scholarly journals Body Mass Index and Weight Loss in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in CALGB (Alliance)/SWOG 80405

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Brendan J Guercio ◽  
Sui Zhang ◽  
Alan P Venook ◽  
Fang-Shu Ou ◽  
Donna Niedzwiecki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Patient Outcome ◽  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Weight Loss ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Study Entry ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Background In nonmetastatic colorectal cancer, overweight and mild-to-moderately obese patients experience improved outcomes compared with other patients. Obesity’s influence on advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is relatively unexplored. Methods We conducted a prospective body mass index (BMI) companion study in Cancer and Leukemia Group B (now Alliance)/SWOG 80405, a phase III metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treatment trial. BMI was measured at trial registration. Primary and secondary endpoints were overall and progression-free survival, respectively. To minimize confounding by poor and rapidly declining health, we used Cox proportional hazards regression to adjust for known prognostic factors, comorbidities, physical activity, and weight loss during the 6 months prior to study entry. We also examined weight loss prior to enrollment as an independent predictor of patient outcome. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results Among 2323 patients with mCRC, there were no statistically significant associations between BMI and overall or progression-free survival (adjusted Ptrend = .12 and .40, respectively). Weight loss during the 6 months prior to study entry was associated with shorter overall and progression-free survival; compared with individuals with stable weight ±4.9%, individuals with weight loss greater than 15% experienced an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.52 for all-cause mortality (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.26 to 1.84; Ptrend < .001) and of 1.23 for disease progression or death (95% CI = 1.02 to 1.47; Ptrend = .006). Conclusions In this prospective study of patients with mCRC, BMI at time of first-line chemotherapy initiation was not associated with patient outcome. Weight loss prior to study entry was associated with increased risk of patient mortality and disease progression.

Bevacizumab in Combination With Oxaliplatin-Based Chemotherapy As First-Line Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Phase III Study

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (12) ◽  
pp. 2013-2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonard B. Saltz ◽  
Stephen Clarke ◽  
Eduardo Díaz-Rubio ◽  
Werner Scheithauer ◽  
Arie Figer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Placebo Group ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival

PurposeTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab when added to first-line oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (either capecitabine plus oxaliplatin [XELOX] or fluorouracil/folinic acid plus oxaliplatin [FOLFOX-4]) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC).Patients and MethodsPatients with MCRC were randomly assigned, in a 2 × 2 factorial design, to XELOX versus FOLFOX-4, and then to bevacizumab versus placebo. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS).ResultsA total of 1,401 patients were randomly assigned in this 2 × 2 analysis. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.4 months in the bevacizumab group and 8.0 months in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.83; 97.5% CI, 0.72 to 0.95; P = .0023). Median overall survival was 21.3 months in the bevacizumab group and 19.9 months in the placebo group (HR, 0.89; 97.5% CI, 0.76 to 1.03; P = .077). Response rates were similar in both arms. Analysis of treatment withdrawals showed that, despite protocol allowance of treatment continuation until disease progression, only 29% and 47% of bevacizumab and placebo recipients, respectively, were treated until progression. The toxicity profile of bevacizumab was consistent with that documented in previous trials.ConclusionThe addition of bevacizumab to oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy significantly improved PFS in this first-line trial in patients with MCRC. Overall survival differences did not reach statistical significance, and response rate was not improved by the addition of bevacizumab. Treatment continuation until disease progression may be necessary in order to optimize the contribution of bevacizumab to therapy.

scholarly journals Body Mass Index Is Prognostic in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Pooled Analysis of Patients From First-Line Clinical Trials in the ARCAD Database

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 144-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsay A. Renfro ◽  
Fotios Loupakis ◽  
Richard A. Adams ◽  
Matthew T. Seymour ◽  
Volker Heinemann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Risk Of Progression ◽  
Low Bmi

Purpose In recent retrospective analyses of early-stage colorectal cancer (CRC), low and high body mass index (BMI) scores were associated with worsened outcomes. Whether BMI is a prognostic or predictive factor in metastatic CRC (mCRC) is unclear. Patients and Methods Individual data from 21,149 patients enrolled onto 25 first-line mCRC trials during 1997 to 2012 were pooled. We assessed both prognostic and predictive effects of BMI on overall survival and progression-free survival, and we accounted for patient and tumor characteristics and therapy type (targeted v nontargeted). Results BMI was prognostic for overall survival (P < .001) and progression-free survival (P < .001), with an L-shaped pattern. That is, risk of progression and/or death was greatest for low BMI; risk decreased as BMI increased to approximately 28 kg/m2, and then it plateaued. Relative to obese patients, patients with a BMI of 18.5 kg/m2 had a 27% increased risk of having a PFS event (95% CI, 20% to 34%) and a 50% increased risk of death (95% CI, 43% to 56%). Low BMI was associated with poorer survival for men than women (interaction P < .001). BMI was not predictive of treatment effect. Conclusion Low BMI is associated with an increased risk of progression and death among the patients enrolled on the mCRC trials, with no increased risk for elevated BMI, in contrast to the adjuvant setting. Possible explanations include negative effects related to cancer cachexia in patients with low BMI, increased drug delivery or selection bias in patients with high BMI, and potential for an interaction between BMI and molecular signaling pathways.

Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy continued beyond first disease progression in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer previously treated with bevacizumab-based therapy: Patterns of disease progression and outcomes based on extent of disease in the ML18147 study.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3604-3604
Author(s):  
Richard Greil ◽  
Roger Von Moos ◽  
Jaafar Bennouna ◽  
Pia J. Osterlund ◽  
Thierry André ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Extensive Disease ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Extent Of Disease ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

3604 Background: ML18147 demonstrated that bevacizumab (BEV) + chemotherapy (CT) continued beyond first disease progression (PD) significantly prolongs overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) as second-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) [Bennouna et al. Lancet Oncol 2012]. Here we report exploratory analyses of patterns of PD and outcomes based on extent of disease. Methods: In ML18147, patients (pts) with unresectable, histologically confirmed mCRC who progressed ≤3 months after discontinuation of first-line BEV were randomised to second-line CT±BEV. This exploratory analysis evaluated PD patterns, time from discontinuation of study medications to PD, and survival outcome (OS, PFS) based on liver-limited vs extensive disease. Results: Details on patterns of PD and outcome by extent of disease are shown in the table. Conclusions: These exploratory analyses suggest that pts with liver-limited or extensive disease seem to benefit equally from BEV+CT continued beyond PD. Our findings indicate that the pattern of PD does not appear to differ between the two treatment arms following cessation of BEV treatment in this setting. Clinical trial information: NCT00700102. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Bevacizumab plus capecitabine as later-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and fluoropyrimidines

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yeong Hak Bang ◽  
Jeong Eun Kim ◽  
Ji Sung Lee ◽  
Sun Young Kim ◽  
Kyu-Pyo Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Medical Need ◽  
Significant Disease

AbstractThere is an unmet medical need for later-line treatment options for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Considering that, beyond progression, co-treatment with bevacizumab and cytotoxic chemotherapy showed less toxicity and a significant disease control rate, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of capecitabine and bevacizumab. This single-center retrospective study included 157 patients between May 2011 and February 2018, who received bevacizumab plus capecitabine as later-line chemotherapy after progressing with irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and fluoropyrimidines. The study treatment consisted of bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg on day 1 and capecitabine 1,250 mg/m2 orally (PO) twice daily on day 1 to 14, repeated every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The median PFS was 4.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.9–5.3). The median overall survival (OS) was 9.7 months (95% CI 8.3–11.1). The overall response rate was 14% (22/157). Patients who had not received prior targeted agents showed better survival outcomes in the multivariable analysis of OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.59, 95% CI 0.43–0.82, P = 0.002) and PFS (HR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.43–0.85, P = 0.004). Bevacizumab plus capecitabine could be a considerably efficacious option for patients with mCRC refractory to prior standard treatments.

Lonsurf (trifluridine/tipiracil): Assessing the impact of dose related toxicities and progression free survival in (refractory) metastatic colorectal cancer

2021 ◽  
pp. 107815522110179
Author(s):  
Olivia R Court
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Dose Reduction ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Electronic Patient Records ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Length Of Treatment ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
The Impact

In the RECOURSE trial which lead to its accreditation, Lonsurf (trifluridine/tipiracil) was shown to extend progression free survival (PFS) by 1.8 months in metastatic colorectal cancer. This Trust audit aims to assess the average quantity of cycles of Lonsurf received by participants and the length of time it extends PFS. Similarly, to identify how many participants required a dose-reduction or experienced toxicities which necessitated supportive therapies. Quantitative data was collected retrospectively from all participants who had received ≥1 cycle of Lonsurf from The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre (CCC) from 2016 until June 2020. Participant electronic patient records were accessed to identify toxicity grading, length of treatment received, the date progression was identified, if dose reductions were applied and if supportive therapies were administered. Lonsurf extends PFS in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer at CCC by 3.0 months (95% CI: 2.73–3.27) and average treatment length was 2.4 months. However, 78 participants (41.5%) received a dose reduction due to toxicities. A total of 955 toxicities were recorded by participants; the most commonly reported toxicities irrespective of grade were fatigue (33.8%), diarrhoea (13.8%) and nausea (12.3%). The most common grade ≥3 toxicities were constipation and infection. The most frequently utilised supportive therapies were loperamide (49.6%) and domperidone (49.1%). Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (GCSF) was required by patients on 5 occasions (0.3%) in total. Lonsurf extends median PFS in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer by 3.0 months. The most common grade ≥3 toxicities which necessitated supportive therapies or a dose reduction were gastrointestinal and infection.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document