Those Baby Blues

2020 ◽  
pp. 45-50
Author(s):  
Tracey Wagner
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Marked Change ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Altered Level ◽  
American Academy Of Pediatrics ◽  
Baby Blues ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
High Risk Infants ◽  
Life Threatening Event

Background: Per American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) guidelines, the term “brief resolved unexplained event” (BRUE) has replaced the previous term “apparent life threatening event” (ALTE). A BRUE is defined as an event occurring in infants younger than 12 months of age who were reported as having a sudden brief episode with at least one of the following symptoms: (a) cyanosis or pallor, (b) absent or irregular breathing, (c) marked change in tone, and/or (d) an altered level of responsiveness. There must be no other etiology or diagnosis that better explains the event. Management: The recommended management of a BRUE depends upon risk stratification. All low risk criteria must be present for a patient to be considered low risk. Low risk infants require limited diagnostics and do not require admission to the hospital. The AAP did not provide specific recommendations for high risk infants.

Brief Resolved Unexplained Event

2020 ◽  
pp. 31-34
Author(s):  
Ilene Claudius
Keyword(s):  
Risk Stratification ◽  
American Academy ◽  
Marked Change ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Altered Level ◽  
Routine Testing ◽  
American Academy Of Pediatrics ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Historic Data ◽  
Life Threatening Event

The term brief resolved unexplained event (BRUE) replaced the term apparent life-threatening event (ALTE) after the publication of a 2016 American Academy of Pediatrics guideline. BRUE is defined as occurring in an infant younger than age 1 year who has experienced a brief episode of cyanosis or pallor; absent, decreased, or irregular breathing; marked change in tone; and/or altered level of responsiveness. Due to the novelty of the condition BRUE, minimal literature exists to inform incidence or risk. Although the overlap between ALTE and BRUE is not complete, historic data on ALTE can be used to fill these gaps. The American Academy of Pediatrics guideline offers recommendations for risk stratification and management. BRUE patients do not benefit from routine testing, and low-risk BRUE patients do not benefit from empiric admission for monitoring.

scholarly journals The pseudo-life-threatening conditions in infants

2019 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 13-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. N. Korableva ◽  
L. M. Makarov ◽  
L. A. Balykova ◽  
N. P. Kotlukova
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Skin Color ◽  
Muscle Tone ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
First Year ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
First Year Of Life ◽  
Life Threatening Event

The article analyzes the literature on the development of views on the definition, approaches to diagnostics and tactical measures in case of suddenly manifesting conditions in children of the first year of life, accompanied by respiratory failure, changes in muscle tone and skin color. The article contains data from the clinical guidelines of theAmericanAcademyof Pediatrics 2016. The above guidelines gave introduced a new term “brief resolved unexplained event” (BRUE) and distinguished two groups of infants – with low and high risk of unfavorable outcome. The article contains a definition of a “life-threatening event”, which refers to events in children of the first year of life who have experienced a rapidly resolved unexplained condition and met the criteria of low risk. The authors describe the approaches to the diagnosis and prevention of pseudo-life-threatening events in infants. The authors call the pediatric community to discuss and present their own view on the problem of definition and tactical measures necessary for identifying quickly resolved unexplained events in children of the first year of life who meet the criteria of low risk.

Identification of Molecular Biomarkers and Pathways for Risk Stratification in Human Papilloma Virus-Associated Cancers

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eun Jung Kwon ◽  
Hye Ran Lee ◽  
Ju Ho Lee ◽  
Mihyang Ha ◽  
Yun Hak Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Molecular Biomarkers ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Receptor Interaction ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Tumor Microenvironments ◽  
Cell Immunity

Abstract Background: Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the major cause of cervical cancer (CC) etiology; its contribution to head and neck cancer (HNC) incidence is steadily increasing. As individual patients’ response to the treatment of HPV-associated cancer is variable, there is a pressing need for the identification of biomarkers for risk stratification that can help determine the intensity of treatment. Methods: We have previously reported a novel prognostic and predictive indicator (HPPI) scoring system in HPV-associated cancers regardless of the anatomical locations by analyzing the TCGA and GEO databases. In this study, we comprehensively investigated the association of group-specific expression patterns of common differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between high-risk and low-risk groups in HPV-associated CC and HNC, identifying a molecular biomarkers and pathways for the risk stratification. Results: Among the identified 174 DEGs, expression of the genes associated with extracellular matrix (ECM)-receptor interaction pathway (ITGA5, ITGB1, LAMB1, LAMC1) were increased in high-risk groups in both HPV-associated CC and HNC while expression of the genes associated with the T-cell immunity (CD3D, CD3E, CD8B, LCK, and ZAP70) were decreased vise versa. The individual genes showed statistically significant prognostic impact on HPV-associated cancers but not on HPV-negative cancers. The expression levels of identified genes were similar between HPV-negative and HPV-associated high-risk groups with distinct expression patterns only in HPV-associated low-risk groups. Each group of genes showed negative correlations, and distinct patterns of immune cell infiltration in tumor microenvironments. Conclusion: These results identify molecular biomarkers and pathways for risk stratification in HPV-associated cancers regardless of anatomical locations. The identified targets are selectively working in only HPV-associated cancers, but not in HPV-negative cancers indicating possibility of the selective targets governing HPV-infective tumor microenvironments.

scholarly journals Pre-hospital risk assessment in suspected non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: A prospective observational study

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominique N van Dongen ◽  
Rudolf T Tolsma ◽  
Marion J Fokkert ◽  
Erik A Badings ◽  
Aize van der Sluis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Heart Score ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
St Elevation

Background: Pre-hospital risk stratification of non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) by the complete HEART score has not yet been assessed. We investigated whether pre-hospital risk stratification of patients with suspected NSTE-ACS using the HEART score is accurate in predicting major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Methods: This is a prospective observational study, including 700 patients with suspected NSTE-ACS. Risk stratification was performed by ambulance paramedics, using the HEART score; low risk was defined as HEART score ⩽ 3. Primary endpoint was occurrence of MACE within 45 days after inclusion. Secondary endpoint was myocardial infarction or death. Results: A total of 172 patients (24.6%) were stratified as low risk and 528 patients (75.4%) as intermediate to high risk. Mean age was 53.9 years in the low risk group and 66.7 years in the intermediate to high risk group ( p<0.001), 50% were male in the low risk group versus 60% in the intermediate to high risk group ( p=0.026). MACE occurred in five patients in the low risk group (2.9%) and in 111 (21.0%) patients at intermediate or high risk ( p<0.001). There were no deaths in the low risk group and the occurrence of acute myocardial infarction in this group was 1.2%. In the high risk group six patients died (1.1%) and 76 patients had myocardial infarction (14.4%). Conclusions: In suspected NSTE-ACS, pre-hospital risk stratification by ambulance paramedics, including troponin measurement, is accurate in differentiating between low and intermediate to high risk. Future studies should investigate whether transportation of low risk patients to a hospital can be avoided, and whether high risk patients benefit from immediate transfer to a hospital with early coronary angiography possibilities.

scholarly journals Establishment of an Ultrasound Malignancy Risk Stratification Model for Thyroid Nodules Larger Than 4 cm

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuehua Xi ◽  
Ying Wang ◽  
Luying Gao ◽  
Yuxin Jiang ◽  
Zhiyong Liang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Thyroid Nodules ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Validation Dataset ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Solid Mass ◽  
Incidence And Mortality ◽  
Risk Stratification Model

BackgroundThe incidence and mortality of thyroid cancer, including thyroid nodules &gt; 4 cm, have been increasing in recent years. The current evaluation methods are based mostly on studies of patients with thyroid nodules &lt; 4 cm. The aim of the current study was to establish a risk stratification model to predict risk of malignancy in thyroid nodules &gt; 4 cm.MethodsA total of 279 thyroid nodules &gt; 4 cm in 267 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Nodules were randomly assigned to a training dataset (n = 140) and a validation dataset (n = 139). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was applied to establish a nomogram. The risk stratification of thyroid nodules &gt; 4 cm was established according to the nomogram. The diagnostic performance of the model was evaluated and compared with the American College Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS), Kwak TI-RADS and 2015 ATA guidelines using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).ResultsThe analysis included 279 nodules (267 patients, 50.6 ± 13.2 years): 229 were benign and 50 were malignant. Multivariate regression revealed microcalcification, solid mass, ill-defined border and hypoechogenicity as independent risk factors. Based on the four factors, a risk stratified clinical model was developed for evaluating nodules &gt; 4 cm, which includes three categories: high risk (risk value = 0.8-0.9, with more than 3 factors), intermediate risk (risk value = 0.3-0.7, with 2 factors or microcalcification) and low risk (risk value = 0.1-0.2, with 1 factor except microcalcification). In the validation dataset, the malignancy rate of thyroid nodules &gt; 4 cm that were classified as high risk was 88.9%; as intermediate risk, 35.7%; and as low risk, 6.9%. The new model showed greater AUC than ACR TI-RADS (0.897 vs. 0.855, p = 0.040), but similar sensitivity (61.9% vs. 57.1%, p = 0.480) and specificity (91.5% vs. 93.2%, p = 0.680).ConclusionMicrocalcification, solid mass, ill-defined border and hypoechogenicity on ultrasound may be signs of malignancy in thyroid nodules &gt; 4 cm. A risk stratification model for nodules &gt; 4 cm may show better diagnostic performance than ACR TI-RADS, which may lead to better preoperative decision-making.

P4688Additional role of unmodifiable risk factors in pulmonary arterial hypertension risk stratification according to current ESC/ERS guidelines

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Zuffa ◽  
F Dardi ◽  
M Palazzini ◽  
E Gotti ◽  
A Rinaldi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Arterial Hypertension ◽  
Specific Treatment ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
P Value ◽  
Pulmonary Arterial

Abstract Background Current pulmonary hypertension (PH) guidelines stratify the risk of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) using a multiparametric approach. Anyway, the role of unmodifiable risk factors is not taken into account. Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of unmodifiable risk factors (age, gender, PAH aetiology) in PAH risk stratification using the recently proposed simplified risk table and to test if these factors influence the response to PAH-specific treatment. Methods All patients with PAH referred to a single centre were included from 2003 to 2017. We applied a simplified risk assessment strategy using the following criteria: WHO functional class, 6-min walking distance, right atrial pressure or brain natriuretic peptide plasma levels and cardiac index (CI) or mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO2). The last 2 criteria were based on which parameter was available; if both were available the worst was chosen. Risk strata were defined as: Low risk= at least 3 low risk and no high-risk criteria; High risk= at least 2 high risk criteria including CI or SvO2; Intermediate risk= definitions of low or high risk not fulfilled. Then we performed multivariate Cox analysis to evaluate what are the independent predictors of survival (age, gender, PAH aetiology together with the recently proposed simplified PAH risk table) and we tested if these factors influence the response to PAH specific therapy comparing the % improvement of hemodynamic parameters from baseline to 3–4 months after starting treatment. Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test was used for comparisons. Results Six hundreds and twenty-one treatment-naïve patients were enrolled. Age [HR (95% CI) = 1.022 (1.014–1.030); p-value <0.001], male gender [HR (95% CI) = 1.881 (1.479–2.392); p-value <0.001] and connective tissue disease (CTD)-PAH aetiology [HR (95% CI)= 2.278 (1.733–2.995); p-value <0.001] were all independent predictors of prognosis in patients with PAH together with the recently validated simplified PAH risk table [HR (95% CI) = 2.161 (1.783–2.618); p-value <0.001] but they didn't significantly influence the response to PAH specific treatment as shown in the Figure. Figure 1 Conclusions Age, gender and CTD-PAH aetiology significantly influence prognosis together with the recently validated simplified PAH risk table but don't significantly influence the response to PAH-specific treatment. Acknowledgement/Funding None

scholarly journals Persisting new nodules in incidence rounds of the NELSON CT lung cancer screening study

Thorax ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. 247-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joan E Walter ◽  
Marjolein A Heuvelmans ◽  
Kevin ten Haaf ◽  
Rozemarijn Vliegenthart ◽  
Carlijn M van der Aalst ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Lung Cancer Screening ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Solid Nodule ◽  
Volume Limit ◽  
Management Protocol

BackgroundThe US guidelines recommend low-dose CT (LDCT) lung cancer screening for high-risk individuals. New solid nodules after baseline screening are common and have a high lung cancer probability. Currently, no evidence exists concerning the risk stratification of non-resolving new solid nodules at first LDCT screening after initial detection.MethodsIn the Dutch-Belgian Randomized Lung Cancer Screening (NELSON) trial, 7295 participants underwent the second and 6922 participants the third screening round. We included participants with solid nodules that were registered as new or <15 mm³ (study detection limit) at previous screens and received additional screening after initial detection, thereby excluding high-risk nodules according to the NELSON management protocol (nodules ≥500 mm3).ResultsOverall, 680 participants with 1020 low-risk and intermediate-risk new solid nodules were included. A total of 562 (55%) new solid nodules were resolving, leaving 356 (52%) participants with a non-resolving new solid nodule, of whom 25 (7%) were diagnosed with lung cancer. At first screening after initial detection, volume doubling time (VDT), volume, and VDT combined with a predefined ≥200 mm3 volume cut-off had high discrimination for lung cancer (VDT, area under the curve (AUC): 0.913; volume, AUC: 0.875; VDT and ≥200 mm3 combination, AUC: 0.939). Classifying a new solid nodule with either ≤590 days VDT or ≥200 mm3 volume positive provided 100% sensitivity, 84% specificity and 27% positive predictive value for lung cancer.ConclusionsMore than half of new low-risk and intermediate-risk solid nodules in LDCT lung cancer screening resolve. At follow-up, growth assessment potentially combined with a volume limit can be used for risk stratification.Trial registration numberISRCTN63545820; pre-results.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document