O-094 Utilization of ultrastructural analysis and genomics of spermatozoa to better characterize subtle forms of male factor infertility

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Hancock ◽  
P Xie ◽  
S Cheung ◽  
Z Rosenwaks ◽  
G Palermo

Abstract Study question Can sequencing the sperm genome provide insight into the various forms of male factor infertility caused by sperm organelle ultrastructural defects? Summary answer A comprehensive genomic assessment of spermatozoal DNA is able to identify genetic causes of ultrastructural defects visualized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). What is known already To evaluate a man’s reproductive potential, a conventional semen analysis through the assessment of concentration, motility, and morphology can indicate the proficiency of male gametes. Among those, conventional morphology assay can only provide indirect information on the different components of the sperm cell. The assessment of nanoscopic details such as chromatin, centriolar, mitochondrial, and axonemal components can only be observed by TEM. Indeed, TEM has been used to identify defects in the acrosome, chromatin compaction, and axonemal/periaxonemal structures. Furthermore, exome sequencing of spermatozoal DNA may identify novel causes and candidate genes for these ultrastructural defects. Study design, size, duration In the past 2 years, 20 men with history of fertilization failure or severe astheno-/terato-zoospermia were selected for TEM analysis of their spermatozoa, while 3 fertile men served as controls. Sperm head characteristics, intactness of fibrous sheath, and axonemal/periaxonemal structure were examined by diagnostic TEM. For consenting patients, NGS assessment was concurrently performed to identify mutations responsible for the structural abnormalities identified by TEM. Participants/materials, setting, methods TEM was performed on the ejaculates of 20 infertile patients and 3 fertile controls. Post-centrifugation cell pellets were resuspended, fixed, and dehydrated to be infiltrated and embedded onto the resin. Fixed specimens were sliced by ultramicrotome to 100-nm sections, then viewed by JEOL-1400 electron microscope at 300,000X magnification. At least 100 spermatozoa were evaluated by TEM. For consenting patients, DNA was extracted and amplified from at least 500 spermatozoa for concurrent NGS analysis. Main results and the role of chance Four types of sperm ultrastructural defects were observed, including globozoospermia, dysplasia of fibrous sheath (DFS), proximal centriole defect, and primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD). One combined case of globozoospermia and DFS was identified. In globozoospermic patients (n = 13), 97-100% of the spermatozoa displayed characteristic spherical heads with absence of acrosomes, dispersed chromatin, and perinuclear theca deformities. Centrosomal and axonemal structures were conserved. NGS identified gene deletions (DPY19L, PICK1, SPATA16) directly related to the globozoospermic phenotype. In patients with DFS (n = 4), complete absence of flagellum was observed in 90-100% of spermatozoa. These defective gametes also displayed mitochondria disorganization, microtubular deformities, and cytoplasmic residues containing coiled flagellum with deformed capitulum within the plasma membrane. Contrary to the globozoospermia, acrosomes and nuclei appeared normal, indicating incomplete late spermiogenesis. Indeed, NGS confirmed gene deletions involved in flagellar development/function (AKAP4, SPAG16, CATSPER1). For the patient with proximal centriole defect (n = 1), sperm nucleus, fibrous sheath, and flagellar structure were conserved. However, 90% of proximal centrioles assessed exhibited microtubular disorganization, confirmed by ODF2 mutation per NGS. In the PCD patient (n = 1), chaotic flagellar microtubule arrangement and absence of outer dynein arms were prevalent in 90% of axonemal cross-sections examined, which was explained by a DNAH5 gene deletion. Limitations, reasons for caution While TEM can overcome the limitations of conventional semen analysis by providing direct visualization of the inner organelle arrangement of spermatozoa to accurately diagnose rare sperm pathologies, it is not routinely applied in clinics due to its high cost and technical specifications. Therefore, confirmatory NGS can provide additional diagnostic value. Wider implications of the findings Ultrastructural analysis with a concurrent genomic assessment characterized phenotypes and genotypes of rare sperm pathologies in infertile men. The utilization of TEM, corroborated by genomic assay, is therefore crucial for clinical and translational reproductive medicine to better characterize male factor infertility. Trial registration number N/A

Reproduction ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 154 (6) ◽  
pp. F93-F110 ◽  
Author(s):  
G D Palermo ◽  
C L O’Neill ◽  
S Chow ◽  
S Cheung ◽  
A Parrella ◽  
...  

Among infertile couples, 25% involve both male and female factors, while male factor alone accounts for another 25% due to oligo-, astheno-, teratozoospermia, a combination of the three, or even a complete absence of sperm cells in the ejaculate and can lead to a poor prognosis even with the help of assisted reproductive technology (ART). Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) has been with us now for a quarter of a century and in spite of the controversy generated since its inception, it remains in the forefront of the techniques utilized in ART. The development of ICSI in 1992 has drastically decreased the impact of male factor, resulting in millions of pregnancies worldwide for couples who, without ICSI, would have had little chance of having their own biological child. This review focuses on the state of the art of ICSI regarding utility of bioassays that evaluate male factor infertility beyond the standard semen analysis and describes the current application and advances in regard to ICSI, particularly the genetic and epigenetic characteristics of spermatozoa and their impact on reproductive outcome.


2019 ◽  
pp. 555-580
Author(s):  
John Reynard ◽  
Simon F Brewster ◽  
Suzanne Biers ◽  
Naomi Laura Neal

Male factor infertility is outlined in an easily digestible format to provide clear information on this sometimes less familiar topic, starting with the basics of male reproductive physiology, the hypothalamic–pituitary–testicular axis, and spermatogenesis. This chapter includes a review of the aetiologies of abnormal sperm counts (with particular emphasis on azoospermia and oligospermia), relevant clinical assessment, and key male factor infertility investigations such as semen analysis, hormone measurement, karyotying, imaging, and testicular biopsy. The chapter explains the management options for the infertile male and couple, including information on the different assisted reproductive techniques. The chapter covers additional important clinical and exam topics, including varicoceles, indications for repair in males of different ages, red flag signs that should trigger further investigation, and the treatment options of embolization and surgical repair. The fourth edition also includes the addition of new material exploring the pros and cons of vasectomy and vasectomy reversal.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Berhe Tesfai ◽  
Fitsum Kibreab ◽  
Hailemichael Gebremariam ◽  
Liwam Abraham

Abstract Background Semen analysis is the first step to identify male factor infertility. World Health Organization estimates that male factor accounts for 50% of couple sub-fertility. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence and patterns of male factor infertility based on semen analysis in patients visiting Massawa Hospital with infertility complaints. Methods It was a retrospective, descriptive cross sectional hospital based type of study with a census sampling method. Patient’s medical records and hospital laboratory register were used to retrieve semen analysis results of patients from June 2018 to June 2020. Ethical approval was obtained from the Ministry of Health Research and Ethical Review Committee. Confidentiality of patients records kept was secured and consent was obtained from study participants to use their data. Results were presented in frequency, tables and p value < 0.05 was considered significant. Results A total of 112 patients data was analyzed in the study with 49.1% were aged between 20 to 30 years. The prevalence of male factor infertility in these patients was found to be 42% and 79.5% of them had primary type of infertility. Of the study participants; 63 (56.3%), 72 (64.3%) and 70 (62.5%) had sperm count < 15 million sperms/ml, sperm motility < 40 % and morphology of < 60% respectively. One tenth, 15 (13.4%) of the patients had a semen volume of < 1.5ml/ejaculate, out of which 13(86.7%) had primary type of infertility. Moreover; 72 (64.3%) patients had total sperm count/ejaculate of < 39 million and 59 (82%) of these had primary type of infertility. In addition; 50.8% and 50% of patients aged 20 to 30 years had a sperm count < 15 million/ml and sperm motility of < 40% respectively. Conclusion The prevalence of male factor infertility was slightly higher and was dominated with primary infertility. Most patients had lower sperm count, sperm motility but higher semen volume, and majority of the patients with abnormal sperm results were aged between 20 to 30 years. Further prospective researches to determine the risk factors for male infertility and introducing assisted type of fertility in Eritrea are highly recommended.


Author(s):  
Jyoti Garg ◽  
Rachana Meena ◽  
Shailaja Shukla ◽  
Sunita Sharma ◽  
Riva Choudhury

Background: In India, the prevalence of primary infertility ranges from 3.9% to 16.8%. Male factor contributes 40-50% of this. Male factor infertility is indicated by decreased sperm concentration, reduced motility, vitality or abnormal sperm morphology. Semen analysis is the single most important investigation to detect male factor infertility. The aim of this study was to analyse the prevalence of abnormal semen parameters among males in infertile couples and their association with contributing factors.Methods: This cross-sectional hospital-based study was carried out in the Department of Pathology at Lady Hardinge Medical College and Smt. Sucheta Kriplani Hospital. A total of 400 cases were analyzed during a period of 6 months. Detailed history of the couple was taken. Semen analysis was done using automated semen analyzer (SQA-vision) after 3 days of abstinence according to the WHO 5th edition 2010 guidelines. The results were analysed using excel sheet and SPSS software.Results: In the present study, 122 cases (30.5%) out of 400 cases had abnormal semen parameters. Most common abnormality detected was asthenozoospermia (14.3%) followed by oligozoospermia (13.8%), azoospermia (10.5%) and teratozoospermia (10.5%). There was significant association of alcohol intake, obesity and trauma with abnormal semen parameters.Conclusions: Asthenozoospermia was the most common abnormality noted in this study. Lifestyle modifications along with timely medical attention in male partners of infertile couples can improve the semen quality.


2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 314-319
Author(s):  
Zeeba S Jairajpuri ◽  
Safia Rana ◽  
Manal Ashraf Ali ◽  
Mukta Pujani ◽  
Sujata Jetley

Background:Infertilityis defined as failure of a couple to conceive after one year of regular sexual intercourse. It remains both prevalent and problematic among couples worldwide. The analysis of semen remains the preliminary investigation for males in the workup of infertility in couples.It is a key element in the fertility evaluation of men and permits male reproductive potential to be evaluated in association with possible risk factors.Aim: To assess and analyse the semen characteristics of all the males who presented to our hospital, irrespective of primary or secondary infertility.Material and Methods: This is an observational study conducted in the Department of Pathology, Hamdard Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi; from Jan 2012 to Oct 2013. Semen of 139 subjects were evaluated and results analyzed.Results: The present study included 139 subjects whose age ranged from 22 years to 48 years with a mean age of 29.42 years. Patients were divided into oligospermia[17%], normospermia[16%] and azoospermia[9%]. 42.5% of the cases had sperm counts in the range of 51-80million/ml. Asthenospermia was seen in 22.1% of the cases.An age specific comparative analysis of the mean sperm counts, total motility and normal morphology revealed a decline in the aaverage values of these parameters with age.Conclusions: Routine semen analysis remains the backbone of the evaluation of the male factor infertility, but it is important to acknowledge the limitation of semen analysis with respect to collection, processing, evaluation, biological variation of the parameters and lack of information on sperm function. A normal semen analysis does not guarantee the fertilization potential of sperm.Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science Vol.16(2) 2017 p.314-319


2018 ◽  
Vol 110 (3) ◽  
pp. 419-428.e1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle M. Denomme ◽  
Blair R. McCallie ◽  
Jason C. Parks ◽  
Keith Booher ◽  
William B. Schoolcraft ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document