20 Comparison of native warm-season grasses and bermudagrass for stocker calf grazing in the Black Belt Prairie region

Abstract Native grasses are touted for use in drought mitigation strategies for grazing cattle. It is important to determine how these forages compare in specific production environments to more widely used improved grasses such as bermudagrass [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.] that they may replace as pasture. Native warm-season grasses including big bluestem (Andropogon gerardi Vitman), little bluestem (Andropogon scoparius), and indiangrass (Sorghastrum nutans L.) were evaluated against bermudagrass pastures in the Black Belt Prairie region of Mississippi for stocker cattle grazing. Objectives were to compare bermudagrass (BG), indiangrass (IG) and mixed-sward native warm-season grass (mix of big bluestem, little bluestem, and indiangrass) (NGMIX) pasture for forage nutritive value and steer ADG. Crossbred (Bos taurus) steers (n = 36 steers/year) were stratified by initial BW (339.7 ± 4.3 kg) to 2.02-ha pastures (3 replications) during 56-d grazing periods in June and July for 2 yr. Mean forage nutritive values on a DM basis were: BG [8.8% CP, 43.4% ADF, 67.3% NDF, 58.7% TDN, and 77 relative feed value (RFV)], IG (6.7% CP, 39.6% ADF, 68.3% NDF, 58.2% TDN, and 79 RFV) and MIXNG (7.3% CP, 40.5% ADF, 69.5% NDF, 58.1% TDN, and 77 RFV). A forage treatment x day x year effect existed (P < 0.01) for each these nutritive values. There was no effect (P = 0.47) of forage treatment on steer ADG (BG: 0.4 ± 0.1 kg/d; IG: 0.5 ± 0.1 kg/d; NGMIX: 0.5 ± 0.1 kg/d). Thus, no net advantage or disadvantage in steer growth rates was observed due to forage species. Other factors such as forage establishment cost and animal stocking rates supported may be relevant to consider in decisions to replace bermudagrass with warm-season native grasses.

Download Full-text

Modification of the summative equation to estimate daily total digestible nutrients for bermudagrass pasture

Journal of Animal Science ◽

10.1093/jas/skaa354 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 98 (11) ◽

Author(s):

Prem Woli ◽

Francis M Rouquette ◽

Charles R Long ◽

Luis O Tedeschi ◽

Guillermo Scaglia

Keyword(s):

Nutritive Value ◽

Cynodon Dactylon ◽

Perennial Grass ◽

Warm Season ◽

Neutral Detergent Fiber ◽

Systematic Bias ◽

Grazing Season ◽

Nutritive Values ◽

Plant Maturity ◽

Daily Total

Abstract In forage-animal nutrition modeling, diet energy is estimated mainly from the forage total digestible nutrients (TDN). As digestibility trials are expensive, TDN is usually estimated using summative equations. Early summative equations assumed a fixed coefficient to compute digestible fiber using the lignin-to-neutral detergent fiber (NDF) ratio. Subsequently, a structural coefficient (φ) was added to the summative equations to reflect an association between lignin and cell wall components. Additional modifications to the summative equations assumed a constant φ value, and they have been used as a standard method by many commercial laboratories and scientists. For feeds with nutritive values that do not change much over time, a constant φ value may suffice. However, for forages with nutritive values that keep changing during the grazing season owing to changes in weather and plant maturity, a constant φ value may add a systematic bias to prediction because it is associated with the variable lignin-to-NDF ratio. In this study, we developed a model to estimate φ as a function of the day of the year by using the daily TDN values of bermudagrass [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.], a popular warm-season perennial grass in the southern United States. The variable φ model was evaluated by using it in the TDN equation and comparing the estimated values with the observed ones obtained from several locations. Values of the various measures of fit used—the Willmott index (WI), the modeling efficiency (ME), R2, root mean square error (RMSE), and percent error (PE)—showed that using the variable φ vis-à-vis the constant φ improved the TDN equation significantly. The WI, ME, R2, RMSE, and PE values of 0.94, 0.80, 0.80, 2.5, and 4.7, respectively, indicated that the TDN equation with the variable φ model was able to mimic the observed values of TDN satisfactorily. Unlike the constant φ, the variable φ predicted more closely the forage nutritive value throughout the grazing season. The variable φ model may be useful to forage-beef modeling in accurately reflecting the impacts of plant maturity and weather on daily forage nutritive value and animal performance.

Download Full-text

87 Evaluation of two stocking rates for grazing heifers on mixed sward native warm-season grass pastures in the Black Belt Prairie region

Journal of Animal Science ◽

10.1093/jas/skz397.061 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 98 (Supplement_2) ◽

pp. 27-27

Author(s):

Jane A Parish ◽

Kalisha C Yankey ◽

Libby S Durst

Keyword(s):

Nutritive Value ◽

Bos Taurus ◽

Warm Season ◽

Stocking Rate ◽

Sorghastrum Nutans ◽

Study Objective ◽

Little Bluestem ◽

Year Effect ◽

Plant Persistence ◽

Stocking Rates

Abstract Optimal use of native warm-season grasses in pasture systems involves stocking grazing livestock at suitable rates. The study objective was to evaluate forage nutritive value and heifer ADG at two stocking rates on mixed-sward pastures of big bluestem (Andropogon gerardi Vitman), little bluestem (Andropogon scoparius), and indiangrass (Sorghastrum nutans L.). Pastures (3 replications) were stocked for 56 d during June and July in 2 yr with crossbred (Bos taurus) heifers (n = 24 heifers/year) stratified by initial BW (288.3 ± 1.7 kg) to one of two continuous stocking rates: 1.9 heifers/ha (HIGH) and 1.2 heifers/ha (LOW). Mean forage nutritive values on a DM basis were not different between HIGH and LOW stocking rates, respectively, for CP (7.0 ± 0.2% vs 6.7 ± 0.2%; P = 0.27), ADF (41.0 ± 0.6 vs. 41.4 ± 0.6; P = 0.64), NDF (69.9 ± 0.5 vs. 68.7 ± 0.5; P = 0.09), or relative feed value (RFV) (76.0 ± 1.0 vs. 76.9 ± 1.0; P = 0.53). There was a year effect (P < 0.01) and stocking rate x day effect (P < 0.01) for TDN. At LOW, TDN decreased from day 0 to day 28 (P = 0.02) and day 28 to day 56 (P = 0.02). At HIGH, TDN decreased (P < 0.01) from day 0 to day 28 but remained steady until day 56 (P = 0.21). There was a stocking rate x day interaction (P < 0.01) with ADG: LOW day 28 to 56 (1.20 ± 0.08 kg/day), HIGH day 0 to 28 (0.89 ± 0.08 kg/day), HIGH day 28 to 56 (0.44 ± 0.08 kg/day), and LOW day 0 to 28 (0.30 ± 0.08 kg/day). Further assessment of cattle ADG using more divergent stocking rates and plant persistence measures is warranted to inform ideal native grass stocking rate recommendations.

Download Full-text

Herbicides for Postemergence Control of Annual Grass Weeds in Seedling Forage Grasses

Weed Science ◽

10.1017/s0043174500072088 ◽

1989 ◽

Vol 37 (3) ◽

pp. 375-379 ◽

Cited By ~ 12

Author(s):

Thomas J. Peters ◽

Russell S. Moomaw ◽

Alex R. Martin

Keyword(s):

Warm Season ◽

Big Bluestem ◽

Forage Grasses ◽

Annual Grass ◽

Cool Season ◽

Intermediate Wheatgrass ◽

Green Foxtail ◽

Annual Grasses ◽

Large Crabgrass ◽

Warm Season Grasses

The control of three summer annual grass weeds with herbicides during establishment of forage grasses was studied near Concord and Mead, NE, in 1984, 1985, and 1986. Three cool-season forage grasses, intermediate wheatgrass, tall fescue, and smooth bromegrass, and two warm-season grasses, big bluestem and switchgrass, were included. The control of three major summer annual grasses, green foxtail, barnyardgrass, and large crabgrass, was excellent with fenoxaprop at 0.22 kg ai/ha. Slight to moderate injury to cool-season forage grasses and severe injury to warm-season grasses were evident. Sethoxydim at 0.22 kg ai/ha and haloxyfop at 0.11 kg ai/ha controlled green foxtail and large crabgrass, but not barnyardgrass. Sulfometuron-treated big bluestem and switchgrass plots had the best forage stand frequencies and yields and, at the rate used, sulfometuron satisfactorily controlled green foxtail but only marginally controlled barnyardgrass and large crabgrass.

Download Full-text

RESPONSE OF THREE WARM-SEASON GRASSES TO VARYING FERTILITY LEVELS ON FIVE SOILS

Canadian Journal of Plant Science ◽

10.4141/cjps82-096 ◽

1982 ◽

Vol 62 (3) ◽

pp. 657-665 ◽

Cited By ~ 9

Author(s):

R. W. TAYLOR ◽

D. W. ALLINSON

Keyword(s):

New England ◽

Panicum Virgatum ◽

Warm Season ◽

Late Summer ◽

Control Treatment ◽

Yield Response ◽

Limiting Factor ◽

Big Bluestem ◽

P Fertilization ◽

Warm Season Grasses

Animal production in New England has been limited by inadequate forage during mid- to late summer when cool-season grasses are in summer dormancy. Big bluestem (Andropogon gerardi Vitman), indiangrass [Sorghastrum nutans (L.) Nash] and switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) are warm-season grasses that may be a perennial source of summer forage. Since production of these warm-season grasses would be limited to the less fertile soils of the region, a greenhouse study was conducted to examine the growth and quality of these species in five acid, infertile soils as well as fertilizer-amended soils. The soils were fertilized with limestone (L), limestone plus nitrogen (LN), limestone, nitrogen plus phosphorus (LNP), and limestone, nitrogen, phosphorus plus potassium (LNPK). Limestone was applied to adjust soils to a pH of 6.5. Fertilizer was applied at rates of 45, 117 and 111 kg/ha of N, P and K, respectively. First harvest yields were greatest for switchgrass and big bluestem, but indiangrass produced significantly greater yields than either of the other grasses in the second harvest. In both harvests, the yields of all grasses were greatest under the LNP and LNPK fertility regimes. Nitrogen, without P, did not significantly increase yields above the control treatment in the first harvest. Yield responses to P fertilization varied with soils. Although P appeared to be the limiting factor insofar as growth was concerned, the yield response from P fertilization would probably be limited without N fertilization. Indiangrass was significantly higher in crude protein and K concentration and significantly lower in Ca concentration than big bluestem and switchgrass. Phosphorus concentrations were below the recommended levels for ruminant nutrition.

Download Full-text

76 Evaluating Nitrogen Management Strategies to Improve Southern Bermudagrass Grazing Systems

Journal of Animal Science ◽

10.1093/jas/skz397.059 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 98 (Supplement_2) ◽

pp. 26-26

Author(s):

Justin C Burt ◽

Jennifer J Tucker ◽

Lisa Baxter

Keyword(s):

Nutritive Value ◽

Cynodon Dactylon ◽

Management Strategies ◽

Stocking Density ◽

Warm Season ◽

The South ◽

Forage Crops ◽

University Of Georgia ◽

Annual Grasses ◽

The University

Abstract Bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) is one of the most common perennial warm-season forage crops grown in the South. While prominent in the region bermudagrass management requires large amounts of fertility and forage quality is moderate at best. Incorporating a legume into bermudagrass pastures could serve as an alternative to the necessary applications of synthetic N, while also improving the nutritive value of the forage base. A two-year grazing evaluation was conducted from May-Sept. 2018 (Y1) and May-Aug. 2019 (Y2) at the University of Georgia Tifton Campus in Tifton, Georgia, to compare concurring production of alfalfa/bermudagrass mixed pastures (BGA) with bermudagrass monoculture pastures with (BGN) or without (BGZ) the application of synthetic nitrogen. The experimental design was a randomized complete block with three treatments and two replications. All paddocks were evaluated pre and post grazing event for herbage availability, botanical composition, forage species competitiveness, and nutritive value. Paddocks (0.8-ha) were rotationally grazed using put and take management with stocker steers (Y1 BW=195.9±22.9 kg; Y2 BW=228.5±30.0 kg), two testers per treatment. Steers were weighed at initiation, conclusion, and on a 28–30 day interval for calculation of ADG and gain/ha. Statistical analysis was conducted using the PROC MIXED procedure of SAS. Despite significant drought in Y2, year did not affect total gain/ha, however treatment did (P = 0.04), such that BGA was highest (383.6±35.1 kg/ha), and BGN and BGZ were not different (261.2±35.1 kg/ha and 239.0±35.1 kg/ha, respectively). This is likely due to the lower stocking density and inclusion of high-quality volunteer annual grasses in BGZ treatments which allowed for selective grazing. These data suggest that rotationally grazing alfalfa/bermudagrass mixtures can result in a higher gain/ha, than bermudagrass pastures that are supplemented with or without synthetic N in the South.

Download Full-text