How I Whiten My Teeth”: YouTube™ as a patient information resource for teeth whitening (Preprint)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hüseyin Şimşek ◽  
Suleyman Kutalmış Buyuk ◽  
Ebru Cetinkaya ◽  
Mubin Tural ◽  
Murside Seda Koseoglu
Keyword(s):  
Patient Information ◽  
Information Quality ◽  
Medical Information ◽  
Quality Of Information ◽  
Video Information ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Chi Squared ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Material Preparation

BACKGROUND Internet offers an attractive and useful platform for patients seeking information about health. YouTubeTM is one of the most visited sites by patients who want to access medical information, and the YouTubeTM website is the world's second most popular site after Google in Internet. OBJECTIVE The aim of the study was to assess the quality and content of information presented on YoutubeTM for patients seeking information on teeth whitening. METHODS YouTubeTM were searched for videos about teeth whitening using the term ‘‘teeth whitening’’. One hundred and ten results were assessed to obtain 100 acceptable videos. General video evaluation included views, duration, time since video upload, likes/ dislikes, number of comment, source, material types (dental, natural and other) and whilst video purpose was analyzed under nine categories (definition, material preparation, procedure of application, material comparison, after/before comparison, symptoms, post-op experience, commercial, educational). Each video was classified according to quality of information content as ‘good’, ‘moderate’ or ‘poor’. The Kruskal–Wallis, Pearson’s chi-squared test, and Spearman correlation coefficient were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS Most videos were uploaded by layperson (60%). Definition of teeth whitening was the most commonly covered topics (74.0%), followed by procedure of application (54.0%), post-op experience (36.0%). Only 12% of videos were classified as having good information quality content, 53% moderate and 35% were rated as poor. Poor content videos had significantly higher number of viewing rate than the other groups (p=0.016), while the duration was significantly higher in low content videos (p=0.003). There was a significant difference between the quality of video information and material types (p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS YouTubeTM should not be used as a fully reliable and accurate source for patient information. More studies are needed to investigate the quality of information about teeth whitening.

scholarly journals TikTok as a Health Information Source: Assessment of the Quality of Information in Diabetes-Related Videos

10.2196/30409 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (9) ◽  
pp. e30409
Author(s):  
Wenwen Kong ◽  
Shijie Song ◽  
Yuxiang Chris Zhao ◽  
Qinghua Zhu ◽  
Ling Sha
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Social Media ◽  
Nonprofit Organizations ◽  
Health Information ◽  
Information Quality ◽  
Quality Of Information ◽  
Disease Symptoms ◽  
For Profit ◽  
Definition Of

Background Diabetes has become one of the most prevalent chronic diseases, and many people living with diabetes use social media to seek health information. Recently, an emerging social media app, TikTok, has received much interest owing to its popularity among general health consumers. We notice that there are many videos about diabetes on TikTok. However, it remains unclear whether the information in these videos is of satisfactory quality. Objective This study aimed to assess the quality of the information in diabetes-related videos on TikTok. Methods We collected a sample of 199 diabetes-related videos in Chinese. The basic information presented in the videos was coded and analyzed. First, we identified the source of each video. Next, 2 independent raters assessed each video in terms of the completeness of six types of content (the definition of the disease, symptoms, risk factors, evaluation, management, and outcomes). Then, the 2 raters independently assessed the quality of information in the videos, using the DISCERN instrument. Results In regard to the sources of the videos, we found 6 distinct types of uploaders; these included 3 kinds of individual users (ie, health professionals, general users, and science communicators) and 3 types of organizational users (ie, news agencies, nonprofit organizations, and for-profit organizations). Regarding content, our results show that the videos were primarily about diabetes management and contained limited information on the definition of the disease, symptoms, risk factors, evaluation, and outcomes. The overall quality of the videos was acceptable, on average, although the quality of the information varied, depending on the sources. The videos created by nonprofit organizations had the highest information quality, while the videos contributed by for-profit organizations had the lowest information quality. Conclusions Although the overall quality of the information in the diabetes videos on TikTok is acceptable, TikTok might not fully meet the health information needs of patients with diabetes, and they should exercise caution when using TikTok as a source of diabetes-related information.

scholarly journals TikTok as a Health Information Source: Assessment of the Quality of Information in Diabetes-Related Videos (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenwen Kong ◽  
Shijie Song ◽  
Yuxiang Chris Zhao ◽  
Qinghua Zhu ◽  
Ling Sha
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Social Media ◽  
Nonprofit Organizations ◽  
Health Information ◽  
Information Quality ◽  
Quality Of Information ◽  
Disease Symptoms ◽  
For Profit ◽  
Definition Of

BACKGROUND Diabetes has become one of the most prevalent chronic diseases, and many people living with diabetes use social media to seek health information. Recently, an emerging social media app, TikTok, has received much interest owing to its popularity among general health consumers. We notice that there are many videos about diabetes on TikTok. However, it remains unclear whether the information in these videos is of satisfactory quality. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to assess the quality of the information in diabetes-related videos on TikTok. METHODS We collected a sample of 199 diabetes-related videos in Chinese. The basic information presented in the videos was coded and analyzed. First, we identified the source of each video. Next, 2 independent raters assessed each video in terms of the completeness of six types of content (the definition of the disease, symptoms, risk factors, evaluation, management, and outcomes). Then, the 2 raters independently assessed the quality of information in the videos, using the DISCERN instrument. RESULTS In regard to the sources of the videos, we found 6 distinct types of uploaders; these included 3 kinds of individual users (ie, health professionals, general users, and science communicators) and 3 types of organizational users (ie, news agencies, nonprofit organizations, and for-profit organizations). Regarding content, our results show that the videos were primarily about diabetes management and contained limited information on the definition of the disease, symptoms, risk factors, evaluation, and outcomes. The overall quality of the videos was acceptable, on average, although the quality of the information varied, depending on the sources. The videos created by nonprofit organizations had the highest information quality, while the videos contributed by for-profit organizations had the lowest information quality. CONCLUSIONS Although the overall quality of the information in the diabetes videos on TikTok is acceptable, TikTok might not fully meet the health information needs of patients with diabetes, and they should exercise caution when using TikTok as a source of diabetes-related information.

PENGARUH KUALITAS INFORMASI DAN KUALITAS LAYANAN TERHADAP SIKAP DALAM PENGGUNAAN SISTEM APLIKASI DENGAN KEMUDAHAN PENGGUNAAN SEBAGAI VARIABEL INTERVENING PADA JASA TRANSPORTASI ONLINE (GOJEK) DI YOGYAKARTA

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-133
Author(s):  
Putri Aprilia Isnaini ◽  
Ida Bagus Nyoman Udayana
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Quality Of Service ◽  
Information Quality ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Ease Of Use ◽  
Quality Of Services ◽  
Quality Of Information ◽  
Transportation Services ◽  
Application Systems

This writing is done to determine the effect of information quality and service quality on attitudes in the use of application systems with the ease of use of the system as an intervining variable in online transportation services (gojek) in Yogyakarta. The sample in this study is customers who use online motorcycle transportation services in Yogyakarta. The sampling technique uses accidental sampling technique. Data collection is done by distributing online questionnaires through the Goegle form and distributed with social media such as WhatsApp and Instagram on a 1-4 scale to measure 4 indicators. The results of this study show 1) the quality of information affects the ease of use, 2) the quality of service affects the ease of use, 3) the quality of information influences attitudes in use, 4) the quality of services does not affect attitudes in use, and 5) ease of use attitude in use.

scholarly journals Interoperability in Healthcare

2017 ◽  
pp. 689-714 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luciana Cardoso ◽  
Fernando Marins ◽  
César Quintas ◽  
Filipe Portela ◽  
Manuel Santos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Information Systems ◽  
Patient Information ◽  
Swot Analysis ◽  
Medical Information ◽  
Healthcare Delivery ◽  
Quality Of Healthcare ◽  
High Availability ◽  
Heterogeneous Information ◽  
Multi Agent

With the advancement of technology, patient information has been being computerized in order to facilitate the work of healthcare professionals and improve the quality of healthcare delivery. However, there are many heterogeneous information systems that need to communicate, sharing information and making it available when and where it is needed. To respond to this requirement the Agency for Integration, Diffusion, and Archiving of medical information (AIDA) was created, a multi-agent and service-based platform that ensures interoperability among healthcare information systems. In order to improve the performance of the platform, beyond the SWOT analysis performed, a system to prevent failures that may occur in the platform database and also in machines where the agents are executed was created. The system has been implemented in the Centro Hospitalar do Porto (one of the major Portuguese hospitals), and it is now possible to define critical workload periods of AIDA, improving high availability and load balancing. This is explored in this chapter.

scholarly journals ANALYSIS OF SYSTEM QUALITY, INFORMATION QUALITY AND PERCEIVED USEFULNESS TO USER SATISFACTION

2019 ◽  
pp. 62
Author(s):  
Tiana Tiana ◽  
Bambang Sugiharto ◽  
Indah Umiyati
Keyword(s):  
User Satisfaction ◽  
Structural Equation ◽  
Information Quality ◽  
Partial Least Square ◽  
Perceived Usefulness ◽  
Equation Modeling ◽  
Significant Positive Effect ◽  
Quality Of Information ◽  
Positive Effect

This study aims to test and analyze the quality of the system against perceived usefulness, the quality of information against perceived usefulness, the quality of the system to user satisfaction, Information Quality to user satisfaction and perceived usefulness to user satisfaction. The population in this research is employees teller and customer service department of Bank BJB in subang city. Sampling technique is nonprobability sampling by using purposive sampling method. The type of data used is primary data with questionnaire data collection method. Hypothesis testing used is Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) approach with variance Structural equation test or better known as Partial Least Square (PLS). The result of the research shows that Quality System has a significant positive effect on Perceived Usefulness, Quality of Information has a significant positive effect on Perceived Usefulness, Quality of System has a significant positive effect on user satisfaction, Information Quality has positive significant effect on user satisfaction, and Perceived Usefulness has no effect to User Satisfaction

scholarly journals Do multidisciplinary cancer care teams suffer decision-making fatigue: an observational, longitudinal team improvement study

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. e027303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tayana Soukup ◽  
Tasha A K Gandamihardja ◽  
Sue McInerney ◽  
James S A Green ◽  
Nick Sevdalis
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Cancer Care ◽  
Information Quality ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Case Review ◽  
Quality Of Information ◽  
High Workload ◽  
Assess Quality

ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to examine effectiveness of codesigned quality-improving interventions with a multidisciplinary team (MDT) with high workload and prolonged meetings to ascertain: (1) presence and impact of decision-making (DM) fatigue on team performance in the weekly MDT meeting and (2) impact of a short meeting break as a countermeasure of DM fatigue.Design and interventionsThis is a longitudinal multiphase study with a codesigned intervention bundle assessed within team audit and feedback cycles. The interventions comprised short meeting breaks, as well as change of room layout and appointing a meeting chair.Setting and participantsA breast cancer MDT with 15 members was recruited between 2013 and 2015 from a teaching hospital of the London (UK) metropolitan area.MeasuresA validated observational tool (Metric for the Observation of Decision-making) was used by trained raters to assess quality of DM during 1335 patient reviews. The tool scores quality of information and team contributions to reviews by individual disciplines (Likert-based scores), which represent our two primary outcome measures.ResultsData were analysed using multivariate analysis of variance. DM fatigue was present in the MDT meetings: quality of information (M=16.36 to M=15.10) and contribution scores (M=27.67 to M=21.52) declined from first to second half of meetings at baseline. Of the improvement bundle, we found breaks reduced the effect of fatigue: following introduction of breaks (but not other interventions) information quality remained stable between first and second half of meetings (M=16.00 to M=15.94), and contributions to team DM improved overall (M=17.66 to M=19.85).ConclusionQuality of cancer team DM is affected by fatigue due to sequential case review over often prolonged periods of time. This detrimental effect can be reversed by introducing a break in the middle of the meeting. The study offers a methodology based on ‘team audit and feedback’ principle for codesigning interventions to improve teamwork in cancer care.

The Information Quality of Databases

2005 ◽  
pp. 281-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
InduShobha Chengalur-Smith ◽  
M. Pamela Neely ◽  
Thomas Tribunella
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Strategic Planning ◽  
Decision Support Systems ◽  
Information Quality ◽  
Support Systems ◽  
Transaction Processing ◽  
Quality Of Information ◽  
Transaction Processing Systems

A database is only as good as the data in it. Transaction-processing systems and decision-support systems provide data for strategic planning and operations. Thus, it is important to not only recognize the quality of information in databases, but also to deal with it. Research in information quality has addressed the issues of defining, measuring and improving quality in databases; commercial tools have been created to automate the process of cleaning and correcting data; and new laws have been created that deal with the fallout of poor information quality. These issues will be discussed in the next sections.

High Performance Work Systems and Organizational Outcomes: The Mediating Role of Information Quality

ILR Review ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 590-605 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gil A. Preuss
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
High Performance ◽  
Information Quality ◽  
Knowledge Work ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Quality Of Information ◽  
Work Systems ◽  
High Performance Work Systems ◽  
Performance Quality

Using data on registered nurses and nursing assistants in 50 acute-care hospital units, the author explores the relationships among high performance work systems, information quality, and performance quality within a context shaped by equivocal information—information that can be interpreted in multiple and sometimes conflicting ways. He finds that the quality of information available for decision-making, which largely depends on the interpretative skills of the workers who are exposed to important equivocal information, partially mediates how employee knowledge, work design, and total quality management systems affect organizational performance (which is measured as the inverse of medication error incidence). Providing employees with extensive relevant knowledge and enabling them to use their skills during even seemingly routine tasks improves the effective quality of information they bring to decision-making, and thereby promotes high performance quality.

Quality of information available on the World Wide Web for patients undergoing thyroidectomy: review

2011 ◽  
Vol 126 (2) ◽  
pp. 116-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Muthukumarasamy ◽  
Z Osmani ◽  
A Sharpe ◽  
R J A England
Keyword(s):  
World Wide Web ◽  
World Wide ◽  
Medical Information ◽  
Quality Of Information ◽  
Internet Health Information ◽  
Flesch Reading Ease ◽  
Key Word ◽  
The World ◽  
Ease Score

AbstractIntroduction:This study aimed to assess the quality of information available on the World Wide Web for patients undergoing thyroidectomy.Methods:The first 50 web-links generated by internet searches using the five most popular search engines and the key word ‘thyroidectomy’ were evaluated using the Lida website validation instrument (assessing accessibility, usability and reliability) and the Flesch Reading Ease Score.Results:We evaluated 103 of a possible 250 websites. Mean scores (ranges) were: Lida accessibility, 48/63 (27–59); Lida usability, 36/54 (21–50); Lida reliability, 21/51 (4–38); and Flesch Reading Ease, 43.9 (2.6–77.6).Conclusion:The quality of internet health information regarding thyroidectomy is variable. High ranking and popularity are not good indicators of website quality. Overall, none of the websites assessed achieved high Lida scores. In order to prevent the dissemination of inaccurate or commercially motivated information, we recommend independent labelling of medical information available on the World Wide Web.

scholarly journals Introduction of the identification, situation, background, assessment, recommendations tool to improve the quality of information transfer during medical handover in intensive care

2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Ramasubbu ◽  
Emma Stewart ◽  
Rosalba Spiritoso
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Patient Information ◽  
Information Transfer ◽  
Relevant Information ◽  
Interquartile Range ◽  
Quality And Safety ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Handover Process

Objective To audit the quality and safety of the current doctor-to-doctor handover of patient information in our Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit. If deficient, to implement a validated handover tool to improve the quality of the handover process. Methods In Cycle 1 we observed the verbal handover and reviewed the written handover information transferred for 50 consecutive patients in St George’s Hospital Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit. For each patient’s handover, we assessed whether each section of the Identification, Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendations tool was used on a scale of 0–2. Zero if no information in that category was transferred, one if the information was partially transferred and two if all relevant information was transferred. Each patient’s handover received a score from 0 to 10 and thus, each cycle a total score of 0–500. Following the implementation of the Identification, Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendations handover tool in our Intensive Care Unit in Cycle 2, we re-observed the handover process for another 50 consecutive patients hence, completing the audit cycle. Results There was a significant difference between the total scores from Cycle 1 and 2 (263/500 versus 457/500, p < 0.001). The median handover score for Cycle 1 was 5/10 (interquartile range 4–6). The median handover score for Cycle 2 was 9/10 (interquartile range 9–10). Patient handover scores increased significantly between Cycle 1 and 2, U = 13.5, p < 0.001. Conclusions The introduction of a standardised handover template (Identification, Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendations tool) has improved the quality and safety of the doctor-to-doctor handover of patient information in our Intensive Care Unit.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document