of 10.533 patients with a mean age of 73 (±12) years and median SBP of 140 (130-150) mmHg were included within mean 8.2 hours from admission. LVEF was assessed in 8493 (81%), and of these, 4294 (51%) had HFrEF. Increasing SBP as a continuous variable was inversely associated with 180-day mortality (HRadjusted: 0.93 [0.88-0.98], p = 0.004 per 10 mmHg increase) and with the composite endpoint (HRadjusted: 0.90 [0.85-0.95], p < 0.0001 per 10 mmHg increase). A significant interaction was observed regarding LVEF, revealing that SBP was not associated with mortality in patients with HFpEF (HRadjusted: 1.01 [0.94-1.09], p = 0.83 per 10 mmHg increase), but SBP was associated with increased mortality in HFrEF (HRadjusted: 0.80 [0.73-0.88], p < 0.001 per 10 mmHg increase) (Figure). Conclusions Elevated SBP is independently associated with favorable short- and long-term outcome in AHF-patients. The association between SBP and mortality was, however, not present in patients with preserved LVEF. Abstract Figure. Survival plots by SBP and LVEF

Download Full-text

Mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation with or without heart failure following hospital discharge

European Heart Journal ◽

10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.0362 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽

Author(s):

A Kartas ◽

A Samaras ◽

D Vasdeki ◽

G Dividis ◽

G Fotos ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Heart Failure ◽

Atrial Fibrillation ◽

Primary Endpoint ◽

Cox Regression ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Tertiary Center ◽

All Cause Mortality ◽

Endpoint Event ◽

Secondary Endpoints ◽

Sectional Analysis

Abstract Background The association of heart failure (HF) with the prognosis of atrial fibrillation (AF) remains unclear. OBJECTIVES To assess all-cause mortality in patients following hospitalization with comorbid AF in relation to the presence of HF. Methods We performed a cross-sectional analysis of data from 977 patients discharged from the cardiology ward of a single tertiary center between 2015 and 2018 and followed for a median of 2 years. The association between HF and the primary endpoint of death from any cause was assessed using multivariable Cox regression. Results HF was documented in 505 (51.7%) of AF cases at discharge, including HFrEF (17.9%), HFmrEF (16.5%) and HFpEF (25.2%). A primary endpoint event occurred in 212 patients (42%) in the AF-HF group and in 86 patients (18.2%) in the AF-no HF group (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.65 to 3.13; P<0.001). HF was associated with a higher risk of the composite secondary endpoint of death from any cause, AF or HF-specific hospitalization (aHR 1.69; 95% CI 1.32 to 2.16 p<0.001). The associations of HF with the primary and secondary endpoints were significant and similar for AF-HFrEF, AF-HFmrEF, AF-HFpEF. Conclusions HF was present in half of the patients discharged from the hospital with comorbid AF. The presence of HF on top of AF was independently associated with a significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality than did absence of HF, irrespective of HF subtype. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Download Full-text

Prognostic value of global longitudinal layer specific strain for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

European Heart Journal ◽

10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.0117 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽

Author(s):

C Johnsen ◽

M Sengeloev ◽

P Joergensen ◽

N Bruun ◽

D Modin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Heart Failure ◽

Ejection Fraction ◽

Prognostic Value ◽

Left Ventricular ◽

Volume Index ◽

Funding Source ◽

Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽

Patients With Heart Failure ◽

All Cause Mortality ◽

Echocardiographic Parameters

Abstract Background Novel echocardiographic software allows for layer-specific evaluation of myocardial deformation by 2-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography. Endocardial, epicardial- and whole wall global longitudinal strain (GLS) may be superior to conventional echocardiographic parameters in predicting all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of endocardial-, epicardial- and whole wall GLS in patients with HFrEF in relation to all-cause mortality. Methods We included and analyzed transthoracic echocardiographic examinations from 1,015 patients with HFrEF. The echocardiographic images were analyzed, and conventional and novel echocardiographic parameters were obtained. A p value in a 2-sided test <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Cox proportional hazards regression models were constructed, and both univariable and multivariable hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated. Results During a median follow-up time of 40 months, 171 patients (16.8%) died. A lower endocardial (HR 1.17; 95% CI (1.11–1.23), per 1% decrease, p<0.001), epicardial (HR 1.20; 95% CI (1.13–1.27), per 1% decrease, p<0.001), and whole wall (HR 1.20; 95% CI (1.14–1.27), per 1% decrease, p<0.001) GLS were all associated with higher risk of death (Figure 1). Both endocardial (HR 1.12; 95% CI (1.01–1.23), p=0.027), epicardial (HR 1.13; 95% CI (1.01–1.26), p=0.040) and whole wall (HR 1.13; 95% CI (1.01–1.27), p=0.030) GLS remained independent predictors of mortality in the multivariable models after adjusting for significant clinical parameters (age, sex, total cholesterol, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, ischemic cardiomyopathy, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and diabetes) and conventional echocardiographic parameters (left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction, LV mass index, left atrial volume index, deceleration time, E/e', E-velocity, E/A ratio and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion). No other echocardiographic parameters remained an independent predictors after adjusting. Furthermore, endocardial, epicardial and whole wall GLS had the highest C-statistics of all the echocardiographic parameters. Conclusion Endocardial, epicardial and whole wall GLS are independent predictors of all-cause mortality in patients with HFrEF. Furthermore, endocardial, epicardial and whole wall GLS were superior prognosticators of all-cause mortality compared with all other echocardiographic parameters. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public hospital(s). Main funding source(s): Herlev and Gentofte Hospital

Download Full-text

Left ventricular fibrosis and hypertrophy are associated with mortality in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Scientific Reports ◽

10.1038/s41598-020-79729-6 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Pankaj Garg ◽

Hosamadin Assadi ◽

Rachel Jones ◽

Wei Bin Chan ◽

Peter Metherall ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Heart Failure ◽

Ejection Fraction ◽

T1 Mapping ◽

Left Ventricular ◽

Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽

Native T1 ◽

Lv Mass ◽

All Cause Mortality ◽

Ventricular Fibrosis

AbstractCardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is emerging as an important tool in the assessment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). This study sought to investigate the prognostic value of multiparametric CMR, including left and right heart volumetric assessment, native T1-mapping and LGE in HFpEF. In this retrospective study, we identified patients with HFpEF who have undergone CMR. CMR protocol included: cines, native T1-mapping and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). The mean follow-up period was 3.2 ± 2.4 years. We identified 86 patients with HFpEF who had CMR. Of the 86 patients (85% hypertensive; 61% males; 14% cardiac amyloidosis), 27 (31%) patients died during the follow up period. From all the CMR metrics, LV mass (area under curve [AUC] 0.66, SE 0.07, 95% CI 0.54–0.76, p = 0.02), LGE fibrosis (AUC 0.59, SE 0.15, 95% CI 0.41–0.75, p = 0.03) and native T1-values (AUC 0.76, SE 0.09, 95% CI 0.58–0.88, p < 0.01) were the strongest predictors of all-cause mortality. The optimum thresholds for these were: LV mass > 133.24 g (hazard ratio [HR] 1.58, 95% CI 1.1–2.2, p < 0.01); LGE-fibrosis > 34.86% (HR 1.77, 95% CI 1.1–2.8, p = 0.01) and native T1 > 1056.42 ms (HR 2.36, 95% CI 0.9–6.4, p = 0.07). In multivariate cox regression, CMR score model comprising these three variables independently predicted mortality in HFpEF when compared to NTproBNP (HR 4 vs HR 1.65). In non-amyloid HFpEF cases, only native T1 > 1056.42 ms demonstrated higher mortality (AUC 0.833, p < 0.01). In patients with HFpEF, multiparametric CMR aids prognostication. Our results show that left ventricular fibrosis and hypertrophy quantified by CMR are associated with all-cause mortality in patients with HFpEF.

Download Full-text

Very early detection of low dose anti-cancer therapy-related cardiotoxicity in lymphoma patients

European Heart Journal ◽

10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.3257 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽

Author(s):

Y.W Liu ◽

H.Y Chang ◽

C.H Lee ◽

W.C Tsai ◽

P.Y Liu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Heart Failure ◽

Cancer Therapy ◽

Cardiac Dysfunction ◽

Systolic Dysfunction ◽

Multivariable Analysis ◽

Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test ◽

Left Ventricular ◽

Funding Source ◽

Anti Cancer ◽

All Cause Mortality

Abstract Background and purpose Left ventricular (LV) global peak systolic longitudinal strain (GLS) by speckle-tracking echocardiography is a sensitive modality for the detection of subclinical LV systolic dysfunction and a powerful prognostic predictor. However, the clinical implication of LV GLS in lymphoma patients receiving anti-cancer therapy remains unknown. Methods We prospectively enrolled 74 patients (57.9±17.0 years old, 57% male) with lymphoma who underwent echocardiography prior to chemotherapy, post 3rd and 6th cycle and 1 year after chemotherapy. Cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) is defined as the reduction of absolute GLS value from baseline of ≥15%. All the eligible patients underwent a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) upon completion of 3 cycles of anti-cancer therapy. The primary outcome was defined as a composite of all-cause mortality and heart failure events. Results Among 36 (49%) patients with CTRCD, LV GLS was significantly decreased after the 3rd cycle of chemotherapy (20.1±2.6% vs. 17.5±2.3%, p<0.001). In the multivariable analysis, male sex and anemia (hemoglobin <11 g/dL) were found to be independent risk factors of CTRCD. Objectively, patients with CTRCD had lower minute oxygen consumption/kg (VO2/kg) and lower VO2/kg value at anaerobic threshold in the CPET. The incidence of the primary composite outcome was higher in the CTRCD group than in the non-CTRCD group (hazard ratio 3.21; 95% CI, 1.04–9.97; p=0.03). Conclusion LV GLS is capable of detecting early cardiac dysfunction in lymphoma patients receiving anti-cancer therapy. Patients with CTRCD not only had a reduced exercise capacity but also a higher risk of all-cause mortality and heart failure events. Change of LVEF and GLS after cancer Tx Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): The Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST), Taiwan

Download Full-text