scholarly journals SARS–CoV-2 isolation from an appendix

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shahzaib Ahmad ◽  
Rahim Nadeem Ahmed ◽  
Poonam Jani ◽  
Mattee Ullah ◽  
Hossam Aboulgheit
Keyword(s):  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Abdominal Pain ◽  
Respiratory Symptoms ◽  
Tissue Sample ◽  
Gastrointestinal Symptoms ◽  
Shortness Of Breath ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Histological Features ◽  
First Case ◽  
Polymerase Chain

Abstract Efforts to recognize SARS–CoV-2 infection have focused on respiratory symptoms such as cough and shortness of breath. Although it is also well known that SARS–CoV-2 infection can cause gastrointestinal symptoms such as abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea, there are emerging reports of SARS–CoV-2 infection causing surgical pathology. We present the first case report of SARS–CoV-2 infection directly causing acute appendicitis, first suspected due to highly atypical histological features and later confirmed as polymerase chain reaction positive appendicular tissue sample.

scholarly journals Gastrointestinal symptoms as antecedent signs of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 323-325
Author(s):  
Aleksandra Młodożeniec ◽  
◽  
Paulina Szul ◽  
Agnieszka Gala-Błądzińska ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Symptoms ◽  
Gastrointestinal Symptoms ◽  
Final Diagnosis ◽  
Shortness Of Breath ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Acute Infectious Disease ◽  
History Of ◽  
Polymerase Chain ◽  
Loss Of Appetite

Introduction. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‑19) is an acute infectious disease of the respiratory system caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS‑CoV‑2). Most patients present with typical, respiratory symptoms. Common signs include cough, fever, dyspnea and shortness of breath. In this case we provide atypical indications of COVID-19, which may occur earlier than respiratory symptoms. Aim. This case is an example of an unusual course of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Description of the case. This article describes a case of a 63-year-old man and his wife, a 60-year old woman who were admitted to the emergency department with a few days’ history of gastrointestinal symptoms. Both patients presented with the digestive symptoms of nausea, diarrhea and loss of appetite. They denied abdominal pain and the loss of smell or taste. Due to suspicion of SARS-CoV-2 infection a nasopharyngeal swabs of both patients was taken. The results of real- time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction were positive. When the final diagnosis of COVID-19 was established they were transported to another hospital. Conclusion. COVID-19 may manifest with atypical indications such a nausea and diarrhea. An atypical indications of COVID-19 may occur earlier than respiratory symptoms. It is important for clinicians to remain alert.

scholarly journals Adolescent COVID-19-Associated Fatal Rhabdomyolysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 215013272098564
Author(s):  
Huda Anwar ◽  
Anwaar Al Lawati
Keyword(s):  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Global Health ◽  
Respiratory Tract ◽  
Sore Throat ◽  
Shortness Of Breath ◽  
Past Medical History ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Viral Illness ◽  
Polymerase Chain ◽  
High Index Of Suspicion

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has become an urgent global health priority. Although most patients with COVID-19 manifest with fever and respiratory tract symptoms, COVID-19 infections may also involve other organs and extrarespiratory manifestations, including cardiac, gastrointestinal, hepatic, renal, and neurological symptoms. This case describes a 16-year-old boy who presented with fever, sore throat, myalgia, and subsequently with shortness of breath. A diagnosis of COVID-19 was confirmed by polymerase chain reaction. His condition deteriorated and he died within 3 days of admission. An evaluation of his past medical history confirmed an episode of viral illness which had progressed to myositis and rhabdomyolysis 1 year prior. Clinicians should be aware of this complication and maintain a high index of suspicion in cases of COVID-19 presenting with extrapulmonary symptoms.

Polymerase chain reaction in the diagnosis of parotid gland tuberculosis

1998 ◽  
Vol 112 (5) ◽  
pp. 494-496 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enis Alpin Güneri ◽  
Ahmet Ömer İkiz ◽  
Nese Atabey ◽  
Özlem İzci ◽  
Semih Sütay
Keyword(s):  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Differential Diagnosis ◽  
Parotid Gland ◽  
Mycobacterial Infection ◽  
Social Characteristics ◽  
Causative Organism ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
First Case ◽  
Polymerase Chain ◽  
High Degree

AbstractA parotid gland mass with presenting features of malignancy is a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. The histological nature of the lesion must be clearly determined before proceeding with facial nerve sacrificing surgery. Although rare, tuberculosis of the parotid gland must be included in the differential diagnosis of a parotid gland mass especially when the social characteristics of the patient suggests a mycobacterial infection. Primary tuberculosis of the parotid gland is generally encountered among populations with a high incidence of pulmonary disease. The difficulty in the differential diagnosis of a parotid gland malignancy may be helped by a high degree of clinical suspicion, since laboratory tests generally do not identify the specific causative organism. This article reports the first case of parotid gland tuberculosis with clinical and radiodiagnostical features simulating malignancy in which the diagnosis was confirmed by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

A Microdissection and Molecular Genotyping Assay to Confirm the Identity of Tissue Floaters in Paraffin-Embedded Tissue Blocks

2003 ◽  
Vol 127 (2) ◽  
pp. 213-217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer L. Hunt ◽  
Patricia Swalsky ◽  
E. Sasatomi ◽  
Laura Niehouse ◽  
Anke Bakker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Tissue Sample ◽  
Small Samples ◽  
Allelic Loss ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Neoplastic Tissue ◽  
Tissue Samples ◽  
Genotyping Assay ◽  
Tissue Identification ◽  
Polymerase Chain

Abstract Context.—A recurring problem in surgical pathology practice is specimen mix-up and floater contamination. While many cases can be resolved histologically, a significant number remain unclear and may have serious clinical and medicolegal implications. Objectives.—To design a microdissection and genotyping assay to identify contaminating floater tissues in paraffin-embedded tissues that is optimized for small samples, and to use the assay to resolve a series of clinical cases with floater tissues. Materials and Methods.—Twenty-one cases of possible tissue floater contamination in paraffin-embedded tissue blocks were included. Using 4 unstained, 4-μm-thick histologic sections, multiple sites were microdissected under direct visualization either by hand or by laser capture microdissection. Nonneoplastic and neoplastic tissues were sampled. Polymerase chain reaction was performed for a panel of 10 polymorphic microsatellite markers at 1p34, 3p26, 5q21, 9p21, 10q23, and 17p13. Allele size and content were analyzed semiquantitatively by fluorescent capillary electrophoresis, and the genotypes for the tissues in the paraffin-embedded tissue blocks were compared for identity. Results.—Tissue identification was successful in all cases, despite small tissue sample size and fixation effects. Comparative analysis of neoplastic tissue floaters and the presumptive source tumor was performed when possible to control for possible allelic loss or microsatellite instability. Conclusions.—Microdissection and genotyping are effective and reliable means to objectively resolve problems of possible floater contamination. Even minute tissue samples provide sufficient DNA template for polymerase chain reaction microsatellite analysis. Because of the potential clinical implications of floaters, we recommend that all suspected floaters that would change a diagnosis from benign to malignant be subjected to genotyping assay to confirm the identity of the floater tissue.

scholarly journals Gastrointestinal and Liver Manifestations of COVID-19

2020 ◽  
Vol 56 (02) ◽  
pp. 091-098
Author(s):  
Sunil Taneja ◽  
Rohit Mehtani ◽  
Yogesh Kumar Chawla
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Symptoms ◽  
Gastrointestinal Symptoms ◽  
Liver Function Tests ◽  
Atypical Presentation ◽  
Shortness Of Breath ◽  
Gi Tract ◽  
First Case ◽  
The World ◽  
Novel Coronavirus ◽  
Common Manifestation

AbstractA novel Coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2 illness, has spread throughout the world after the first case was reported from Wuhan, China, in December 2019. This illness typically causes respiratory symptoms like fever, cough, and shortness of breath, although atypical presentation with gastrointestinal symptoms like abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea are being increasingly reported. The viral RNA has been detected in saliva and stool of such patients, which raises concerns regarding the risk of transmission during gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy. Many patients also have liver involvement, with the most common manifestation being deranged liver function tests. This review highlights the symptomatology, mechanism, and histopathology findings of SARS-CoV-2 in GI tract and liver. This review also focuses on implications of COVID-19 in patients afflicted with chronic liver disease and in patients undergoing liver transplantation.

scholarly journals Culture-Negative Endocarditis Diagnosed Using 16S DNA Polymerase Chain Reaction

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 216-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Duffett ◽  
Bayan Missaghi ◽  
Peter Daley
Keyword(s):  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Dna Polymerase ◽  
Tissue Sample ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Severe Aortic Regurgitation ◽  
Valve Tissue ◽  
Polymerase Chain ◽  
Dna Pcr ◽  
Culture Negative

16S DNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a molecular amplification technique that can be used to identify bacterial pathogens in culture-negative endocarditis. Bacterial DNA can be isolated from surgically excised valve tissue or from blood collected in EDTA vials. Use of this technique is particularly helpful in identifying the bacterial pathogen in cases of culture-negative endocarditis. A case involving a 48-year-old man who presented with severe aortic regurgitation and a four-month prodrome of low-grade fever is reported. Blood and valve tissue cultures following valve replacement were negative. A valve tissue sample was sent for investigation with 16S DNA PCR, which successfully identifiedStreptococcus salivariusand was interpreted as the true diagnosis. A review of the literature suggests that 16S DNA PCR from valve tissue is a more sensitive diagnostic test than culture. It is also extremely specific, based on a sequence match of at least 500 base pairs.

scholarly journals Transient benign hyperphosphatasemia due to COVID-19: the first case report

2020 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tugba Erat ◽  
Müge Atar ◽  
Tugba Kontbay
Keyword(s):  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Alkaline Phosphatase ◽  
Case Report ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Benign Condition ◽  
Case Presentation ◽  
Normal Ranges ◽  
First Case ◽  
Polymerase Chain

AbstractObjectivesCoronavirus disease (COVID-19) rapidly spread worldwide in a few months and was declared as a worldwide pandemic by WHO in March 2020. Transient benign hyperphosphatasemia (THI) is a benign condition associated with marked elevation of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) without any other kidney, bone, and liver pathologies.Case presentationHerein, we report a previously healthy 16-month-old female patient who developed a secondary transient benign hyperphosphatasemia associated with SARS-CoV-2. Patient whole family’s SARS-CoV-2 real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) results were positive. Since THI is a diagnosis of exclusion, other reasons that may cause ALP elevation should be ruled out. ALP activity decreased and turned to normal ranges within the following month. THI has been reported to be in association with various conditions. Its relationship with many viruses has been reported previously.ConclusionsIf ALP elevation is detected in patients with COVID 19 due to the increasing number of infections, THI should be considered if there is no other accompanying pathology.

scholarly journals Tuberculous Osteomyelitis of the Hyoid Bone: A Case Report

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Paul Emerson ◽  
Ajay Philip ◽  
George M. Varghese ◽  
Regi Thomas
Keyword(s):  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Hyoid Bone ◽  
Osteolytic Lesion ◽  
Polymerase Chain Reaction Test ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Skeletal Tuberculosis ◽  
First Case ◽  
Tuberculous Osteomyelitis ◽  
Polymerase Chain ◽  
Chain Reaction Test

Skeletal tuberculosis is a well-known disease entity. We report the first case involving hyoid bone and the use of polymerase chain reaction-based test in detection and management. A 62-year-old male presented with neck swelling of a 20-day duration along with change of voice and dysphagia. Examination revealed a cystic, osteolytic lesion of the hyoid bone which histopathologically demonstrated features of granulomatous infection. A polymerase chain reaction test confirmed the diagnosis of tuberculosis.

scholarly journals Perspective of Arguments in Public Health

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-45
Author(s):  
Dinesh Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Respiratory Symptoms ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Negative Report ◽  
Polymerase Chain ◽  
Time Of Admission ◽  
Pcr Test

Recently, an argument was put forth because a symptomatic and positive patient for CoVID-19 turned tested negative after 7 days, so discharged from the hospital. Both at the time of admission and discharge real-time reverse transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) was done for testing of CoVID-19. Immediately, patient again developed respiratory symptoms and was admitted to hospital again. Amidst of current CoVID-19 pandemic, a question was asked “What is the specificity of the Real Time-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) test for COVID-19?” with an assumption that what if at the time of discharge the disease is present in patient but test turned out to be negative? In response to that a counter statement was posed that “It is the sensitivity that should be asked rather than specificity”. It was based on the implication of primary question that was implying false negative report of the RT-PCR. It means, since patient was discharged with negative result that could be false negative.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document