Non-heart-beating organ donation

Author(s):  
Mohamed Y. Rady ◽  
Ari R. Joffe

The transplantation community endorses controlled and uncontrolled non-heart-beating organ donation (NHBD) to increase the supply of transplantable organs at end of life. Cardiac arrest must occur within 1–2 hours after the withdrawal of life-support in controlled NHBD. Uncontrolled NHBD is performed after failed cardiopulmonary resuscitation in an unexpected witnessed cardiac arrest. Donor management aims to protect transplantable organs against warm ischaemic injury through the optimization of haemodynamics and mechanical ventilation. This also requires antemortem instrumentation and systemic anticoagulation for organ perseveration in controlled NHBD. Interval support with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or cardiopulmonary bypass is generally required for optimal organ perfusion and oxygenation in uncontrolled NHBD, which remains a controversial medical practice. There are several unresolved ethical challenges. The circulatory criterion of 2–10 minutes of absent arterial pulse does not comply with the uniform determination of death criterion of the irreversible cessation of functions of the cardiovascular or central nervous systems. There are no robust safeguards in clinical practice that can prevent faulty prognostication, and premature withdrawal of treatment or termination of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Unmanaged conflicting interests of increasing the supply of transplantable organs can have serious consequences on the medical care of potentially salvageable patients. Perimortem interventions can interfere with the delivery of an optimal quality of end-of-life care. The lack of disclosure of these NHBD ethical controversies does not uphold the moral obligation for an informed consent.

1999 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 126-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
James M. DuBois

The family of a patient who is unconscious and respirator-dependent has made a decision to discontinue medical treatment. The patient had signed a donor card. The family wants to respect this decision, and agrees to non-heart-beating organ donation. Consequently, as the patient is weaned from the ventilator, he is prepped for organ explantation. Two minutes after the patient goes into cardiac arrest, he is declared dead and the transplant team arrives to begin organ procurement. At the time retrieval begins, it is not certain that the patient's brain is dead or that cardiac function cannot be restored. Procurement follows uneventfully, and two transplantable kidneys are retrieved.Many people now consider such cases of non-heart-beating organ donation to be ethically permissible. However, widespread disagreement persists as to how such practices are to be justified and whether such practices are compatible with the Uniform Declaration of Death Act (UDDA). In this paper, I argue that non-heart-beating organ donation can be ethically justified, that in the justified cases the patients are in fact dead, and that the early declarations of death required for such donation do comply with the UDDA.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 149
Author(s):  
Anugerah Ruben Ananda ◽  
Desi Friska Dela Zalukhu ◽  
Firdaus G Junior ◽  
Marisa Junianti Manik ◽  
Swingly Wikliv D

<p><em>Cardiac arrest is a significant cause of death worldwide, and an estimated 17.9 million people die from heart disease. In 2016, cardiac arrest represented 31% of all global deaths, and heart attacks and strokes caused 85%. In the treatment of cardiac arrest, health providers must perform cardiac and pulmonary resuscitation, a combination of chest compressions, and assistance for the victim's breathing. Nurses must be able to provide high-quality CPR to the patients for optimal outcomes. This study aimed to describe the knowledge of nurses in six private hospitals in Indonesia about high-quality CPR. This research was quantitative descriptive using a modified questionnaire regarding the theory of high-quality CPR. The population in this study were nurses from adult inpatient wards at six private hospitals in Indonesia with a total sample of 86 respondents through convenience sampling technique. The results showed that 79.1% inpatient nurses at six hospitals in Indonesia had good knowledge about high-quality CPR. Nurses are expected to maintain and improve their knowledge and ability to provide high-quality CPR so that the basic life support provided will be of high quality and provide optimal results for cardiac arrest patients in hospitals.</em><strong><br /><br />BAHASA INDONESIA ABSTRAK: </strong>Henti jantung merupakan penyebab kematian yang signifikan di dunia dan diperkirakan 17,9 juta orang meninggal karena penyakit jantung. Pada 2016, henti jantung mewakili 31% dari semua kematian global, dan 85% disebabkan oleh serangan jantung dan stroke. Dalam penanganan henti jantung, perawat harus melakukan resusitasi jantung dan paru yaitu kombinasi dari kompresi dada dan bantuan terhadap pernafasan korban. Tenaga kesehatan harus mampu memberikan<em> high-quality</em> CPR kepada korban untuk hasil yang optimal. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui gambaran pengetahuan perawat tentang high-quality CPR di enam rumah sakit swasta di Indonesia. Penelitian ini merupakan studi deskriptif kuantitatif dengan menggunakan kuesioner mengenai teori <em>high-quality</em> CPR yang telah dimodifikasi. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah perawat ruang rawat inap dewasa di enam rumah sakit swasta di Indonesia dengan jumlah sampel sebanyak 86 responden melalui teknik sampel konvenien. Hasil penelitian menunjukan 79.1% perawat rawat inap di enam rumah sakit di Indonesia memiliki pengetahuan tentang <em>high-quality</em> CPR pada tingkat yang baik. Perawat diharapkan untuk tetap mempertahankan dan meningkatkan pengetahuan dan kemampuan pemberian <em>high-quality CPR</em> sehingga bantuan hidup dasar yang diberikan akan berkualitas dan memberikan hasil optimal bagi pasien henti jantung dalam rumah sakit.</p>


Circulation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 138 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanna C Moore ◽  
Michael Grahl ◽  
Tracy Marko ◽  
Ariel Blythe-Reske ◽  
Amber Lage ◽  
...  

Background: Rates of neurologically intact survival after cardiac arrest remain abysmal. Neuro-prognostication intra-arrest is challenging, with few real-time factors that can be used to determine patient prognosis. During the implementation of a new cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) protocol in a large urban pre-hospital system, first responders prospectively recorded the presence of signs of perfusion during CPR. Hypothesis: Positive signs of perfusion would be a predictor of a good neurologic outcome in this observational study, as defined by Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) Score of 1 or 2. Methods: Basic life support first responders (n = 420) and paramedics (n = 207) underwent training including didactic and hands-on sessions to learn the new protocol, which included active compression-decompression CPR with an impedance threshold device. In addition to patient demographics and circumstances of cardiac arrest, signs of perfusion during CPR were prospectively recorded and included improved color, pulse during CPR, gasping, and movement during CPR. Chart review was performed to determine CPC score at discharge. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and calculation of unadjusted odds ratios. Results: The new protocol began May 1, 2017. Cases from May 2017-November 2017 (n= 102) were reviewed, with complete data available for 96 patients (94%). The median age was 56 (range 25-97), 54/91 (59%) male, 43/102 (42%) witnessed, 31/90 (34%) shockable rhythm, and 51/102 (50%) receiving bystander CPR. Improved color during CPR was seen in 23/102 (23%), pulse during CPR in 17/102 (17%), gasping in 18/102 (18%), and movement during CPR in 5/102 (5%). Any sign of perfusion during CPR was seen in 47/102 (46%), and 13/96 (13.5%) had a CPC score of 1 or 2 at discharge. The unadjusted OR for any sign of perfusion during CPR for a CPC score of 1 or 2 was 26 (95% CI 3 - 213) and for any sign of perfusion during CPR for ROSC was 9 (95% CI 3 - 24). Conclusions: Positive signs of perfusion during CPR noted by first responders strongly predicted ROSC and neurologically intact survival in this small sample. This suggests the importance of prospectively recording signs of perfusion during resuscitation, and communicating these observations during transfer of care.


Author(s):  
Mark S. Link ◽  
Mark Estes III

Resuscitation on the playing field is at least as important as screening in the prevention of death. Even if a screening strategy is largely effective, individuals will suffer sudden cardiac arrests. Timely recognition of a cardiac arrest with rapid implementation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and deployment and use of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) will save lives. Basic life support, including CPR and AED use, should be a requirement for all those involved in sports, including athletes. An emergency action plan is important in order to render advanced cardiac life support and arrange for transport to medical centres.


2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (02) ◽  
pp. 220-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dhimitri A. Nikolla ◽  
Brandon J. Kramer ◽  
Jestin N. Carlson

Introduction:Hyperventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) negatively affects cardiopulmonary physiology. Compression-adjusted ventilations (CAVs) may allow providers to deliver ventilation rates more consistently than conventional ventilations (CVs). This study sought to compare ventilation rates between these two methods during simulated cardiac arrest.Null Hypothesis:That CAV will not result in different rates than CV in simulated CPR with metronome-guided compressions.Methods:Volunteer Basic Life Support (BLS)-trained providers delivered bag-valve-mask (BVM) ventilations during simulated CPR with metronome-guided compressions at 100 beats/minute. For the first 4-minute interval, volunteers delivered CV. Volunteers were then instructed on how to perform CAV by delivering one breath, counting 12 compressions, and then delivering a subsequent breath. They then performed CAV for the second 4-minute interval. Ventilation rates were manually recorded. Minute-by-minute ventilation rates were compared between the techniques.Results:A total of 23 volunteers were enrolled with a median age of 36 years old and with a median of 14 years of experience. Median ventilation rates were consistently higher in the CV group versus the CAV group across all 1-minute segments: 13 vs 9, 12 vs 8, 12 vs 8, and 12 vs 8 for minutes one through four, respectively (P &lt;.01, all). Hyperventilation (&gt;10 breaths per minute) occurred 64% of the time intervals with CV versus one percent with CAV (P &lt;.01). The proportion of time which hyperventilation occurred was also consistently higher in the CV group versus the CAV group across all 1-minute segments: 78% vs 4%, 61% vs 0%, 57% vs 0%, and 61% vs 0% for minutes one through four, respectively (P &lt;.01, all).Conclusions:In this simulated model of cardiac arrest, CAV had more accurate ventilation rates and fewer episodes of hyperventilation compared with CV.Nikolla DA, Kramer BJ, Carlson JN. A cross-over trial comparing conventional to compression-adjusted ventilations with metronome-guided compressions. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2019;34(2):220–223


Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (16_suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine M. Berg ◽  
Jasmeet Soar ◽  
Lars W. Andersen ◽  
Bernd W. Böttiger ◽  
Sofia Cacciola ◽  
...  

This 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations for advanced life support includes updates on multiple advanced life support topics addressed with 3 different types of reviews. Topics were prioritized on the basis of both recent interest within the resuscitation community and the amount of new evidence available since any previous review. Systematic reviews addressed higher-priority topics, and included double-sequential defibrillation, intravenous versus intraosseous route for drug administration during cardiac arrest, point-of-care echocardiography for intra-arrest prognostication, cardiac arrest caused by pulmonary embolism, postresuscitation oxygenation and ventilation, prophylactic antibiotics after resuscitation, postresuscitation seizure prophylaxis and treatment, and neuroprognostication. New or updated treatment recommendations on these topics are presented. Scoping reviews were conducted for anticipatory charging and monitoring of physiological parameters during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Topics for which systematic reviews and new Consensuses on Science With Treatment Recommendations were completed since 2015 are also summarized here. All remaining topics reviewed were addressed with evidence updates to identify any new evidence and to help determine which topics should be the highest priority for systematic reviews in the next 1 to 2 years.


Circulation ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 140 (24) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan P. Duff ◽  
Alexis A. Topjian ◽  
Marc D. Berg ◽  
Melissa Chan ◽  
Sarah E. Haskell ◽  
...  

This 2019 focused update to the American Heart Association pediatric advanced life support guidelines follows the 2018 and 2019 systematic reviews performed by the Pediatric Life Support Task Force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. It aligns with the continuous evidence review process of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation, with updates published when the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation completes a literature review based on new published evidence. This update provides the evidence review and treatment recommendations for advanced airway management in pediatric cardiac arrest, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in pediatric cardiac arrest, and pediatric targeted temperature management during post–cardiac arrest care. The writing group analyzed the systematic reviews and the original research published for each of these topics. For airway management, the writing group concluded that it is reasonable to continue bag-mask ventilation (versus attempting an advanced airway such as endotracheal intubation) in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. When extracorporeal membrane oxygenation protocols and teams are readily available, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation should be considered for patients with cardiac diagnoses and in-hospital cardiac arrest. Finally, it is reasonable to use targeted temperature management of 32°C to 34°C followed by 36°C to 37.5°C, or to use targeted temperature management of 36°C to 37.5°C, for pediatric patients who remain comatose after resuscitation from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest or in-hospital cardiac arrest.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. e0155303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Schober ◽  
Alexandra M. Warenits ◽  
Christoph Testori ◽  
Wolfgang Weihs ◽  
Arthur Hosmann ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document