The Role and Functioning of Mutual Recognition in the European Market of Financial Services

2007 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 309-338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo Ortino
Keyword(s):  
Financial Services ◽  
Market Integration ◽  
Mutual Recognition ◽  
National Level ◽  
European Market ◽  
Important Distinction ◽  
Services Sector ◽  
European Court ◽  
Rule Making

AbstractIn Europe part of the rule-making and the whole enforcement of financial services regulation still take place at national level. For this reason, mutual recognition of national financial laws remains an element of central importance in the creation and regulation of a European market in this field. This article seeks to contribute to the analysis of such legal instrument, as several aspects of its functioning often appear unclear. The article starts by analysing the principle of mutual recognition as developed by the European Court of Justice. An important distinction is drawn between such judicially created principle and the principle of mutual recognition applied by the EC legislator. The article then looks at the question of why mutual recognition has not succeeded as a regulatory mechanism of financial services market integration, and at the role of mutual recognition after the introduction of the so-called ‘Lamfalussy’ law-making process to the financial services sector.

scholarly journals PERAN OTORITAS JASA KEUANGAN TERHADAP PENGAWASAN LEMBAGA KEUANGAN DI INDONESIA

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (02) ◽  
pp. 177-188
Author(s):  
Annisa Arifka Sari
Keyword(s):  
Capital Market ◽  
Financial Services ◽  
Financial Service ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Services Sector ◽  
Financial Services Sector ◽  
Stable Manner ◽  
The Government

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan peran Otoritas Jasa Keuangan sebagai lembaga independen dalam melakukan pengawasan terhadap lembaga jasa keuangan di Indonesia serta kewenangan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan yang diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2011 tentang Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif. Dari hasil penelitian dijelaskan bahwa Otoritas Jasa Keuangan adalah lembaga yang independen dan bebas dari campur tangan pihak lain, yang mempunyai fungsi, tugas, dan wewenang pengaturan, pengawasan, pemeriksaan, dan penyidikan terhadap lembaga jasa keuangan seperti perbankan. Dasar hukum dibentuknya Otoritas Jasa Keuangan adalah Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2011. Secara kelembagaan, Otoritas Jasa Keuangan berada di luar pemerintah, yang dimaknai bahwa Otoritas Jasa Keuangan tidak menjadi bagian dari kekuasaan pemerintah. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan dibentuk dengan tujuan agar keseluruhan kegiatan di dalam sektor jasa keuangan terselenggara secara teratur, adil, transparan, dan akuntabel; mampu mewujudkan sistem keuangan yang tumbuh secara berkelanjutan dan stabil; serta mampu melindungi kepentingan konsumen dan masyarakat. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan bertugas tidak hanya mengatur dan mengawasi perbankan saja, tetapi juga mencakup pasar modal, perasuransian, dana pensiun, lembaga pembiayaan, serta lembaga jasa keuangan lainnya.    THE ROLE OF FINANCIAL SERVICES AUTHORITY ON SUPERVISION OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS IN INDONESIA This research aims to explain the role of the Financial Services Authority as an independent institution in supervising financial service institutions in Indonesia as well as the authority of the Financial Services Authority as regulated in Law Number 21 of 2011 concerning the Financial Services Authority. The method used in this research is normative legal research. From the research results, it is explained that the Financial Services Authority is an independent institution and free from interference from other parties, which has the function, task and authority to regulate, supervise, examine and investigate financial service institutions such as banks. The legal basis for the establishment of the Financial Services Authority is Law Number 21 of 2011. Institutionally, the Financial Services Authority is outside the government, which means that the Financial Services Authority is not part of the government's power. The Financial Services Authority was formed with the aim that all activities in the financial services sector are carried out in an orderly, fair, transparent and accountable manner; able to realize a financial system that grows in a sustainable and stable manner; and able to protect the interests of consumers and society. The Financial Services Authority is tasked with not only regulating and supervising banking, but also covering the capital market, insurance, pension funds, financing institutions, and other financial service institutions.    

scholarly journals The Role of Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (Financial Services Authority) in Supervising Sharia Banking Products in Indonesia

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 375-384
Author(s):  
Ida Hanifah
Keyword(s):  
Financial Services ◽  
Financial System ◽  
System Stability ◽  
Islamic Banking ◽  
Services Sector ◽  
Financial Services Sector ◽  
Product Service ◽  
Moral Damage ◽  
Effective Supervision

The number of cross-sectoral issues in the financial services sector including Islamic banking, which includes moral hazard measures, lack of optimal protection of financial services, and the disruption of financial system stability increasingly encourage the need for the establishment of a supervisory institution in the integrated financial services sector. The source of moral damage in the management of the economy encourages the establishment of newsupervision institutions, more accountable and has a tighter function in overseeing the financial system so that it can better guarantee the achievement of financial system stability. Based on that, Financial Services Authority was formed. Various regulations that have been and will be made by the Financial Services Authority related to Islamic banking are expected to be able to provide protection for the Islamic banking industry as well as spur the development of Islamic banking in Indonesia. More comprehensive and effective supervision of sharia banking is needed along with the increase in market players, product / service variants, and increasingly innovative and complex technological advancements. During this time the existence of Financial Services Authority for Islamic banking has not felt its existence. Financial Services Authority Law is still silent on sharia-based financial services.

4 Criminal Prosecutions by Regulators—Procedural Considerations

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Russen Jonathan ◽  
Kingham Robin
Keyword(s):  
Financial Services ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Services Sector ◽  
Financial Services Sector ◽  
Discrete Area ◽  
Evidence Collection ◽  
Court Proceedings

This chapter examines the role of the FCA and the PRA as prosecuting authorities and their right to bring criminal proceedings in pursuit of their regulatory objectives as enshrined in the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA). The FCA and the PRA are not the only agencies responsible for the prosecution of criminal offences in the financial services sector; the jurisdiction of the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) in particular often overlaps with that of the FCA and the two agencies can work in tandem. Meanwhile, although a discrete area of criminal practice, the regulators’ powers to administer a caution to an offender should not be overlooked—particularly in the context of ongoing investigations. Acceptance of a caution can provide an offender with a way of avoiding conviction and sanction whilst offering the prosecutor an ‘easy win’ without the need for costly court proceedings. The chapter then considers key procedural issues as well as the importance of evidence collection and deployment in financial services prosecutions.

scholarly journals The Role of ‘Digitalization’ in German Sustainability Bank Reporting

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florian Diener ◽  
Miroslav Špaček
Keyword(s):  
Financial Services ◽  
Banking Sector ◽  
Business Environment ◽  
Current Analysis ◽  
Structural Inequality ◽  
Services Sector ◽  
Financial Services Sector ◽  
Further Development ◽  
Insight Into

The financial services sector, particularly with respect to today’s banking industry, is aiming to make a digital transition. Sustainable reporting is a holistic new reporting approach in banking and has only become partially mandatory for the sector. Thus, this paper makes a contribution to the current analysis approach and further development of the German Sustainability Code as well as associated legal approaches. It concerns the assessment of mandatory sustainable reporting in the light of constantly changing market conditions and stricter legal requirements for stakeholder data responsibility. In specific, it focuses on a digital evolving business environment and is intended to provide an insight into the perception of the topic of digitalization in the banking sector. The assessment is based on the structure of the German Sustainability Code. Based on 113 bank reports, a multiple regression analysis of 1410 codings of the keyword ‘digital’ is carried out. The results show that banks partly and not fully address digital issues in their reporting. It transpires that the emphasis is on seven criteria, while social elements are totally ignored. The paper shows a structural inequality within sustainable bank reporting with regard to digitalization. It also shows that issues are not adequately addressed and covered in legal reporting standards and that the provision of information to stakeholders on specific issues is largely undefined.

Association between performance measurement systems and organisational effectiveness

2014 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. 853-875 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bedanand Upadhaya ◽  
Rahat Munir ◽  
Yvette Blount
Keyword(s):  
Performance Measurement ◽  
Performance Measures ◽  
Financial Services ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Services Sector ◽  
Measurement Systems ◽  
Organisational Effectiveness ◽  
Financial Services Sector ◽  
Performance Measurement Systems

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate the role of performance measurement systems in organisational effectiveness in the context of the financial services sector within a developing country. Design/methodology/approach – Using the mail survey method data were collected from 69 financial institutions operating in Nepal. Multivariate analysis, in particular multiple regression analysis was employed to test the hypotheses. Findings – The results suggest that non-financial measures and feedback are tightly intertwined with organisational effectiveness. While institutions are focused on using the performance measures concerning internal business process perspective, less emphasis is placed on using customer and employee-related performance measures because they are considered less significant to organisational effectiveness. The findings also reveal that strategy-related feedback is considered more critical by management, as opposed to performance and staff. The study also provides evidence that 40.58 per cent of the financial institutions in Nepal had implemented the Balanced Scorecard, which is considered to be high when compared with other developing countries. Practical implications – The findings provide managers with valuable insights pertaining to the role of non-financial performance measures and the importance of feedback in improving organisational effectiveness, which could assist them in (re) aligning their performance measurement practices. Originality/value – The findings of this study contributes to the limited management accounting literature on performance measurement and the impact on organisational effectiveness by providing evidence from the financial services sector within the context of a developing country.

scholarly journals PERAN OTORITAS JASA KEUANGAN DALAM PENYELESAIAN PENGADUAN KONSUMEN SEKTOR JASA KEUANGAN

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 236
Author(s):  
Marwah Marwah
Keyword(s):  
Empirical Research ◽  
Consumer Protection ◽  
Financial Services ◽  
Accurate Information ◽  
Business Service ◽  
Services Sector ◽  
Consumer Complaints ◽  
Financial Services Sector ◽  
Laws And Regulations

Abstract                Under the provisions of Article 22 paragraph (1) of the Financial Services Authority Regulation No. 1/POJK.07/2013 on Consumer Protection of the Financial Services Sector, whereas in the case of Business Service Actors using standard agreements, such standard agreements shall be prepared in accordance with the laws and regulations . However, based on the results of the research, in the current banking practice, the agreement format has been prepared unilaterally by the bank in the form of standard conditions set forth in the printed form, and then presented to applicant debtor for approval. This study aimed to find out about the role of the Financial Services Authority as a facilitator in providing accurate information and provide facilities for the settlement of consumer complaints. This research was an empirical research conducted in Makassar city. The results indicated that the Financial Services Authority as a facilitator, not optimal in protecting the mortgage debtor.Key Word : Role of the Financial Services Authority, Debtor Protection Abstrak             Berdasarkan ketentuan Pasal 22 ayat (1) Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 1/POJK.07/2013 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen Sektor Jasa Keuangan, bahwa dalam hal Pelaku Usaha Jasa Keuangan menggunakan perjanjian baku, maka perjanjian baku tersebut wajib disusun sesuai dengan peraturan perundang-undangan. Namun, berdasarkan hasil penelitian, dalam praktik perbankan saat ini, format perjanjian telah disiapkan secara sepihak oleh pihak bank berupa syarat-syarat baku yang dituangkan dalam formulir yang sudah dicetak, dan kemudian disodorkan kepada calon nasabah debitor untuk disetujui. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui mengenai peran Otoritas Jasa Keuangan sebagai fasilitator dalam menyediakan informasi yang akurat serta memberikan fasilitas penyelesaian pengaduan konsumen. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian empiris yang dilaksanakan di kota Makassar. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Otoritas Jasa Keuangan sebagai fasilitator, belum optimal dalam melindungi debitor Kredit Pemilikan Rumah.Kata Kunci : Peran Otoritas Jasa Keuangan, Perlindungan Debitor   

scholarly journals Peran Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) dalam Mengawasi Maraknya Pelayanan Financial Technology (Fintech) di Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 559
Author(s):  
Elvira Fitriyani Pakpahan ◽  
Jessica Jessica ◽  
Corris Winar ◽  
Andriaman Andriaman
Keyword(s):  
Financial Services ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Electronic Money ◽  
Services Sector ◽  
Digital Money ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Moment ◽  
Financial Transactions ◽  
Financial Technology

The purpose of this research is to give insights on how Fintech and the role of OJK in supervising the services of Fintech in Indonesia. The presence of Fintech in Indonesia greatly helps citizens in accessing and provide easiness in financial transactions. At the moment, Fintech provides several functions that are believed to develop rapidly and Fintech also provides services on electronic money, virtual account, aggregator, lending, crowdfunding and other online monetary transactions. Various businesses that are part of Fintech are startups and online businesses. Therefore, the government should provide legal protection in order to protect both parties, the business organizers and the possible customers. In this case, business organizers with legal Fintech development have potential that is related to consumer protection, stable financial system, economy, and payment methods. The method of the research that is used in conducting this journal is the applied law research method. This research is using normative law with the facts approach and Constitution approach. In this case, Bank Indonesia has issued the Bank Indonesia Regulation No. 18/40/PBI/2016 about the implementation of the payment transaction and the Bank Indonesia Regulation No. 19/12/PBI/2017 about the implementation of Financial Technology. Along with OJK Regulation No. 13/POJK.02/2018 about the innovation of digital money in the financial services sector as a provision that covers the supervision and stipulates financial technology (fintech) industry issued by Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK). Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk memberikan pengetahuan bagaimana Fintech dan peran OJK dalam mengawasi maraknya pelayanan Fintech di Indonesia. Munculnya Fintech di Indonesia sangat membantu masyarakat untuk mengakses dan mempermudah transaksi keuangan. Saat ini, Fintech memiliki berbagai fungsi yang diyakini mampu berkembang cepat dan Fintech mampu melayani electronic money, virtual account, agregator, lending, crowdfunding dan transaksi keuangan online lainnya. Berbagai usaha yang termasuk dalam Fintech adalah bisnis startup dan bisnis online. Dengan demikian Pemerintah harus memberikan suatu bentuk perlindungan hukum baik itu dari segi penyelenggara bisnis maupun untuk masyarakat yang berperan sebagai nasabah. Dalam hal ini, Pelaksanaan bisnis yang dijalankan secara legalitas untuk pengembangan fintechnya memiliki potensi resiko yang berhubungan dengan perlindungan konsumen, stabilitas sistem keuangan dan ekonomi ,serta sistem pembayaran. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penyusunan jurnal ini adalah metode hukum yuridis normatif. Dimana penelitian ini meneliti hukum secara normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan fakta dan pendekatan Undang-Undang. Dalam Hal ini Bank Indonesia (BI) mengeluarkan Peraturan Bank Indonesia No 18/40/PBI/2016 dan Peraturan Bank Indonesia No 19/12/PBI/2017 serta Peraturan OJK No. 13/POJK.02/2018 sebagai bentu pengawasan dan pengaturan industri financial technology (fintech) yang dikeluarkan oleh Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK).

scholarly journals Cyber Governance and the Financial Services Sector: The Role of Public-Private Partnerships

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valeria San Juan Menacho ◽  
Aaron Martin
Keyword(s):  
Information Sharing ◽  
Financial Services ◽  
Critical Infrastructure ◽  
Policy Coordination ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Public Private Partnerships ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Services Sector ◽  
Financial Services Sector

This contribution is the first to explore in depth the various financial services sector organizations focused on cybersecurity and critical infrastructure protection. We first discuss how governance over security and the protection of critical infrastructure has increased the focus on the role of public-private partnerships (PPPs) in addressing issues of cybersecurity. We continue by highlighting three sector-led bodies—the Financial Services Information Sharing and Analysis Center, the Financial Services Sector Coordinating Council, and the Financial Systemic Analysis and Resilience Center—and how each facilitates PPPs to address cyber challenges primarily in the areas of information sharing, policy coordination, and threat analytics, respectively. The chapter concludes with a discussion of lessons learned and remarks on future research avenues in the area of cybersecurity governance. These lessons include: 1) validation of the PPP model, with some important caveats, 2) the need to extend PPPs beyond information sharing to address systemic risks, and 3) the limitations of PPPs in regulated industries like finance.

The surrender of prosecuted persons under the EAW procedure: Issues of transposition of EU criminal policy to the national level

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-68
Author(s):  
Joanna Beata Banach-Gutierrez
Keyword(s):  
Mutual Recognition ◽  
National Level ◽  
Criminal Policy ◽  
Criminal Prosecution ◽  
Eu Member States ◽  
Polish Experience ◽  
European Arrest Warrant ◽  
National Citizenship ◽  
The Eu

This article deals with the transposition of European Union (EU) criminal policy to national justice systems, taking, as an example, the surrender of prosecuted persons under the European Arrest Warrant (EAW) procedure. In particular, attention is focused on the question about the limits of the application of mutual recognition in the event of executing the EAW that is also linked to the increasing role of punishment, as a measure for rehabilitation and reintegration of the offender into society. The author argues that national citizenship should be treated very carefully by judicial authorities in the EU Member States which are deciding on the surrender of the prosecuted person under the EAW procedure. This care should apply whether surrender is for the purposes of criminal prosecution, the execution of custodial sentences or in the case of the transfer of sentenced persons to their State of nationality under Council Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA. With this aim, the first section explains the possible functions of punishment in contemporary penology; the second section is devoted to the Court of Justice of the EU rulings which are crucial for the further developments of EU criminal policy; and the third section refers to the Polish experience in surrendering own nationals for the purposes of prosecution in the EAW issuing Member State.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document