63 Assessing the Quality and Reliability of Patient Information Regarding First-aid Burn Care on Youtube

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S41-S42
Author(s):  
David Parizh ◽  
Maleeh Effendi ◽  
Thomas L Martin
Keyword(s):  
Patient Information ◽  
Medical Information ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Physician Assistants ◽  
First Aid ◽  
Lower Number ◽  
Burn Treatment ◽  
Burn Care ◽  
Quality And Reliability

Abstract Introduction Social media has increasingly become the first point of reference for patients regarding medical information. This study assesses the quality and reliability of patient information available on YouTube regarding First-Aid for Burn Care. Methods Using Google Trends, “burn treatment” was identified as the most common term to likely be used to seek out information regarding first-aid treatment of burns. The terms “burn treatment” was searched on YouTube within Internet Explorer on September 18, 2019. Results were filtered by view count and the first 6 pages of results, top 120 videos were reviewed, excluding duplicates, non-English language videos, and videos unrelated to first-aid burn care. Videos were analyzed by two independent reviewers and descriptive statistics. Videos were also rated for information reliability and quality using both the Modified DISCERN (MD) tool (1 = low, 5 = high) and the Global Quality Scale (GQS) (1 = poor, 5 = excellent). Results Overall 67% of the videos were classified as informative with 15% constituting personal experience, the remainder of which were misleading. The physicians had a lower number of mean views per video at 140k compared to 210k from non experts. Physician group constituted 20.6% of all speakers in the video, with NP/PA constituting 2.9%. The GQS mean was 2, with physicians scoring slightly higher at 2.3, NP/PA scoring 3, and the remainder of the speakers scoring lowest at 1.8. The Modified discern score mean was 2.0. Conclusions Overall the burn care professionals inclusion physician, nursing and physician assistants constituted a minority of the speakers present. 76% were by other professionals who don’t deliver care inside the hospital setting. The physicians had lower number of views when compared to non experts. However, burn care professionals scored higher on the modified discern and the GQS compared to non-experts. The overall quality of all videos was low across the board with a modified discern of 2 out of 5. There is an opportunity to improve resources available to our patients from the burn care professional stand point to increase online presence. Applicability of Research to Practice The quality of videos reviewed was poor, and demonstrated an opportunity for improvement of resources available to our patients online.

Assessing the Quality and Reliability of Patient Information Regarding First-Aid for Acute Burns on YouTube

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Parizh ◽  
Maleeh Effendi ◽  
Elizabeth Dale ◽  
Julia Slater
Keyword(s):  
Medical Training ◽  
First Aid ◽  
Accurate Information ◽  
Burn Treatment ◽  
Burn Centers ◽  
Burn Care ◽  
Global Quality ◽  
Quality Scale ◽  
Scale Scores

Abstract Given ever increasing ease of access to technology, the majority of adults first turn to the internet for medical advice. The world wide web is filled with user-generated content within multiple social media platforms that lack a governing body to validate the information’s accuracy and reliability. The authors performed a qualitative review of first-aid burn resources available on YouTube using two validated scales: Modified Discern and Global Quality Scale. A search was conducted using the term “burn treatment” on September 18, 2019. Of 120 reviewed videos, 59 met their inclusion criteria. 36% (n = 21) of the speakers had formal medical training, with only 12% (n = 7) identified as burn care professionals. The mean views originating from nonmedical speakers (162,675) were more than eight times that originating from burn centers (14,975). The quality of the videos was compared by video source, speaker, and specialty. Burn centers had the highest Modified Discern and Global Quality Scale scores, 2.91 and 2.86, respectively (P < .05). Additionally, the authors were able to demonstrate that there was a statistically significant higher quality of videos when the speaker was a burn care professional or had formal medical training. Unfortunately, their review demonstrated that videos originating from hospital systems and burn centers made up a minority of the online media content. These results illustrate an opportunity for improvement by way of increased content creation to bolster the online presence of the burn community and provide patients with more accurate information.

743 Keeping up with Dr. Google: When Are Patients Seeking First-aid Burn Resources?

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S204-S205
Author(s):  
David Parizh ◽  
Maleeh Effendi ◽  
Thomas L Martin
Keyword(s):  
Search Engine ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
First Aid ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Google Trends ◽  
Burn Treatment ◽  
Burn Care ◽  
Search Data ◽  
Search Numbers ◽  
Google Search

Abstract Introduction Treating burns is a relatively common occurrence in American Emergency Departments occurring an estimated 486,000 times per year. In the digital era, patients feel increasingly empowered to seek out medical resources independently. The true number of people sustaining an injury and treating themselves at home or outside of the hospital setting is difficult to quantify. However, we can see when patients were searching for first-aid burn resources on the world’s most powerful and popular search engine - Google. We hypothesized that there would be a correlation between patient’s searching for burn care resources online and burn admissions. Methods We used Keywords Everywhere a browser add-on for Google Chrome to cross check various phrases and words that Americans might search for to find information on how to treat a burn. “Burn treatment” was found to be the most commonly searched phrase and this was verified using Google Trends. Google Trends dose not give raw search numbers. However, it expresses the search frequency for a term relative to how frequently that term was sought out during a specified time period. We pulled search data for each successive year back till 2006 the earliest year for which complete data was available. We were then able to overlay this data on a year to year basis and thus view when information about treating burns was the most sought out. Results A clear increase in the frequency of searches for burn treatment can be seen around the summer months, peaking in the week surrounding the 4th of July. Further data comparing this trend to burn admissions is forthcoming as data is being solicited. Conclusions Americans are searching for more resources regarding burn injuries in the summer months; and especially in the days surrounding the fourth of July. We are excited to correlate this data to burn admissions. If there is an inverse relationship between admissions during the summer months and number of inquiries made via Google for acute burn care, this may suggest that many of the burns are minor. Thus, being treated through our clinics or through third-party providers. Alternatively, the patients may be treating themselves using internet resources. If this proves to be the case, there may be an opportunity to enrich online resources for our patients. Applicability of Research to Practice Once the data processing is complete, there will be an indication if the number of people seeking out resources via Google Search Engine correlates with out burn admissions. If not, this may be an opportunity for improvement to enrich burn first-aid resources available online.

scholarly journals Interoperability in Healthcare

2017 ◽  
pp. 689-714 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luciana Cardoso ◽  
Fernando Marins ◽  
César Quintas ◽  
Filipe Portela ◽  
Manuel Santos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Information Systems ◽  
Patient Information ◽  
Swot Analysis ◽  
Medical Information ◽  
Healthcare Delivery ◽  
Quality Of Healthcare ◽  
High Availability ◽  
Heterogeneous Information ◽  
Multi Agent

With the advancement of technology, patient information has been being computerized in order to facilitate the work of healthcare professionals and improve the quality of healthcare delivery. However, there are many heterogeneous information systems that need to communicate, sharing information and making it available when and where it is needed. To respond to this requirement the Agency for Integration, Diffusion, and Archiving of medical information (AIDA) was created, a multi-agent and service-based platform that ensures interoperability among healthcare information systems. In order to improve the performance of the platform, beyond the SWOT analysis performed, a system to prevent failures that may occur in the platform database and also in machines where the agents are executed was created. The system has been implemented in the Centro Hospitalar do Porto (one of the major Portuguese hospitals), and it is now possible to define critical workload periods of AIDA, improving high availability and load balancing. This is explored in this chapter.

scholarly journals Evaluating The Quality, Utility And Reliability of Information In Uveitis Videos Shared On YouTube

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Burak Tanyıldız ◽  
Murat Oklar
Keyword(s):  
Medical Information ◽  
Poor Quality ◽  
Educational Quality ◽  
Video Content ◽  
Global Quality ◽  
Total View ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Quality And Reliability ◽  
Positive Correlations

Abstract Background: The aim of this study was to analyze the quality of videos on YouTube as educational resources about uveitis.Methods: An online YouTube search was performed using the keyword ‘‘uveitis’’. Total view counts, duration of videos, publishing dates, likes and dislikes, numbers of comments, and source of videos were recorded. Educational quality and accuracy of the video content were evaluated using the DISCERN score, Global Quality Score (GQS), Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) score. Video popularity was also evaluated using the video power index (VPI) score. All videos were classified according to publishers and types of categories.Results: From among the 200 videos analyzed, 94 were included. The mean DISCERN score was 38.5 ± 13.2 (poor), the mean JAMA score was 1.8 ± 0.6 (fair), and the GQS was 2.5 ± 0.9 (fair). There were positive correlations between the three checklist (p < .001). VPI was not correlated with each score (p >.05). The most common upload sources were ophthalmologist (24.4%) and YouTube channel (20.2%). Regarding content, 47 videos (50%) medical education, 26 videos (27.6%) patient education, 16 videos (17%) patient experience, 5 videos (5.3%) surgical procedures in patient with uveitis. While the most popular videos were uploaded by doctors other than ophthalmologists, the videos uploaded by academic institutions and associations were found to be higher educational quality and reliability scores. Conclusions: Uveitis videos on YouTube are poor quality and reliability and are not adequately educational for patients. Therefore, the physicians must be aware of the limitations of YouTube and ensure the flow of correct medical information to patients.

scholarly journals Guidelines for burn rehabilitation in China

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Ying Cen ◽  
Jiake Chai ◽  
Huade Chen ◽  
Jian Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Burn Injury ◽  
Medical Science ◽  
Current Medical ◽  
Team Work ◽  
Burn Patients ◽  
Burn Treatment ◽  
Burn Care ◽  
Chinese Association

Abstract Quality of life and functional recovery after burn injury is the final goal of burn care, especially as most of burn patients survive the injury due to advanced medical science. However, dysfunction, disfigurement, contractures, psychological problems and other discomforts due to burns and the consequent scars are common, and physical therapy and occupational therapy provide alternative treatments for these problems of burn patients. This guideline, organized by the Chinese Burn Association and Chinese Association of Burn Surgeons aims to emphasize the importance of team work in burn care and provide a brief introduction of the outlines of physical and occupational therapies during burn treatment, which is suitable for the current medical circumstances of China. It can be used as the start of the tools for burn rehabilitation.

How I Whiten My Teeth”: YouTube™ as a patient information resource for teeth whitening (Preprint)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hüseyin Şimşek ◽  
Suleyman Kutalmış Buyuk ◽  
Ebru Cetinkaya ◽  
Mubin Tural ◽  
Murside Seda Koseoglu
Keyword(s):  
Patient Information ◽  
Information Quality ◽  
Medical Information ◽  
Quality Of Information ◽  
Video Information ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Chi Squared ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Material Preparation

BACKGROUND Internet offers an attractive and useful platform for patients seeking information about health. YouTubeTM is one of the most visited sites by patients who want to access medical information, and the YouTubeTM website is the world's second most popular site after Google in Internet. OBJECTIVE The aim of the study was to assess the quality and content of information presented on YoutubeTM for patients seeking information on teeth whitening. METHODS YouTubeTM were searched for videos about teeth whitening using the term ‘‘teeth whitening’’. One hundred and ten results were assessed to obtain 100 acceptable videos. General video evaluation included views, duration, time since video upload, likes/ dislikes, number of comment, source, material types (dental, natural and other) and whilst video purpose was analyzed under nine categories (definition, material preparation, procedure of application, material comparison, after/before comparison, symptoms, post-op experience, commercial, educational). Each video was classified according to quality of information content as ‘good’, ‘moderate’ or ‘poor’. The Kruskal–Wallis, Pearson’s chi-squared test, and Spearman correlation coefficient were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS Most videos were uploaded by layperson (60%). Definition of teeth whitening was the most commonly covered topics (74.0%), followed by procedure of application (54.0%), post-op experience (36.0%). Only 12% of videos were classified as having good information quality content, 53% moderate and 35% were rated as poor. Poor content videos had significantly higher number of viewing rate than the other groups (p=0.016), while the duration was significantly higher in low content videos (p=0.003). There was a significant difference between the quality of video information and material types (p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS YouTubeTM should not be used as a fully reliable and accurate source for patient information. More studies are needed to investigate the quality of information about teeth whitening.

scholarly journals Interoperability in Healthcare

2014 ◽  
pp. 78-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luciana Cardoso ◽  
Fernando Marins ◽  
César Quintas ◽  
Filipe Portela ◽  
Manuel Santos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Information Systems ◽  
Patient Information ◽  
Swot Analysis ◽  
Medical Information ◽  
Healthcare Delivery ◽  
Quality Of Healthcare ◽  
High Availability ◽  
Heterogeneous Information ◽  
Multi Agent

With the advancement of technology, patient information has been being computerized in order to facilitate the work of healthcare professionals and improve the quality of healthcare delivery. However, there are many heterogeneous information systems that need to communicate, sharing information and making it available when and where it is needed. To respond to this requirement the Agency for Integration, Diffusion, and Archiving of medical information (AIDA) was created, a multi-agent and service-based platform that ensures interoperability among healthcare information systems. In order to improve the performance of the platform, beyond the SWOT analysis performed, a system to prevent failures that may occur in the platform database and also in machines where the agents are executed was created. The system has been implemented in the Centro Hospitalar do Porto (one of the major Portuguese hospitals), and it is now possible to define critical workload periods of AIDA, improving high availability and load balancing. This is explored in this chapter.

The reliability of the Internet for patient-centred education for surgical procedures

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 197-203
Author(s):  
Ca Slinger ◽  
I Smillie
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Procedures ◽  
Patient Information ◽  
Medical Information ◽  
Poor Quality ◽  
Reading Level ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Flesch Reading Ease ◽  
Written Information ◽  
Ease Score

Background There is increasing use of the Internet by patients as an educational tool prior to a surgical procedure. However, the quality of information is highly variable, and it is imperative that as clinicians, we are aware of the information available to ensure that consent is valid and avoid unrealistic expectations. Our aim is to assess the quality of medical information available on the Internet related to common surgical procedures. Methods Analysis of the quality of patient information on 10 websites for six common surgical conditions ( n = 54 following exclusions) was assessed using the DISCERN questionnaire and, for readability, using the Flesch reading ease test. Results There was high variation in the DISCERN score from 1.34 to 4.4 (mean 2.75). Overall, poor quality of patient information is available. Consistent scoring below 55 on Flesch reading ease score suggests a reading level beyond the majority of the patient population. Conclusion The majority of patient-centred health education on the Internet is poor. Therefore, improved verbal and written information during consultation combined with local, national and international websites is important to meet patient’s expectations and avoid issues regarding consent.

scholarly journals Concerns of Quality and Reliability of Educational Videos Focused on Frailty Syndrome on YouTube Platform

Geriatrics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 3
Author(s):  
Natalia Maria Hawryluk ◽  
Małgorzata Stompór ◽  
Ewelina Zofia Joniec
Keyword(s):  
Medical Information ◽  
Medical Knowledge ◽  
Quality Criteria ◽  
Consumer Health ◽  
Frailty Syndrome ◽  
Video Content ◽  
Global Quality ◽  
Educational Videos ◽  
Quality And Reliability

(1) Background: Evaluation of the quality and reliability of the frailty syndrome videos available on YouTube platform was the aim of this study. (2) Methods: The observational study included 75 videos retrieved by searching seven terms related to frailty syndrome on YouTube. The quality and reliability of the videos were measured using three different tools: quality criteria for consumer health information (DISCERN), the Global Quality Score (GQS), and the Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA). The video content was categorized according to the following characteristics: video provider, duration, view count, average daily views of the video, average daily views of a channel, channel subscribers, number of days since upload date, likes, dislikes, comments, the external webpages linked to the videos. (3) Results: The videos had a mean duration of 375 s and an average number of views of 1114. The quality of 17 videos assessed in the study was found to be high, 48—intermediate, and 10—low. The high-quality videos had the longest duration, the highest number of views, and points for the DISCERN score. The physician uploaders had the highest mean DISCERN and mean GQS scores, the highest number of views, and the longest duration but the hospital channels had the highest JAMA score. (4) Conclusions: YouTube can be a valuable source of medical information for patients and caregivers. The quality of videos mostly depends on the authorship and the source of video providers—physicians, academic, and health care-related organizations provide the best quality content based on professional medical knowledge.

scholarly journals Physiotherapy after Burns Injury, Acute and Surgical Burn Care Stages: Literature Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 92-100
Author(s):  
Brigita Siparytė-Sinkevičienė ◽  
Rytis Rimdeika
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Scientific Literature ◽  
Burn Injury ◽  
Burn Treatment ◽  
Joint Mobilization ◽  
Burn Care ◽  
Equal Importance ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Burn Survivors

People recovering from burn injury experience a wide range of challenges throughout their recovery. Currently, the survival is not the only important issue in the treatment of burns. As the advancement and amelioration in burn treatment have improved significantly, the patients’ recovery and abilities to return to their pre-burn functional status are of equal importance as well. The results of recent scientific literature review (Kazis et al.) demonstrate that 28% of burn survivors never return to any form of employment and only 37% of burn survivors regain the fullness of previous employment. Physical therapy is a critical, though painful, component of burn rehabilitation therapy and includes a variety of physiotherapy treatment methods such as exercise therapy, cardiopulmonary training, joint mobilization, positioning, splint adjustment, etc. The application of physiotherapy after burn injury was found to improve physical capacity, muscle strength, body composition, and quality of life. The use of early physiotherapy is also recommended in patients treated in the intensive care unit.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document