scholarly journals Mobilizing the U.S. Military’s TRICARE Program for Value-Based Care: A Report From the Defense Health Board

2021 ◽  
Vol 187 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 12-16
Author(s):  
Paul R Schaettle ◽  
Robert S Kaplan ◽  
Vivian S Lee ◽  
Michael D Parkinson ◽  
Gregory H Gorman ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT The U.S. Military Health System spends about $50 billion annually to provide care to 9.6 million active duty service members, retirees, and their families through its TRICARE health plans. TRICARE follows the predominant payment model in the USA—fee-for-service—although the Department of Defense (DoD) and Congress encourage and mandate a move toward alternative payment models—mainly, fee-for-value. For the next TRICARE contracts which will begin in 2023, the DoD asked its health-focused federal advisory committee, the Defense Health Board (DHB), to recommend how best to assess and prioritize leading value-based healthcare initiatives identified from private, public, and employer-based health plans. The November 2020 report, ‘Modernization of the TRICARE Benefit’, specifies a rubric to evaluate these value-based care initiatives not only in traditional measures of effectiveness but also in terms of the Defense Health Agency’s Quadruple Aim with its focus on readiness. The goal of TRICARE’s move toward value-based care is to leverage its size and focus on prevention of disease and injury to maintain the readiness of the U.S. Armed Forces in addition to delivering great outcomes and value to the DoD’s nearly 10 million beneficiaries. The DHB emphasizes that TRICARE’s size and focus on providing quality care at lower cost will incentivize providers to participate in the shift toward value-based care despite the potential challenges in transitioning to this system. This shift also aims to motivate other large government and private payors to accelerate the adoption of value-based care through TRICARE’s example.

Author(s):  
Jay C. Bisgard

The United States Military Health Care System exists primarily to ensure the ready availability of medical support to U.S. Armed Forces at any level of conflict anywhere in the world. Many military medical units are therefore organized and equipped to permit their rapid deployment on short warning to relatively remote areas. They can provide life-saving services within hours and can operate almost independently in any climate, provided they have the means to evacuate patients and to receive supplies. The military mission demands that the medical personnel assigned to these units be trained in peacetime to do their jobs in wartime.


2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 169-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Torrens Armstrong

Since 1986, health promotion has had a place within the U.S. Department of Defense. Emphasizing the leading health indicators of Healthy People, the role of health promotion has continued to support the U.S. Armed Forces in perhaps one of the most challenging decades of wartime operations. Serving a sizable population with both typical and mission-related health issues, health promotion plays a critical role in maintaining and improving health. The purpose of this article is to highlight military health promotion by offering insight into the day-to-day life of a “boots on the ground” military health educator, reviewing the challenges and opportunities of working with a unique population. A summary of a variety of military specific initiatives is provided. Additionally, the article highlights the barriers and benefits to military health promotion. Last, the article concludes with a call to action to consider the role of all health educators in serving those that serve.


2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 245-264
Author(s):  
Andrey Ganin

The document published is a letter from the commander of the Kiev Region General Abram M. Dragomirov to the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces in the South of Russia General Anton I. Denikin of December, 1919. The source covers the events of the Civil War in Ukraine and the views of the leadership of the White Movement in the South of Russia on a number of issues of policy and strategy in Ukraine. The letter was found in the Hoover Archives of Stanford University in the USA in the collection of Lieutenant General Pavel A. Kusonsky. The document refers to the period when the white armies of the South of Russia after the bright success of the summer-autumn “March on Moscow” in 1919 were stopped by the Red Army and were forced to retreat. On the pages of the letter, Dragomirov describes in detail the depressing picture of the collapse of the white camp in the South of Russia and talks about how to improve the situation. Dragomirov saw the reasons for the failure of the White Movement such as, first of all, the lack of regular troops, the weakness of the officers, the lack of discipline and, as a consequence, the looting and pogroms. In this regard, Dragomirov was particularly concerned about the issue of moral improvement of the army. Part of the letter is devoted to the issues of the civil administration in the territories occupied by the White Army. Dragomirov offers both rational and frankly utopian measures. However, the thoughts of one of the closest Denikin’s companions about the reasons what had happened are interesting for understanding the essence of the Civil War and the worldview of the leadership of the anti-Bolshevik Camp.


1990 ◽  
Vol 22 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 49-56
Author(s):  
E. D. Smith ◽  
R. J. Scholze

This paper presents a review of collected experience of one of the U.S. Corps of Engineers research laboratories in the area of small systems for wastewater treatment. Findings and experiences are presented for the use of package plants such as rotating biological contactors (RBCs), and remote site waste treatment at military installations and recreation areas.


1975 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 314-314

The report issued by the U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency, in January 1975, concerns arms expenditures and sales made between 1963 and 1973. The 123-page document is composed mostly of two major parts: a country-by-country breakdown of arms trade for each of the years studied and a study contrasting each country's yearly military expenditures with its G.N.P., population size, and armed forces. The report (U.S. A.CD.A. Publication 74) may be purchased from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 for $2. Persons ordering from abroad (other than Canada and Mexico) should add 25 percent to the price to cover shipping charges.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document