MO226A NEW DIAGNOSTIC TOOL FOR CKD PATIENTS: CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASONOGRAPHY. A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirela Liana Gliga ◽  
Cristian Chirila ◽  
Paula Chirila ◽  
Adriana Gomotarceanu ◽  
Imola Torok ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Tool ◽  
Final Diagnosis ◽  
Medical System ◽  
Focal Lesions ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Single Center Experience ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasonography ◽  
Malignant Lesions ◽  
Guidelines And Recommendations

Abstract Background and Aims Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) is a minimally invasive diagnostic tool available for diagnosing microvascular disturbances in tumors and many vascular pathologies. Unlike other radiological contrast agents, it is completely harmless for CKD patients and therefore it is used for the safe diagnosis of many diffuse or focal pathologies. Method We used CEUS examination in 50 CKD patients for the following pathologies: 10 atypical cysts, 15 liver focal lesions, 2 splenic focal lesions, 3 renal infarcts, 12 kidney focal lesions and 8 other organ involvements. Examination was made using a VOLUSON E8 machine (GE Medical System Kreztechnik GmbH Tiefenbach 15, Austria) with a 3.5 MHz convex array abdominal transducer. 2.4 ml of microbubble contrast-agent was administered intravenously and recording of the results were made for 3-5 minutes after injection. Results Depending on the organ vascular characteristics, contrast enhancement and/or wash-out were suggestive for the final diagnosis. In liver lesions there are three phases and in kidneys, spleen, gallbladder, adenopathies there are two vascular phases. We obtained a very good positive predictive value and sensitivity in detecting malignant lesions. Conclusion According to The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations for the Clinical Practice of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound they are used both for hepatic and Non-Hepatic Applications. Being non-invasive and non-irradiating it could be the main diagnostic examination in CKD population in the future.

scholarly journals Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography features of hepatobiliary neoplasms in cats

2019 ◽  
Vol 186 (10) ◽  
pp. 320-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tommaso Banzato ◽  
Silvia Burti ◽  
Giuseppe Rubini ◽  
Riccardo Orlandi ◽  
Paolo Bargellini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Large Range ◽  
Liver Parenchyma ◽  
Qualitative And Quantitative ◽  
Hepatocellular Carcinomas ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasonography ◽  
Malignant Lesions

BackgroundContrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) features of primary hepatobiliary neoplasms have been reported in dogs but no information is available in cats.MethodsQualitative and quantitative features of bile duct adenomas (BDAs, n=20), bile duct carcinomas (BDCs, n=16), and hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs, n=8) are described in 44 cats.ResultsThere was an overlap in CEUS qualitative features between different histotypes, both in wash-in and wash-out phases. Distinction between different neoplasms based only on the CEUS qualitative features was not possible. At peak of enhancement, the BDAs, BDCs and HCCs showed a large range of echogenicities, from hypoenhancement to hyperenhancement, in comparison to the liver parenchyma. Eight of 20 BDAs showed inhomogeneous hyperenhancement during wash-in, which is a feature reported as typical of malignant lesions in dogs. BDC had a significantly faster wash-in compared with both BDA and HCC but the diagnostic accuracy of all the included quantitative variables was only moderate. No significant differences in the wash-out quantitative features of BDA and BDC were evident.ConclusionThere is poor evidence that CEUS may be used to distinguish between different primary hepatobiliary neoplasms in cats.

Incidentally Detected Splenic Lesions in Ultrasound: Does Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography Improve the Differentiation of Benign Hemangioma/Hamartoma from Malignant Lesions?

2011 ◽  
Vol 32 (06) ◽  
pp. 582-592 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Stang ◽  
H. Keles ◽  
S. Hentschke ◽  
C.-U. von Seydewitz ◽  
J. Dahlke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Sulfur Hexafluoride ◽  
Multivariate Analyse ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasonography ◽  
Malignant Lesions

Zusammenfassung Ziel: Ziele dieser Arbeit waren die Identifikation und die Validierung von unterschiedlichen tumorspezifischen Kontrastmittelmustern für die Differenzialdiagnose zwischen benignen vaskulären Neoplasien (Typ Hämangiom/Hamartom) und malignen Milzherden in der Kontrastmittelsonografie (CEUS). Material und Methoden: 136 Milzläsionen (58 benigne vaskuläre Neoplasien, 78 maligne Läsionen) wurden jeweils in der B-Bild-Sonografie (US) und nachfolgend in der Kontrastmittelsonografie nach Sulfur-Hexafluoride-Injektion untersucht und dokumentiert. Zwei On-site-Reader analysierten das Kontrastmittelverhalten der Milzläsionen während der arteriellen und parenchymalen Phase. Mittels univariater und multivariater Analyse wurden tumorspezifische Kontrastmittelmuster, die signifikant mit einer der beiden Tumordiagnosen korreliert waren, identifiziert. Zwei geblindete Off-site-Reader benutzten diese tumorspezifischen Kontrastmittelmuster als Diagnosekriterien und stellten unabhängig voneinander anhand der Befunde der B-Bild-Sonografie und der Kontrastmittelsonografie eine Diagnose der Milzherde. Die diagnostische Treffsicherheit und Confidence (Az-Werte) sowie die Übereinstimmung der Off-site-Reader (қ-Werte) wurden kalkuliert. Referenzstandards waren Histopathologie oder CT und/oder MRI mit klinischem Verlauf. Ergebnisse: In der multivariate Analyse waren arterielles Hyper- oder Isoenhancement unabhängige Prediktoren für eine benigne vaskuläre Neoplasie (Odds Ratio, 3,558; p < 0,0017). In der Subgruppe der iso- oder hypoechogenen Läsionen war arterielles Hyperenhancement praktisch beweisend für eine benigne vaskuläre Neoplasie (Odds Ratio, 21,333; p < 0,001). In der geblindeten Situation verbesserte sich die diagnostische Treffsicherheit und Confidence (Az-Werte) für beide Off-site Reader signifikant von 63,2 % und 70,6 % (0,785 und 0,818) in der B-Bild-Sonografie auf 87,5 % und 88,2 % (0,915 und 0,908) in der Kontrastmittelsonografie (p < 0,001). Die Interreaderübereinstimmung verbesserte sich ebenfalls (қ = 0,52 für B-Bild-Sonografie vs. қ = 0,88 nach Kontrastmittelsonografie). Schlussfolgerung: Die Kontrastmittelsonografie verbessert die Differenzialdiagnose zwischen benigen vaskulären Neoplasien und malignen Tumoren in der Milz und scheint besonders hilfreich bei unklaren, zufällig im Ultraschall entdeckten hypoechogenen Milzherden.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of Velscope and Vizilite Plus Systems in Diagnostics of Oral Lesions

2021 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-94
Author(s):  
N. Nikolov ◽  
E. Karaslavova ◽  
B. Yaneva
Keyword(s):  
Standard Method ◽  
Classical Method ◽  
Final Diagnosis ◽  
Oral Lesions ◽  
Coincidence Rate ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Systemic Medication ◽  
Highly Sensitive ◽  
Malignant Lesions ◽  
Diagnostic Properties

Abstract Aim: To compare the level of diagnostic coincidence between classical (standard) method and VELscope and ViziLite Plus systems in the diagnosis of different oral lesions. Material and methods: 184 oral lesions were examined using classical method, VELscope and ViziLite Plus systems, and after that underwent a pathohistological examination for diagnosis proof. The percentage of diagnostic coincidence for various types of lesions was analyzed for the three methods compared. Results: The results demonstrated the highest coincidence rate for lesions diagnosed with VELscope – 35 (83.3%), followed by those with classical method – 80 (80.8%), and those with the application of ViziLite – 33 (76.7%). In premalignant and malignant lesions, the highest percentage of diagnostic coincidence was reported using the classical method – 14 (93.3%), for non-malignant lesions using VELscope – 28 (84.8%), for inflammatory and reactive lesions using VELscope – 14 (82.4%) and for lesions associated with general disease and systemic medication again using VELscope – 11 (91.7%). Conclusion: Non-invasive methods, tested in the study, have different diagnostic properties when differentiating particular clinical types of lesions. They are highly sensitive to changes in the oral mucosa but the final diagnosis must always be proved with biopsy.

scholarly journals Role of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Using LI-RADS and Ancillary Features: A Single Tertiary Centre Experience

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 2232
Author(s):  
Adriana Ciocalteu ◽  
Sevastita Iordache ◽  
Sergiu Marian Cazacu ◽  
Cristiana Marinela Urhut ◽  
Sarmis Marian Sandulescu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Diagnostic Yield ◽  
High Specificity ◽  
Final Diagnosis ◽  
Focal Liver Lesions ◽  
Liver Imaging ◽  
Tertiary Centre ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasonography ◽  
Ancillary Features

Clinical utility of ancillary features (AFs) in contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS®) is yet to be established. In this study, we assessed the diagnostic yield of CEUS LI-RADS and AFs in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We retrospectively included patients with risk factors for HCC and newly diagnosed focal liver lesions (FLL). All lesions have been categorized according to the CEUS LI-RADS v2017 by an experienced sonographer blinded to clinical data and to the final diagnosis. From a total of 143 patients with 191 FLL, AFs favoring HCC were observed in 19.8% cases as hypoechoic rim and in 16.7% cases as nodule-in nodule architecture. From the total of 141 HCC cases, 83.6% were correctly classified: 57.4%- LR-5 and 26.2%- LR-4. In 9.21% cases, CEUS indicated LR-M; 2.12% cases- LR-3. The LR-5 category was 96.2% predictive (PPV) of HCC. LR-5 had 60.4% sensitivity and 93.6% specificity. PPV for primitive malignancy (LR-4 + LR-5) was 95.7%, with 88% sensitivity, 89.3% specificity and 88.4% accuracy for HCC. LR-4 category had 94.8% PPV and 26.2% sensitivity. CEUS LR4 + LR5 had 81,8% sensitivity for HCCs over 2 cm and 78.57% sensitivity for smaller HCCs. CEUS LR-5 remains an excellent diagnostic tool for HCC, despite the size of the lesion. The use of AFs might improve the overarching goal of LR-5 + LR-4 diagnosis of high specificity for HCC and exclusion of non-HCC malignancy.

scholarly journals The Use of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography for the Characterization of Focal Liver Lesions

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 500-511
Author(s):  
Jennifer E. Bagley ◽  
Dennis E. Paul ◽  
Sutton Halferty ◽  
Dora DiGiacinto
Keyword(s):  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Diagnostic Process ◽  
Focal Liver Lesions ◽  
Liver Lesions ◽  
Benign Lesions ◽  
Underlying Liver Disease ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasonography ◽  
Malignant Lesions

Focal liver lesions often occur with or without an underlying liver disease. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography can aid in characterizing liver lesions, potentially avoiding biopsy and computed tomography procedures. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography has a high sensitivity and specificity for differentiating characteristics of liver lesions compared with noncontrast sonography. The different contrast characteristics aid in differentiating benign and malignant lesions. Malignant lesions tend to have washout of contrast in the venous phases, whereas benign lesions have hyperenhancement during the venous phases. Therefore, contrast-enhanced ultrasonography should be considered an essential component of the diagnostic process for diagnosing and following focal liver lesions.

scholarly journals Characteristics of hepatic solitary necrotic nodules on contrast-enhanced ultrasonography

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunyu Lu ◽  
Shaoshan Tang ◽  
Xiaoyue Zhang ◽  
Yang Wang ◽  
Kaiming Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
The Other ◽  
Arterial Phase ◽  
Focal Lesions ◽  
Multiple Lesions ◽  
Portal Phase ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
The Us ◽  
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasonography ◽  
Dynamic Enhancement ◽  
Three Phases

Abstract Background:To summarize the characteristics of solitary necrotic nodules (SNN) in the liver observed under contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS).Methods:Conventional ultrasonography (US) and CEUS were performed in 24 patients who were confirmed to have SNN by pathological assessment. The US data and dynamic enhancement patterns of CEUS were recorded and retrospectively analyzed.Results:Ten of 24 patients underwent surgical resection, while the other 14 patients underwent a puncture biopsy to be confirmed as SNN. Among the 24 patients, 13 patients had a single lesion and 11 patients had multiple lesions. The largest lesion was selected for CEUS examination for patients with multiple lesions. Eleven patients presented no enhancement in all three phases, while the other 13 patients presented with a peripheral thin rim-like enhancement in the arterial phase, an iso-enhancement in the portal phase and delayed phase. However, no enhancement in the interior of the lesions was detected during three phases of CEUS.Conclusions:SNN has characteristic findings on the CEUS, which play an important role in the differential diagnoses of liver focal lesions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document