618 Clinical and Humanistic Burdens of Pediatric Burns: A Systematic Literature Review
Abstract Introduction Children face long-term clinical and psychological sequelae from burn injuries. This review summarizes the scientific literature on the clinical and humanistic burdens of pediatric burns. Methods A systematic review of literature published between Jan 2015 and Jun 2020 was conducted based on PRISMA guidelines in Embase, Biosis, and MEDLINE to identify publications examining the clinical, humanistic, economic, and/or epidemiologic burdens of illness associated with pediatric burns in the US. Results Of 2,286 unique articles identified, 28 met eligibility criteria. This analysis focused on studies relating to the clinical (n=8) and humanistic (n=9) burdens of pediatric burns. Across all studies, flame and scald were the most common burn etiologies. Among the 8 clinical studies, several evaluated outcomes (n=2) or treatments (n=3) in predominantly graft recipients. One study found that 64% of pediatric split-thickness autograft recipients exhibited hypertrophic scarring (HTS) at the donor site. Other variables (time to re-epithelialization, donor-site harvest depth, harvest in an acute burn care setting, thigh donor-site location) were associated with increased risk of HTS. An increase in percentage total body surface area (%TBSA) burned corresponded to increased number of autograft procedures, risk for HTS, and viral infection risk. Other reported outcomes included infections (eg, healthcare-associated, wound, viral), pain, inhalation injury, and sepsis. One study found that while the frequency and intensity of pruritis decreased over time, 63% of children continued to report symptoms at 2 years after injury. Among the 9 humanistic studies, 4 reported larger %TBSA corresponded to worse health-related quality of life assessed by various instruments. In a study of patients under age 5 with burns, Burns Outcomes Questionnaire (0–4) scores improved over time in multiple domains. In youth with a history of burn injuries, patient-reported pain interference with daily living was significantly associated with decreased physical functioning, depression, and impaired peer relationships. Two studies assessed caregiver burden, with one study finding that 19% of caregivers self-reported clinical or at-risk levels of distress following the child’s burn injury. Conclusions Pediatric burns place a substantial clinical and humanistic burden on patients and their caregivers. While outcomes appeared to improve over time, clinical and humanistic consequences of pediatric burns endured. More research on novel treatment products and procedures is needed to reduce the burden of burns for this population.