700 A Comparison of Pediatric Burn Injuries Based on Cultural Environment

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S180-S181
Author(s):  
Nicole Bennie ◽  
Heather Belacic ◽  
David Bruckman ◽  
Mary A Mondozzi ◽  
John Crow
Keyword(s):  
Injury Severity ◽  
Burn Injury ◽  
Cultural Beliefs ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Burn Injuries ◽  
Surgical Interventions ◽  
Burn Center ◽  
Fire Flame ◽  
Need For Rehabilitation ◽  
Flame Burn

Abstract Introduction The Amish maintain cultural customs that preserve their identity minimizing assimilation into American culture and selectively use technology. Cultural beliefs and environmental situations can predispose the Amish, especially children to burn injuries. As a burn center it is important to examine demographics, incidence and causes of burn injury to bring awareness for prevention efforts. The purpose of this study was to determine if burns in Amish children are associated with greater severity when compared to non-Amish children. Methods A retrospective analysis of the burn registry at a verified burn center collected data on inpatient children < 14 years with an acute burn injury from 2012 through 2018. Children with frostbite and non-accidental burn trauma were excluded. Results Of the 273 children, 16 (5.9%) Amish children were similar to the 257 (94.1%) non-Amish children in age (mean age 4.8y, SD=3.8 vs. 4.0y, SD=3.7), male gender (63% vs. 59%) and percent needing surgery (44% vs. 26%, p=0.14). However, Amish children had a greater median injury severity score (ISS) (9.0, IQR [1, 25] vs. 1.0, [1, 4], p< 0.0001), median TBSA (19.5% [5.2, 52] vs. 4.0 [1.7, 7], p< 0.0001), median length of stay (LOS) (10.5 days [4, 50] vs. 2.0 days [1, 8], p< 0.0001), and median number of surgeries (0.5 [0, 6.5] vs. 0 [0, 1], p< 0.0074). Complications of ARDS (25%), sepsis (25%), compartment syndrome (18.8%), acute renal injury/failure (12.5%) and amputation (18.8%) were more prevalent among Amish children (all p< 0.0033) and non-existent in the non-Amish group. Amish children had a higher incidence of fire/flame burn (43.8% vs. 19.5%) and need for rehabilitation (37.5% vs. 0.8%). Conclusions In this study, Amish children had greater burn area, severity, longer LOS, more surgical interventions and complications than non-Amish children. Applicability of Research to Practice Culturally appropriate prevention efforts and education are needed to enhance existing care and burn or fire awareness with the Amish population.

Most prominent factors contributing to burn injury-related amputations: an analysis of a referral Burn Center

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kayhan Gurbuz ◽  
Mete Demir ◽  
Abdulkadir Basaran ◽  
Koray Das
Keyword(s):  
Burn Injury ◽  
Total Body Surface Area ◽  
Health And Safety ◽  
Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Past Research ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Burn Injuries ◽  
Burn Center ◽  
Severe Burns ◽  
Fire Flame

Abstract Amputations are un-common surgical procedures in patients with severe burn injuries. However, these patients often face extreme physical and psychological challenges that result in social stigmatization and inadequate rehabilitation facilities. A retrospective cohort study was designed for the patients admitted to the Burn Center of Adana City Training and Research Hospital (ACTRH). During the study period, a total of 2007 patients aged 0.5 to 92 years were hospitalized and treated at the burn center from January 2016 to June 2020. The incidence of amputation observed among inpatient burn injuries regardless of the etiology was 1.9%, and 87.2% were male. The univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to detect the most prominent factors contributing to burn injury-related amputations. The cause of burns appears to be one of the main factors in the past research, and in this context, the electrical burns stand out, likewise, the fire-flame-related burns, full-thickness burns, the existence of infection, male gender, patients aged within the 18 to 64 age group, and the burn extent within the total body surface area (TBSA) range of 10 to <50% were found to be the most leading factors of amputations among patients having severe burns. Although they are rare, amputations related to burns commonly cause a decrease in quality of life. Therefore, besides increasing occupational health and safety methods for these risk groups, especially for adults of working age; also, it is essential to increase the importance and awareness of the precautions to be taken in daily life.

scholarly journals Outcome of Acute Burn Injuries in a Tertiary Care Centre of Kathmandu Nepal

2020 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 33-36
Author(s):  
Manish Devkota ◽  
Samit Sharma ◽  
Sangam Rayamajhi ◽  
Jayan M Shrestha ◽  
Ishwar Lohani
Keyword(s):  
Low Income ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Burn Injury ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Total Body Surface Area ◽  
Burn Injuries ◽  
Low Income Countries ◽  
Female Population ◽  
Partial Thickness Burn ◽  
Flame Burn

Introduction Burn injuries are associated with higher morbidity and mortality especially in middle and low-income countries. The objective of the study is to assess the outcome of acute burn injuries in a tertiary care center of Kathmandu, Nepal. MethodsThis is a descriptive cross-sectional study of the clinical data of acute burn patients admitted from January 2016-December 2018. ResultsOut of 124 patients with burn injuries, there were more females (n=65, 52.4 %) than males (n=59, 47.6%). Flame burn was the most common mode of injury (n=71,57.3 %) followed by scald (n=22,17.7 %). Thirty-eight (30.6%) patients arrived to hospital on the same day of injury. The average time required to reach our hospital was 24 hours. The most frequently involved site was lower extremities (n=40, 32.26%) followed by upper extremities (n=33, 26.62%). Total body surface area (TBSA) involved in the burn injury ranges from 10% to 50% with a median of 15%. Hospital stay was 14 to 58 days with a median of 17 days. Partial thickness burn was seen in 114 (91.94%) patients whereas 10 (8.06%) patients had full thickness burn. Surgical intervention was needed in 71 (57.26%) patients. Among 71 patients, 12 patients underwent surgery twice. Fifty-two (41.94%) patients were managed conservatively. The mortality rate was 4.03%. ConclusionAdult female population is at high risk for burn injuries mostly due to flame burn. Delay in reaching care has also contributed for poor outcome of burn injuries. Majority of burn injury patients needed surgical intervention and hence improvement in surgical aspects can lead to better outcome of burn injuries.Keywords:

Inpatient Data of Occupational Burn Injuries Treated at a Tertiary Burn Center

2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 398-401
Author(s):  
Abdulkadir Basaran ◽  
Ozer Ozlu
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Burn Injury ◽  
Health And Safety ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Burn Injuries ◽  
Occupational Accidents ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Work Related ◽  
Burn Center ◽  
Electrical Burns

Abstract Occupational burns are among the important causes of work-related injuries. We aimed to investigate the epidemiology and reasons of occupational burns and thereby to emphasize preventive measures. Between January 2017 and December 2018, the data of major occupational burn injury patients admitted to our burn center were evaluated in this cross-sectional retrospective study. During the study period 342 patients older than 16 years were admitted to the burn center. Among them 80 patients with occupational burns (23.4%) were identified. The mean age of the patients was 34.73 ± 12.3 years. Seventy-eight patients (97.5%) were male. Electrical burns and flame burns were the two leading type of occupational burns. The most common occupation of our patients was construction work. Dangerous behavior, carelessness, lack of protective equipment, and failure to follow instructions were causes of injury. Only 14 patients (17.5%) experienced unavoidable accident. Thirty-seven patients (46.3%) worked on temporary basis. Occupational experience was under 5 years in majority of the cases (62.5%). For the occupational burns the percentage of burned TBSA was 17.08 ± 14.5 (1–60) and the length of hospital stay was 23.94 ± 21.9 days (2–106). There were no significant differences between occupational and nonoccupational burn injuries considering TBSA, total length of hospital stay, and complications (P > .05). Occupational burn injuries are common in less experienced and younger workers. Therefore, recognition of the problem and maintaining awareness is important. In order to prevent occupational accidents and burns, occupational health and safety rules must be obeyed.

726 The Use of Xeroform Dressings for Partial Thickness Scald Burn Injuries in a Verified Pediatric Burn Center

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S194-S195
Author(s):  
Lisa C Vitale ◽  
Jennifer Livingston ◽  
Erica Curtis ◽  
Katherine Oag ◽  
Christina M Shanti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Burn Injury ◽  
Wound Care ◽  
Total Body Surface Area ◽  
Burn Injuries ◽  
Wound Complications ◽  
Burn Wound ◽  
Burn Center ◽  
Partial Thickness ◽  
Partial Thickness Burn ◽  
At Home

Abstract Introduction For children who have suffered a burn injury one of the greatest challenges is managing pain with an adequate yet practical burn wound dressing that will ultimately be managed at home. Medical product companies have created a variety of wound care products available on the market. These products are advertised to be more superior over one another in categories such as decrease in wound infections, minimization of pain, ease of dressing application, increased dressing wear time, and better wound healing. With all the options for burn wound care there are many factors to consider when choosing a burn dressing such as cost, ease of dressing for families at home, comfort, and efficacy. At our ten year verified pediatric burn center we have tried many different burn wound care products, however we have found Xeroform and bacitracin to be the most practical and easy to use for our patient population. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed from 2016–2018 of all cascading scald injuries to children 0–5 years of age treated at our verified pediatric burn center. 179 patients were included in this review. Of those patients a total of 52 patients were excluded, 28 patients had no follow up, 21 patients received alternate dressings, and 3 patients had full thickness injuries requiring a split thickness skin graft (STSG). Charts were reviewed for total body surface area (TBSA), length of stay (LOS), discharge dressing type, complications, and time to healing. All patients included routinely received consistent application of the Xeroform and bacitracin. Results 127 patients discharged with Xeroform dressings were included in this study with an average age of 1.4 years old (range 0–5 years) and average TBSA of 2.5% (range 0.25–13%). The average LOS was 1.6 days (range 1–10 days). In this sample 32 (25%) patients were healed within 7 days. 77 (61%) patients were healed within 7–14 days. 11 (9%) patients were healed within 14–21 days. 7 (5%) patients were healed in greater than 21 days. There were no wound complications identified within this study group. Conclusions Using Xeroform as our standard of practice has streamlined the care provided to our patients. We have demonstrated consistent effective re-epithelization, protection from infection, and ease of dressings for families and burn providers. In our experience Xeroform has provided a versatile way to care for partial thickness burn injuries. Applicability of Research to Practice We suggest Xeroform and bacitracin dressings be used for partial thickness burn injuries in patients under 5 years of age. This dressing may be superior to other products because it allows for bathing while providing good wound epithelization and is easy to use.

Purulent septic infections in patients with severe burn injuries. Etiology, prevalence, and risk factors

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 98-103
Author(s):  
Yu.Yu. Kutlaeva ◽  
◽  
A.A. Golubkova ◽  
V.A. Bagin ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Burn Injury ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Severity Index ◽  
Burn Injuries ◽  
Burn Wound ◽  
Open Flame ◽  
Burn Center ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Epidemiological Characteristics

Objective. To assess epidemiological characteristics of purulent septic infections (PSIs) in the intensive care unit (ICU) of a burn center. Patients and methods. In this retrospective epidemiological study, we analyzed medical records of 399 patients with burn injuries and the results of laboratory testing (2,572 samples). The majority of ICU patients were men aged 30–39 years. Almost half of the patients were workers. Burns were primarily caused by an open flame and were mainly received at home. Of note, 45.4% of patients who had burns caused by an open flame also had respiratory tract lesions. More than half of the patients had deep burns. A total of 18.6% of patients (95% CI 14.8–22.7) died. Results. The incidence of PSIs in the ICU of the burn center was 533,8‰ (95% CI 483.5–583.6), which is 2.5 times higher than that in the official statistics (210,1‰ (95% CI 182.5–239.9)). More than half of PSIs (50.2% (95% CI 43.3–57.1)) were burn wound infections. Conclusion. The following factors were found to be associated with an increased risk of PSIs: burn area >40%, burn severity index >30, SOFA score >4, deep burns, surgery, stay in the ICU for >10 days, artificial ventilation for >1 day, and placement of a central venous catheter or an urinary catheter for >1 day. Most frequently, PSIs were caused by non-fermenting gram-negative bacteria such as Pseudomonas аeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii. Key words: burn injury, purulent septic infections, risk factors, infection control

547 Long-term Outcomes of Chemical Burn Injuries: A Burn Model System National Database Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S113-S114
Author(s):  
Gabrielle G Grant ◽  
Olivia Stockly ◽  
Audrey E Wolfe ◽  
Steven E Wolf ◽  
Jeffrey C Schneider ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Employment Status ◽  
Satisfaction With Life ◽  
Burn Injury ◽  
Burn Injuries ◽  
National Database ◽  
Chemical Burn ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Chemical Injuries ◽  
Fire Flame

Abstract Introduction Information on long-term outcomes following chemical burn injury is sparse. This study aims to examine whether or not there are differences in long-term outcomes for individuals with chemical burn injuries compared to those with fire/flame injuries. Methods Data from the Burn Model System (BMS) National Database (1997–2019) were used for analysis. Demographic and clinical characteristics of adult burn survivors with chemical injuries and fire/flame injuries were compared. Regression analyses for the Mental Health Composite Scale (MCS) and the Physical Health Composite Scale (PCS) of the Short Form Health Survey-12, employment status, and Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) were conducted at 12 and 24 months post-burn, adjusting for age, gender, race, and burn size. Results A total of 2,522 database participants (96 with chemical burns; 2,426 with fire/flame injuries) were included in the analyses. Those with chemical injuries had smaller burn sizes, shorter hospital stays, and fewer ventilator days (p< 0.0001, p=0.0034, and p=0.0005, respectively). Chemical burn survivors were more likely to be employed at the time of the burn (p< 0.0001), to have sustained an employment-related injury (p< 0.0001), and to have been discharged to their own home following their acute stay (p< 0.0001). No significant differences in the MCS, PCS, employment status or SWLS were found at either 12 or 24 months post-burn between groups in the regression analyses. Conclusions Chemical burn injuries were not found to have a significant difference on mental health, physical health, employment status, and satisfaction with life outcomes compared to fire/flame injuries. However, the effects of chemical burn injury on long-term outcomes may be difficult to detect due to the relatively small sample size of this population. Applicability of Research to Practice Further investigation is needed to better understand long-term outcomes following chemical injuries. Individuals with chemical burn injuries may require more specific assessment tools to improve how these types of injuries are studied.

scholarly journals Amputation Following Burn Injury

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 430-436
Author(s):  
Colleen N Bartley ◽  
Kenisha Atwell ◽  
Laura Purcell ◽  
Bruce Cairns ◽  
Anthony Charles
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Logistic Regression Model ◽  
Burn Injury ◽  
Burn Injuries ◽  
Multivariate Logistic Regression Model ◽  
Multivariate Logistic Regression ◽  
Black Race ◽  
Burn Center

AbstractAmputation following burn injury is rare. Previous studies describe the risk of amputation after electrical burn injuries. Therefore, we describe the distribution of amputations and evaluate risk factors for amputation following burn injury at a large regional burn center. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients ≥17 years admitted from January 2002 to December 2015. Patients who did and did not undergo an amputation procedure were compared. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to determine the risk factors for amputation. Amputations were further categorized by extremity location and type (major, minor) for comparison. Of the 8313 patients included for analysis, 1.4% had at least one amputation (n = 119). Amputees were older (46.7 ± 17.4 years) than nonamputees (42.6 ± 16.8 years; P = .009). The majority of amputees were white (47.9%) followed by black (39.5%) when compared with nonamputees (white: 57.1%, black: 27.3%; P = .012). The most common burn etiology for amputees was flame (41.2%) followed by electrical (23.5%) and other (21.9%). Black race (odds ratio [OR]: 2.29; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.22–4.30; P = .010), electric (OR: 13.54; 95% CI: 6.23–29.45; P < .001) and increased %TBSA (OR: 1.03; 95% CI: 1.02–1.05; P < .001) were associated with amputation. Burn etiology, the presence of preexisting comorbidities, black race, and increased %TBSA increase the odds of post burn injury. The role of race on the risk of amputation requires further study.

Fireworks and Seafood Boils: The Epidemiology of Burns in Louisiana

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dylan M Johnson ◽  
Levi J White ◽  
Jameson Gilstrap ◽  
Tracee C Short
Keyword(s):  
Burn Injury ◽  
Burn Injuries ◽  
Severe Injuries ◽  
Burn Center ◽  
Burn Prevention ◽  
Temporal Relationships ◽  
Total Incidence ◽  
Demographical Data ◽  
Epidemiological Trends ◽  
Outpatient Settings

Abstract Epidemiological trends provide a means for targeting efforts in burn prevention. There have been but few regional-specific studies concerning burns in the southern United States. This study describes burn injury trends experienced by a single burn center in Louisiana. We also investigate the temporal relationships of several activities informally known for having a high risk for burn injury among local providers. Data were retrospectively extracted from the records of all patients treated for burn injuries at the regional burn center from 2012 to 2018 in both inpatient and outpatient settings. Demographical data and burn injury characteristics were noted. A total of 6,498 patients were included (1,593 inpatient, 4,905 outpatient). The most common burn etiologies were scald and flame, with flame being associated with more severe injuries. Overall incidence was disproportionally high in males and children less than 4 years of age. Total incidence was highest in Caucasians, though African Americans held the highest annual incidence rate specific to this population. The most common situation at the time of burn injury involved the consumption or preparation of food or beverages. Significant variation was observed in the rates of different injury situations throughout the year. Notably, burns related to seafood, heating, and firework activity occurred more often during crawfish season, colder months, and the months of January and July, respectively. In addition to establishing preliminary trends, these data may be useful in guiding the development of future evidence-based prevention efforts to target the most detrimental burn injuries in this population.

98 A 10-year Retrospective Review of Older Adult Admissions at a Regional Burn Center

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S64-S65
Author(s):  
Stephanie Campbell ◽  
Trina Andres
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Older Adult ◽  
Retrospective Review ◽  
Tap Water ◽  
Burn Injuries ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Prevention Programming ◽  
Burn Center ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Fire Flame

Abstract Introduction A verified regional burn center conducted a 10-year retrospective review of older adult patients admitted to the burn service. The primary goal of the review was to examine trends in mechanisms of injury, demographics, and outcomes to inform burn prevention programming. Methods Admission data from 2009–2018 was retrieved from burn center databases and combined into a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet. Older adults were defined as age 65 years and older. Patients admitted to the burn service for skin disorders or soft tissue infections were excluded. Patients with cutaneous burn injuries or inhalation only injuries were included. Results The total number of patients included was 697. Nearly a third of the patients were 65 to 69 years old, with incidence declining with each subsequent 5-year age group. Males accounted for 61.3% of admissions. Two thirds of the patients were White (67.6%). The other third consisted of Black (18.4%) and Hispanic (9.8%), Asian (1.9%) and Native American (0.14%) patients. Overall mortality was 14%. Mortality generally increased per 5-year age group: 65–69 (7.8%), 70–74 (10.6%), 75–79 (13.7%), 80–84 (20.6%), 85–89 (29.8%), 90–94 (24.2%), and 95–99 (42.9%). Baux scores ranged from 65 to 180. The highest Baux score that lived to discharge was 119. The average Baux score of the mortality group was 114 and the average of the lived group was 82. No patients with a Total Body Surface Area (TBSA) above 43% lived. Fire/flame burns accounted for 72.7%. Scald burns made up 19.9%, contact burns 3%, chemical burns 2.3% and electrical burns &lt; 1%. Nearly a quarter (24.6%) of fire/flame burns were related to smoking on home oxygen therapy (HOT), which was also the overall most common mechanism at 17.8%. Other fire/flame mechanisms included housefires (21.2%), clothing catching on fire (16.9%), and gasoline-related injuries (11.7%). More than 70% of scald burns came from the three mechanisms: hot tap water, boiling water, and hot grease. For the mortality group, a third of patients had been injured in housefires (32.7%), followed by clothing catching on fire (17.4%) and HOT burns (12.2%). Conclusions Incidence rates decline with increasing age but mortality rates climb. Burn injuries with a TBSA greater than 40% are generally fatal in the older adult. Flame burns account for the majority of injuries with HOT and house fire injuries as the leading mechanisms. Scald burns were most often caused by hot tap water or boiling water. White older adults accounted for more than double the number of patients identified in all other races combined. Applicability of Research to Practice The demographics and mechanism of injury insight gained from this review can be utilized to inform prevention programming design in this region. Trends in mortality can help emphasize the seriousness of preventing older adult burn injuries and anticipate the mortality risk for older adults admitted to the burn center.

546 Impact of the Affordable Care Act on Burn Outcomes

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S112-S113
Author(s):  
Jamie Oh ◽  
Amali Fernando ◽  
Stephen Sibbett ◽  
Gretchen J Carrougher ◽  
Barclay T Stewart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Affordable Care Act ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Burn Injury ◽  
Insurance Coverage ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Patient Disposition ◽  
Burn Center ◽  
The Affordable Care Act ◽  
Chi Square Analysis ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Introduction With changes in insurance coverage after the implementation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) in 2014, we aim to analyze the impact of Medicaid expansion on clinical outcomes and patient disposition after burn injury. We hypothesize that with increased insurance coverage, more patients are discharged to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) or rehabilitation center. Methods Under IRB approval, we reviewed trauma registry data for patients with burn injuries admitted to a regional burn center from 2011 to 2018. Patients were grouped into two categories: before (2011–2014) and after (2015–2018) ACA; we excluded data from 2014 to serve as a washout period. Outcomes of interest were length of hospital stay controlled for burn size (LOS/TBSA), number of complications, patient disposition (Home, SNF, or Rehab), and mortality. Chi square analysis and student t-tests were performed to determine differences between the two groups. Multivariate logistic regression including age, sex, race, distance from medical center, burn size, and etiology of the burn as covariates were used to determine the impact of ACA implementation on patient disposition. Results Inpatient mortality rates did not change following ACA implementation. Average LOS/TBSA and number of complications increased, which may be due to increased average age, burn size, and distance from the burn center after ACA. Fewer patients were discharged home and more patients were sent to rehabilitation centers and SNF, which may relate to more patients being insured. Even after adjusting for covariates, discharge to inpatient rehabilitation was significantly increased and discharge to a SNF approached significance. Conclusions Since ACA implementation, there has been no change in mortality after a burn injury, but an increase in average LOS and complication rates, consistent with increased injury severity. Rates of discharge to rehab centers and SNF improved with the increase in overall insurance coverage in the burn population. Applicability of Research to Practice This work highlights changes in patient outcomes with ACA implementation and can help to guide understanding of health disparity and resource utilization in this population.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document