scholarly journals HOUT-25. HOSPITAL ACQUIRED CONDITIONS (HACs): PREDICTORS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR OUTCOMES FOLLOWING SPINE TUMOR RESECTION

2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (suppl_6) ◽  
pp. vi111-vi111
Author(s):  
Nikita Lakomkin ◽  
Constantinos Hadjipanayis
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Spine Tumor ◽  
Hospital Acquired Conditions ◽  
Hospital Acquired

scholarly journals Hospital-acquired conditions: predictors and implications for outcomes following spine tumor resection

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 717-722 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikita Lakomkin ◽  
Constantinos G. Hadjipanayis
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Improvement Program ◽  
Spine Tumor ◽  
Prolonged Length ◽  
Hospital Acquired Conditions ◽  
Hospital Acquired

OBJECTIVEHospital-acquired conditions (HACs) significantly compromise patient safety, and have been identified by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services as events that will be associated with penalties for surgeons. The mitigation of HACs must be an important consideration during the postoperative management of patients undergoing spine tumor resection. The purpose of this study was to identify the risk factors for HACs and to characterize the relationship between HACs and other postoperative adverse events following spine tumor resection.METHODSThe 2008–2014 American College of Surgeons’ National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to identify adult patients undergoing the resection of intramedullary, intradural extramedullary, and extradural spine lesions via current procedural terminology and ICD-9 codes. Demographic, comorbidity, and operative variables were evaluated via bivariate statistics before being incorporated into a multivariable logistic regression model to identify the independent risk factors for HACs. Associations between HACs and other postoperative events, including death, readmission, prolonged length of stay, and various complications were determined through multivariable analysis while controlling for other significant variables. The c-statistic was computed to evaluate the predictive capacity of the regression models.RESULTSOf the 2170 patients included in the study, 195 (9.0%) developed an HAC. Only 2 perioperative variables, functional dependency and high body mass index, were risk factors for developing HACs (area under the curve = 0.654). Hospital-acquired conditions were independent predictors of all examined outcomes and complications, including death (OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.24–4.11, p = 0.007), prolonged length of stay (OR 2.74, 95% CI 1.98–3.80, p < 0.001), and readmission (OR 9.16, 95% CI 6.27–13.37, p < 0.001). The areas under the curve for these models ranged from 0.750 to 0.917.CONCLUSIONSThe comorbidities assessed in this study were not strongly predictive of HACs. Other variables, including hospital-associated factors, may play a role in the development of these conditions. The presence of an HAC was found to be an independent risk factor for a variety of adverse events. These findings highlight the need for continued development of evidence-based protocols designed to reduce the incidence and severity of HACs.

scholarly journals Risk factors for wound-related reoperations in patients with metastatic spine tumor

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 663-668 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannah M. Carl ◽  
A. Karim Ahmed ◽  
Nancy Abu-Bonsrah ◽  
Rafael De la Garza Ramos ◽  
Eric W. Sankey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Multivariate Model ◽  
Wound Complications ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Scale ◽  
Thromboembolic Events ◽  
Spine Tumor ◽  
Wound Breakdown ◽  
Metastatic Spine Tumor

OBJECTIVEResection of metastatic spine tumors can improve patients’ quality of life by addressing pain or neurological compromise. However, resections are often complicated by wound dehiscence, infection, instrumentation failures, and the need for reoperation. Moreover, when reoperations are needed, the most common indication is surgical site infection and wound breakdown. In turn, wound reoperations increase morbidity as well as the length and cost of hospitalization. The aim of this study was to examine perioperative risk factors associated with increased rate of wound reoperations after metastatic spine tumor resection.METHODSA retrospective study of patients at a single institution who underwent metastatic spine tumor resection between 2003 and 2013 was conducted. Factors with a p value < 0.200 in a univariate analysis were included in the multivariate model.RESULTSA total of 159 patients were included in this study. Karnofsky Performance Scale score > 70, smoking status, hypertension, thromboembolic events, hyperlipidemia, increasing number of vertebral levels, and posterior approach were included in the multivariate analysis. Thromboembolic events (95% CI 1.19–48.5, p = 0.032) and number of levels involved were independently associated with increased wound reoperation rates in the multivariate model. For each additional spinal level involved, the risk for wound reoperations increased by 21% (95% CI 1.03–1.43, p = 0.018).CONCLUSIONSAlthough wound complications and subsequent reoperations are potential risks for all patients with metastatic spine tumor, due to adjuvant radiotherapy and other medical comorbidities, this study identified patients with thromboembolic events or those requiring a larger incision as being at the highest risk. Measures intended to decrease the occurrence of perioperative venous thromboembolism and to improve wound care, especially for long incisions, may decrease wound-related revision surgeries in this vulnerable group of patients.

Impact of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Hospital-Acquired Conditions Policy on Billing Rates for 2 Targeted Healthcare-Associated Infections

2015 ◽  
Vol 36 (8) ◽  
pp. 871-877 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison Tse Kawai ◽  
Michael S. Calderwood ◽  
Robert Jin ◽  
Stephen B. Soumerai ◽  
Louise E. Vaz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Times Series ◽  
Hospital Acquired Conditions ◽  
Medicare Patients ◽  
Study Population ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
Additional Payment ◽  
Healthcare Associated ◽  
Hospital Acquired

BACKGROUNDThe 2008 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services hospital-acquired conditions policy limited additional payment for conditions deemed reasonably preventable.OBJECTIVETo examine whether this policy was associated with decreases in billing rates for 2 targeted conditions, vascular catheter-associated infections (VCAI) and catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI).STUDY POPULATIONAdult Medicare patients admitted to 569 acute care hospitals in California, Massachusetts, or New York and subject to the policy.DESIGNWe used an interrupted times series design to assess whether the hospital-acquired conditions policy was associated with changes in billing rates for VCAI and CAUTI.RESULTSBefore the policy, billing rates for VCAI and CAUTI were increasing (prepolicy odds ratio per quarter for VCAI, 1.17 [95% CI, 1.11–1.23]; for CAUTI, 1.19 [1.16–1.23]). The policy was associated with an immediate drop in billing rates for VCAI and CAUTI (odds ratio for change at policy implementation for VCAI, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.69–0.81]; for CAUTI, 0.87 [0.79–0.96]). In the postpolicy period, we observed a decreasing trend in the billing rate for VCAI and a leveling-off in the billing rate for CAUTI (postpolicy odds ratio per quarter for VCAI, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.97–0.99]; for CAUTI, 0.99 [0.97–1.00]).CONCLUSIONSThe Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services hospital-acquired conditions policy appears to have been associated with immediate reductions in billing rates for VCAI and CAUTI, followed by a slight decreasing trend or leveling-off in rates. These billing rates, however, may not correlate with changes in clinically meaningful patient outcomes and may reflect changes in coding practices.Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2015;36(8):871–877

Frailty Severity Impacts Development of Hospital-acquired Conditions in Patients Undergoing Corrective Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine E. Pierce ◽  
Bhaveen H. Kapadia ◽  
Cole Bortz ◽  
Haddy Alas ◽  
Avery E. Brown ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Deformity ◽  
Adult Spinal Deformity ◽  
Corrective Surgery ◽  
Hospital Acquired Conditions ◽  
Hospital Acquired

scholarly journals Replantation of Spinous Process-lamina Complex in the Treatment of Cervical Spine Tumor : Two Cases Report and Literature Review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xu Jiahui ◽  
Ma Bin ◽  
Wang Chenggang
Keyword(s):  
Spinous Process ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Good Health ◽  
Structure And Function ◽  
Anatomical Structure ◽  
Spine Tumor ◽  
Posterior Element ◽  
Cervical Spine Tumor ◽  
And Function

Abstract Purpose: The primary aim of our study was to prove that the replantation of spinous process-lamina complex is beneficial to restore the anatomical structure and function of the spine, and to find if it can reduce postoperative complications.Methods: We report two cases of cervical intraspinal tumor, whose postoperative pathological diagnosis, Respectively, are Neurilemmoma and meningioma. They all underwent the resection and replantation of spinous process-lamina complex, in which the resected spinous process-lamina complex was replanted at the end of the procedure, allowing a complete reconstruction of the posterior element of the spinal canal. Results：After the surgery, the symptoms were relieved, and no dysfunction of upper limbs and sphincter was observed. The tumors were benign pathologically and were diagnosed as Neurilemmoma and meningioma. The patient recovered and at 6-month follow-up had no complaints and in good health.Conclusion: After tumor resection, the replantation of spinous process-lamina complex is beneficial to restore the anatomical structure and function of the spine.

scholarly journals Impact of Medicare’s Hospital-Acquired Condition Policy on Infections in Safety Net and Non–Safety Net Hospitals

2015 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 649-655 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise Elaine Vaz ◽  
Kenneth P. Kleinman ◽  
Alison Tse Kawai ◽  
Robert Jin ◽  
William J. Kassler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bloodstream Infection ◽  
Financial Incentives ◽  
Safety Net ◽  
The United States ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Unintended Consequences ◽  
Infection Rates ◽  
Healthcare Associated Infection ◽  
Hospital Acquired Conditions ◽  
Hospital Acquired

BACKGROUNDPolicymakers may wish to align healthcare payment and quality of care while minimizing unintended consequences, particularly for safety net hospitals.OBJECTIVETo determine whether the 2008 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Hospital-Acquired Conditions policy had a differential impact on targeted healthcare-associated infection rates in safety net compared with non–safety net hospitals.DESIGNInterrupted time-series design.SETTING AND PARTICIPANTSNonfederal acute care hospitals that reported central line–associated bloodstream infection and ventilator-associated pneumonia rates to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Health Safety Network from July 1, 2007, through December 31, 2013.RESULTSWe did not observe changes in the slope of targeted infection rates in the postpolicy period compared with the prepolicy period for either safety net (postpolicy vs prepolicy ratio, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.84–1.09]) or non–safety net (0.99 [0.90–1.10]) hospitals. Controlling for prepolicy secular trends, we did not detect differences in an immediate change at the time of the policy between safety net and non–safety net hospitals (P for 2-way interaction, .87).CONCLUSIONSThe Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Hospital-Acquired Conditions policy did not have an impact, either positive or negative, on already declining rates of central line–associated bloodstream infection in safety net or non–safety net hospitals. Continued evaluations of the broad impact of payment policies on safety net hospitals will remain important as the use of financial incentives and penalties continues to expand in the United States.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2015;00(0): 1–7

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document