scholarly journals Is stereotactic radiotherapy equivalent to metastasectomy in patients with pulmonary oligometastases?

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 544-550 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuangjiang Li ◽  
Shihong Nie ◽  
Zhiping Li ◽  
Guowei Che

Summary A best evidence topic in thoracic surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) was equivalent to metastasectomy in patients with pulmonary oligometastases arising from solid tumours. Altogether, 1612 papers were found using the reported search, of which 5 cohort studies derived from 4 patient populations represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. All 5 studies demonstrated no significant difference in post-treatment overall survival, disease-free survival or local control between SBRT and metastasectomy for pulmonary oligometastases. One of the 5 studies showed a significantly decreased rate of severe complications among the patients treated with SBRT. The other papers reported higher rates of complications in the SBRT groups, invariably due to radiation, but with uncertain clinical significance. The evidence strength of these findings may be largely attenuated due to the small sample size, heterogeneity of SBRT protocols and incomparable follow-up periods between the 2 treatment groups. The selection criteria for the choice of treatment were not stated. We conclude, based on limited evidence, that SBRT has equivalent outcomes to metastasectomy in the treatment of patients with pulmonary oligometastases.

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sameer Sharma ◽  
Umair Afzal ◽  
Mubashir Pervez ◽  
Rochele Clark ◽  
Julius G Latorre ◽  
...  

Introduction: Minor acute stroke (NIHSS≤4) within 4.5 hours from symptom onset is a common reason for withholding intravenous (iv) Thrombolysis (TPA), due to potential risk of major bleeding with such treatment and assumed good outcome without intervention. This subgroup of patients was excluded from the landmark NINDS iv tPA trial as per the prespecified protocol and also from various recent clinical trials involving acute stroke. In a recent study of patients with Rapid Improving symptoms and Minor stroke who did not receive IV tPA, 28.3% could not be discharged home and 28.5% could not ambulate independently at the time of discharge (Smith et al 2011). The efficacy of iv TPA in Minor stroke has not been previously studied. Method: Retrospective review of consecutive patients with Minor stroke (NIHSS ≤4) arriving within 4.5 hours between January 2009-July 2013 was done. Outcome in patients who received IV TPA was compared with patients who did not receive any IV tPA. Good outcome was defined as mRS ≤2. Results: 186 patients were identified out of which 20 received iv tPA. The baseline median NIHSS was 2 in the non-intervention group vs 3 in the intervention group (p =0.001), more cardioembolic, cryptogenic and lacunar stroke in tPA group (40% vs 35.53%, 20% vs 14.46% and 30% vs 22.89% respectively) there was no other statistically significant difference between the baseline characteristics of the two groups. Median change in NIHSS from admission to discharge was 1 for non-tPA vs 2.5 for tPA(p<0.001) and good outcome at discharge was seen in 80% patients in tPA vs 69.28% in non-tpa group (p =0.321). 8-12 week follow up data was available for 100 patients (12 tPA patients). Mean mRS was 1.34 in non-tPA vs 1 in tPA group (p=0.430) Conclusion: Acute intervention in Minor stroke appears to be safe. We did not find any statistically significant difference in clinical outcome between the two groups; this is likely due to small sample size, short follow-up period, and other confounding factors that we cannot fully account for in a retrospective study. A prospective randomized control study is warranted to clearly delineate the effect of iv TPA in patients with Minor stroke.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 647-654 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nickul Saral Jain ◽  
Ailene Nguyen ◽  
Blake Formanek ◽  
Ram Alluri ◽  
Zorica Buser ◽  
...  

Study Design: Retrospective review of insurance database.Purpose: To investigate national trends, complications, and costs after cervical disc replacement (CDR) using an administrative insurance database representative of the United States population.Overview of Literature: As CDR continues to be used to treat patients with cervical stenosis, it is important to gain a better understanding of its use on a national level, potential complications, and cost. This information will allow for optimal patient counseling, risk stratification, and healthcare cost assessments. Several prior studies have investigated complications associated with CDR, but they have been limited by small sample size, single institution experiences, limited follow-up, and potential conflicts of interest.Methods: Patients who underwent single or multilevel CDR between 2007 and 2015 were identified using an insurance database. We collected data on annual trends, reimbursement costs, patient demographic information, hospital information, and information on complications from the time of operation to 1 year postoperative.Results: Total of 293 patients underwent either single or multilevel CDR. The number of procedures increased nonlinearly over time at an average of 17% per year, with a greater increase seen in the outpatient setting. Less than 3.7% of patients had new onset pain within 1 year after CDR. Within 1 year, 12.3% of patients reported a mechanical and/or bone-related complication. There were no patients who indicated a new nerve injury within 6 months of follow-up. Less than 3.7% of patients presented with dysphagia or dysphonia within 6 months, infection within 3 months, or a revision or reoperation within 1 year. Average reimbursement for single-level inpatient versus outpatient CDR was US $33,696.28 and US $34,675.12, respectively (p =0.29).Conclusions: This study demonstrated that the use of CDR continued to increase. The most common complication was mechanical and/or bone-related, and cost analysis demonstrated no significant difference between inpatient and outpatient CDR.


Rheumatology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 60 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry J S Vardon ◽  
Karen M J Douglas

Abstract Background/Aims  Baricitinib is an oral, reversible and selective inhibitor of JAK1 and JAK2 tyrosine kinases. It was approved for use in 2017 by NICE for the treatment of moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Considering the current risk of COVID-19, the BSR have advocated the use of short-acting drugs such as baricitinib when escalating treatment in RA. As real-world data is limited, we aimed to explore the efficacy of baricitinib in clinical practice. Methods  Observational data was collected retrospectively for patients at the Dudley Group NHSFT with RA (ACR/EULAR criteria) who had received at least one dose of baricitinib prior to 1st October 2019, with a follow up period to 1st October 2020. Patients were identified from a local biologics database. Further data was identified from patients’ medical records including, demographics, features of RA, previous RA therapy history and disease activity scores (DAS28) at 0, 6 and 12 months. Data was input into an Excel spreadsheet with subsequent analysis conducted using SPSS Version26. Results  We identified 26 RA patients (77% female) treated with baricitinib; mean age 61.6 (SD 14.6) years and median disease duration of 12.1 (IQR 5.8-18.4) years. Rheumatoid factor and anti-CCP antibody were positive in 73% and 65% respectively. 35% (n = 9) of patients were biologically naïve, in whom baricitinib was chosen due to needle-phobia (n = 7), or where anti-TNF drugs were considered inappropriate (bronchiectasis, ANA positivity). Mean DAS28 (SD) scores at baseline, 6 and 12 months were 5.9(0.8), 2.8(0.9) and 2.7(1.3) respectively, with significant reduction from baseline to both 6 and 12 months (P &lt; 0.001). A drop of ≥ 1.2 in DAS28 was recorded in 94% of patients with complete data at 6 months (n = 18, 4 missing, 4 discontinued). At 6 and 12 months, 85% and 81% of patients remained on Baricitinib. In total five patients discontinued Baricitinib due to side effects or tolerability issues. Reasons for discontinuation did not include thromboembolic events, zoster or serious infections. When comparing naïve and non-naïve groups, there was no significant difference in age, sex or disease duration. The number of previous biologics used by patients were 1(n = 6), 2(n = 3), ≥3(n = 8). Biologically naive compared to non-naïve patients had a higher DAS28 at baseline, (Mean [SD]) (6.2[0.9] versus 5.7[0.8] NS) but lower at 6 months (2.1[1.6] versus 3.1[1.1] P = 0.023) and greater DAS improvement at 6months (-4.4[1.2] versus -2.5[0.9] P &lt; 0.002). Conclusion  We observed that up to 94% of patients responded to baricitinib with a mean DAS improvement at 6 months of -3.1, biologic naïve patients doing best. Drug survival at 12 months was 81%. These trends are comparable to findings in clinical trials. However, due to our small sample size, the findings are vulnerable to type 1 and 2 errors and should be interpreted with caution. Disclosure  H.J.S. Vardon: None. K.M.J. Douglas: None.


2009 ◽  
Vol 101 (05) ◽  
pp. 852-859 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ponnudurai Kuperan ◽  
Chin Hin Ng ◽  
Heng Joo Ng ◽  
Ai Leen Ang

SummaryAcquired factor V(FV) inhibitors as a rare bleeding disorder, poses a formidable challenge to treating physicians with limited evidence to guide its management. We systematically reviewed our experience in Singapore and the published literature to determine possible answers to clinical questions formulated on the manifestation and best management of non-bovine thrombin and non-congenital acquired FV inhibitors. The incidence in Singapore was 0.09 cases per million person years (3 cases over 10 years). Seventy-three other cases meeting pre-defined search criteria were found in the published literature. Bleeding occurred in 68.4% of these patients, with mucous membranes being the most common site. Intracranial and retroperitoneal bleeds carried the highest mortality. The mortality rate from bleeding was 12%. There was a tendency for FV levels and PT/aPTT prolongation to predict bleeding but not the inhibitor level. No consistently effective haemostatic agent could be determined, but platelet transfusion should probably be the first line therapy. Among bleeding patients, inhibitors tended to disappear faster with inhibitor elimination therapy (IET) compared to without IET (60 vs. 150 days, p=0.299). IET made no significant difference among non-bleeding patients (p=0.511) and is thus recommended for bleeding patients or those with high bleeding risk. Steroids as single agent IET was effective in the majority of patients. Logical management approaches may be drawn but are limited by small sample size, heterogeneity of reports, and potential publication bias. The inception of a comprehensive registry will provide more reliable data that may verify our findings.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 406-406
Author(s):  
Hanbo Zhang ◽  
Nimira S. Alimohamed ◽  
Naveen S. Basappa ◽  
Tina Cheng ◽  
Michael Chu ◽  
...  

406 Background: HDC-ASCT is a standard therapy for patients (pts) with mGCTs whose disease progresses on or after conventional dose chemotherapy. We conducted a retrospective review of HDC-ASCT in pts with relapsed mCGT in Alberta over the past two decades. Methods: Pts with mGCTs who received HDC-ASCT at two provincial referral cancer centers in Alberta, Canada from 2001-2018 were identified. Baseline clinical and treatment characteristics were collected as well as overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Relevant prognostic variables were analyzed. Results: Forty three pts were identified. Median age was 28 years (range 19 – 56). Majority (95%) had non-seminoma histology and testis/retroperitoneal primary (84%). Twenty pts (47%) had poor risk disease as per IGCCC at start of first-line chemotherapy. HDC-ASCT was used as second-line therapy in 65% and 58% received tandem HDC-ASCT. Median follow-up from ASCT was 22 months (range 2 – 181). At last follow-up, 42% of pts are alive without disease, including 3/7 (43%) of pts with primary mediastinal disease. Two-year and 5-year DFS/OS were 44%/51% and 41%/43%, respectively. Median OS and DFS for all pts were 27.9 months (10.2 – NR) and 9.3 months (4.2 – 124), respectively. Conclusions: We found that HDC-ASCT is an effective salvage therapy in mGCT, consistent with existing literature. Pts appeared to benefit regardless of primary site. Though limited by small sample size, we found a numerical difference in DFS and OS between 2nd and 3rd line HDC-ASCT and single vs. tandem ASCT.[Table: see text]


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 4925-4925
Author(s):  
Rosario Di Maggio ◽  
Matthew Hsieh ◽  
Courtney Fitzhugh ◽  
Xiongce Zhao ◽  
Giusi Calvaruso ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Since HU has been FDA-approved for patients with SCD, it is not clear what proportion are taking a therapeutic dose (≥15mg/kg/day). There is also inadequate reporting of the frequency of HU dose modification during follow-up, or whether those who were treated with subtherapeutic doses (<15mg/kg/day) benefit from HU. We conducted this analysis to answer these important questions in a single center in Palermo, Italy. Methods: Patients were enrolled at the Haematology Department of Ospedale V. Cervello between January 2000 and April 2014. Laboratory parameters and frequency of vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC) and acute chest syndrome (ACS) were recorded. Blood counts, fetal hemoglobin (HbF) response, and changes in SCD complications were compared between the first and last visits to the clinic and across these 3 groups: patients who never took HU were combined with those who suspended HU before the last visit (no HU group, n=50, 36%); HU <15mg/kg (n=30, 21%); or HU ≥15mg/kg (n=60, 43%). Results: There were a total of 140 patients: 25 HbSS, 54 HbSβ0thal, and 61 HbSβ+thal. Median follow-up was 6.6 years. The median age was 35 years (range 0.4-61 years). 28% of patients never took HU, and 8% suspended HU treatment during the follow-up. Among patients taking <15mg/kg HU at first visit, about half stayed in the same dose range (<15mg/Kg/day) and half increased to the ≥15mg/kg dose range. Among patient taking ≥15 mg/kg, 17% decreased to <15mg/Kg/day due to cytopenia; 83% stayed on the ≥15 mg/kg. White blood cell (WBC) counts were lower in both HU groups, but comparing first and last visits, the change in WBC within each group was insignificant (P all >0.05, Table 1). Similarly, the change in total hemoglobin levels within each group was also insignificant (P all >0.05). HbF decreased in the no HU group, likely due to maturing age of 2 young children included in this group. Both HU treatment groups had modest increases in HbF (P=0.004, 0.001). With respect to SCD complications, the no HU group had less severe disease at the first visit, with lower percent of subjects with and fewer episodes of VOC and ACS (Table 2). While there was an increase in both VOC and ACS with time, this increase was not statistically significant. Both HU treatment groups had a significant reduction in both complications (p<0.0001 in both), and the magnitude of reduction was similar. The pattern of reduction appeared to be similar in all SCD phenotypes, but the small sample size precluded subtype analysis. Comparing changes in laboratory markers of liver and kidney function as well as TRV and ejection fraction between the first and last visit showed no significant differences. Conclusions: About one third of patients with SCD never took or discontinued HU. While these patients may have less severe disease initially, their rates of complications increased during follow-up. Among those taking HU, dose adjustment was common. HU increased HbF and is associated with reducing VOC and ACS. Since the increase in HbF and changes in HU dosing parameters were only modest in patients even on the highest HU doses, titrating HU to the maximum HbF response should be explored in order to improve markers of organ function. Table 1: Hematologic parameters based on HU status First Visit Last Visit NO HU HU <15mg/kg HU >15mg/kg NO HU HU <15mg/kg HU >15mg/kg WBC (k/uL) 11.2 8.74* 10.9 10.7 7.8* 8.3* Hgb (g/dL) 10.0 10.2 10.0 10.2 9.7 9.9 HbF (%) 11.9** 9.4* 10.7* 7.7 11.7* 12.8* *P<0.05 compared to no HU group **includes 4 subjects with hereditary persistent of HbF and 2 children aged 3 months. Table 2: SCD complications based on HU status VOC ACS % of subjects Crisis per patient per year % of subjects Mean episodes per patient F V L V F V L V F V L V F V L V No HU 60 70 2 2.5 22 28 0.2 0.28 HU<15mg/kg 90 56.6 4.3* 1.2* 50 20 0.7* 0.23 HU>15mg/kg 96.6 60 4.1* 1.1* 51 25 1.1* 0.32 FV, first visit; LV, last visit *P<0.05 compared to no HU group Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8542-8542
Author(s):  
Leslie Jane Padrnos ◽  
Betsy LaPlant ◽  
Shaji Kumar ◽  
Kimbery Henderson ◽  
Angela Dispenzieri ◽  
...  

8542 Background: Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) is defined by the presence of leukemia-associated somatic mutations in clonally expanded hematopoietic stem cells with a VAF of ≥2%. CHIP has been associated with myeloid malignancies and increased all cause mortality largely from atherovascular disease. The prevalence and impact of CHIP in patients with myeloma (MM) is yet to be defined. Aims: Evaluate the prevalence and significance of CHIP in 101 lenalidomide exposed patients with multiple myeloma. Methods: 101 MM patients, the majority exposed to > 2 years of lenalidomide (Len), with stored mononuclear blood samples were identified for Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) using a panel encompassing 42 gene mutations associated with CHIP. Electronic medical records were reviewed and outcomes of secondary malignancy, macrocytosis, thrombosis and mortality were extracted. Results: Thirty of 101patients were found to have CHIP with the most frequent mutations: DNMT3A (12%), TET2 (5%), and TP53 (4%). One third of patients with CHIP had > 1 mutation (37%). At 68 months median follow up over a quarter of patients experienced thrombosis (31%) and 13% developed subsequent malignancy/premalignant condition including myelodysplastic syndrome (3%). There was no significant difference in age, gender, duration of Len prior to NGS testing, thrombosis complication, or survival in those with versus without a CHIP mutation. At last F/U 30% had died, 25% remained on therapy, 27% were on maintenance therapy and 11% were on observation alone. Conclusions: CHIP mutations are common in plasma cell neoplasms, with 30% of patients in this study retrospectively found to have CHIP mutations by NGS testing. CHIP mutations have been associated with cardiovascular events and malignancy development, however no associations were identified in this small study. Limitations to this study include small sample size, retrospective nature and duration of follow up. Further study of this very common finding in MM patients regarding timing of development and subsequent impact of these mutations could help risk stratify and inform therapy selection. [Table: see text]


2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (15) ◽  
pp. 2896-2903 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thierry André ◽  
Philippe Colin ◽  
Christophe Louvet ◽  
Erik Gamelin ◽  
Olivier Bouche ◽  
...  

Purpose: This randomized, 2 × 2 factorial study compared a semimonthly (LVFU2) with a monthly (FULV) regimen of fluorouracil and leucovorin and 24 versus 36 weeks of each regimen as adjuvant treatment of patients with stage II (Dukes’ B2) and III (Dukes’ C) colon cancer. Patients and Methods: LVFU2 was administered semi-monthly for 2 consecutive days as dl- or l-leucovorin (200 or 100 mg/m2, respectively) as a 2-hour infusion, followed by a 400 mg/m2 FU bolus and 600 mg/m2 of FU as a 22-hour continuous infusion. FULV was administered monthly for 5 consecutive days as a 15-minute infusion of dl- or l-leucovorin, followed by 400 mg/m2 of FU as a 15-minute infusion. Results: A total of 905 patients were randomly assigned. The median follow-up was 41 months. Disease-free survival was similar between the LVFU2 and FULV groups (127 v 124 events; hazard ratio [HR] = 1.04; P = .74) and between 24 and 36 weeks of therapy (128 v 123 events; HR = 0.94; P = .63). Analysis of overall survival showed a slight excess in the number of deaths in LVFU2 compared with FULV (73 v 59), but this difference was not statistically significant (HR = 1.26; 95% confidence interval, 0.90 to 1.78; P = .18). The most commonly observed grade 3 to 4 toxicities were neutropenia, diarrhea, and mucositis. Toxicities were significantly lower in the LVFU2 group (all toxicities, P < .001). Conclusion: Our data confirm that LVFU2 is less toxic than FULV. At a median follow-up of 41 months, no statistically significant difference could be detected in disease-free or overall survival between the treatment groups or treatment durations.


2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (9) ◽  
pp. 1125-1132
Author(s):  
Jeanne Sze Lyn Wong ◽  
Nalini M. Selveindran ◽  
Rashdan Zaki Mohamed ◽  
Fuziah M. Zain ◽  
Siti S. Anas ◽  
...  

AbstractObjectivesEstablished reference intervals of thyroid function in neonates are important; however, studies often consist of a small sample size or lack of clinical information. We aim to define reference intervals for thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) and free thyroxine (FT4) for infants aged 14–30 days. We also reviewed follow-up TSH for infants with initial values 10–20 mIU/L.MethodsVenous TSH and FT4 of term babies aged 14–30 days with breast milk jaundice that had thyroid function test performed as part of a prolonged jaundice workout from September 2016 to March 2017 were analyzed. Electronic medical records were reviewed to ensure only well babies with no pathological causes of jaundice or conditions that may affect thyroid function were included. TSH and FT4 were analyzed using immunoassay analyzer Dxl 800, Beckman Coulter.ResultsThere were no correlations between FT4 and TSH with gender, birth weight and ethnicity. Correlation coefficient between FT4 and total bilirubin was weak at 0.138 (p=0.001). No association was found between TSH and bilirubin levels. Mean FT4 was higher in the younger age group day 14–21 (p<0.01). There was no significant difference in TSH values between the age groups. Infants with mildly elevated TSH 10–20 mIU/L had normalized values on follow-up (mean, 11.41 vs. 4.42 mIU/L; p<0.01; 95%CI, 5.88–8.09). The following reference intervals (2.5–97.5th percentile) were derived: FT4 day 14–21 (n=513): 11.59–21.00 pmoL/L; FT4 day 22–30 (n=66): 10.14–19.60 pmoL/L; TSH day 14–30 (n=579): 1.90–10.34 mIU/L. Comparison between studies showed variations of reference intervals with different manufacturer assays, age and methodology.ConclusionsOur reference intervals would be useful in the clinical setting. Infants with mildly elevated TSH could be monitored first instead of immediate treatment.


BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. e042246
Author(s):  
Sanjoy K Paul ◽  
Olga Montvida ◽  
Jennie H Best ◽  
Sara Gale ◽  
Attila Pethö-Schramm ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo explore possible associations of treatment with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs), including T-cell-based and interleukin-6 inhibition (IL-6i)-based therapies, and the risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).Study design, setting and participantsFive treatment groups were selected from a United States Electronic Medical Records database of 283 756 patients with RA (mean follow-up, 5 years): never received bDMARD (No bDMARD, n=125 337), tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi, n=34 873), IL-6i (n=1884), T-cell inhibitors (n=5935) and IL-6i+T cell inhibitor abatacept (n=1213). Probability and risk for T2DM were estimated with adjustment for relevant confounders.ResultsIn the cohort of 169 242 patients with a mean 4.5 years of follow-up and a mean 641 200 person years of follow-up, the adjusted probability of developing T2DM was significantly lower in the IL-6i (probability, 1%; 95% CI 0.6 to 2.0), T-cell inhibitor (probability, 3%; 95% CI 2.3 to 3.3) and IL-6i+T cell inhibitor (probability, 2%; 95% CI 0.1 to 2.9) groups than in the No bDMARD (probability, 5%; 95% CI 4.6 to 4.9) and TNFi (probability, 4%; 95% CI 3.7 to 4.7) groups. Compared with No bDMARD, the IL-6i and IL-6i+T cell inhibitor groups had 37% (95% CI of HR 0.42 to 0.96) and 34% (95% CI of HR 0.46 to 0.93) significantly lower risk for T2DM, respectively; there was no significant difference in risk in the TNFi (HR 0.99; 95% CI 0.93 to 1.06) and T-cell inhibitor (HR 0.96; 95% CI 0.82 to 1.12) groups.ConclusionsTreatment with IL-6i, with or without T-cell inhibitors, was associated with reduced risk for T2DM compared with TNFi or No bDMARDs; a less pronounced association was observed for the T-cell inhibitor abatacept.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document